Friday, November 02, 2007
|
|
Report From Iowa
|
|
Posted by:
Hugh Hewitt at
9:27 AM
|
My pal "Classic" is a Romney supporter in small town Iowa. He sent along this report of a Romney visit last week. This is the way presidential politics works in Iowa and New Hampshire, and why it is actually an excellent way to vet the field. The candidates get support the old-fashioned way --by asking for it one-on-one:
A few days ago I received a phone call inviting me to attend an informal small meet and greet with Governor Romney as he traveled from one "Ask Mitt" to another. On Tuesday night, I received a message asking if I would help introduce people from my small town to the governor.
After picking up my two school age children for this educational and historica visit, we arrived at the facility where the event was being met. I visited with staff people I had met during an event in January.
As people gathered in the designated part of the building for the governor's visit, I spotted Byron York. Dressed comfortably in a black blazer and jeans I borrowed him from a Romney staffer for a photograph of the two of us.
As he and I talked, he realized that I am part of a niche demographic that is very important to the Governor, both in the primaries and the general election. He asked for some contact information, so I gave him my personal e-mail address and home phone number.
By now my wife had arrived. The four of us sat down in the foyer of the building. Soon Governor Romney came bouncing up the steps, with crisp white long shirt rolled up between wrist and elbow, and greeted me by name. He graciously obliged when I asked for a family picture with him.
This is subjective, but it seemed to me today that Governor Romney is even more confident than when I met him 9 months ago. He has even more charisma. Perhaps it is because he is a front runner in most of the early states. Maybe it is because he has been tested on the campaign trail and in the debates. It could be because he was coming off a rousing meeting at a private college with approximately 400 people! Then again, it could be a combination of all of those and more.
He was escorted to the speaking area by an aide and we followed him. I was told after the event that because there were more people than expected that he wanted to give a more substantive talk. By the way, I had first been told the campaign expected 40 or 50. Today I was told (after the event) more like 20 had been expected. The actual attendance? 73 (counted by my younger child--I'm pretty sure she didn't count the legs and forget to divide by two!).
After apologizing for being 15 minutes late (saying, "I hate to be late!"), he launched into his standard stump speech of Strong military. Strong economy. Strong families." He mixed in local items, as well as the recent Democratic debate.
When he was done, he opened it up to questions, which included "the Bain Way," (see below), foreign and domestic pharmaceuticals, college education, and more. After the meeting one staffer (a conservative political science graduate from the University of Colorado!) commented on how good the questions where--how relevant, appropriate, and rubber meets the road.
Then the governor greeted as many people as wanted to shake his hand. One person had him sign a Romney t-shirt from the Iowa Straw Poll event. Another person who shook his hand is the chair of the Democratic party in this party. During the speech, the governor more than once spoke of the need to talk and work with Democrats on solutions for the benefit of the country.
When I had arrived at the facility I had been asked to provide local color on a quick tour of the facility. To get back on time to his next event, he skipped that tour.
Getting back to the Bain Way question. A few weeks ago I dropped in on a friend who runs two retirement businesses in town. He is a conservative Christian, as am I. He registered surprise at my support of Romney. I loaned him Hugh's "A Mormon President?" book.
This gentleman's question about the Bain Way showed that he had read the book and understood the principle of leadership involved. This person has moved from being a skeptic to a strong Romney reporter. He was holding three Romney lawn signs in his hand and, I'm told, had tried to make a contribution when he arrived at the event!
In the parking lot, a staffer told me she was driving a couple hours to lead a caucus training event. The work goes on and the Romney team keeps its eye on the prize--vote by vote; delegate by delegate; to get nominated. And then plans from there....
|
|
He(PP) might be tempted to turn them on Neocons before anywhere else. Thank goodness he's got enough sense to have you aboard killing them that need it.
Baseball's over for a few months, which always puts me and the fanatical Mrs.Neo in a state of mourning. And, Joe Torre just signed with the Dodgers, which means that the studios and #%&$in' writers better settle the strike, so I can be called west and watch games in Chavez Ravine. |
|
Secretary of Offense, that's good, not quite what it was, Secretary of War, before we became so squeamishly PC.
Neo, you do have something there in that Mauser. Take good care of it. |
|
Me noble....? Believe me, it this was a fight between Kossacks, I would have made popcorn and enjoyed it. You and Virginia are more alike than you are different...and both friends. You'll still see me mix it up now and then. If God didn't want me to fight, He wouldn't have made me Irish. My motto: May God have mercy on my enemies, cuz I won't. (with respects to G.S. Patton Jr.) BTW, Phil is ok too. He's more libertarian than we, but you can't expext a guy like him to support a Rudy type. If elected president, Phil has promised me the SecDef position, which will then me renamed Secretary of Offense. I also get one nuke a year for my personal use.....not bad, huh? :-) Enjoy the football guys..... |
|
I'm entirely new at this stuff(comments at a blog) before the last 2 or 3 months. Didn't know why my posts came out looking so scattered at times and now 'get it' with the 'form' punctuation. Thanks.
By the by, I grew up in a hunting & fishing family(in L.A., no less)and, being the sole survivor, have possession of the family artillary. My mother's 8mm Mauser buck hunting rifle is a classic. Uncle brought it home from the European theater and Dad cut it down, scope mounted it and beautiful stock for her smaller size. A tiny eagle & swastika stamp--German Army--is on the side of the barrel, if you squint. |
|
|
We can agree to disagree about Rudy. I'm not wired to vote for liberals. I am also a history buff. Thank you for the space after puctuation, it makes your posts easier to read. |
|
VP: Peace. I'm not wired to be nice to JS & PP, I'm afraid. But, I can show restraint of keyboard and let them say that stuff without comment.
The books curiosity was real, as it happens. I asked PL+LP the question a week or two ago and got an interesting list. I'm an old historian, so books have been a lifelong comfort zone to have around me(and read!)and I'm curious about what others--particularly folks I disagree dramatically with--read, bookwise.
