thanks for the plug to get people to read my blog lol
I have my first lib fan. haha
I know that Ann is generalizing the welfare state, but when I saw her on Hannity & Colmes the other night I changed my mind about buying her book. She came across as completely lumping every single mother into one pot and that simply is fair. She is entitled to her opinion and yes there are studies that prove points of hers. However, I am an educated young woman with an excellent job raising a baby without the father and my son wants for nothing, is healthy, happy, smart, and well loved and cared for. I will raise him with TRUE traditional values.
But I will NEVER apologize or be sorry that I had him out of wedlock because he is an absolute blessing. |
|
our Constitution, likely something you have not done.
I cannot wait until we have a 5-4 steady left leaning majority on the Court. |
|
"President Barack H. Obama
January 20, 2009 to January 20, 2017. That has a nice ring. If you don't like it, then try to elect people who don't agree with him.
As for 'rights', the Constitution is not stagnant or stuck in 1789. Can't wait until we have a majority that feel that way. Soon, soon."
Surely you see the silliness, here, yes?
On one hand, you revere the Constitution as it is interpreted in heralding in your choice for President, done by the natural right of expressing individual thought, yet in the next sentence, you state that it's intent shouldn't be held because old white men, born over 200 years ago, and their ideas are stagnant and don't reflect society today.
That's nice. Really.
"Americans" like you really do grow on trees. |
|
January 20, 2009 to January 20, 2017. That has a nice ring. If you don't like it, then try to elect people who don't agree with him.
As for 'rights', the Constitution is not stagnant or stuck in 1789. Can't wait until we have a majority that feel that way. Soon, soon. |
|
One more example of collectivism for you, since I am trying to help...
Remember the 200o election?
Which political association was going around chanting "the will of the people"?
Which political association always does during an election when the results don't seem to go the way they wish?
FYI, the phrase, "the will of the people" is collective thought.
Learn it. |
|
As for collectism, we just elected a community organizer whose political beliefs resoundingly mirror collectivism.
If you cannot see, or feel collectivism, when we had a significant debate in this country recently, then you may add that term to the list of political philosophies you are ignorant of.
Let me help: try reading some Thomas Paine, for starters. |
|
"Those who wish to take away
a woman's right to choose are fascists. And yes, I know what fascism is. By the way, few conservatives, esp. women, are anti-choice. Otherwise, in addition to banning gay marriage, you'd be successful on things like parental notification. But you never are, are you? Why might that be? Hypocrites.
And collectivism? Really? Where?"
There is no such thing as a "woman's right to choose", and this, more than anything you've cobbled together since this litte tete-a-tete shows your ignorance.
You have 10 rights. Ten. That's all. Do you think that the founders didn't know about abortion? Gays? Any of the other social "rights" that "liberals" such as yourself seem to predicate your existence on?
Do you understand the messes society gets embroiled in when government gets involved in the "rights" business, or is your hubris too challenged to admit that which you see before your very eyes?
Do you know what a natural right is, and where our founders acknowledged their creation from? Do you think that the source of those natural rights would have sanctioned homosexuality, or abortion? Do you understand the "Bill of Rights" and why they deemed them inalienable?
Do you understand why the founders made it absolutely clear that governments (and their branches) have no business creating, or granted through judicial activism, natural rights?
If there is a "right to choose" why are contemporary liberals such as yourself so afraid that a turn of political tides will erase your "rights"? Your "right" is supposedly inalienable, yes?
And you call yourself a "liberal"?
You know nothing of fascism; and, that is clear. I'd like you to post scientific evidence that youths are certain that conservatives are fascists; ergo, they cannot vote for them.
Fascists, indeed. |
|
a woman's right to choose are fascists. And yes, I know what fascism is. By the way, few conservatives, esp. women, are anti-choice. Otherwise, in addition to banning gay marriage, you'd be successful on things like parental notification. But you never are, are you? Why might that be? Hypocrites.
And collectivism? Really? Where? |
|
If that's what you call control, than isn't the "women's right to choose" mantra pretty much the same thing for the left? Oh, that's right. It's only controlling if the side you're against uses it.
