I've only seen bits and pieces...is there somewhere to view it in its entirety???
thanks |
|
|
so why did so many sheeple believe they were making histoy by electing a "BLACK" man as President when he is ONLY HALF BLACK? |
|
Thank God for people with a voice like Rush, Hannity, Savage, Beck, Levin, Coulture, Ingraham,etc. We need them, and we need them now more than ever. Of course, the opposition can't take the so-called abuse from the Republicans, so now they feel they have to re-install the Fairness Doctrine(what's so fair about it?) What a name for silencing those who really care about us Americans in this country who have been working hard all our lives to have what we do.
The new WTO wants to break all that down now, and all the work done by presidents before them.
They will call us dissidents now, and do more than that. How about a chip in your license?
Would any of us like that infringement? It's in the works. And more down the road.
We have to keep those letters and emails to our Senators and Congressmen(women)going to them every day and phone calls and text messaging(the latest to get to them Now). Emails, yes, they delete, that's why I send letters and also faxing is great too(right to them on their desks). Do what ever you can and stand up for your freedoms so well fought by our forefathers,
and the preservation of our Constitution as we know it now(not as Pres. Obama wants to see it as he goes along with his socialist agenda and nanny state, welfare state, call it whatever you want. It's just one big handout to the non-achievers and those that do not have any work ethic at all, and that is why they voted for him and agreed with his campaign promises to give and give and give. So now you have the bailouts, one and two and three. How many more, Mr. President? My congrats go out to Mr. Santelli for speaking his mind at his job site. Well Done!!
|
|
|
SO how did OBAMA become the first black potentate wherupon his mother is white. SO is he black or is he white. |
|
|
And by the way, I thought Rush gave a very enlightening speech, as usual, but wonder why a radio host would get more time than a sitting office holder, or former office holder. I realize he was the key note speaker, but after all it is the elected officials in the party who actually help to make policy for the nation. And Romney, Huckabee and the rest all made good points, added some much needed levity in such a stressful time, and made for a very entertaining and sobering event which I wish all Conservatives had been able to attend in person. for the Conservatives who believe the GOP is falling apart at the seams I'd like to say... maybe if you'd get behind it and give it some support instead of pissing and moaning about it, we could strengthen it again and run the Demomcrat rats out once and for all. |
|
|
And by the way, I thought Rush gave a very enlightening speech, as usual, but wonder why a radio host would get more time than a sitting office holder, or former office holder. I realize he was the key note speaker, but after all it is the elected officials in the party who actually help to make policy for the nation. And Romney, Huckabee and the rest all made good points, added some much needed levity in such a stressful time, and made for a very entertaining and sobering event which I wish all Conservatives had been able to attend in person. for the Conservatives who believe the GOP is falling apart at the seams I'd like to say... maybe if you'd get behind it and give it some support instead of pissing and moaning about it, we could strengthen it again and run the Demomcrat |
|
Part 1
speeches at CPAC, so why are there so many posts on here about what Obama is doing, will do, etc.? I don't want to see or hear the man, or his name anymore than I absolutely have to, especially when we are supposed to be discussing what we thought of our Conservative representatives and what they had to say at CPAC.
A poster above said we should turn off Fox because it was nothing Obama 24-7 and I agree. He may be the president of some people, but I will never accept him as mine, and those of us who feel that way do not apprecaite having him and his Socialist agenda crammed down our throats even on so-called Conservative sites, TV news programs and Conservative events.
As far as the Left Wing Liberal, Messiah worshipping loons who come on here singing his praises and dissing our Conservative leaders, I think we should all have the courage and sensibility to ignore their posts as if they carried the bubonic plague. Perhaps then they would go away. If we allow them contnue riling us, they win, just as Obama said..."I win." Please don't give them the satisfaccction of arguing with them, as their diatribe is nothing more than filthy gutter mentality ignorance, and should not be given any credence whatsoever.
rats out once and for all. |
|
Raelei writes:
. . . but who here remembers the Bush administration getting hammered with virulent negativity in such great numbers in his first days, weeks, months, YEARS, of office? Be honest, please.
From the Huffington Post on inauguration day 2009: Remember now, Raelei?
