Thursday, May 31, 2007
|
|
When Media Pit-Yorkies Attack
|
|
Posted by:
Dean Barnett at
12:12 PM
|
|
They dislike him! They really dislike him!
Time Magazines’ Joe Klein has an article on Mitt Romney today that isn’t particularly favorable. Actually, it’s downright hostile. Before continuing, I must confess to liking Joe Klein. I enjoyed “Primary Colors,” and have always thought him a far more entertaining media presence than the leftwing bloggers do. Those guys hate him.
The point of Klein’s article is that Mitt Romney rubs him the wrong way. There’s really nothing more substantive there, or certainly nothing more substantive that you haven’t already heard 8 million times before. As required by the Time Magazine style-book, Klein hits the flip-flop thing (breathtaking originality!) and misstates Romney’s past immigration positions which are the same as they are today, but big deal. Such things are all in a day’s work for a media Bigfoot. Fresh insights and reporting accuracy aren’t job requirements at dinosaurs like Time Magazine. No newsflash there.
But check out the way Mitt Romney obviously makes Joe Klein’s flesh crawl, and the way Klein makes no effort to disguise that fact:
Mitt Romney is the fastest-talking presidential candidate I have ever seen. He dashes through his stump speech like a racehorse in full gallop — he even looks a bit equine… But his speed of delivery also has an element of sleight of hand… When Romney slowed down and focused on a single issue — immigration — at a press conference in Dover, N.H., the brazen cynicism of his candidacy became almost embarrassing… Romney takes postures, not positions…
"You know," he often says, very Reagan, "there are people out there who actually believe America is great because of its government." Gasps and groans. "Well, we have a great system of government, but America is great because of" — pause for effect, cue passion — "its people."
There is something slightly anachronistic about all this. Romney is the most perfect iteration I've seen of the television-era candidate. At one point, I squinted a bit and saw him in the middle distance: blue suit, white shirt, red tie, high forehead, slick black hair, tan, tall and ramrod straight — he could have been an exhibit in some future Museum of Natural History: Politicianus americanus… His success or failure will be a reflection of how serious the electorate is in 2008.
Battle-hardened conservatives will recognize this tired media meme. As with the rest of Klein’s piece, it’s breathtakingly clichéd. In the eyes of super-smart reporters like Joe Klein, successful Republicans have only succeeded because they were so skilled at hoodwinking the unwashed masses who couldn’t recognize hokiness and “sleight of hand” when they stared them right in the eye.
Ronald Reagan got the same kind of relentless criticism from enlightened lefties for decades. Oh, how his purportedly empty platitudes about the greatness of America and the American people maddened the media. He, too, was labeled an anachronism, one that came straight out of the 1950’s. Why, the simpleton Reagan even selected “Family Ties” as his favorite TV show, a program that was frighteningly redolent of anachronistic 1950’s family values.
The fact that Romney has emerged as the candidate who most irritates the left is an unmistakably good sign for his campaign. Liberals by nature loathe their opponents. (Conservatives, on the other hand, mock their opponents.) The fact that Romney so angers adversaries like Andrew Sullivan, Joe Klein, and the Boston Globe is a good thing; for whatever reason, the only Republicans who ever get into the Oval Office are the ones who really rub lefties the wrong way.
The Klein article also reveals a fundamental divide between the liberal media and a guy like Romney. Romney really does believe in the greatness of America and her people. That’s why, even though we face such enormous challenges, he’s still honestly optimistic. He radiates this optimism, and it drives some people nuts. Shouldn’t he be despondent about Gitmo like everyone else?
Also, like Ronald Reagan, Romney effortlessly gets under his critics’ skin for having the audacity to be smarter and more insightful than they are. The media routinely dismissed Reagan as a senile dunderhead. Reagan was in good company there. Eisenhower had the same reputation a generation earlier. It never dawned on the gluttons at the press buffet to wonder how such dopes habitually ran circles around them. And how it must have shocked them when it turned out that Reagan was a more skilled and lucid writer than all of the knights of the keyboard who so vainly hounded him.