It seems like the equivalent of "free-thinking" for political people is wearing an Obama t-shirt to the Southern Baptist Convention, or a Palin t-shirt to a Hollywood premere. |
|
"The youth vote cannot vote for conservatives because conservatives are, at heart, fascists. They want to control people's personal lives. They hate those who are different than they are."
First, learn what fascism is before your wanton ignorance continues to debase whatever point you tried to make in addressing the matter at hand.
It is not conservatives telling me that I must submit to a collectivist system in the name of "unity".
The basis of your argument, that conservatives are "anti-liberal" merely shows your confusion, as it is conservatism that most highlights "classical liberalism".
You stated that you were a liberal in an earlier post. I take that you mean a contemporary liberal. If so, then you also need to learn the difference between a liberal and a contemporary liberal, and then, you will understand what conservatives fight for, and how far your ideas have strayed from classical thought. |
|
|
shouldn't apply to talk shows or shows like the Early Show or the Today show. The news yes. |
|
|
...Politico is reporting that Coulter WILL be appearing. |
|
cannot vote for conservatives because conservatives are, at heart, fascists. They want to control people's personal lives. They hate those who are different than they are.
No liberal I know is afraid of a dead man whose widow is actually a proponent of very liberal causes like stem cell research. Were Reagan alive, he'd have had a cow over Palin. Sarah Palin is nothing like what Ronald Reagan was--Reagan was a very smart, experienced man. Sarah is a fraud.
Coulter is like the Wizard of Oz, a fake. But keep making her rich. She laughs all the way to her lesbian lover.
As for Libs fearing Christianity, not at all true. Many of us dislike what some people claim they do in Christ's name (like being anti gay), but not Christ.
As for the 'killing of babies', that's just another way that you righties get controlled by your cynical leadership. How come you can never pass a law that abridges Roe? How come, when you could stop gay marriage (or so you thought) in California, you still lost the parental notification initiative? |
|
You have just explained why 9 of 10 blacks, 7 of 10 Hispanics, 6 of 10 suburbanites, and nearly 8 of 10 younger voters eschew your party.
Sure she'll sell a lot of books, but she'll be singing to the choir. Meanwhile,the independents and moderates your party so badly needs see her as a pariah. |
|
1. Cigarettes unless Obama is smoking
2. Personal liberty
3. Low taxes
4. Babies getting a "choice" to live
5. Competition. Only line rule.
6. Bad names people call others. Unless it's under your breath. |
|
|
She would call her mama a whore if it sold a book..She attacks the 9-11 widows as money grubbing skanks,she calls John Edwards a faggot,offending faggots everywhere.she had the audacity on tv this very morning to refer to George Bush Dick Cheney Don Rumsfeld Richard Nixon Ronald Reagan and Tom Delay as ""victims"" of the left...I understand how some on the right find her attractive..the Larry Craig/Ted Haggard section of the Gop does indeed hit from both sides of the plate and would indeed find this ahh woman with the giant adams apple,afghan hound face and huge hands appealing. |
|
Are Republicans the only "minority group" that would patronize a business that so clearly and so disrespected it? Would Blacks go into a diner knowing they would not be served with the same regard as White customers? Would Jews or Hispanics or Gays spend money at a business that was anti-Semitic, or anti-Hispanic, or anti-Gay?
So why should Conservatives? Republican politicians, Republican voters, even those who can walk pass a Republican without spitting should boycott NBC and MSNBC.
Maybe then NBC would learn the meaning of the phrase "fair and balanced". |
|
Chloe:
"Oppose us? Then how come Mr. Obama won by 7.2%? How come Dems control the Senate and House, perhaps by veto proof majorities? Because you conservatives won the day?"
Obama won by winning the youth vote by a 2:1 ratio. These same kids will swing the other way when they realize that one cannot put a politician's campaign promises into political reality.
What is a "veto-proof majority? The President is on their side, so what would they veto?
Conservaties did indeed win the remaining contests, most notably in Louisiana and Georgia, particularly in the runoffs because blacks and youths did not attend these elections as they did in their misguided zeal to elect a black man for President.
The last point, I hope, is not lost on you as to who the Democrat party caters its campaign message to, but will inevitably kick to the curb yet again when vote harvesting season has run its course.