Eight years ago, the country was experiencing an entirely different sort of Inauguration Day. On January 20, 2001, people were outraged that George W. Bush had stolen the 2000 election. The largest number of protesters since the Nixon era came to Washington, D.C. and staged a counter-Inaugural, vowing to resist the fraudulent Bush Administration. |
|
"Don't waste thoughtful dialogue on them"
What? Thoughtful dialogue like this...
"You had the King Of The GOP, Thunderbutt du Gasbag and his Mini Me, Master Bates (of "The TOY" fame) Krohn, "nuke Chicago" Bolton and Barely Literate Joe the make-believe Plumber. Who was missing? OH YEAH - Piyush!"
Yeah, really thoughful. You call a string of insulting and childish names thoughtful dialogue?
So, if it's waste of time why do you continue to come here day afetr day under more than one name and post your vile garbage. Thoughtful debate might have gained some traction but under one name you just spew bile and under the other you just vomit lies.
Funny how you AND Raelei are both absent from your seminar blogging duties all day and suddenly you both show up late at night within 3 minutes of each other. Coincidence...??????
Funny how you both suddenly start calling Jindal "Piyush" at exactly the same time?
Coincidence....?
You can't evcen be honest with yourself so how would any right thinking American expect you and your party of cheats, frauds and liars to be honest with us either. You and your idiot alter-ego make a fine public face for your party.
|
|
|
Hey, Karen - ever hear of capital letters and correct punctuation? And, by the way, "thier" is spelled "their". Vote for Obamba did ya? |
|
"Oy -- Munck, why bother?
these guys live by alien rules. All the logic, facts, reason in the world can't penetrate this kind of mental sludge. We're talking purposeful pigheaded obstinance in the far right of wingnuttia. Don't waste thoughtful dialogue on them - they'll just chew it up and spit it back. You can't save a wingnut from being a moron. It's in the blood."
You would know all about it wouldn't you? what is hilarious is you label anyone who disagrees with you a 'wing nut' and you can't even spell it correctly, and yet we are supposed to believe your the bastion of true intelligence and intellect. |
|
|
these guys live by alien rules. All the logic, facts, reason in the world can't penetrate this kind of mental sludge. We're talking purposeful pigheaded obstinance in the far right of wingnuttia. Don't waste thoughtful dialogue on them - they'll just chew it up and spit it back. You can't save a wingnut from being a moron. It's in the blood. |
|
I have, but probably not as much as I should. Instead, I get Ron Paul's newsletter to help me keep up with paleolibertarian ideals on personal liberty. Mises.org has quite a bit of material well worth reading.
What time I do have for reading is spread across what is left of the political spectrum. Over the years I've found the terms "left" and "right" are almost meaningless. |
|
|
|
His exact words, to the Marines at Camp Lejeune:
"[U]nder the Status of Forces Agreement with the Iraqi government, I intend to remove all U.S. troops from Iraq by the end of 2011."
This means nothing coming from a politician, but we'll see. I remember Clinton saying we would only stay in Bosnia for six months. That was in 1994 and we are not only still there, but in Kosovo as well.
Obama could prove me wrong, but I doubt it. The globalists aren't going to surrender their empire without a fight. |
|
|
|
"Obama will pull out all troops except
for 35,000 to 50,000 who will remain to train and advise Iraqi troops"
His exact words, to the Marines at Camp Lejeune:
"[U]nder the Status of Forces Agreement with the Iraqi government, I intend to remove all U.S. troops from Iraq by the end of 2011." |
|
for 35,000 to 50,000 who will remain to train and advise Iraqi troops; pretty much what Bush intended, from what I gather (the actual number of troops may differ, I'll grant you).
As for the economy, Obama's actions are to involve the government in a big way in trying to "fix" the economic crisis; how is this different than Bush's actions? They may go about it using different arms of the government; they may spend the newly minted monies in different sectors (based on political calculations, to be sure), but fundamentally they are both adherents of the statist philosophy that the government can overcome its inability to gather and process timely and correct information about the markets (provided by the price mechanism in the free market) and accurately assess and distribute the right resources to the right recipients. Yeah, that's always worked...http://mises.org/story/3346
As an aside, isn't it curious that Obama is slamming fat cat CEO's for having the needless luxury of corporate jets, not considering that he is basically saying "screw you" to the pilots, flight attendants, mechanics, ground crews, and air traffic controllers, who currently service the corporate jets; not to mention the engineers and factory workers who build the blame things? |
|
Obama's foreign policy is centrist.