While Romney will be tougher to dismiss as an intellectual lightweight than Reagan was because of his impressive resume, his “simple” faith in America is sure to madden the media. It’s also telling that Klein attacks Romney for his “speed of delivery” and “sleight of hand.” One of the things that drove the liberal Boston media nuts about Romney is that they were convinced he had something up his sleeve, but could never find it. For four years the local media unloaded haymakers in Romney’s direction, and never laid a glove on him. Drove them nuts.
I got a glimpse into exactly how deep this frustration ran when I appeared on a local chat-fest with Boston Globe columnist and longtime Romney nemesis Joan Vennochi last week. I mentioned that Romney had balanced a wildly out of whack budget without raising taxes. Joan countered that he had balanced the budget only by raising fees and – I hope you’re sitting down for this – closing corporate loopholes! Since every Democrat since Woodrow Wilson has had “closing corporate loopholes” as the lynchpin of his economic plan, this was an odd attack for a liberal to make.
But such is the effect that Mitt Romney has on the liberal media. He has brought his message directly to the rubes, and it has resonated. Curses! No wonder why Joe Klein is so frustrated.
Compliments? Complaints? Contact me at Soxblog@aol.com.
|
|
Did you ever find one, except in the mirror? Thanks |
|
The author of said poem is unknown to me. Many happy returns.
|
|
Great poem. Wonder if gabby sees himself in any of the characters. Hope you don't mind if I send it on, with attribution of course. |
|
Is that your beloved dog?
|
|
|
You are insane. And I fear you are driving yourself to an early death by reading this site. |
|
Gabby, Do you read what you write? Your "rhetoric"...is...sadly not new.
Six men trapped by happenstance In dark and bitter cold; Each one possessed a stick of wood, Or so the story’s told. Their dying fire in need of logs, The first man held his back, For of the faces ’round the fire, He noticed one was black. The next man looked across the way, Saw one not of his church, And couldn’t bring himself to give The fire his stick of birch. The third man, dressed in tattered clothes, Then gave his coat a hitch. Why should his log be given up To warm the idle rich? The rich man sat back thinking of The wealth he had in store, And how to keep what he had earned From going to the poor. The black man’s face bespoke revenge, While fire passed from sight. Saw only in his stick of wood, A way to spite the white. The last man of this forlorn group, Did nothing but for gain. "Give only unto those who gave" Was how he played the game. The logs held firm in death-stilled hands Was proof of human sin. They died not from the cold without But from the cold within.
|
|
His education's nothing special, his bilingualism is commonplace, his business success is nothing special, it's pretty typical to found and save numerous major businesses, it's nothing special to be a governor, it's no big deal to close a deficit and balance a state budget without raising taxes, it's no big deal to defend the traditional definition of marriage or to oppose the cloning of humans for research purposes, it's nothing unusual to take over a scandal-ridden and deeply indebted international Olympics and bring it to a clean and profitable conclusion right after 9/11, and it's no big deal to do all of this while serving many hours each week as a volunteer church worker and leader on the side.
I guess all Mitt's done with his pathetic little life is to grow a nice head of hair.
Nothing compared to YOUR achievements, I'm sure. |
|
Dean:
The media/Democract theme on modern Republican Presidents is that they can be either 1)dumb, or 2)evil/uncaring patricians. They cannot be anything else.
Thus, Harding, Coolidge, Eisenhower, Ford, Reagan, and Bush (II) were all dumb. Nixon was evil. Hoover and Bush I were uncaring patricians.
Occasionally, a GOP VP is so categorized - i.e., Dan Quayle was dumb.
(Prior GOP Presidents are usually not so categorized.)
My guess is, if Mitt Romney were elected, the Dems/media would put him under the uncaring patrician slot. Giuliani would probably be evil. And Fred Thompson and John McCain would be dumb.
Get ready for it, people, cause we (the GOP) is going to win.
|
|
|
Romney is a class act. Some people aren't comfortable with a candidate they can't destroy with his own weaknesses. So he's obviously not weak, not uncertain, not arrogant...well then he has to be 'slick'. Anyone who listens to him hears his credibility, his grasp of the problems facing America. But some just can't stand the fact that he's also a good man; it says a lot more about them than it does about Romney. |
|
Your post shows me you are an arrogant sot.
We are supposed to take your word about Mitt? And if he comes across to us as a pandering pol, that reflects on us?
