You haven't heard, obviously, that we've WON in Iraq. NOT that you care. And NOT that you're at all relieved and proud that our warriors WON. And NOT that you've heard, because you NEVER EVER dig the shiite outta your vapid ears long enough to let the unaccustomed TORTURE of critical thought reach that little turd at the end of your flabby spinal columns.
Yep, Y'all, fewer Americans have been killed in the place that the gallant, classy Obama refuses to mention--IRAQ--than in his town of Chicago.
Yep, that's some quagmire, you sewer dwelling, America loathing, Butcher supporting Crybabies. |
|
Andrew Sullivan has been very good on Iran over the past week. But he has suggested that some "bad Neocons" want Ahmadinejad to win. Who would that be? I would like to know so I can deounce them too Andrew. A completely unsubstantiated slur.
So far, the only public figure calling for that is George Galloway and last time I checked he is not a neocon.
And Andrew argues that the US has to stay out of this, so as not to delegitimize the opposition as American stooges. This seems more like Gunga Andrew carrying Obama's water. While I agree President Obama has to be very careful in what he says, saying nothing is a message too. You can promote democracy, reform, and non violence in a more forceful way than Obama has done. The Europeans and Canada are speaking out. The US should speak out too.
This is not about backing winners and losers. This is about right and wrong. It is called, being on the right side of history.
|
|
|
As if this moronic coward Hitchens could be more discredited for the ongoing misery and chaos he cheered on for Iraq.I wake up so proud every day of all religious freedom and "women's liberation" our trillion dollar ongoing ENDLESS bloody quagmire has brought to Iraq.Been in Iraq since 2003...need another twenty ...thirty years!!! Want to talk about Afghanistan now or do we defer that bloody quagmire of "nation-building" Obama-style until we shove Karzai down Afghanistan's throat while the mullahs push Admadinijad down Iran's.Here's my friendly advice to idiots like Hitchens that are worried about "sexually repressed" mobs in Iran: come up with a plan that will not COMPLETELY BACKFIRE,costing this bankrupt country trillions of borrowed dollars and tens of thousands of more dead and maimed soldiers...and will last less than one hundred years to accomplish. |
|
|
|
"But these people, of course as with the North Koreans, these regimes exist in theory only at our pleasure"
Did I read that right? God obviously haven't received the memo that the USA is the ruler of all regimes. WOW!
And Obama is accused of having a 'big' ego? |
|
When the President spoke in Cairo, invoking overthrown Iranian Prime Minister, the pajama wearing Mossadegh, (Old Mossy), he telegraphed his weakest punch to the current Iranian regime.
Obama sent out the clear signal that he is more concerned with the Anglo/American yesterdays, that existed in the wake of W.W. II, then he is with Iran today.
Penitent be damned.
Hitchens does remind us, (as if we need it,) that the Iranian Revolution and its touchstones in Qom, are thirty plus years old. It may be an irony that Iran has spent more time under the Mullahs, then it did under the Shah, following the overthrow of Mossadegh.
Imagine if the Nazi beast had institutionalized itself beyond Hitler and had governed for thirty years.
Obama is the wrong elected leader to challenge and demand the head of the Iranian Revolutionary beast. His entire raison d’être, his philosophical political predicate is Chamberlin before it ever could be or become Thatcher.
In Buchner's Danton's Death, the writer reminds the reader, that "the revolution, like Saturn devours its own."
Only the Iranian people can stop the carnivores of Qom and the necrotic feasts they have set over thirty years.
Forget Obama.
|
|
|
|