Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons

Townhall.com The Blogspot for Political, Conservative and Republican Blogs and Bloggers


Wednesday, June 11, 2008
"Don't Touch Our Reserves!"
Posted by: Michele Bachmann at 3:54 PM

A crucial energy vote took place today in the Appropriations Committee to address America's energy concerns. Rep John Peterson, (R-PA) attempted to amend a provision in the Fiscal Year 2009 Interior spending bill that has prevented American consumers from accessing America’s abundant deep-sea energy reserves for nearly 30 years.

It should be noted that the federal Minerals Management Service estimates that there are 86 billion barrels of oil and 420 trillion cubic feet of natural gas locked up along our nation’s outer continental shelf. The Peterson amendment would modify sections 104 and 105 of the Interior spending bill, specifically targeting abundant energy reserves residing beyond 50 miles from shore

But given the chance today to at least get the ball rolling on addressing our nation's energy concerns, Democrats stonewalled Peterson's amendment and it failed by a party line vote of 6-9.

Every Democrat member of the committee voted against it:

Norman Dicks (Wash.), James Moran (Va.), Maurice Hinchey (N.Y.), John Olver (Mass.), Tom Udall (N.M.), Ben Chandler (Ky.), Ed Pastor (Ariz.), Dave Obey (Wisc. – ex officio), and Alan Mollohan (W.Va.).


There's no silver bullet to lowering the cost of gasoline and no one solution will affect change overnight.  That's why it's even more important to pass and pursue methods like the ones the Democrats just voted down. It'd be one thing if the Democrats had an alternative plan of their own, but to just flat out reject a measure that could eventually help lower the cost of energy is just flat out insulting.





Your Blog Postings:
Last updated 15 Minutes 6 Seconds Ago
Last updated 40 Minutes 11 Seconds Ago
Last updated 40 Minutes 28 Seconds Ago
Last updated 40 Minutes 43 Seconds Ago
Last updated 41 Minutes 7 Seconds Ago
 

Archives of our Conservative, Republican, Political Blogs

Blog Search



Townhall Conservative, Republican, Political Blogs Townhall Blogs
Townhall Conservative, Republican, Political Columns Columns
Your Townhall Conservative, Republican, Political Blogs Your Blogs
By Month
 November 2009
 October 2009
 September 2009
 August 2009
 July 2009
 June 2009
 May 2009
 April 2009
 March 2009
 February 2009
 January 2009
 December 2008
 November 2008
 October 2008
 September 2008
 August 2008
 July 2008
 June 2008
By Issue
 A Culture of Life
 Budget & Government
 Campaigns & Elections
 Education
 Energy & Environment
 Faith & Family
 Foreign Affairs
 Health Care
 Immigration
 Jobs & Economy
 Judges & Courts
 Media & Culture
 Property Rights
 Safety & Security
 Science & Technology
 Second Amendment
 Social Security
 Tax Relief
Advertisement

Comments Comments

NOTW 8:13 PM
 Re: Bush: "I Went Against My Free-Market Instincts"; Beware of This "Temptation"
  By Bob Munck
I wonder...
 Re: Shouldn't It Be 14 Counts?
  By Meredith
Meredith,
 Re: Shouldn't It Be 14 Counts?
  By Tazzmax
"sceptyczny" is "kaboom"
 Re: Shouldn't It Be 14 Counts?
  By cottoneyed
shot
 Re: Big John Gets the H1N1 Vaccination
  By LaVerne
twomay
 Re: Re: Beck Has No Sympathy for Carrie Prejean
  By Crispian
Yeah,
 Re: Shouldn't It Be 14 Counts?
  By Tazzmax
Baradiel
 Re: Shouldn't It Be 14 Counts?
  By NOTW
Dhimmis and sky pixies,
 Re: Shouldn't It Be 14 Counts?
  By cottoneyed
Axeman
 Re: Shouldn't It Be 14 Counts?
  By NOTW
Munck
 Re: Shouldn't It Be 14 Counts?
  By NOTW
Careful Nazi
 Re: Shouldn't It Be 14 Counts?
  By Baradiel
Scept, and Baradull
 Re: Shouldn't It Be 14 Counts?
  By Careful with that axe, Eugene
Munck?
 Re: Bush: "I Went Against My Free-Market Instincts"; Beware of This "Temptation"
  By NOTW
"Obama and his cronies don't view"
 Re: Shouldn't It Be 14 Counts?
  By moderateGuy
David
 Re: Prejean Slams Olbermann, Says Liberal Media "Palinized" Her & Talks About The "Sex Tape"
  By Careful with that axe, Eugene
Crispian
 Re: Re: Beck Has No Sympathy for Carrie Prejean
  By twomay
sceptyczny
 Re: Shouldn't It Be 14 Counts?
  By Baradiel
You know Bambooddle has a problem
 Re: TX Governor: Obama Taking US Toward Socialism
  By moderateGuy
Baradull
 Re: Bush: "I Went Against My Free-Market Instincts"; Beware of This "Temptation"
  By Careful with that axe, Eugene

The Latest on Town HallThe Latest on Town Hall


Blog Roll Blog Roll