I scoff at your assertion! |
|
I wonder sometimes if people actually read before they comment.
Dean wrote this. Not Hugh!
Joe Klien is an elitist snob. I can't stand him. I'm no Romney fan but Klein isn't to be taken seriously. He is totally in love with himself. |
|
I agree, what exactly is the complaint about "speed of delivery." Does Joe get lost? apparently, I mean because he can't write that quickly, or something, and having decided that speaking quickly is unfair, by the way that clearly means that Hugh is beyond him, not always of course, but there are times, anyway, as I was saying, having decided that speaking quickly is unfair, Joe Klien decided to rely on his own received wisdom, which isn't much, and declare memorized cliche's that aren't there.
Which reminds me that Joe reminds me of this guy I saw in a movie I was watching during one of my many insomnia moments lately, oh and by the way insomnia moments have a way eventually of catching up with you in the form of enforced sleep which in its way can be very relieving, but anyway I was watching this movie that dates from 1958 called the Big Eye in the Cloud, or some such thing, and, beyond being really bad, the movie had as it's central hero, the UN.
Now this UN bombed the eyes in the clouds to smithereens, which is very unlike the UN we've come to dispise its real life form, er activity in Darfur for instance.
It would not surprise if Joe, Klien that is, believed in the UN that bombs eyes in the clouds, but hasn't given much thought to the real one.
P.S. I did hear Rudy on Sean Hannity and for the most part I really liked what he had to say. |
|
Read Hugh's latest piece on the immigration bill. He's in full court compromise mode right now.
How convenient, Romney gets to bash opponent McCain and bash a bill nobody likes, and Hugh gets to sound magnanimous in his quest for a "compromise".
Compromise = Amnesty
|
|
Alex, listen to talk radio. Fred has a young wife, which people are dying to know more about. The hosts start mumbling when Mitt is mentioned. For a sample, listen to WRKO, Boston, Alex. |
|
"The GOP is still the only entitiy where any Conservative ideas will rise into legislation. If His wins, not only her socialism on the home front wins, she selects SCOTUS, she loses war to the Islamofascists, she raises taxes, she really does doom the 1st and 2nd Amendments for speakers, gun owners, and even Talk Radio. The purists just want REVENGE and are forgetting their kids and grandkids will who suffer a generation of leftist rule by the Dems."
Have you ever heard of gesellschaft? It means: more people = bigger government. The relationship is as natural as breathing. Although an inverse relationship, as Rousseau reasons, is more efficacious, it doesn't change the natural and symbiotic relationship between population size and the size of government.
If Bush and Kennedy get their amnesty, conservatism will be something written about in history books and believed by a few kooks somewhere in fly-over country. The GOP will only be an alternative to the Democrats on paper and TV because from a practical standpoint, conservatism will be dead. In fact, I'd be willing to say that it may already be too late.
I'm ashamed that I voted for Bush two times because his stance on border security means the end of the conservatism. I think Romney is just another prepackaged Rockefeller Republican. I'll bet Romney and his cheerleaders are hoping that Bush gets this amnesty passed ASAP in hopes that it eliminates, or at least blunts immigration as a major issue.
And that, my friend, is why Hugh won't ever agree that we just need to simply enforce Simpson/Mazzoli rather than pass an amnesty...er, I mean, "compromise" bill.
|
|
Klein describes Romney as:
"...blue suit, white shirt, red tie, high forehead, slick black hair, tan, tall and ramrod straight..."
The context of this description definitely lets us know that Klein considers these characterists as dreaded liabilities!
However, if possessed by a Democratic candidate -- Obama, for instance -- I suspect the same characteristics would be assets.
Oh well.
---Tom Nally, New Orleans
|
|
"After all, today his campaign spent huge amounts of money to discredit Fred Thompson;"
Where is this money trail? What did he do to spend so much money? Has he taken out a full page add in the Wall Street Journal? I'm curious. I really am. |
|
|
Mitt should stay in the race right to the end. After all, today his campaign spent huge amounts of money to discredit Fred Thompson; it was all over the place. Spend, Mitt, spend! |
|
Romney's expensively educated. So is almost everyone else in the field, and thousands of people not running.