Paddy: Great to have you back. Ya didn't go to some ashram thingy and get noble on me didja, Lad? |
|
|
You're right. I try not to stoop to that level. |
|
....I come back all this time later and you guys are still fighting. Let's just knock it off okay...? Nobody is going to win..and nobody is going to change anybody's mind....and now it's getting personal and juvenile. Frankly, none of you is looking very good. Grow up everybody..... Later.... |
|
|
Put a space in between your punctuation and the next sentence. |
|
|
I'm positive there are more books in my house than yours. I have 5 dictionaries, I'd recommend you get one. |
|
????It would be interesting to know,wouldn't it?
|
|
|
I recommend scrolling down to Phil's Sept 9 entry and read forward from there. Lot's of food for thought. |
|
|
I welcome people of all opinions. It's how we all learn things. It's boring to only talk with people who agree with me 100%. |
|
|
You are going to have to point out to me what it is that I said in my last comment that offended you. There was nothing in there that referred to you. I don't insult people who disagree with me. I only insult, and only my toying with them, those who just can't keep it civil and on point. I didn't start blogging to straighten out the world but to get into intelligent conversation with intelligent people. The problem with the senior circuit blogs is that they attract rude and vulgar pinheads who cannot hold engage in civilized conversation. I can't think of a single that you have written that violates my sensibilities. I didn't mean to offend you and I am sorry if I did. I should have titled my last comment "To the trolls" or something. |
|
|
|
|
Visit his blog. You probably agree on more than you disagree. I don't think he considers you a Paulbot, it would be better if we avoided perjoratives altogether. |
|
Thanks for the info, I saw a report on the news that Ruger has announced they will no longer ship semi-auto product to CA rather than comply with the flaky laws out there. Had a great time at the rifle range this afternoon with my Winchester. And thank you for not trying to get me to vote for a liberal. I'm pretty sure it won't come to that anyway, Rudy will not be the nominee. |
|
...for a moment, but I'm stayin out of this fight: I've got friends on both sides. I will try to persuade my friends, but I respect them enough to allow them to make up their own minds. Virginia has his reasons and as much as I'd like to persuade him otherwise, he's sticking to his principles. I have to respect him for that....it's not always easy to do. We also share a hobby. Virginia, I asked at the range lastnight, and it seems the only reason that the Super Match is not legal in CA is Sig hasn't applied. Nothing about the gun itself. Have a great weekend my fine friends....
|
|
Brightest candle in the punkin'.One of the many tickles I get from these strange Pauley characters is that they REALLY believe we're out of place here. ;-)))
Cabalista's right on one thing about'cha,Jacko... Put the candy down,Dude.Now...Step away from that child.Goooood. |
|
OVERRRRRRR the edge,Brother.He and PasaPhil, Virgina,Ryan01 are sharing the bong and need to put the candy down and step away from that schoolyard.
I wonder,morbidly as they say,what the last 8 or 10 books are that those geniuses read.Okay,it may have been Dick & Jane in 1st grade.But don't you and MikeS and Rufus and 'our guys' like OHM,Paddy,'Hawk & Dusty ever wonder what these cretins read in their all too spare time,besides the internet?
Sheet is a tad scary,don't you think?Rage out of any sane level.He'd stalk you,Neo,if he could find you.Whew.JackSh!!T,get some counseling,Son. |
|
|
The problem with the senior circuit blogs is that they are polluted by vulgar trolls like MikeS and NeoConScum and all of the paulbots. It is utterly impossible to have a serious discussion about anything when these guys swarm to take over every single post. The good thing is that those who merely read without posting comments can see for themselves who the idiots are. That is why the GOP AND Dme registration numbers keep sinking. Voters are fed up with the lot of them. To the trolls I say: Go ahead! Throw your vote away! Vote for one of those NY liberals. The rest of us have other plans. We conservatives outnumber both wings of the Unified Establishment Party. |
|
|
Romney is the only guy who's positioned to take out Rudy in the primary, and Hillary in the general. He doesn't lose the SoCon wing of the party like Rudy would because he IS a SoCon. He doesn't get out-spent in the general, because he has vaster resources to draw upon than any other Republican. He has a better campaign infrastructure in place than any other Republican. Also, he's perfectly positioned to run the table of the early primary states. So if Mitt wasn't running, we would have to suffer through 4 years of Hillary, after which the military will have been gutted, the treasury sacked, The Supreme Court turned over to Leftist freaks, taxes raised, and inflation and unemployment in the stratosphere. That's leaving out the part about Illegal Aliens running amuck, drugs legalized, the partial birth abortion ban lifted, and medicine socialized. Yes, it's a very good thing Romney is running. |
|
All else pales into insignificance when compared to National Security. That's why I'd walk across broken glass barefoot to vote for "Anybody" but a Democrat.
And, as much as I like Mitt's resume, if I start to feel the least bit squeamish about his gonads I'll support Rudy. You always have a chance to get the Supreme Court back, and you can "Live" with slightly lower wages, and another Mexican Restaurant in town; But, you can't bring your family back once they've been "Nuked."
No Contestelero |
|
|
Judging by the polls, Mitt might make a great president of Iowa. But my grandpa and great grandpa were Iowans. They'd vote against him from the graveyard. |
|
are like some of those guys willing to hide in the woods in order to shoot down the oncoming Black Helicopters. Uh-oh, don't look now, Jack!I think that when Rudy is elected we should pass a law forcing Jack Shiite and Virginia Patriot to have a gay wedding. Then, we should allow any illegal immigrants who want to to purchase their guns (from now on, only illegals will be the ones allowed to have guns). After that, we should force them to perform late term abortions on their friends. (From now on, only illegals will be allowed to have kids, everyone else will have to have an abortion.)
I know the rest of you may laugh at this, but Jack Shiite and Virginia Patriot take it seriously, I assure you. In their wacko dream world, stuff like this threatens America at every moment and would be assured when Rudy takes over. |
|
if your main issues in this election are:
GUN CONTROL ABORTION GAY MARRIAGE ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION
Get this through your heads:
If you really think that when Rudy becomes president, he will seize all of your guns, encourage late term abortion, legalize gay marraige, and throw the borders open, then you are an idiot. On the other hand, if Hillary gets elected, you can be sure she will raise your taxes and create new bureaucracy. What is there to understand? The obtuseness of some of you conservatives is sheer lunacy. It's as if the minute Rudy gets elected, a gay illegal is going to pound on your door, remove your weapons, and perform a late term abortion on your wife. Stop living in your dream world and enter the real one. We need your votes. In the words of the Kinks, "Paranoia will destroy ya!" |
|
and NH. If Romney doesn't "Grow a Pair" he's going to lose this thing. If he lets that old RINO call him a "Liar" one more time without "Firing Back" I won't even vote for him.
One thing Republicans want is to be sure the bad guys know that when they start "Sending them Over," they're going to be getting a whole lot more "Back," post haste. I'm beginning to Wonder. |
|
he is liberal. It is because people suspect he will be a strong leader in dealing with Jiahdi terrorists and in times of crisis. Plus he is for efficient lean government.
I like Rudy, and I acknowledge he has problems. Rudy does not know when to kick people to the curb that are hurting his campaign. I admire loyality, but blind loyality is dumb. His wife is annoying. He takes cell phone calls in meetings and while speaking in public. He is okay with gun control on a state and municipal level. While that does not effect the second ammendment (because that applies to federal action)--I do not care for gun control on any level.
