Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons

Townhall.com The Blogspot for Political, Conservative and Republican Blogs and Bloggers


Wednesday, June 11, 2008
"Don't Touch Our Reserves!"
Posted by: Michele Bachmann at 3:54 PM

A crucial energy vote took place today in the Appropriations Committee to address America's energy concerns. Rep John Peterson, (R-PA) attempted to amend a provision in the Fiscal Year 2009 Interior spending bill that has prevented American consumers from accessing America’s abundant deep-sea energy reserves for nearly 30 years.

It should be noted that the federal Minerals Management Service estimates that there are 86 billion barrels of oil and 420 trillion cubic feet of natural gas locked up along our nation’s outer continental shelf. The Peterson amendment would modify sections 104 and 105 of the Interior spending bill, specifically targeting abundant energy reserves residing beyond 50 miles from shore

But given the chance today to at least get the ball rolling on addressing our nation's energy concerns, Democrats stonewalled Peterson's amendment and it failed by a party line vote of 6-9.

Every Democrat member of the committee voted against it:

Norman Dicks (Wash.), James Moran (Va.), Maurice Hinchey (N.Y.), John Olver (Mass.), Tom Udall (N.M.), Ben Chandler (Ky.), Ed Pastor (Ariz.), Dave Obey (Wisc. – ex officio), and Alan Mollohan (W.Va.).


There's no silver bullet to lowering the cost of gasoline and no one solution will affect change overnight.  That's why it's even more important to pass and pursue methods like the ones the Democrats just voted down. It'd be one thing if the Democrats had an alternative plan of their own, but to just flat out reject a measure that could eventually help lower the cost of energy is just flat out insulting.



View in ascending order View in descending order
Buzzard writes: Thursday, June, 12, 2008 4:42 PM
Stupid is as stupid does!
The demoncrats want to see america fail. I have no idea where they plan on living afterwords!
RodT writes: Thursday, June, 12, 2008 11:49 AM
You wanted change.
Remember the election in 2006?
Thought you might like to read the following……
A little over one year ago:
1) Consumer confidence stood at a 2 1/2 year high;
2) Regular gasoline sold for $2.19 a gallon;
3) The unemployment rate was 4.5%.

Since voting in a Democratically controlled Congress in 2006 we have seen:
1) Consumer confidence plummet;
2) The cost of regular gasoline soar to over $3.50 a gallon;
3) Unemployment is up to 5% (a 10% increase);
4) American households have seen $2.3 trillion in equity value evaporate (stock and mutual fund losses);
5) Americans have seen their home equity drop by $1.2 trillion dollars;
6) 1% of American homes are in foreclosure.

America voted for 'change' in 2006, and we got it!

Remember, it's Congress that makes the law…not the President. He has to work with what's handed him.
Quote of the Day: 'My friends, we live in the greatest nation in the history of the world. I hope you'll join with me as we try to change it.' — Barack Obama
J. Ewing writes: Thursday, June, 12, 2008 10:20 AM
Alternatives
It is bad enough that they have no alternative, but they don't even have a REASON! Apparently, there has been no significant environmental damage to coastal drilling, and there have been significant environmental gains in fisheries and in biodiversity.

Obviously, the only thing that will change Democrat positions is if they are forced to pay a very high price for their obstinate stupidity on the energy issue. It will grab their attention sort of like the price of gasoline the rest of us are paying.
Sign Up to Post Your Comments Sign Up to Post Your Comments
Please take a few seconds to sign up, then you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, create your own blog and more! If you are already registered, click here.
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.
 


Your Blog Postings:
Last updated 13 Minutes 19 Seconds Ago
Last updated 14 Minutes 25 Seconds Ago
Last updated 34 Minutes 50 Seconds Ago
Last updated 34 Minutes 54 Seconds Ago
Last updated 38 Minutes 47 Seconds Ago
 

Archives of our Conservative, Republican, Political Blogs

Blog Search



Townhall Conservative, Republican, Political Blogs Townhall Blogs
Townhall Conservative, Republican, Political Columns Columns
Your Townhall Conservative, Republican, Political Blogs Your Blogs
By Month
 November 2009
 October 2009
 September 2009
 August 2009
 July 2009
 June 2009
 May 2009
 April 2009
 March 2009
 February 2009
 January 2009
 December 2008
 November 2008
 October 2008
 September 2008
 August 2008
 July 2008
 June 2008
By Issue
 A Culture of Life
 Budget & Government
 Campaigns & Elections
 Education
 Energy & Environment
 Faith & Family
 Foreign Affairs
 Health Care
 Immigration
 Jobs & Economy
 Judges & Courts
 Media & Culture
 Property Rights
 Safety & Security
 Science & Technology
 Second Amendment
 Social Security
 Tax Relief
Advertisement

Comments Comments

Seadog 5:24
 Re: 'This isn't the Britain we fought for,' say the 'unknown warriors' of WWII
  By Tea Party
Any Brit who fought in WW2 is an old
 Re: 'This isn't the Britain we fought for,' say the 'unknown warriors' of WWII
  By Lonny
Vamp
 Re: Shocker: Palin #1
  By Riders on the Storm
Food stamps for drugs.
 Re: NYT: Being On Food Stamps No Longer Carries A Stigma
  By sloandog
A very good friend of ours,
 Re: 'This isn't the Britain we fought for,' say the 'unknown warriors' of WWII
  By Riders on the Storm
Right axe
 Re: 'This isn't the Britain we fought for,' say the 'unknown warriors' of WWII
  By sloandog
Mike
 Re: Only Global Warming Critics Can Save Climategate Scientists
  By NOTW
For some of us it still is a stigma
 Re: NYT: Being On Food Stamps No Longer Carries A Stigma
  By Riders on the Storm
Molotov
 Re: Only Global Warming Critics Can Save Climategate Scientists
  By JPK
You Know Things Are Bad
 Re: 'This isn't the Britain we fought for,' say the 'unknown warriors' of WWII
  By JPK
Plan B
 Re: And the Countdown Continues
  By FinalRac
Axe's nonsense multiplied ten fold:
 Re: This Day in American History...
  By homer noble
careful
 Re: Twenty lessons your teenage daughter will learn from the Twilight movies
  By mike
Jo
 Re: 'This isn't the Britain we fought for,' say the 'unknown warriors' of WWII
  By Careful with that axe, Eugene
Neo
 Re: And the Countdown Continues
  By Careful with that axe, Eugene
grace
 Re: Shocker: Palin #1
  By mike
mikey
 Re: Twenty lessons your teenage daughter will learn from the Twilight movies
  By Careful with that axe, Eugene
Jo
 Re: This Day in American History...
  By Careful with that axe, Eugene
Coming to theater near you!
 Re: 'This isn't the Britain we fought for,' say the 'unknown warriors' of WWII
  By sloandog
The Iranians *will* have nukes, Carol.
 Re: And the Countdown Continues
  By Cicero

The Latest on Town HallThe Latest on Town Hall


Blog Roll Blog Roll