Obama's domestic policy is extreme left and really on the verge of being socialist.
He is not devious; these are the policies in which he believes.
The Founding Fathers had a somewhat different concept; the Declaration of Independence and Constitution express those concepts. CPAC is unapologetically based on the same principles and concepts. |
|
"Obama is withdrawing ALL TROOPS by the end of 2011; Bush built a bunch of expensive permanent bases and obviously planned to be in Iraq until the sun goes nova."
Sure he will. The only way we're leaving is a) we are physically thrown out or b), we go bankrupt like the Brits did at the end of WWII.
"And I won't even mention the planned war crimes
trials of most of the Bush administration."
That is because there won't be any. It doesn't matter which party controls the White House, both parties will cover for each other when it comes to the major crimes they have committed. |
|
"Obama is relying on a timetable for withdrawal from Iraq that is similar to what Bush proposed"
Obama is withdrawing ALL TROOPS by the end of 2011; Bush built a bunch of expensive permanent bases and obviously planned to be in Iraq until the sun goes nova.
"the current reliance on government solutions to fix the economy is in line with what Bush had done in his last days as President."
I don't see that at all. Bush gave a huge amount of money to the banks; Obama is spending a huge amount of money doing things. Other than the number of digits in the amounts, there's no similarity.
In the more general case, Obama has and continues to REVERSE a great number of Bush policies. And I won't even mention the planned war crimes trials of most of the Bush administration. |
|
"Debra Fisk"
Who is Debra? You seem to be responding to a comment written by karen. |
|
so far Obama's policies haven't diverged much from Bush's, that I can see. Obama is relying on a timetable for withdrawal from Iraq that is similar to what Bush proposed; the current reliance on government solutions to fix the economy is in line with what Bush had done in his last days as President. He's kept Bernanke in the Fed Chair. It seems that Obama is just using an accelerated version of the Bush Strategy, meaning that he'll get us to the zone of destruction that Bush steered us toward, only Obama will get us there faster.
I genuinely want President Obama to succeed, but from the policies that he is pursuing, it's evident that his definition of success is different from mine. He wants success in the aggregation of political power into the hands of the central government. I judge success in a President on how much he protects and expands Liberty for Americans. |
|
"> have lost thier jobs and then thier homes
...
And how is it NOT the homeowners' fault, at all?"
So it's your conviction that if someone loses their job, it's THEIR fault? |
|
> have u been to walmart everything is made in
> china,...
And sold here. Who can afford all that stuff, hm? SOMEONE must, or Wal-Mart would go out of business.
Who's buying it?
> ...and walmart told thier people they would be
> fired if the voted for a liberal.
Was this something your Trainer told you? Did you ask for any sort of verification? Or do you accept silliness like this without question since, well, I mean, c'mon, it's WAL-MART...!
> you every in the military fighting for freedom
> rush?
And you?
> god bless you rush cause no one else will.
> now u are talking about russia, i could out
> talk u in a night.
At least talking doesn't require spelling, proper capitalization or punctuation, so you'd certainly be ahead of the game there.
> you are an idiot and so are all those that
> follow you, but then alot are small minded and
> think thier way is the only right way
While you think YOURS is just one of many, many ways, right? |
|
> i am sorry but alot of people like living ,
> have lost thier jobs and then thier homes but
> that was all thier fault, not bush, not
> republicans, etc. but that home owners
> fault,...
Could you please elaborate on this "thought" for a bit? In what way is losing one's home because you got a mortgage that was far beyond your ability to pay, the fault of "Bush and Republicans," exactly?
And how is it NOT the homeowners' fault, at all?
People like you continue to make sounds of this kind, but I can never seem to detect any information contained therein. It's like trying to decipher a scholarly treatise from Bizarro World.
> cause at the time they bought thier house they
> made good money, whose fault was it thier job
> got out sent to china.
Can you give me an example of someone you know, personally, whose "job get sent out to China?" Maybe someone who works at a dry-cleaners, perhaps? How exactly is a Chinese man or woman now doing that job?
> and then walmart voters.