Mitt has a really nice wife and family, so he does not have the personal bagage Rudy does. Mitt supported almost all of the same positions Rudy (in fact Mitt was left of Ted Kennedy on lots of issues) did until he decided to become President and had an epiphany that he was a conservative on everything. Mitt is a panderer.
And then you have Fred. I like Fred. I trust Fred. I think Fred would be the best president of the bunch. Fred is no panderer. Fred's biggest problem is he is Fred and does not have a dynamic style.
There is Huckabee too. But because he has not chance and bleeds off support for Mitt, Huck has to go. |
|
the next life,'is the way my Mother used to put it.The 20-20 hindsight of Liberals & lefties is always A-Mazing to me.A dramatic lack of adulthood.
The Paulist Nutters here seem to have that same affliction.Infantile Defiance,as the psychologists dub it.Take a look at jackdefaco's highchair pounding comments directly above and you'll know that his Paulie bud,Ry-Ry01 can't be far.
Rudy will eat jihadist livers.Hilly thinks they're a minor diversion from the real focus of Nanny Statism.Jeepers.who to vote for!
Gotta take jackdefaco's advice and look for an Israeli JeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeewW under the furniture.Oooooooooo...Think I found one. and at GOP-HQ. |
|
I do not think true conservatives are just gonna go out and vote Republican this time. I know I will not. The oh my God it's Hillary the sky is falling crowd just can not get their heads around the concept that many Republicans have betrayed us. They all say the right things, but then vote differently or do nothing.
Oh the Sean Hannity !!! I know it ticks some of you off....oh my Gawd !!! if you do not vote for our precious Republicans why you are giving the country over to Liberals and then the bad people are gonna kill us...oh my GAWD !!!
Sorry I am tired of being sold out and lied to, I am not failing the country, you RHINOS and Country Club Republicans have sold this country out. I would love a viable third party option
dirL |
|
|
A ham sandwich with a conservative agenda can beat Hillary. A liberal New York mayor will not. Nominate wisely. |
|
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/sc/s outh_carolina_republican_primary-233.html
Romney is leading in South Carolina! Of course it is the same ARG poll that used to promote John McCain. Rasmussen has Thompson by 4 points, but who is counting. This is Mitt we are talking about.
Which reminds me of Jesus's first miracle:
On the third day a wedding took place at Cambridge in Massachusetts. Mitt Romney's wife was there, and Mitt Romney and his campaign staff had also been invited to the wedding. When the wine was gone, Ann Romney said to him, "They have no more wine." "Dear woman, why do you involve me?" Mitt Romney replied, "My time has not yet come, and I do not drink wine"
Ann Romney said to the servants, "Do whatever he tells you."
Nearby stood six stone water jars, the kind used by the Jews for ceremonial washing, each holding from twenty to thirty gallons.
Mitt Romney said to the servants, "Fill the jars with water"; so they filled them to the brim.
Then he told them, "Now draw some out and take it to the master of the banquet."
They did so, and the master of the banquet tasted the water that had been turned into Hi-C. He did not realize where it had come from, though the servants who had drawn the water knew. Then he called the bridegroom aside and said, "Everyone brings out the choice wine first and then the cheaper wine after the guests have had too much to drink; but you have saved the Hi-C till now."
This, the first of his miraculous signs, Mitt Romney performed in Cambridge of Massachusetts. He thus revealed his glory, and his campaign put their faith in him.
|
|
Virginia Patriot,
When you equate Rudy Giuliani to Hillary, you remind me of the people who equate Hezbollah and Hamas to the Israeli Defense Forces, or the Jihadists to the U.S. forces. It also reminds me of the people who used to equate the Soviet Union to the West. Townhall even attracts some crazy Ron Paul acolytes (Jack Shiite, Ryan01, Al, Lev Strauss, etc.) who make an equivalency between 'neoconservatives' and Nazis.
All of those equivocations---including saying that Rudy = Hillary---is a bunch of Orwellian garbage which is not based in truth. You're entitled to your own opinions, but you're not entitled to your own facts. And the facts show that Rudy and Hillary are as different as day and night.
Ronald Reagan used to say that the person who agrees with you 70% of the time is your ally, not your enemy.
Rudy Giuliani may not be the 'perfect' candidate, but he is light years better than any Democrat, especially anyone named Clinton.
Life is not about waiting around for the 'perfect' wife, the 'perfect' house, the 'perfect' job, the 'perfect' dog, the 'perfect' lawnmower, or the 'perfect' Presidential candidate---it's about selecting the best available option at the time.
When a person can't afford to live in their 'perfect' dream house, they don't say, "Oh well, since I can't live in the perfect house, I guess I'll just be homeless !" Rather, they choose the 'best' house available to them.
There do happen to be people on this planet who are attempting to establish a 'perfect' paradise on earth---and we're currently fighting them; they're called Islamo-fascists. |
|
If Rudy is the nominee, I'm staying home.
No fear is Hillary will change that.
I consider voting for Rudy immoral. Now if you can't understand why, well I don't have time to explain. |
|
Poster Kids for Stuck on Stupendously Stupid. Take a count of the air sucked up on this thread.GoooooooooooodD Grief.
I don't give the remotest EFF who you do or don't vote for.Only a certifiable bizarro can look at Her Thighship and Rudy and see the same.Ask Radical Islamists worldwide who they prefer:HRC, by a jihadist landslide.Jeepers...who-oh-who to vote for.