"Successful term as governor?" By what standard? Massachusetts was, as I outlined, glad to see the back of him. He did nothing of significance in office.
"Spectacular success in business?" So, starting out rich, he made himself richer.
This is simply not a good resume for the White House. Any of the Democrats running- even Gravel and Kucinich- has a better one. So do most of the other GOoPers (the only one obviously weaker is Gilmore). |
|
thanks Dean, beat that drum....Mitt'08 Granpa Mitt knows he's making the left nervous. Here's another evangelical for Mitt. The Hillary-Obama juggarnaut may not be invincible if enough independents and GOPs actually read, rather than jerk their knees. |
|
Of course, it was 'if Hil wins,not if his wins. ' Oh well, socialism does that to me. Gall arose in my throat even as I wrote, ' if Hil wins' and the bitterness moved the finger of fate to read, if his wins. Obviously some Demoncrat devil trying to stop any critcism of Her Highness! |
|
MSNBC has gone after Jordan Sparks because she supposedly "lied" about having a formal trainer. Forget the fact that there are numerous opinions about what a formal trainer is or is not. It's one thing to start ankle biting a politician. But when Tucker Carlson goes after a seventeen year old talent show winner we know that a Yorkie is much too cute an animal to be used in a comparison. And its all because MSNBC will do anything to throw bricks at Fox. These people remind me of pond scum. A dog is way to far up the evolutionary ladder to be helpful. |
|
The GOP is firing back at its own constituents, correct. The fact is however, their phone banks and emails and fax machines are all humming from those constituents and even outsiders like myself. I have made it a point to join varied lobbying groups that fire back at the Dems and if necessary, the GOP. They strike home. NumbersUSA, the NRA, even some political religious groups have power in moving votes. When you see Rudy, Newt,even Mitt and Fred speaking out on this Hil socialist issue, borders, Dem tax raises, that is because some in the BASE are getting through to their thick Beltway heads. To leave the battlefield, as some purists want , because RINOS have hurt them, W has wounded them is to forget our future as a nation. The GOP is still the only entitiy where any Conservative ideas will rise into legislation. If His wins, not only her socialism on the home front wins, she selects SCOTUS, she loses war to the Islamofascists, she raises taxes, she really does doom the 1st and 2nd Amendments for speakers, gun owners, and even Talk Radio. The purists just want REVENGE and are forgetting their kids and grandkids will who suffer a generation of leftist rule by the Dems. |
|
|
Of all the Republican candidates, Mitt Romney seems to straddle the moderate middle ground the most. His work as Governor proves that he’s willing to compromise with liberals and pursue effective reform plans regardless of their party affiliation. Yet, if elected, I can only hope that he will extend his liberal work into more global areas as well. For example, I would like to see him fulfill the United States’ commitment to the United Nation’s Millennium Development Goals, which call for cutting world hunger in half by 2015 and eliminating it altogether by 2025. Indeed, it is estimated that the expenditure of a mere $19 billion would eliminate starvation and malnutrition worldwide. In a time when the current defense budget is $522 billion, the goal of eradicating world hunger is clearly well within reach and it is my hope that whoever becomes president in 2008 addresses this pressing issue. |
|
Romney is the Bill Buckner of politics. He was so close to taking down Teddy Kennedy in a GOP year 1994, but alas those little mistakes came home to roost late in the game.
I love seeing those old Bob Shrum produced Teddy Kennedy ads from the '94 sentate race that sunk the Mittship.
I'd love to see Mitt as the nominee. He can't win Ohio, and Florida could go blue as well. |
|
First-class educational background, spectacular success in business, a spectacular rescue of the scandal-ridden and problem-plagued Salt Lake Olympic games, a successful term as Republican governor of the Kennedys' one-party home state . . .
"What resume?"?????
Whether you like Romney or dislike him, whether you like his religion or not, even if you favor a Kucinich/Sharpton ticket, it's just plain silly to pretend that Romney lacks an impressive resume.
(Let's see YOURS, Brian J!) |
|
|
What a sneaky, rotten candidate Mitt is for having secret plot to run for president in the back of his mind while governor! Wouldn't you think that most decent people who run for president make absolutely no plans before they run? I knew I didn't like him! ;-) |
|
Hmm. I wonder if he had aspirations of running for the presidency, instead.