The monolithic black vote has never learned that lesson; but, the youth, all inclusive, and upwardly mobile, will, and these are the voters who will swing conservative as time passes. |
|
If we are judged by our enemies, Ms. Coulter should feel complimented by being banned by NBC.
Also, note the reason for canceling Coulter was the news in Washington and the Middle East. NBC apparently feels Perez Hilton is more pertinent to these important issues. This is pretty consistent with their vapid world view? |
|
for Republicans to supposedly care so little about NBC, they sure have alot to say about this hag being permanently kicked off. What kind of person gets dismissed from an entire network of television! That takes a special kind of jerk. Congrats Coulter!
Her book will likely be a best seller because controversy sells - not because the slime in there has any substance. Don't get it twisted.
Amd she can say what she wants about Michelle's wardrobe versus Cindy McCain's but it's Michelle's wardrobe that will hang in the whitehouse closets - and last I checked, that's what counts!
She is a childish, child-less, anorexic lonely person who has simply been dismissed by a network who would rather lose the 10 people who would like to see her on their stations rather than entertain her nonsense. GO NBC! well done. |
|
"I'm a liberal, proudly liberal. That doesn't mean I hate conservatives."
Could've fooled me, toots.
In any case, since I really don't know much about Ann Coulter, aside from the apparent frothing at the mouth that she causes liberals, I'm just going to express my annoyance that she was replaced by a lewd blogger. I mean, seriously, you couldn't replace her with something relevant? You might as well have replaced her with Dora the Explorer. At least that way people could've learned some Spanish. |
|
It was a too part question - "yet never attack or attempt to disprove her claims?"
Also if you are so upset about what Ann Coulter wrote about Michelle's appearance - why do then turn around and call her "a menopausal anorexic commitment-phobe who poses on the grass in central park in a pathetic dress wrapped around her thighs" - do I sense another example of liberal hypocrisy?
|
|
Oppose us? Then how come Mr. Obama won by 7.2%? How come Dems control the Senate and House, perhaps by veto proof majorities? Because you conservatives won the day?
LOL. Ann Coulter is a sad, closted gay woman, much like Laura Ingraham. They rag against gay marriage because they want everyone to be as miserable in their lives as those two are. At least Tammy Bruce admits she is gay.
Liberals will continue to run the show, folks. I love the fact that conservatives have to hope that our country gets attacked and goes further in the economic hole so they can get their power back, power they use mostly to enrich really rich people, and to tell consenting adults what to do in the privacy of their own homes. |
|
|
Are nbc, abc, msnbc, cbs still in buisness? |
|
|
She say's what most conservitaves think. So does Rush , Shawn, people on the left that is how the other half of the counrty thinks. Who do you think their listeners are? And who do you think buys their books ? It's the 50 million of us who oppose you on the left !!! |
|
|
She say's what most conservitaves think. So does Rush , Shawn, people on the left that is how the other half of the counrty thinks. Who do you think their listeners are? And who do you think buys their books ? It's the 50 million of us who oppose you on the left !!! |
|
"How come liberals attack her and call her mean spirited and insult her appearance "
Maybe because she used her book to attack Michelle Obama by criticizing her wardrobe and HER appearance.
What planet are you on? |
|
|
She should be glad. Who would want to appear on the lowest rated network anyway? This is the network that has keith dopeyman and chris"softballs" matthews kneeling before obama's shrine everyday. NBC is a liberal dominated cesspool. |
|
Ever since Reagan helped define liberalism as a total joke, liberals have been trying to distance themselves from the description "liberal" and call themselves "progressive." Pretty much like you are trying to do right now. If you are afraid of the word used to describe you policies and have had a national effort to redefine the term liberal as progressive that should tell you something!
Ever hear a conservative back away from that label? I doubt it!
We will continue to use the word liberal to describe the failed Carter policies and the soon to be failed Obama policies!
|
|
Coulter actually sell? How does it compare to record album sales?
I'm a liberal, proudly liberal. That doesn't mean I hate conservatives. Reagan was a very good president, though he has been deified by those on the right who know that W was a disaster, both as a president and as a conservative. Palin? Please, please keep her in the public eye. She is all that is wrong with our country, and with the GOP.
And just why isn't Bristol married yet? |
|
Perez: gay.