MikeS: To repeat what I've repeatedly repeated to you...I can't speak for Ohio,though Hugh probably can,but here in Florida there's no rush to Hillary happening as you suggest,IF we field a good, strong candidate.There are Huge Negatives here for her. |
|
|
You guys just can't get it through your thick skulls. Follow this reasoning carefully. Read it slowly and consult your dictionary if necessary. When we say we see no difference between Hillary and Rudy WE MEAN IT! BELIEVE IT! Don't count on our vote in the end. You are making a fatal assumption. If you're really THAT cartoonishly afraid of Hillary, you better start making friends because your attitude is solidifying my resolve. I believe what YOU are saying. It would advance the argument if you believed what those who agree with ME are saying. WE DON'T CARE WHO GETS ELECTED BETWEEN HILLARY AND RUDY. Would you like me to repeat it? Is this really so difficult to understand? You see a choice, we don't. If you want our vote, you're going about it the wrong way. |
|
|
I'm glad you don't regret voting for Ross Perot, but some of the rest of us sure as heck regret that you did, fostering us with Clinton. I am not a RINO, I am an independent; I don't even like Republicans! But I hate Hillary more. Make no mistake, she will be a disaster for the USA and it will be YOUR fault, not the Republicans who chose Rudy. Keep in in mind if you truly choose to be as narrow-minded and arrogant as you sound right now. |
|
|
That attitude that the VirginiaP's like me are going to vote for Rudy in the end is what is going cost the GOP the election. I was one of the 19% of voters who voted for Ross Perot in 1992 and BJ Clinton became president. I have never regretted it. If Hillary wins in 2008, I will not have voted for her nor Rudy. YOU RINOs will have elected her by insisting on nominating her doppleganger. And VirginiaP is right that there are more conservatives who agree with his position than yours. The Rasmussen report from last Tuesday made it very clear that for Hillary and Rudy to be the nominees is unacceptable to most voters. Of the 25% or so of registered voters who are Repubs, only about 14-15% think like you. There are lots of GOP women who will vote for Hillary out of sympathy because she was the woman wronged by a x-timing man. Rudy cannot get their vote - ever. Then there are the conservatives. Go ahead. Nominate him. Just don't blame us. We don't care if Hillary gets elected. She's YOUR candidate. |
|
|
You're the one that's wrong. Let me tell you how this will go, should Rudy get the nomination. You will be sujected, along with the rest of us, to ten months of Rudy vs. Hillary. Ten months is a long time to have displayed the differences between the two candidates. As strong and as admirable as your resolve is, with only these two to look at, you will come to realize that Rudy is preferable in so many ways to Hillary. You will also realize that your home state Virginia will be in play, and every vote will count. In the end, no way you stay home. Not a chance. |
|
I don't think anyone said you did. But if you give the GOP a NO vote. Then Billary gets your vote.
Sorry dude but that's just the way it is.. Look I'm with you on Hunter... BUT????????? |
|
|
You're wrong. I don't vote for liberals. |
|
It looks more and more like Romney's scheme to win the nomination, as endorsed by Hugh, might actually work. If it does, the Clinton machine are licking their chops. This guy will be the worst GOP candidate in my lifetime. He represents every bad stereotype of the GOP: the slick,white millionaire who appears to have no empathy with the middle class, much less anyone poorer than that. He's got no shot of attracting anyone beyond his base, and I think he loses in a historical landlslide.
|
|
Don't listen to Virginia Patriot. I know he thinks he won't vote for Rudy, but in the end, he will. The conservatives won't sit at home and allow Hillary to win.
The election will be decided in Ohio and Florida, and Hillary will crush Romney in those states, if he's the guy. She will crush Fred, as well. I think she will probably beat Rudy, too, but he's the only one with even a decent chance to beat her.
I don't even like Rudy very much, (I'm an independent) but I really don't want to see Clinton in office. It's probably going to happen, anyway, but let's try to stop it, huh?
We've got to support Rudy... |
|
may be a touch off, but there's no doubt Mitt is now "Playing" in SC. |
|
Damn.. don't write and try to talk to someone.. WELL I CAN'T.
556 has NO knock down power. |
|
lol,,, Well Richard. I just wish the 223 had some know down power.
PS I'm a MEDIC... seen to many 762 & 556 wounds! I'll take the 762 or 45 thank you. (-: ( for death) |
|
|
Now you know why they call me Richard_223! |
|
Look friend... I want Hunter too, but it looks like that isn't going to happen. So if it's Rudy fine. Then Hunter needs to be VP or Sec of DEF.. which I think is the best palce for him.
If Billary get's in she will hurt our fighting guys so BAD that I can't even begin to start...
The lester of two evils! |
|
Sorry Patty got called away.
OK on the M-16 against the M-14. We all know that the m-16 is a 556 round and the M-14 is 762. Here's the point that may matter. When I did a Dustoff we could not be armed... (YEAH RIGHT) thank you UN. So we got shot full of holes and way to may died. So we carried door gunners! "don't tell anyone" LOL The M-14 can hit it's target on auto, but only one round or two may hit.. All the other rounds go everywhere. Now the M-16 could 4 rounds in the same spot on auto. That was the only good thing about them. But they had little KNOCK down power.
Can't win in this game. |
|
I'm a Romney supporter who will vote for Rudy if I need to in the general. In the short term there would probably not be too much difference in their presidencies. I think they would both be tough with the WOT - thankfully. But Rudy will not be as strong as Romney on illegal immigration or social issues. Fiscally - basically the same. Supreme court - that's hard to tell with either of them, no matter what they say now.
The long term consequences of laying aside socially conservative ideals (with Rudy) is harder to predict, but may end up being a big mistake. After all, if we concede the life issue as a party - who will be left to stand up for the innocent? Like Ann Coulter said - "It's time to hang it up as a country if both parties nominate pro-choice candidates." I wholeheartedly agree with her and I hope it does not come to that. That's why I sympathize with those who are refusing to vote for Rudy.
|
|
|
If everyone who likes Hunter votes for him in the primaries, he will be the nominee. We should not listen to the spin that only the liberal New York mayor can beat the liberal New York Senator. What has become of this party? |
|
Romney does not believe the same things as Huck. He does not believe in raising taxes, granting pardons, commuting sentences of dangerous people, big government programs and regulations for fat people and others, a federal ban on smoking, or amnesty. He also does not have ethical questions swirling around his head.
Thank Heaven there is a stark difference between Romney and Huck. It's very clear for anyone to see who the real conseravative is. |
|
|
Your name calling and invective are so very persuasive, you have convinced me. Rudy should be elcted first as President of the U.S. and then President of MexAmericanada for life. |
|
|
He won't miss my vote, in the primary or the general if he gets that far. I think it'll be Romney/Hunter and I will support them enthusiastically. |
|
This is well known.
Putting the mayor and Lady MacClinton on terms of agreement is,pardon me,absurd.Which is a big reason she fears him.He can eviscerate her.I like that. |
|
No need my man....everything we do is perfectly legal, and rightfully so..... We might as well be talking about our favorite golf clubs.... What about you? When the guys in white lab coats show up, do you go quietly, or kicking and screaming.....??? |
|
|
Of all the candidates, Hunter is spot on, but he won't be nominated. The cheap labor wing of the party sickens me, too. Securing the border and fighting these Ishmaelites, are one and the same. Normally, i would never vote for Guiliani, but i look at my two young daughters and that changes my mind. There safety trumps everything. Guiliani is a bulldog when it comes to national security. I believe one of the reasons we have not been hit since 9/11, is because the children of Ishmael want a Democrat president. An attack might elect a Republican. All hell is going to break loose after this election. We must have strong leadership. Patriots don't sit this one out. |
|
|
Never said I speak for gazillions, but I have seen many posters on threads here express similar sentiments regarding Bald Hillary. You may be able to cast aside all principle, but I can't. I don't vote for liberals, R or D. |
|
|
Some say that if Rudy is the nominee they will sit this one out. That is crazy talk. For God's Sake if that women win's (which she will if we stay home) we are in for a world of hurt. Just think of life for at least 4 years with that woman and her husband and Charlie Rangle..ARRRRggH! Don't forget to vote no mater what! I'd glady take a mormon who changed his ways the the clinton's... |
|
|
Sounds like sports equipment for toddlers. Plastic Mitt. I can't get past his phoniness. I guess it doesn't bother others, but he seems so robotic to me. Just nothing there. His Mormonism doesn't help me any, either. I started with Fred and I've ended up with Mike Huckabee, who is really something. Everything in one neat package. Mitt believes a lot of things Huck believes. It's just that Huck ALWAYS believed them. |
|
Your thumping on the "I speak for gazillions of Rebubs who will sit it out if Rudy's the guy..."