Oh, that slick b*****d! |
|
|
In case you haven't noticed, the GOP is busy savaging their own voters at the moment. They can fire back(wards). |
|
|
I should have said "ulterior motive" rather than "alterior motive." |
|
|
Regardless of whether Romney is the Tiger Woods of politics or not, he is excellent on the stump, no question. Polish doesn't necessarily have an alterior motive. However, since it normally does for the left, it must be doubly sinister if someone on the right is polished. The playbook mandates he must be fake. |
|
|
Romney is the Tiger Woods of politics? I am not so sure about that. And Kobe Bryant too? Then again, perhaps the Kobe Bryant connection is one Mitt would prefer you did not make. http://www.courttv.com/trials/bryant/ |
|
|
You hit the mark. They don't understand how you could possibly be polished and yet unencumbered by ethical problems. They are comfortable with an ethically challenged smooth talker like Clinton, but get uneasy when there is no excuse for his polish like with Romney. Since everything must be so complicated, it is imperative that Mitt Romney be sinister, sneaky, deceptive, plastic, or phony, or at least be made to appear that way. I believe the truth really is much simpler than that. No, he is not the second coming. He is just a decent competent candidate who I believe has a sensible conservative agenda, a good understanding of world affairs and an effective grasp of the issues involved in the global war on terror. He does not know everything he needs to know, but he knows how to put minds to work to solve problems. |
|
I know it is nit picking, but seriously, how hard is it to read a byline? This post was by Dean and yet, as in many of Dean's posts, several commenters address their comments to Hugh. Though they share a lot of viewpoints, they are actually different.
|
|
One term as an ineffectual governor of a medium-sized state isn't much of a resume when running for President. It's even thinner than the shrub's- that is, of a person demonstrably inadequate for the job.
You say, "For four years the local media unloaded haymakers in Romney’s direction, and never laid a glove on him." Then why didn't he run again? And why didn't he, you know, accomplish anything while in Boston?
Under Romney the Massachusetts GOP, ailing for decades, finally breathed its last. His Lieutenant Governor lost the Governor's race by over 20 points- a pretty good sign that Romney's ideas weren't considered worth keeping around. GOoPers didn't win a statewide or Congressional race in the Bay State last November- and didn't even try for three statewide posts or 7 of 10 Congressional districts.
The people who know him best told Romney and all his hangers-on to get lost. Doesn't say much for his chances elsewhere. |
|
|
I think you are right on. The alternative media alone cannot do it. Did you have something specifically that you were thinking about? What do you think the base could concretely do better? |
|
|
Klein better stay away from that performance artist (who is hooked up with Yoko Ono), who recently protested something the Windsor's did by obtaining a dead corgie and eating it (he apparently ground the meat up and made meat balls). If a corgie is the equivalent of a turkey, a yorkie would be like a cornish game hen. |
|
So, after many years Klein has really hit the crux of Romney: he's an empty (very expensive) suit. That explains his resume.
Likewise, there is something a bit too smooth, a bit too polished in Tiger Wood's swing. And when you look really close at Tiger’s putting, it reveals the cynicism of his golf game, which is that he keeps winning when he’s not that good of golfer.
Maybe Klein also noticed that there is something a bit too 'sleight of hand' in Kobe Bryant's jump shot. It goes through the hoop all too smoothly.
What a dope. Klein probably thinks that Hillary's obfuscation and obtuseness can only mean that she is the real deal.
|
|
In fact he writes like Peggy Noonan. It is all about emotions, feelings, and subjectiveness. Maybe Joe Klein should have his hormone levels checked--your testosterone can drop in middle age!
I liked Primary Colors too--and to Klein's credit he captured something about Bill Clinton was was very true and ultimately was his Achilles heel. Well his penchant for women other than his wife is one big obvious thing--but it the underlying character flaws that manifest themselves in lies and bad behavior.