Ah, yes, the prime bug-a-boo of the clueless Left: WAL-MART. You actually finish a thought that contains ravings about "jobs going to China" with a pot-shot at one of the largest employers in the country.
Who writes your material? |
|
> yeah billionares should win, and make more
> money cause rush says so.
What's frightening is there are so many like you who think that "someone" (meaning the Federal government) should "stop" people from making money. That this has NEVER been the business of the United States government doesn't seem to cross your mind - such as it is.
> he wants this goverment to fail...
"The government?" Or the current President's radical Leftist policies that will destroy freedom if they are not stopped?
Aren't you the people who told us that "true patriotism consists in protest?"
Hm?
> ...and all those moonies that follow him care
> more about thier guns and bullets than the
> citizens of the usa.
Wow! She got in "Rushbotics," and "guns and ammo" all in one sentence! I'm impressed! It's like hitting on of those "Triple Word Scores" in SCRABBLE, with something like "ZYGOTE!" You get lots of points! You fail to MAKE a point, but you do EARN lots! |
|
yeah billionares should win, and make more money cause rush says so. he wants this goverment to fail and all those moonies that follow him care more about thier guns and bullets than the citizens of the usa.i am sorry but alot of people like living , have lost thier jobs and then thier homes but that was all thier fault, not bush, not republicans, etc. but that home owners fault, cause at the time they bought thier house they made good money, whose fault was it thier job got out sent to china.
and then walmart voters. have u been to walmart everything is made in china, and walmart told thier people they would be fired if the voted for a liberal.explain rush.you every in the military fighting for freedom rush? god bless you rush cause no one else will. now u are talking about russia, i could out talk u in a night. you are an idiot and so are all those that follow you, but then alot are small minded and think thier way is the only right way
|
|
That might be the reason the powers that be who control the RNC give, but it isn't the main reason.
They hate Dr. Paul because of his stand on the Federal Reserve, "free" trade and the empire and that's for starters.
While others pay lipservice to the Constitution and their oaths of office, Paul takes his seriously. |
|
|
The link to the Limbaugh speech video doesn't work. We were out in bread lines this afternoon. The difference between the 30's depression and today's? We went to Sam's and Costco both today. We hade to troll for parking like it was Christmas during a boom. We stood in line to pay for hundreds of dollars of goods (including bread) with hundreds of other people. I guess this is the new bread line. What will shopping be like if the economy actually improves? |
|
To David:
You are truly optimistic to think that the GOP is going "Libertarian"...Maybe you're young and don't know how this GOP thing works..There's a REASON that Ron Paul was not allowed to debate on Fox News...The "libertarians" are a group without a home....See, if the GOP were to lean more toward the libertarian side, it would mean that they are turning their collective backs on the group that they are too petrified to offend: Social Conservatives...You should not think that the former "yellow dogs" would EVER let the GOP move away from their agenda...See, the GOP made a bargain back in the 60's..The bargain was that the Southern states would come on board because the Dems sold them out with that nasty "Civil Rights Amendment"...The PRICE for the southern state admission would entail that the GOP take up those wonderful social issues that are sooooo important to this group. You've got ZERO chance that the Republican party will move away from those voters. The "pro-life platform" (which did not EXIST in Reagans tenure) is a true litmus test for ANY national GOP leader...There was one person's name that was boooed in today's straw poll. It was Ron Paul. Sorry but the Libertarians are persona non grata within the power structure of the GOP. The old "yellow dogs" support is far too important to the Republicans. |
|
"It's gotta be a sickness."
Not at all; it's infinitely amusing. |
|
Rush is a mega-phone for The Silent Majority, and he happens to be a highly intelligent; as we are. We're smart enough to know how to earn a living, and we are intelligent enough to figure out what our taxes are, and we are honorable enough to actually pay them.
|
|
at all the leftist/commie trolls who continue spread their BS here day after day.
They are sooo obscessed at what the conservatives are saying and doing.