A.)I don't think you do. B.)LT's right as rain.If Rudy,I don't see my GOP friends sitting at home. C.)I have an Army Issue .30cal M1A1 Carbine.Probably hasn't been shot more than 3 or 4 times.Perfect shape.
My .45ACP S&W Model 1955 is the Greatest Handgun in the world.And the prettiest. :-)
'HAWK...I know little of Michael,but folks I listen to like him alot. |
|
...are better than what's waiting for us on the other side of the aisle. Please, no more talk of sitting out the general election or running a 3rd party truther who owns all the "X-files" DVD's.
Realistically of the top five:
Huck is too short on time and money. McCain and Thompson have both managed (for different reasons) to grab defeat from the jaws of victory.
Its now a state poll (Mitt) vs national poll (Rudy) contest. These two men have put the most effort into their campaigns and have made the best decisions --at least so far. In the next few weeks we will see which one chose the best strategery. Whoever wins, they will deserve it through good planning, wise spending, and hard work. We MUST rally behind our guy and achieve the victory or go down together at the bitter end. Think of it this way... most of you guys will not have to worry about saluting Her Thighness, if she wins --don't let this happen. |
|
You are a talented man....carrying on a pleasant conversation and fighting at the same time.... The Peoples' Republic of CA has outlawed the AR-15 due to certain features that make it unacceptable....most prominently, the "pistol grip." Basically, they outlaw anything "scary." Next I hear they'll be outlawing "icky," but that's a ways off. We also have a 10 round magazine capacity, so there are some CA-specific magazines being made. In order to carry legally in your car, firearms must be as far to the back of the car as possible in a locked container; ammo must be in a separate container (also locked); rounds in a magazine.....no, no...you're busted. Basically, if you come under fire, you are pretty much dead. Some manufacturers have will bail, but I have not seen it yet. I actually believe that's what the legislators want...crazy stupid rules that make no sense...eventually the manufacturers bail. They can't achieve gun control constitutionally, so they circumvent. Beware...this will not go unnoticed by pols elsewhere....
|
|
Virginia Patriot wrote; --------------------- "I don't play with guns. I shoot them, very accurately. Playing with them would be dangerous, as any clear thinking adult would know." ----------------------
The only thing you shoot is your mouth---and you're not very accurate with that.
|
|
|
Judging by Rudy's previous judicial picks, you're wrong. And when he ran for Mayor, he ran as a Liberal Party candidate. He is a liberal, there should be no way in hell Rudy gets the GOP nomination, and he probably won't, so it's a moot point. |
|
|
That basically is an M14, really nice. I've thought about adding one of those also. I am curious why you can't have an AR in CA. I'm still looking into why my Super Match is not CA compliant. I heard about the new law on semi-autos and micro-stamping. I also heard most of the manufacturers are just writing off CA and will not ship product there. |
|
Virginia Patriot,
If you think Rudy = Hillary, then you're not a clear thinking adult. And there's no way in hell that Hillary could get the GOP nomination; she's a crazy left-wing radical.
Rudy would nominate someone like Duncan Hunter to be Secretary of Defense. Hillary would nominate someone like Joe Biden.
Rudy would nominate someone like Janice Rogers Brown to the Supreme Court. Hillary would nominate someone from the 9TH Circuit Court of Appeals.
Rudy would fight Islamo-fascism. Hillary would declare war against...wealthy Americans !
But here's where your childish logic falls flat; you claim that Hillary is bad, yet you just shrug your shoulders at the thought of her becoming President.
I swear, some of you good ole' boys in Southern states are still fighting the American Civil War---uh, I'm sorry, I mean, "The War of Northern Aggression."
You don't realize that it's the Islamo-fascists who want to kill you---not Republican mayors from northern cities !
|
|
|
|
|
I don't play with guns. I shoot them, very accurately. Playing with them would be dangerous, as any clear thinking adult would know. |
|
|
Oh, the Springfield M1A1, ask BrianR, (viewfromtheisland.townhall.com) he has one and loves it. |
|
Actually, I've been looking at the Socom II by Springfield Armory....
|
|
|
|
I can't get an AR in CA, but I can get an M1A1 in .308 (at least until Hillary takes over). I'd still rather have the AR, but the M-1 has more pop, so what the heck. I think I'm good on the handguns....
|
|
|
As a clear thinking adult, I'm aware I may not get my ideal choice, Duncan Hunter. I will vote for most of the other GOP nominees just not the Democrat in GOP clothing. I am not alone, there are many who will not abandon their principles for party. There isn't much difference between HRC and RG. Would you vote for Hillary if she had an R behind her name? |
|
M1's? ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
You mean as in Gun?
wow haven't played with one of them in years. I was more of a 45, M-14/M-16 person in my Army days. |
|
It's the Spanish oligarchy that runs Mexico that is exporting their poor onto us. Mostly native peoples. It has to stop or we will become Mexico in every way. ________________________________________ Buddy as someone who grew up in San Diego and has seen the problem. I'm with you there. The Mex goverment is not run by Mexicans. Look at their back ground and skin color ( yes I said that) Most of them have a large part of Spain in their family history. Not Mexico. The good people of that country have had the wool pulled over their eyes for years by these people. |
|
Virginia Patriot,
In regards to you taking your ball and going home (boo-hoo !) on Election Day 2008 if Giuliani is the GOP nominee, you just come across as a narcissist.
A clear thinking adult recognizes that life involves choosing the best available option, rather than screaming and kicking when he doesn't get the 'ideal' choice.
When you enable Hillary to win the White House, do you realize she gets to be in charge of foreign policy ? You want Joe Biden as Secretary of Defense ?