Mitt Romney is not Bill Clinton. He does not cheat on Ann, he is a good father and an ethical business man. He has accomplished things outside of government. He does not cut corners. But he does have a slight touch of disingeniousness about him, that does not ring entirely true. I do not think Mitt in his heart of hearts is half as conservative on social issues as you want him to be (or for that matter on immigration). I think the Massachusetts Mitt was the real Mitt. In trying to appeal to the conservative base of the GOP he is trying to be something he is not.
|
|
|
It is sometimes useful to remember that the millions of voters who put Reagan and both Bushes into office, and who will decide the next election, don't actually care about what Joe Klein thinks. They don't watch MSNBC or fret about Time Magazine. They have come to learn that these media are as objective and transparent as the French and Russian judges at a gymnastics tournament. |
|
|
Look Hugh, you have been around long enough to know that for nearly 45 years, Dems have always acted like pacifist socialists and the media has been in their pocket, or vice versa! Every GOP candidate is met with cynicism, hatred, wink wink and every GOP person is a rube, stupid and 'I don't know anybody who voted for that guy' responses. The GOP has never fired back except under Newt in '94. The GOP needs to fire back and not let Talk Radio carry its water as Rush avered. With Hil stating obvious socialist agendas just yesterday, you would think that the GOP would have a Truth squad out on her like bees on honey. But, no, it takes Rush or Sean or you to deal with it. That is also what frustrates the BASE. So, Klein hates Mitt. So what? Those types hate you, me , every other GOPers, conservative, Christian or traditonalist. It is not going to change unless the GOP and Conservatives actually fire back with vim and vigor. But, the alternative media cannot carry the water. It must be the GOP who does it. |
|
Perhaps you are reading too much into what motivates Joe Klein, although you could be correct I suppose.
It's so doggone early for a presidential campaign, but I have talked with a handful of other people who are open to being convinced by one or more of the current candidates, eventually. Impressions are beginning to form of some of the candidates, and those views could soon be locked in.
Mitt Romney is not coming across as somebody running on a strong belief in a particular course of action or ideas. Instead he appears to be another politician wanting to BE president, because he is smart, successful, and can do the things a politician does. Maybe that is what people will be looking for in 2008, maybe not.
There are other people who want the job, some of them convey a sense of what they would DO as president, or just seem like fresh and interesting new faces, like that Iraq Bahama feller.
I'm not so sure that Klein and liberal Democrats are afraid of Romney, they have much reason to be confident this cycle. Instead they may be reacting in the vein of "oh no, another polished pefect contentless politician we have to endure", except that he doesn't sing from their songbook on the issues, when he does speak to the issues. |
|
Hugh, your assessment of Mr. Klein's article is dead on. What Klein says he doesn't like about Romney could be said of nost any national political candidate, Republican or Democrat. I'm no big Romney fan, but let's face it: a politician who can't dodge bullets is going to be shot down!
|
|
|
Well said. Well said indeed. |
|
Romney is no dummie. But I sincerely doubt the "dumb GOP guy" is wearing thin b/c of Romney. The "dumb GOP guy" is wearing thin b/c the current POTUS is so dense, he makes any of the current candidates look like luminaries.
Dean, I read Joe's column, and then headed over here to see if you had mounted a rebuttal to Klein's cliche riddled article yet. You didn't disappoint, w/ your own breathless, cliched canonization of Romney as the second-coming of Reagan. ("They like the same kinds of sitcoms!") The thing I find hiliarious is the same feature you and your dungeon-master Hugh defend in YourManMitt are the things you attack in other, "not serious" candidates: namely a superficial take of the issues in the Mideast, a vague plan for the GWOT, etc. I don't actually think Mitt has a superficial grasp of the issues; I think he doesn't want to get bogged down in depressing details, like the fact that Iraq is going to be a lead anchor around the neck of the next President, whomever he (or she, heaven forbid) might be. Better to play sunny optimist and save the details until after the election. Oh, and "Double Gitmo!" But if anyone OTHER than Saint Mitt tried such an approach, you'd be all over them like white on rice. |
|
I have noticed over the years that people tend to think that others act a certain way because they all have the same motivations. In other words, a person who constantly tries to get over on other people thinks most everyone else is doing the same thing. This seems to be most prevelant with people without much of a moral compass; however, it does happen with the "good guys" too. Those who try to live an honest, hard-working lifestyle tend to think most other people do too. Unfortunately, that makes them great targets for scams if they're not careful.