It's gotta be a sickness. |
|
|
I think the Constitution has aways held center stage for Conservatives. What is new in our history is the direct assault on the Constitution internally in the USA. The Constitution has always been under attack externally, but the newest internal attack by the socialist movement is a pernicious danger. |
|
|
Watching CPAC it's apparent you guys have definitely have definitely nailed down the angry white vote that's looking for old ideas. Bravo. |
|
|
I Noticed that most are male and under 30. I noted that Ron Paul took 3rd and I would dare write that the vast majority of the youth made that possible(translation, keep your eye out on 2012)the over 65 crowd were second in voting and problably accounted for Romney. Glen Beck (a Ron Paul fan) came in second for conservative radio personality. Rush is echoing Ron Paul's message. I just think there is something going on here that is not being emphasized enough. The Constitution is taking center stage again, and it is about time. Dr. Paul has stood for it for over 35 years and while he may not be the candidate of choice, his messsage of civil liberty, sound money, noninterventionist foreign policy, the defense of the Constitution and real conservative principals are the rock on which theis party stands on. Like Goldwater in the '60's that ushered in Reagan...Ron Paul and his candidacy in 2008, history will record it helped restore the republic to its former glory. Thank God for it. |
|
How about Rupert Murdoch,Richard Mellon Scaife,Rev.Sung Moon of the Wash.Times all financing CONservative radio,think tanks and other Republican and CON owned media.
|
|
|
Rush giving a speech in his bathrobe? |
|
|
please go and troll elsewhere. You are a lib, leftard fool! |
|
|
All who are already sick of THIS government. We're planning for the future. Join us at http://www.teamsarah.org to support SARAH PALIN in all her political endeavors (hopefully, President in 2012)!! |
|
"It would be a GLORIOUS day if the conference asked Collins, Snow & Specter to leave the Party."
Yes, indeed. 62 Democratic votes in the Senate. |
|
|
The future of the party and conservatisim is the Ron Paul movement. The only conservative with any sort of credibilty. The only one who warned us of what was coming and is now here. The true defender of the Constitution. join http://www.campaignforliberty.com today |
|
Almost all the characters you named on your list won their battles so go Republicans. We are going to win this war.
We are in a war right now and we have taken off the gloves. No more nice guys and reaching across the aisle. We must kick out those who do. John McCain, who was not my pick to run for president, and his "reach across the aisle pals" can all take a hike. |
|
|
To Raelei, I remember the hate right from the start because he "stole" the election from Al Gore. The animosity started immediately and has not abated even to this day. Bush hatred is such a sickness the leftest liberals cannot say a sentence without bringing their hatred of Bush into it. Don't sit there and lie and say Bush got a honeymoon. He didn't even get a wedding. |
|
"If he thinks people want a change in 2008, wait till 2012" - Ann Coulter
She nailed it! - Again! The false messiah spends $800B on pork now he wants to raise taxes, which is the last thing you want to do in a recession! |
|
I agree. The RNC should do anything it can to marginalize Collins, Snow & Specter. They marginalized themselves, of course, but it must be made "official." They need to lose RNC money for election campaigns, any leadership roles, etc. And the party leaders in Congress need to whip the stray Republicans into shape or disenfranchise them all.
The only thing I can think of to JUSTIFY their maverick actions is if they had solid data that their constituencies WANTED their voting the way they did. That would be hard to argue against. |
|
|
It would be a GLORIOUS day if the conference asked Collins, Snow & Specter to leave the Party. The GOP needs soldiers, not turncoats and I'm tired of sitting on the edge of my seat on key votes wondering what side they and often even McCain and Ghramnesty will take. Like prunning a tree, cutting off dead branches makes it look lonely at first but it roars back to it's original glory, strong and vibrant! |
|
Stay off the far left Kool Aid drinking websites that have no sense of humor and are so stupid they take everything literally.
Too bad you guys just aren't smart enough to understand what Obama is saying to you. |
|
|
|
|
has a point. Obama is going to hit everyone so hard in the pocketbook our mothers will feel it. |
|
Jindal just up and disappeared after his big speech on tuesday night? I thought he would make the rounds and cultimate them with a speech at the Star Trek, I mean CPAC event.
Whoops did I just cross Jabba Rush Limbaugh the Hutt? Oh no he does not want to hear from me because I didn't like the delivery of Kenneth the Page, I mean Bobby Jindal's speech.