If a good ole' boy such as yourself who likes to play with guns (bang-bang !) doesn't think Hillary will be all that bad, just wait until she sends the Feds to your property for a weapons violation like at Ruby Ridge and Waco.
|
|
Mexico is very vigilant about enforcing it's own southern border.... Dusty, Virginia....do you know anything about M1's? |
|
|
It's the Spanish oligarchy that runs Mexico that is exporting their poor onto us. Mostly native peoples. It has to stop or we will become Mexico in every way. |
|
Aztecs ________________________________
Odd part. The Aztecs were killed off by Spain.
The horror I tell ya. But you never hear much talk about that.Many mexicans are NOT mexicans..IE Spain. |
|
|
And we won't have a problem. |
|
|
Aztecs, Incas and Mayans are native peoples of Mexico. Mexican citizens as well as Hondurans, Guatemalans, El Salvadorans, etc. do not have an unlimited right to "migrate" into our country. For that matter any foreign national from any country illegally in this country should be deported. 35,000 Chinese nationals have deportation orders and the Communist Chinese refuse to take them back. No other country puts up with this, why should we? |
|
Seems like we've got bigger problems when we've got an AG nominee who must call his prospective boss a war criminal before he can be confirmed. ______________________________________________ This such a bunch of nothing. All the Senate has to do is just write into law the water boarding is wrong and it stops.
But they don't wish to do that. They just want to complain and complain. The funny part. They wanted this AG.
|
|
Virginia Patriot wrote; -------------------- "I want to vote for a GOP candidate in Nov., but I won't endorse national suicide." --------------------
Virginia Patriot, in life, we RARELY are faced with a 'perfect' or 'ideal' choice. Few people enjoy the 'ideal' job, house, spouse, wardrobe, or dog. Thus, as clear thinking adults, we opt for the best available option.
When a person can't buy their ideal house, they don't say, "Ok, then I'd rather be...homeless !" Rather, they choose the best house they can get.
The same applies with presidential elections. Obviously, you're not satisfied with the GOP choices. Rudy Giuliani may not be the 'ideal' or 'perfect' candidate, but he is better than Hillary Clinton.
If you think that securing our southern border is bad under the Bush Administration, just wait until Hillary is in the White House. And just wait until Hillary is nominating left wing nuts from the 9TH Circuit Court of Appeals to the Supreme Court.
And if you want to know how the Clintons would respond to an Islamo-fascist attack against America, just look at their record during the 1990s when they did nothing in response to WTC 1993, the bombings of our embassies in Kenya & Tanzania, the bombing of the Khobar Towers, the bombing of the U.S.S. Cole...
But the Clintons did get tough with the real danger to America...little Elian Gonzales !
Virginia Patriot, if you sit on your hands on Election Day in November 2008 enabling Hillary to win, you'll be doing exactly what you accuse the Bush Administration of doing in regards to illegal immigration. |
|
|
My brother gives me the same arguments every time I see him. He's convinced electing Hillary would be the end of the world. I don't, I think it would be easier to stop Hillary from passing amnesty than Rudy. Also Bill Clinton's election paved the way for the GOP in '94 to take the House for the first time in 40 years. The RNC is committed to amnesty and SPP, which in my opinion is national suicide. I won't participate. |
|
I know what you mean: the lesser of two evils is still evil. I would venture to say, however, that it's at least worth considering that failing to vote for a candidate who is not perfect may result in the next president being someone who will certainly bring evil to bear....the nefarious Ms. Rodham. A vote for any GOP candidate is a vote AGAINST Hillary. Rudy may not be all that different on the face of it, but what kind of judges would he appoint, what party would the VP be (the tie-breaking vote), these are all things we must consider....the bigger picture.... There are a lot of other things riding on which party is in the White House... |
|
|
There was a period in there, but it could easily be overlooked, I should have structured it differently to be clearer. I wnt to vote for a GOP candidate in Nov., but I won't endorse national suicide. |
|
|
Apologies...I misread that as a list of people you would not vote for.... |
|
|
Review post at 1:44 p.m. I clearly stated I could vote for Romney, Thompson, Tancredo, Hunter or even Paul. They would uphold the laws. Rudy, Huckabee and McCain are on record supporting amnesty. Changing the laws to suit those breaking them is bad policy. One more amnesty and this will not be our country anymore. |
|
|
You keep thinking of those troops as Hillary or Bald Hillary gives the country away. I am thinking of America as I have always known her. You seem content to ignore the inundation from south of the border. Learn Spanish. |
|
I was a "troop" at one time, so I cringe in horror at the thought of Hillary as CinC. What a nightmare...! That's why I'm with you on that point: if Romney is the nominee, I will dimple my chad on his behalf without hesitation. Virginia and I part company there. However, I am in full agreement with him that the border and our national sovereignty are of paramount importance. That is why we have troops in the field in the first place.... |
|
Clinton's enforcement was inadequate, Bush's has been non-existent until recently. If Bush had secured the border on September 12, 2001 and actually enforced employer sanctions vigorously and consistently since then, we'd be talking about a much smaller problem and many more would be willing to listen to some kind of compromise. It is the complete lack of enforcement that has doubled this problem in the last six years that exposes the deceitful attempt at forcing us into another amnesty by flooding the country with illegal aliens. The cynical way we are told we will not get border security or enforcement until we give them amnesty and a guestworker program is sickening. We won't be fooled again. We remember 1986. No amnesty/regularization/guestworker until we see ACTUAL fences and ACTUAL enforcement. Let's try that for a few years, then we'll talk. |
|
The USO entertains troops instead of leading them as CinC. I don't donate to them at all because I never found them very useful when I was in the service.
But you keep thinking of yourself. The rest of us will remember the military in that voting booth. |
|
I give to the USO monthly, do you? If we don't elect a President who will secure the border and enforce the laws, we won't have a country to defend. |
|
Well I think Duncan is the cream of the crop, as well,but I know he won't get the nom. I haven't sent him money so I can kick myself if he doesn't! I know the frustration you feel about amnesty, believe me I've burned up the Capitol phone lines and written on RNC and Senatorial Rep donations cards about amnesty hundreds of times. I've told both groups NO MORE $ from me until you close the border!!!! Our beloved President Reagan (and yes I love him still) created this monster of a problem, with the first amnesty. Will you at least concede that it is not the total fault of W. and that you needed a super majority in both Houses to have ever got er' done??? He is not the dictator the Left proclaims and can't get it all himself? |
|
|
You know it! For the time being, I'll have to head out to the rifle range this weekend with my new Winchester Model 94, found one NIB on gunbroker even though they aren't made anymore. Always wanted a lever action. |
|
It really is too bad we didn't have Al Gore in the White House when the towers fell. Good thing you learned your lesson with W!