That's the crux of the matter. |
|
"Has withered on the vine, in terms of both relevance and reproductive ability...
and it shows."
Yeah. That's why her new book is going to be a best-seller. If that's withering, I'll take it.
Plus, she probably gets more propositions for doing the hunka-chunka in one day in her mail's inbox than you would ever get in your life.
It wasn't Annie she was replaced with either; it was that self-important, sexually confused Rachel Maddow that NBC put in her stead. |
|
"'Fear' in the same sense that most people fear cancer, animals with rabies, and being hit by a drunk driver."
But you see, all Coulter has that's scary is words. Some of them are spoken words, some of them are written, but that's all she has. And as the saying goes, "sticks and stones my break my bones, but words can never hurt me." Unlike cancer, rabies and drunk drivers, Ann Coulter's words cannot actually kill. |
|
BTW, I know that the thing conservatives fear the most are "liberals" but here's z tip: if you want to stop embarrassing yourselves, I would remind you that the only people using the word "liberal" any more are the handful of pathetic home-ies who sit around their computers all day and haven't noticed that it's the 21st century.
It's not a crime to live in the past, guys, it's just one of the things that ismaking the Republican job of trying to save their party more difficult.
"liberal", "princess phone", "Y2K meltdown", "Milli Vanilli", --they're no longer part of the culture that you guys are holding onto for dear life.
Get outside, walk around, -- we're ten years into a new century. |
|
Then how come NBC banned her as did the USA Today in 2004 (while letting Michael Moore cover the RNC)? How come every liberal freaks out when they hear her name mentioned? How come liberals attack her and call her mean spirited and insult her appearance yet never attack or attempt to disprove her claims? How come Mrs. Edwards called into Chris Matthews’ show on MSNBC to ask her to stop making fun of her husband?
Only other things that enrage liberals so much are 1) Christianity 2) Ronald Reagan (especially when he is referred to as the greatest President of the 20th century and 3) Sarah Palin.
|
|
they are finally being hoisted on their own pitards, making things up, being hysterical, misleading those on the right. Even people like Gingrich know that for the GOP to get back into power, it has to police its silly talking heads like Coulter, Limbaugh and others, who are just mean-spirited, lying idiots.
Coulter says that Michelle Obama is trying to look like Jackie O? Finally, Coulter reveals that she exists to simply stir up the pot and make an income off of those who believe her claptrap.
Get used to being in the wilderness, GOP-ers. |
|
"the three things liberals fear the most"
"Fear" in the same sense that most people fear cancer, animals with rabies, and being hit by a drunk driver. |
|
Liberals afraid of Anne Coulter?
That's wishful thinking, it's clear you would love to worship her as a force to be reckoned with.
Sorry, a menopausal anorexic commitment-phobe who poses on the grass in central park in a pathetic dress wrapped around her thighs while she comments on the appropriateness of other women's wardrobes is just not something to be frightened of, it's a joke.
Conservatives like Coulter are no longer interesting, or even listened to. If anything, she's just embarrassing to watch. |
|
|
It is actually the left that projects their inner dark side on the right, people on the right just want to go about enjoying life, lefties like you project YOUR darkest inner self on others. Myself, and like-minded individuals, independent thinkers, do not give a rats behind if people like you CHOOSE to be dominated by your own dark side. That is how people like you get to where you believe your own President is more evil, at his core, than Hussein, we do not believe that of Clinton or Obama, we only ask that they keep the terrorists away and dont take my hard-earned money to give to some ingrate in an attempt to purchase future votes. |
|
|
Does anyone even watch NBC anymore? |
|
All the liberal posts on this subject that is. I repeat my statement regarding the outright disgust and condescension liberals show for anything or anyone who does not cow to their mantra.
Perhaps I was wrong however about liberals being a minority, the certainly seem to be in a majority on this site but then what else do they have to do but try to destroy what other people think? |
|
What you are sensing is outrage. When I was cruising the site last night, saw the genuinely wonderful photo of Sweetheart with her baby, and then almost immediately after the excerpts from Coulter's new tome, I frankly became incensed and remain so.