What an overweight drama queen Jabba the Limbaugh is. |
|
They still have Thursday's schedule up. And I'm sad because I missed this last night:
8:30 Youth for Western Civilization Inaugural Reception
Bet there were quite a few Conservative Girls Gone Wild. |
|
|
I'd note that Rhodes Scholar Jindal, seen as the party's greatest intellectual, choose Disneyworld over CPAC. |
|
|
Somebody needs to update the agenda. The CPAC web site still has yesterday up there. I'm not going to sit and watch the whole thing, but I'd love to know when Rush Limbaugh or Mark Levin is going to speak. |
|
From all I've read about the CPAC conference, I would contribute a lot of money if we could get it a bigger audience. What would it take to get it full-time on C-SPAN for example?
People cheering when the president is called a "communist." People cheering when a former UN ambassador suggests dropping a nuclear bomb on Chicago. Honestly, it would cost liberals millions to get a boost like this! |
|
They cannot see the socializing of our great country? We are Americans and do not like to be told what to do. Maybe they think they will immune to the Obama rules to live by...or else.
Thanks for destroying our country ignornat bunch of libs,all mouth and substance. |
|
Yes Paul is speaking Friday afternoon 4 or 5 I think
|
|
|
are there any conservatives billinaires attending cpac, offering to finance a conservative cable channel or finance groups as george soros is doing for democrats ? if there are none , the meeting is useless. until these billionaires step up, put their wealth on the line, as our founding fathers did, nothing cpac does will matter. |
|
|
are there any conservatives billinaires attending cpac, offering to finance a conservative cable channel or finance groups as george soros is doing for democrats ? if there are none , the meeting is useless. until these billionaires step up, put their wealth on the line, as our founding fathers did, nothing cpac does will matter. |
|
We must find a way as conservatives to stop President Obama from stealing the nation. I believe Republicans will make huge gains in 2010 if conservatives control the message and they stick to their guns, but Obama can do a lot of damage before then. We must educate, inform and resist until then. We must drive down his poll numbers so Democrats concerned for their reelection begin to break away. Just a handful in the Senate can help us stop the worst parts of his agenda.
I started The Right Viewpoint at http://rightviewpoint.com to do what I can to inform and educate as many people as possible. Check it. Spread the word. Help save America.
Joe Howell |
|
"You're calling the people running the Republican party socialists? Man, that's some hard-core crazy."
Why not? That's what Hugo Chavez said about Bush after Bush got the Wall Street bailout he wanted last year.
I think he has a point. |
|
|
|
"the socialist elites in the Repub party."
You're calling the people running the Republican party socialists? Man, that's some hard-core crazy.
But again I ask: isn't Limbaugh pretty much the defacto leader of conservatism? |
|
|
Rush is a conservative and disliked by the socialist elites in the Repub party. He is now the man that is taking nearly all of the punches for the party. The Repubs are afraid of being called racist if they dare to question the actions of a man with a dark skin color. From what I understand Nancy Pelosi is on the warpath and out of control. |
|
"But if we find our bearings and find a leader we will see a rapid comeback."
Isn't Limbaugh pretty much the defacto leader of conservatism? |
|
|
This is the beginning of our recovery now we are looking for a new conservative leader. Jindal is not it because he is a poor communicator as his response demonstrated. Palin has an image problem and Ginrgich has too many skeltons. If Pence, or Sanford or someone else who is very articulate does not stand up and take the reigns of leadership the Gop will lose again in 2012. But if we find our bearings and find a leader we will see a rapid comeback. |
|
Starring:
John Boner as Captain Kirk
Eric Cantor as Spock
Sarah Palin as Pricess Leia
Rush Limbaugh as Jabba the Hutt
Sean Hannity as Chewbacca
Ann Coultier as a Klingon
Charles Krauthammer as Pavel Chekov
Bill O'Reilly as "Scotty"
Rev Hagee as an Ewok
Mitch McConnel as Gredo
Hugh Hewitt as C3-PO
Mitt Romney as the Tin Man
Mike Huckabee as the Cowardly Lion
.. yes I know the last two are from the wizard of oz but the character fits their persona's.
|
|
|
John Ziegler (Media Malpractice) is talking at 2:00 in the Diplomat Ballroom. Is there a camera there? |
|
Fair enough and if I came across harshly I apologize.
Ron Paul can't help some of the folks he attracts. All candidates have this problem with certain supporters.
Paul doesn't agree with the truthers and has said so on a number of occasions. This has made a number of them mad at him.