Why don't you try thinking about our troops in harm's way instead of yourself. Will more die with President Hillary or the Republican candidate?
I'm obviously not a big Mitt fan, but if he's the nominee I'm going to pull down that "R" lever so hard I'll break the voting machine. The troops are worth it. |
|
Hey Joe, you need to put the Romney quotes in red letters!
Outstanding take Joe. |
|
|
Republican distant third. I will not vote for ANY of the amnesty supporters, Rudy, Huckabee, McCain. Thompson, Romney, Hunter, Tancredo, and even Paul are possibilities for the general, but no votes for anyone unwilling to uphold the laws. I learned my lesson with W. |
|
Actually, I do read Patriot Post every day. It's where I go for fresh air after coming in here.... :-) Steele is an interesting thought. That hadn't occurred to me before. Guys like he and Santorum will have their day....and they will have been through the fire. Virginia Patriot is a fine guy, and if you want to hear something positive from him, wait until his brand new Sig Sauer P220 Super Match arrives....! (Or elect Duncan Hunter of course....) |
|
He IS working his plan pretty flawlessly. He has to run an intense Iowa and NH cmapaign and he's doing it as well as anyone could. Guiliani knows Romney is his problem, not Fred, Huck, or McCain.
So, laugh at Mitt all you want, he may surprise everyone. |
|
Don't know how you missed it, but here you go:
Securing the border and enforcing the law is the only way we get to keep our rule of law, our representative Republic, and our Constitution. We must elect a President who WILL secure the border and enforce the laws. If citizenship becomes meaningless, this will no longer be the United States of America.
If the GOP thinks they can continue to import cheap labor for their donors at the expense of the citizens, they will. I will not vote for that again. If we continue to play the game of "the other guy is worse", we will lose our country. Sorry, but I will not participate in that game any longer. The GOP power brokers think we will vote for "anybody but a Democrat" so they can continue to ignore securing the borders and enforcing the laws. I'm hoping GOP primary voters give the party elites some surprises in the primaries. The levers of power and the money in the GOP are all in the hands of the cheap labor express. They do not want Duncan Hunter as the candidate. He WOULD enforce the laws and secure the border. WE have to make him the nominee by voting in the primaries. We have to talk to our friends and neighbors about him. He is not going to get media coverage. It's going to have to be a grass roots effort. I WANT to vote for a GOP candidate in Nov.'08, I WILL NOT vote for any of the amnesty supporters. If it takes crushing the GOP so a new party representing American citizens can arise, so be it.
http://www.gohunter08.com |
|
Romney blasting Clinton and others is in the news all the time. He actually gets on Drudge quite regularly, and he has had some good zingers. Comparing Hillary to an intern was his lastest.
|
|
|
For me, It's all about the object of the mockery. I didn't see any mockery of God or his Word, just mockery of a few flawed human beings. And with that, I'll drop the issue as well. Thanks for your respectful input. |
|
The ironic thing about Joe mocking Mitt Romney is that whenever Dean Barnett or Hugh has poked fun of Joe's beloved idol Andrew Sullivan, Joe has rarely taken it in good stride. It normally has provoked Joe to post 15 responses in defense of Sullivan in the same thread.
In fact, I recall that Joe's multiple responses were what elicited Dean to institute the Barnett Rule of "no more than THREE posts in a row in the same thread by any one commenter."
Ha, ha, ha. |
|
Virginia Pat, WHO DO YOU SUPPORT, anyway? _____________________________________________
He's a Hunter supporter, which is fine with me, because I know Mr. Hunter and he's a good guy. But for what ever reason he just can't get any traction.
|
|
Amen to all of you! Joe, should not use the Word for his humor, better to toy and mock the demons, than the one who can send you there. I think Micael Steel would be a fabulous VP? What do the friends say? GOPAC.org And if any of you aren't getting The Federalist online.......it is an absolute MUST read,it's RIGHT and it''s FREE! http://patriotpost.us/subscribe/ Virginia Pat, WHO DO YOU SUPPORT, anyway? All you do is complain, I've never seen a positive out of your mouth? Are you really a Rep?
|
|
I don't think you read what Drew or I said at all....but I have no wish to continue discussing this.
For the record, I thought Life of Brian was hilarious..... |
|
that Mitt can win. I'm just not sure he's smart enough. He can't make a favorable "National" Headline. Every time Hillary, or Obama "Gaffs" Rudy is Right There. Poor Mitt is lost in who knows where.
He's GOTTA find a "TV" Guy. Time's getting short. |
|
You guys aren't big fans of "The Life of Brian," I'll take it?
I have great reverence for God, and nowhere are we commanded to be humorless. In fact, I think such an attitude drives many more away from the faith than towards it.
If Joe or I were in any way mocking God or Scripture, you would have a great point. But we're only mocking fallible humans and their propensity to place their faith in earthly powers rather than God Himself. And I will continue to mock that as long as I live. |
|
Perhaps God has not gifted you with the same reverence for the Word that many of us have.....
I am not a Romney supporter. I just don't care for the Word being used in this way.
If you are familiar with Scripture, you probably have read the part where it says some will be offended by things that others find perfectly fine. In that case, we are instructed not to offend.....
In Joe's case, I think we see the difference between a Christian and some guy who owns a Bible. |
|
|
I think the blasphemous part is not making light of the politician but by using the Word of God as fodder in order to make light of a politician. |
|
Can you clue me in on what exactly is blasphemous about Joe's post? Because even though I'm a knuckle-dragging, religious-right, born-again evangelical extremist, I just ain't seeing it.
Making light of a politician isn't blasphemous. Unless, of course, that politician is your god. |
|
I've never seen so many Libs freak out over a person (religion)
You guys forget JFK during the 1960's?
|
|
Securing the border and enforcing the law is the only way we get to keep our rule of law, our representative Republic, and our Constitution. We must elect a President who WILL secure the border and enforce the law. If citizenship becomes meaningless, this will no longer be the United States of America.
The so-called "top tier" will not get out the voters necessary for a GOP win. Increasing turnout is the key. Give people something to vote for. Not just the lesser of two evils. Won't work this time. People are fed up with the inundation of illegal aliens. They would come out in droves for the clear choice of D=amnesty or R=enforcement. They will stay home if they both equal amnesty.