Usually I dismiss Coulter's rants as her usual schtick, intended to sell books, but this affront to millions of women who have dedicated their lives to a another being coming as it does from the woman who used to be Guccione arm candy is beyond the pale. |
|
I posted a list a few weeks back of the three things liberals fear the most (with a potential 4th to be added in a couple years). I am going to update that list today
Things liberals fear the most
1) Christianity
2) Ronald Reagan
3) Sarah Palin
4) Ann Coulter
- Bobby Jindal will probably be on that list in the #4 or #5 position as he becomes a serious contender for President in 2012 when people realize Obama is as big of if not bigger joke than Carter. |
|
|
They both prey on the ignorance and small-mindedness of people. The are both clever in that way and good for them, that they are able to make a good living doing it. I have read them both and they are good for a laugh but to take either one seriously is a sign of self-delusion or mental illness. |
|
NBC drops a hammer on Ann Coulter huh. Well good for them. And no worry we can be completely confident that Olberman has already decried to be the worst person in the world anyhow so now NBC is just going along with its non-partisan straight-shootin pals over there at MSNBC.
And Bryce1, you really need to get a life your post is not funny so quit repeating it. |
|
|
You're typical of all liberals -- doing a little jig and celebrating the success of all wrongs in the world. While conservatives are genuinely repulsed by your intentional ignorance, we also feel sorry for any putz who keeps thinking liberalism has ever worked or ever will. Sad. |
|
Has withered on the vine, in terms of both relevance and reproductive ability...
and it shows. |
|
"At least we see "weak" liberal represenation on fox"
Continue to tell yourself that Mort and Juan "Iraqis are ingrates" Williams are true liberals. Beacons of light for the left. You sound like a liberal saying Pat Buchanan is a staunch conservative. |
|
"Hurray, the liberals say good riddance and all that. What they fail to grasp is that they are actually a minority and will soon find themselves alone in their liberal bubble."
Conservative denial is so sweet. Enjoy your little world. The rest of us will enjoy being led by "most liberal Senator in the history of the Senate" and drink your sweet, sweet tears.
And yes, a minority in the sense that liberal control the House, Senate, and Presidency! |
|
Who needs NBC. We ALL know that they are the Democrats network, well, more so than CNN,ABC,CBS and PBS.
What has happened to free speech on the REPUBLICAN right? Did we ever have free speech?
If America doesn't wake up, ALL our rights will be gone. They are slipping away everyday.
Christians,conservatives and generally the entire white race are not heard. I am not nor have I ever been a racist, but I have known some on BOTH sides.
It is disturbing to me and there is nothing happening in Washington D.C. to show me there is any leadership for all AMERICANS.
I have voted for 40 years. Please, tell me where I can go to get my RIGHTS back? |
|
Ok big man. I defy you to go over to AmericanSweetheart's blog about the beautiful baby boy she is raising by herself and defend Coulter there.
That is, if you're man enough to face down a strong woman that Coulter characterizes as running a 'farm team for future criminals and social outcasts'.
Go ahead, be a man.
|
|
|
I don't understand why NBC won't just let him on? |
|
This is going to be the best free press Ann Coulter could have wished for, her book sales are going to soar on this NBC censorship.
This is the best piece of free press I have seen since the NBA initially banned those red Air Jordans in the 80s since they did not like the color. Every kid wanted a pair when Nike ran that commercial. They thought they were banned for performance reasons.
People do not like censorship! If NBC was hoping to hurt her book sales, this is going to have the polar opposite effect. People are going to want to know what she wrote that upset NBC so much.
|
|
|
Why should Townhall allow you a forum to argue with the predominant thinking on this site? |
|
that's right. ignore the facts.
roy |
|
Liberals in general and the mainstream media in particular are in serious danger and they don't have a clue as to what is happening. The bias by the media and the outright disgust and condescension they demonstrate for anything that does not comport with their position is driving the "mainstream public" away in droves.
Hurray, the liberals say good riddance and all that. What they fail to grasp is that they are actually a minority and will soon find themselves alone in their liberal bubble.
It may be fun in there for a while bantering among themselves and reinforcing their myopic view of reality but at some point, they will understand that they are on the inside looking out, from a place isolated from the real world and a place in which they will be forever trapped.
|
|
"well it is sure as heck a better attempt than any other channel. At least we see "weak" liberal represenation on fox opposed to the total lack of any conservative representation from CNN and Good Morning America and on and on."
