Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons

Townhall.com The Blogspot for Political, Conservative and Republican Blogs and Bloggers


Friday, May 11, 2007
Murtha Supports Secret Earmarks
Posted by: John Campbell at 4:25 PM

Last night (or actually about 1:45AM this morning), the House passed a bill to fund our intelligence operations (CIA, NSA etc.). Disturbingly, several earmarks were slipped into this important national security legislation without the knowledge to most members until the very last moment. Altogether, 26 unclassified earmarks were included totaling around $97 million.

The largest beneficiary of these secret earmarks was none other than Rep. John Murtha (D-PA). One of his earmarks directs $23 million to a drug intelligence center in his hometown of Johnstown, Pennsylvania. He got this pork for his district even though both the Government Reform Committee and GAO have criticized the center for being an unnecessary use of taxpayer dollars. The center’s remote location and the fact that there are 19 other operations just like it have caused these oversight panels to publicly oppose its continued operation. Even drug enforcement officials have been quoted as saying the center is basically “a jobs program that Mr. Murtha wanted for his district.”

Three times yesterday, motions were made to take the House into secret session so that we could discuss any such earmarks and whether they have legitimate merit or are just pork. Three times on near party-line votes, these motions were defeated. Also, an amendment was offered to strip just the Murtha earmark and use the money for more human intelligence resources. That too was defeated. Why? Did the Democrat's not want to open up their earmarks for disclosure even to the rest of us in Congress? How much money will not be spent on real intelligence efforts because of secret earmarks? I guess Rep. Murtha and the Democrat's feel bringing home the bacon is more important than prioritizing and properly using our national security funding.

It was not too long ago, just last November to be exact, that Nancy Pelosi promised to "crack down on earmarking” and decried the “special interest earmarks that are the ones that go in there in the dark of night that they don’t want anybody to see…”
 
Well my friends what's worse than hypocrisy? Hypocrisy that threatens peoples safety and security.





Your Blog Postings:
Last updated 29 Minutes 20 Seconds Ago
Last updated 53 Minutes 56 Seconds Ago
Last updated 58 Minutes 20 Seconds Ago
Last updated 1 Hours 4 Minutes 55 Seconds Ago
Last updated 1 Hours 28 Minutes 38 Seconds Ago
 

Archives of our Conservative, Republican, Political Blogs

Blog Search



Townhall Conservative, Republican, Political Blogs Townhall Blogs
Townhall Conservative, Republican, Political Columns Columns
Your Townhall Conservative, Republican, Political Blogs Your Blogs
By Month
 November 2009
 October 2009
 September 2009
 August 2009
 July 2009
 June 2009
 May 2009
 April 2009
 March 2009
 February 2009
 January 2009
 December 2008
 November 2008
 October 2008
 September 2008
 August 2008
 July 2008
 June 2008
By Issue
 A Culture of Life
 Budget & Government
 Campaigns & Elections
 Education
 Energy & Environment
 Faith & Family
 Foreign Affairs
 Health Care
 Immigration
 Jobs & Economy
 Judges & Courts
 Media & Culture
 Property Rights
 Safety & Security
 Science & Technology
 Second Amendment
 Social Security
 Tax Relief
Advertisement

Comments Comments

Flunck 12:15 PM...I rest my case...
 Re: Here Comes the Judge?
  By clarityseeker
Timeline for Eugene 4
 Re: Here Comes the Judge?
  By Jo
Timeline for Eugene 3
 Re: Here Comes the Judge?
  By Jo
Timeline for Eugene 2
 Re: Here Comes the Judge?
  By Jo
Christmas is a secular holiday
 Re: Christmas Outlawed
  By Lonny
Timeline for Eugene 1
 Re: Here Comes the Judge?
  By Jo
dreadnut
 Re: Twenty lessons your teenage daughter will learn from the Twilight movies
  By Lonny
To Jo about Phil Jones
 Re: Weather Channel Founder & 30,000 Other Scientists Want to Sue Al Gore for Global Warming Fraud
  By Adam
NeoConScum
 Re: ACORN and "Journalistic Standards"
  By Seadog
no doubt that Reeps
 Re: Shocker: Palin #1
  By Patriotic Liberal
corporations get welfare of all kinds
 Re: NYT: Being On Food Stamps No Longer Carries A Stigma
  By Lonny
Eugene
 Re: Here Comes the Judge?
  By Jo
deadnuts writes
 Re: Twenty lessons your teenage daughter will learn from the Twilight movies
  By MellorSJ2
clarityseeker 12:06 PM
 Re: Here Comes the Judge?
  By Bob Munck
mike
 Re: Christmas Outlawed
  By Patriotic Liberal
Jo, Read the whole story
 Re: Weather Channel Founder & 30,000 Other Scientists Want to Sue Al Gore for Global Warming Fraud
  By Adam
Jo
 Re: Here Comes the Judge?
  By clarityseeker
clam up, grace
 Re: Shocker: Palin #1
  By dreadnaught
Oh, Invisible Sky Pixie, hear my prayer
 Re: Twenty lessons your teenage daughter will learn from the Twilight movies
  By Careful with that axe, Eugene
Jillian Bandes 11:01 AM
 Re: NYT: Being On Food Stamps No Longer Carries A Stigma
  By Bob Munck

The Latest on Town HallThe Latest on Town Hall


Blog Roll Blog Roll