There is a huge majority of American citizens waiting for someone to pledge to uphold the laws and secure the borders, let's not ignore them any more.
http://www.gohunter08.com
|
|
There are millions of us who usually vote GOP who WILL NOT vote for Rudy, for a variety of reasons. For me it's the amnesty issue, for others it's life, still others, homosexuality or gun rights. Whatever the issue is, it is a bright line we will not cross. No amount of Hillaryscare, intimidation, name-calling or cajoling will get us to vote for Rudy. He's in the wrong party. Rudy supporters are like someone holding a gun to his own head and threatening to blow his brains out unless we do what they say. Well, go ahead. Don't blame us, we tried to warn you. Giving the finger to half of your voters is not a winning strategy. You will need a lot of Dems to switch sides to make up for those of us who consider Rudy a liberal too far. |
|
I approved this message:
I am an Iowan, who likes in equal measures Rudy G., Mitt R., Fred T., Duncan H. and John M.
I will vote in the caucus for whichever of them, come January, who is the most conservative with the best chance of winning.
In the event the PaulBots stage a coups d'etat, and secure the nomination of Ron Paul for the G.O.P., I will be asking Alec Baldwin if he has room at his chateau. Not really, but I it would be a tough choice between the Broom Pilot in Chief and The Flying Saucer pilot.
Do you think on the basis of their mutual interest in UFOs that the Paulistinians might clamor for a joint ticket with retarded runt of Cuyahoga County, Dennis Kucinich?
That would be terribly rich.... |
|
would have been President.
Romney is an unknown in some states compared to Rudy, McCain or Thompson. Once he gets the national exposure, he will move up in the polls
I will make a prediction - a Republican nominee that is strong on immigration will win California - we deposed a Governor largely because he was going to give Licenses to illegals - we will depose this Governor if he does the same - and we will not elect a President that even hints he or she will not enforce immigration law. Hillary will see that incredible waffle of hers played over and over again and it will have more impact than any Swift Boat add. |
|
Where's Ray when we need him? (Is everybody here aware that Mitt is an evil Mormon cultist?)
Relevant substance, please!
Something needs to be said here about Joe Smith, magic underwear, being gods of our own planets, Mitt's sinlessness, etc.
Then this thread would be perfect.
But, alas, I lack Ray's eloquence. |
|
|
love the comment. it's always nice to start the day with a laugh. are your sarcasm is way more sincere than hugh's "objectivity." |
|
Yesterday, you were referring to someone as "the Big Mick." Today, you are as blasphemous as it gets. You must be looking for "the line." Well....it's behind you my friend.
|
|
Halfway through the "Classic" letter, I planned to post about a woman touching Mitt's garment to be healed. You beat me to the concept! Hilarious!
And JTB, what on earth is "blasphemous" about having a sense of humor?
Anyway, here goes:
And Mitt, immediately knowing in himself that virtue had gone out of him, turned him about in the press, and said, "Who touched my suit?"
And his campaign advisers said unto him, Thou seest the multitude thronging thee, and sayest thou, Who touched me?
And he looked round about to see her that had done this thing.
But the woman fearing and trembling, knowing what was done in her, came and fell down before him, and told him all the truth.
And he said unto her, voter, thy faith hath made thee whole; go in peace, and remember me at Caucus time.
Jon, http://www.exurbanleague.com |
|
thought of Rudy spanking her ample butt to blisters.I completely believe he's got no reservations about aggressivness on her.I HATE debates,but think they might be wonderful with Rudy going gangland prosecutor on her...And,still not letting her retreat to 'victim of boys'.
I worry,to myself,about Rudy's 'Presidential Temperment'(It just might be possible that he's Batsh!!t Nuts...)and his less than sterling past personal behavior. |
|
Uh, yeah, hi. I have this friend, and my friend is a big Romney booster, and suddenly he realized he has a major man crush on Mitt. But there’s not anything gay about it, right?
So this is normal, okay? It’s just that Mitt’s so tall, and distinguished, and he fixed the Olympics, and there’s not anything gay about sports.
So my friend’s not secretly gay where even he doesn’t even it or anything, is he? |
|
|
Well, here we go again. The real question is, if the Dems nominate the Hildabeast, can Mitt beat her? So far, no polls show that in almost any state. So if Hugh will show us that Mitt can actually win, I will drop my support of Rudy. I will salivate at a Romney win. But, I would do the same if Fred could win. So far, the only guy that can actually win , polling included, is Rudy. So I think I will stick to Rudy and watch him destroy Her Highness. |
|
|
we believe you pal "classic"...yes..your "pal" |
|
I'm a Rudy guy.But,more & more watching Mitt for various reasons.One is his Vast Competence.Two is his always Steady Temperment.Three is his Total Lack of Smarmyness in his BG,combined with Moral Clarity & Character.Four is his Proven Leadership Ability.Five is his Organization.Six is my growing belief that he can beat the petticoats off Her Ladyship.
Two things my jury is still out on: 1.)Is he an aggressive snappin' turtle on the War with Radical Islam-Iraq??This need outweighs everything else for me. 2.)Is he willing to spank the living snot out of Lady MacClinton??I KNOW where Rudy is on both points.AFFIRMATIVE. |
|
|
Don't forget to tell the story of Hugh the Baptist! |
|
Mitt's biggest detraction from my perspective is that he is neither firm in his stance on abortion, amnesty, nor religion.
I don't want a candidate who is willing to go to church on Sunday (or whatever Mormons do) and then on Monday be a different person.
I also don't want a candidate who wants to be Commander in Chief without having served. And in Romney's case, military service is apparently beneath the dignity of all 5 sons as well...
America needs a leader who represents our values. If Romney is that person, may the Lord have mercy on us. |
|
As Mitt Romney went along, he saw a man blind from birth. His campaign workers asked him, "Governor Romney, who sinned, this man or his parents, that he was born blind?"
"Neither this man nor his parents sinned," said Governor Romney, "but this happened so that the work of Romney Healthcare might be displayed in his life. As long as it is day, we must do the work of him who sent me. Night is coming, when no one can work. While I am in the world, I am the light of the world."
Having said this, Mitt spit on the ground, made some mud with the saliva, and put it on the man's eyes. "Go," he told him, "wash in the Pool of Siloam" (this word means Sent). So the man went and washed, and came home seeing.
His neighbors and those who had formerly seen him begging asked, "Isn't this the same man who used to sit and beg?" Some claimed that he was. Others said, "No, he only looks like him." But he himself insisted, "I am the man."
"How then were your eyes opened?" they demanded.
He replied, "The man they call Mitt Romney made some mud and put it on my eyes. He told me to go to Siloam and wash. So I went and washed, and then I could see."
"Where is this man?" they asked him. "He is in Iowa and next week in New Hampshire," he said.
|
|
The one thing that the polls (especially the national polls) do not reflect is the Romney organization ability.
It is one thing to have potential voters report a preference in a poll, it is a very different thing to measure the actual commitment that will drive individual voters to vote in adverse weather.
In close races I would not bet against Romney's GOTV. |
|
|
|