The major morning shows like Good Morning America and the Today Show offer very little commentary to judge which way those shows and networks lean politically.
However, I will concede that CNN slightly leans to the left, and MSNBC is far left. But just like Fox, both networks have their tokens. People like Joe Scarborough, and Pat Buchannan have a heavy presence on MSNBC. And on CNN, Bill Bennet, Tara Walls, and Amy Holmes play their part.
Much of this partisanship is a result of Fox's entrance into news business. Fox has been able to get high ratings as a result of its partisan slant. The other cable networks (particularly msnbc) have foolishly copied this format in attempt to do the same
|
|
|
Liberals are all about censuring Conservatives. Plain and simple. |
|
|
So then you ascribe to the argument, put forth by the Cassandra of the Right, Coulter, that Sarah Palin is running a 'farm team for future criminals and social outcasts' by helping to raise her new grandson? |
|
|
"foxnews is far from balanced" well it is sure as heck a better attempt than any other channel. At least we see "weak" liberal represenation on fox opposed to the total lack of any conservative representation from CNN and Good Morning America and on and on. When there are conservatives on the anchors throw hand grenade questions. Sure fox is right leaning but my goodness, all the other news channels are laying on their left side. |
|
Fox news channel is far from balanced, anyone who has ever watched the network should know this. I love how they bring on far right people like Bill Kristol, and Fred Barnes, and then insert these weak pathetic liberals like Juan Williams and Mara Liasson on Fox News Sunday.
Mara Liasson is a joke and Juan Williams shows his true colors on the O'reilly factor where he’s nothing but O’reilly’s lapdog and agrees with everything Bill-O has to say.
Then there’s Alan Colmes, who has been nothing but Hannity’s sidekick and doormat for eight years.
On the rare occasions when Fox brings authentic liberals on the air (people like Phil Donahue, Clarence page, Michael Eric Dyson, or Bill Maher) you actually see a good and lively debate. However, Fox prefers to perpetually use deferential and conciliatory liberals like Williams, Liasson and Colmes who only serve to give the appearance of balance on the network, when the network is anything but balanced.
|
|
What an honor it would be.
That would be a public relations coup for Ms. Coulter. It is probably not true. |
|
yep (gulp) and keep on ignoring the facts frankie. your motto: don't bother me with the facts, i got my mind made up.
roy |
|
|
Your retroactive reasoning stinks about as much as the left's condemnation of Israel in their fight for survival against the terrorist axis. As the major media have moved ever leftward, surprise, a new network appears to the right of them. This new network can then be blamed for the rest of the medias' leftward bias. You will, no doubt, subscribe to the chicken and the egg notion and say it is unclear which came first. You are the kool aid drinker here. |
|
|
keep drinking that kool aid son. |
|
the only reason why people like frank say that fox is leaning to the right is because networks like nbc, msnbc and others are so looney left and of course being balanced makes you stand out like a sore thumb.
facts, non partisan groups have found that fox is balanced and leads the pack on equal opportunity bashing and praising.
so get your facts straight.
roy |
|
Who cares about NBC,
the worst network on television,
Fox is the number one network by far,
even with football,
I will not watch that network,[NBC] Never. |
|
Who cares about NBC,
the worst network on television,
Fox is the number one network by far,
even with football,
I will not watch that network,[NBC] Never. |
|
NBC has made the strategic decision to capture all the viewers the Fox network alienated by oing 100% partisan over the past eight years
As a business model it will work because the cable paradigm defies the rule of three-NBC can afford to directly confront FOX as counter balance be perfectly within their rights and get away with it. I mean why not? Fox has done a variety of beyond the pale things that republicans have accepted as business as usual.
Fox will continue to represent the right and now the NBC corp will continue to shift left.
This opening shot at coulter was a brillinat move because it continues to psuh her out of the mainstream and force republicans to decide if they want to stand with her statements or not.
