Townhall.com The Blogspot for Political, Conservative and Republican Blogs and Bloggers

Friday, January 09, 2009

Trial Lawyers Win Big

Posted by: Michele Bachmann at 4:18 PM

Today, the House passed the Ledbetter Fair Pay Act and the Paycheck Fairness Act at the urging of its Democrat leadership. While these bills sound well and good by name alone, the fact of the matter is that they do nothing for the struggling American worker and go a long way in lining the pockets of a key political ally of the House majority– trial lawyers.

The truth of the matter is that there are effective and sufficient payment discrimination laws already on the books. These bills simply make it easier to file lawsuits – whether they’re frivolous or well-founded. And, it makes it harder for employers to defend themselves.

The Ledbetter Fair Pay Act eliminates the statute of limitations on pay-discrimination claims currently set in place by a U.S. Supreme Court ruling. As a result, the number of frivolous pay-discrimination claims in future years is likely to skyrocket since older claims are more subject to faded memories, missing documents, unfound witnesses, and businesses that have changed hands or no longer exist.

The Paycheck Fairness Act expands the Equal Pay Act to provide for unlimited punitive and compensatory damages to a successful plaintiff. Worst of all, it moves the burden of proof to the employer. Instead of the employee having to prove they were discriminated against, they simply will be able to make the allegation and the employer has to prove that they acted out of “business necessity.” Furthermore, the employer defense would be negated if an employee could show that another employment practice could have yielded a non-pay-differential result. This removes key business decisions from employers and gives them to a judge and jury.

But that’s not all. The true intent of the bill – to generate more lawsuits and line the pockets of trial lawyers – is made most clear in its provisions expanding class action lawsuits. These provisions are plainly designed to ensure that plaintiffs’ lawyers get the “most bang for their buck” in bringing class-action lawsuits rather than protecting the paychecks of American workers.

And the only Republican amendment allowed to be offered by the Democrat majority – a commonsense amendment that would have capped attorney’s fees at $2000 an hour in cases brought under the Paycheck Fairness Act – was rejected on a nearly party-line vote.

It's a shame that the Democrat majority found it more worthwhile to protect their political allies than the American worker desperately depending on job growth. Instead of fostering a business environment where jobs can flourish, these bills severely hamper the ability of American business to increase our nation's prosperity.

(10) |

(0)

View in ascending order

View in descending order

CaptainSpaulding writes:	Monday, April, 06, 2009 9:56 PM
Class Action Lawsuits
The concept of class-action lawsuits is often misunderstood. Here is a good explanation: http://injurylawyersarasota.com/classActions.htm I think that this is a good explanation. A lot of times, people are injured in small ways by others more powerful than themselves. Check it out.
Email It \| Print It \| Flag as Offensive

Monkeywrench writes:	Monday, January, 12, 2009 9:07 PM
Only thing offensive here is Bachmann
And Lerxst.
Email It \| Print It \| Flag as Offensive

Lerxst writes:	Saturday, January, 10, 2009 1:22 PM
Monkeywrench
Get booted again for too many offensive comments?
Email It \| Print It \| Flag as Offensive

Monkeywrench writes:	Saturday, January, 10, 2009 1:05 PM
Of course Bachmann opposes pay equity
Her own family's business doesn't even provide health insurance for its 4o some employees. And it's a mental health clinic! And what would Bachmann know about private sector discrimination anyway? She's never had anything but a government job. Michele Bachmann is the biggest fraud to ever disgrace the halls of Congress.
Email It \| Print It \| Flag as Offensive

james beam writes:	Saturday, January, 10, 2009 12:17 PM
lola
Lilly could have looked for a job that paid her what she was worth .She should have moved on. the company she worked for , would have suffered the loss of a capable employee and another company would have gained a valued asset. this is the best solution let the market set the value .As an employer ,it is very difficult to find good employees and we compensate them accordingly.
Email It \| Print It \| Flag as Offensive

foxmustang writes:	Saturday, January, 10, 2009 11:41 AM
Lola Lewinsky
Please return to your gingerbread house...... Hansel & Gretel are on the way......
Email It \| Print It \| Flag as Offensive

foxmustang writes:	Friday, January, 09, 2009 9:31 PM
Yep
Lola...Lola...Lola = blah...blah...blah
Email It \| Print It \| Flag as Offensive

Please take a few seconds to sign up, then you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, create your own blog and more! If you are already registered, click here.

Townhall.com The Blogspot for Political, Conservative and Republican Blogs and Bloggers

Townhall Blog, Breaking News & Commentary from the Townhall Crew

Archives of our Conservative, Republican, Political Blogs

Comments Comments

The Latest on Town HallThe Latest on Town Hall

Blog Roll Blog Roll