So, I've found that the best way to know how people really think is to listen to how they judge someone they don't know very well. If you have a friend who you know is a good, decent person, and you hear people who barely know your friend putting him or her down, you have to wonder--not about your friend, but about the other folks. Can you really trust those other folks? My experience says no.
So to Joe Klein, gabby, and others, I say be careful what you reveal about yourselves. The experiences that Dean and thousands of others have had with Mitt Romney (including mine during the 2002 Olympics) are totally opposite to what you present. We have seen that Romney's optimism is genuine and his reason for running is about service to others, not personal gain. If you scoff at my assertion, then tell me how many hours of community service *you* put in during the past year. |
|
The MSM and lefty new media types disallow the confluence of smart, conservative and sincere in a single Republican. It doesn't compute. Therefore...
If, with Mitt, the left-wing media won't be able to use the "this guy is so dumb..." approach this time around, it must be because he's so slick. There must be an inner Nixon.
Besides, the "dumb GOP guy" is wearing thin anyway. Reagan's published radio addresses, personally-written letters, and now his diaries show he was a one-man think tank.
But accusations of "slick" shows desperation. It's a fallback position because it concedes "smart." Sincerity will overcome "slick" in time. Meanwhile, "slick" got Bill 2 terms. |
|
The good news is that you at least linked to the article. The bad news is that in order to make Klein look as though he had no substantive gripe, you used the sort of editing that only Michael Moore could appreciate. Let's look at how you misrepresented the first paragraph.
"Mitt Romney is the fastest-talking presidential candidate I have ever seen. He dashes through his stump speech like a racehorse in full gallop — he even looks a bit equine…"
You stop there? Why? Well here is the rest of the sentence.
"....his feet barely touching the ground as he skims the surface of issues."
The part you pulled out made it look as though Klein just plan did not like Romney for any other reason than just because. By adding the rest of the sentence it becomes clear what Klein's point is - plenty of flash, not enough substance.
Let's continue on.
"But his speed of delivery also has an element of sleight of hand..."
What?!? Joe Klein just called Romney a charlatan! A huckster! Obviously he has a problem with Mormonism, right?!? Or does he? What does Klein say after you chose to stop quoting him? Let's read on and see.
".....He moves so quickly, it's often hard to notice that there's not much nutrition being offered and much that is being avoided. He never mentions Iraq in his stump speech. He talks — well, offers one sentence — about the challenge of "global Islamic jihad." And because he doesn't dwell on it, his audiences don't. On a late-May New Hampshire swing, he cruised through two performances before the word Iraq perforated his balloon. And then it was a high school student, who simply asked, "What would you do about Iraq?"
Here again, there is plenty of "optimistic" style, but not too much substance when it comes to talking about the tough challenges that our country is dealing with. Why is that Dean? Because Romney has positions and not principals. Being principled might mean taking an unpopular position, and that could mean (oh the horror) not maximizing his chances of getting elected. That's not very Reagan-like Dean. In fact, that's Clinton-like.
If you want to cheer on Romney, great, knock yourself silly doing it. Just be honest about the arguments those who do not care for him put forth. Believe it or not there are good reasons to support one of the other candidates. And yes, that includes John McCain.
I strongly encourage everyone to follow the link and judge for yourself how accurate you think Dean's take on Klein's article is. |
|
Klein was on the old IMUS show this morning (Joe not an average Joe).
He made it clear that he loved Clinton. He made it clear that Clinton governed from the center and Bush was a right wing nut...
He also made it CLEAR the Romney creeped him out at the first debate.......
This guys IS NOT an journalist. He is an editorial writer full of bias. |
|
|
That is baseless and likely untrue. I would say the Left doesn't care much about Romney at all. The candidate who most annoys the Left is McCain, because he once seemed so promising as a potentially unifying candidate, and he now seems most to represent the idiotic support for this administration's non-policy in Iraq. I think it is wishful thinking to suggest that Romney is some hobgoblin of the Left. If anything, he is a source of amusement, as he so diligently takes on whatever right position he thinks will get him the nomination. |
|
|
Romney balanced the budget by cheating! He actually delivered on what others have only promised since the beginning of time. Can't let him get away with that! He should have done the honest thing, raise taxes, like liberals do! |
|
|
|