If we are to believe the popular myth that the MSN was in the tank for Obama then we must admit that part of said bias resulted from the creation of our own right wing new media which frankly was partiuclarly mean spirited last election. Neither sours grapes or Ann Coulter are going to get republicans back in power-however more polarization of media is the last thing either side needs now. |
|
Lola C - You are not quite a master at projection of your own toxicity, but you are an able practitioner. The contortions you must assume in branding Coulter a mysogynist rather than applying the term to the men who use these women and then leave them to raise children alone are incredible. Have you considered joining the circus?
Those of us in the stands await the non-negative, loving, mainstream non-spew of your new statesmen of non-depravity - Al Franken. |
|
Sarah Palin and clan aren't welcoming the miracle of a new life to their home, they are operating a 'farm team for future criminals and social outcasts'.
So now that we have Coulter's blessing, is it ok surround the Palin home with torches and pitchforks? |
|
|
And Americans who admire decency in public discourse breathe a sigh of relief. |
|
|
Why would a NEWS program on a MAJOR network ban anyone.She is only banned because she doesnt share the same ideas that the nbc idiots share, and their answer is to just BAN her from their station. I thought the airwaves they take up were LOANED to them and belong to us. That the reason WE even let them use the air is that they are SUPPOSED TO BRING US different views and let US decide for ourselves but not any more.And they are mad because she has come out publically with their shameful and bias stand and that they dont report the news they MANAGE it so it means what they want it to.I dont watch nbc, I try and everytime I change the channel in utter disgust and yet at least I try. They need a wakeup call as to how most of us see them and what they do. |
|
Bony a**, but meaty commentary.
Yes, Coulter is SO unpopular that every time her column is posted here, the trolls mass along the borders in droves, hoping to be the FIRST to post, some of them those that have already appeared here. So glad to include you among the many that are testimony to the ratings she brings anywhere she appears.
I'm watching her right now on Hannity's show and can not wait to spend some of my earnings on her new book. I look forward to everything she may have to say about Obama in the next four years, the laughs will be a welcome break from the tears and outrage. The fact that I don't have to tolerate Rachel Maddow for even one second in the hopes of catching Coulter are just a plus.
As for NBC, MSNBC, CNBC or any of their affiliates, I've already heard enough, tingles up the leg by Matthews, heavy breathing by Olbermann and all. And, speaking of Olbermann, give the makeup airbrush a rest, already. He looks as synthetic as Tim Allen as the fake latex Santa in Santa Clause II. |
|
Is everyone here absolutely convinced that Coulter actually and seriously believes the things she says? I'm about 60% convinced that she's doing it all as a shtick, an act, as entertainment and self-aggrandizement. Kind of like Andrew Dice Clay or maybe Don Rickles, throwing insults in all directions just for the sensation.
I've had similar thoughts about Rush Limbaugh. Certainly a lot of what he says is meant to be sensationalist, but I'm more certain that he actually believes his core message. Coulter, probably not. |
|
Ah yes, the very model of tolerance, Miss Lola C lecturing us about Ann Coulter.
Does your hypocrisy know no bounds?
"Well I'm not dumb but I can't understand
Why she walks like a woman and talks like a man"
|
|
..at my house, where there is no need for N-B-C and other Alphabet Media Empty Suits who love the sound of their own voices.. and I don't provide ratings for p-u-k-e TV. |
|
|
|
the same home of Chris Matthews, David Gregory and Keith Olbermann???????
I'm a huge NFL fan but ABSOLUTELY won't watch an game broadcast on NBC since they put Olbermann on the team.
David Gregory heading up Meet the Press??????
Every time you think the Numbnuts Broadcasting Channel has hit rock-bottom..........
they grab a shovel........
Chet Huntley, David Brinkley and John Chancellor must be rolling over about now.......
sheeesh............ |
|
"We are just not interested in anyone so highly critical of President-elect Obama, right now," a TODAY insider reveals. "It's such a downer. It's just not the time, and it's not what our audience wants, either."
Sooo, only Obamots will watch NBC?? I thought so. They say Annie'll be on CBS's Early Show tomorrow - if that's the case- all 5 of my TV's will be tuned to CBS- and the last time that happened was- ummm NEVER.
|
|
|
Did the few remaining viewers of any NBC affiliate notice? |
|
|
|
Go with TMZ if they want to be serious reporters.
Or perhaps not. |
|