As for that convention, I have an idea of what you read and I can say from reading the same articles that you got the establishment line on that mini-convention. I've read other articles that put it in a different light.
Interestingly enough, some senior members of the RNC put pressure on the mayor and some other officials to cancel it, so apparently they took it quite seriously.
"The man has no credibility outside of Ronulan circles."
I'm not so sure about this. One place where he does have credibility is with Neil Cavuto. Cavuto started out as a critic and now he can't enough of him on his show. Now, of course one show doesn't mean massive approval, but I bet there are a number of folks who are rethinking their view of him because of his grasp of monetary policy and economics. He has been warning for the last several years about the housing market and the Fed's easy credit policy.
|
|
Thank you for being the one who finally noticed the source of my moniker. In that black comedy (which would be today's politics), the good colonel was the only one who was able to keep his head and still remember simple truths regardless of the madness swirling around him. Your's is the most intelligent put-down to date - leap frogging several gene-pools ahead of people like Scarlet O'Hara (whatever happened to her?) or brob who would invent scatological deriavitives of the moniker only Junior High-Schoolers would find impressive.
Ron Paul makes alot of sense at first glance.... Then silliness such as the 9-11 truther tin hat goofiness that comes out of his acolytes such as Jesse "The (lost his) Mind" Ventura flushes the credibility factor right down the tiolet. It doesn't even stick to the bowl at that point. Paul's alternative universe convention in answer to the off-the-shelf GOP convention might as well been a Trekkie from the write ups on it. The man has no credibility outside of Ronulan circles. |
|
Once again you prove my point. this reminds me of you:
Well, I had just got out from the county prison,
Doin' ninety days for non-support.
Tried to find me an executive position,
But no matter how smooth I talked
They wouldn't listen to the fact that I was a genius
The man say, "We got all that we can use."
Now I got them steadily depressin', low down mind messin'
Working at the car wash blues.
Well, I should be sittin' in an air conditioned office in a swivel chair
Talkin' some trash to the secretaries,
Sayin', "Here, now mam-ma, come on over here."
Instead, I'm stuck here rubbin' these fenders with a rag
And walkin' home in soggy old shoes
With them steadily depressin', low down mind messin'
Workin' at the car wash blues.
You know a man of my ability,
He should be smokin' on a big cigar.
But till I get myself straight I guess I'll just have to wait
In my rubber suit a-rubbin' these cars.
Well, all I can do is a-shake my head
You might not believe that it's true,
For workin' at this end of Niagara Falls
Is an undiscovered Howard Hughes.
So baby, don't expect to see me
With no double martini in any high-brow society news,
'Cause I got them steadily depressin', low down mind messin',
Workin' at the car wash blues.
(Lead break)
So, baby, don't expect to see me
With no double martini in any high-brow society news,
'Cause I got them steadily depressin', low down mind messin',
Workin' at the car wash blues
|
|
|
You're too funny! FoxNews IS your channel, but you are right on one point: it is NOT Conservative - it is far rightwing nonsense. |
|
|
fox is nothing but obama 24-7. fox has let comservatives down...we need our own conservative cable tv channel where intense investigations and prosecution of congressional criminals will take place. step up conservative billionaires and fund a conservative channel. step up now! step up now! step up now! |
|
"Dr. Strangelove" was on tv here last week. I had forgotten about the character in the movie, but after reading some of your posts I see that it fits you perfectly.
You're the sort who would worry about a coke machine in the face of more pressing matters.
Ron Paul was one of the very few members of Congress to warn about this debacle. |
|
|
It's CPAC not a Star Trek convention. |
|
I'm wondering if this convention will spend any time backing away from the Republican meltdown of Obama Derangement Syndrome? Thirty days into his administration and the GOP can't see straight they are so overwhelmed with rage and jealous rants. Michelle Malkin has taken great pains over the last week to claim that Democrats 'did it too' against President Bush, but who here remembers the Bush administration getting hammered with virulent negativity in such great numbers in his first days, weeks, months, YEARS, of office? Be honest, please. And realize just HOW deranged you guys REALLY sound (are).
The 'clever' by half BDS charge has never held a candle to the psychotic rage the dwindling Republican 15% has displayed. |
|
Is Ron Paul going to speak?
|
|