Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons

Townhall.com The Blogspot for Political, Conservative and Republican Blogs and Bloggers


Monday, September 29, 2008
Blind Faith, or Secret Knowledge?
Posted by: Carol Platt Liebau at 10:07 AM
According to a piece in the UK Independent, Barack Obama and his team believe they can win by a landslide, and take states including Virginia, North Carolina, and yes, even Indiana.  Their secret weapon?  First time voters, and getting out the vote.

But if that's true, why talk about it?  Just be quiet and watch the plan unfold and surprise everyone on election day.  Could it be that the Obama team is using its friends in the MSM to try a little psychological warfare?

And if all of this is kosher, why is an unnamed advisor telling the reporter that Obama has more "paths to the nomination" (emphasis added) than "paths to victory"?  Sounds like someone is a little confused.

View in ascending order View in descending order
RASHUM writes: Monday, September, 29, 2008 10:24 AM
Obama and the polls
There was some movement toward Obama in the polls largely due to the bailout. However Obama should be a little worried about were he is in the polls.

If Obama is below 48% in battleground state polls the last week before the election he will likely lose. The undecided vote will break towards McCain. If someone is not yet behind Obama, despite all his positive press, doubtful they will support him come Election Day.
Pasadena Phil writes: Monday, September, 29, 2008 10:46 AM
Read the RCP polls
The whole plan for backing Giuliani or McCain this year over a Republican candidate was that these two libs would put several Blue States in play. So what has happened?

1. McCain has not only failed to put ANY blue states (states Bush lost in 2004) in play, he is actually losing in five red states, Virginia, NC, Colorado, NM, and Iowa, (states Bush won in 2004).

2. In the "toss up" states, polling is trending hard towards Obama. Two, Missourri and NC have flipped from leaning McCain to leaning Obama.

3. Obama is getting stronger across the board as McCain continues his "I can't make up my mind which side I'm on" lunacy.

Pick a side already John! How about leading YOUR party! Nobody trusts a mealy-mouthed weasel.
Michael writes: Monday, September, 29, 2008 11:08 AM
Obama the economy Wizard ????


How is it that Obama gets credit on the economic side of things??

He has no experience on the economy. But yet it automatically a given that he is stronger on the economy.
Explain how ? Anyone ? If anything he should explain how he got $500 million for his district but yet it is worse than ever on housing, crime, drugs, etc.. He put the money to good use, right !!

Or maybe he just passed it onto the corruption of ACORN.

MJ
Christina writes: Monday, September, 29, 2008 11:12 AM
Garbage Phil
Some of the worst flip flopping in this campaign has been done on the side of the libs. Everything from Iraq, Iran, Russia/Georgia, The 2nd Ammendment, the bailout....you have got to be kidding me! The one thing that can be certain is that John has been John and love him or hate his that is just the way it is. He is solid and unfortunately that is what keeps some Repubs at arms length...they call that "moderate". Obama is not getting stronger...he is faltering terribly. He has slowly been slipping in popularity since March. I am not a big tracking poll person, especially with this campaign because while many may say that they will vote for BHO outwardly, in the booths they will do something different. I hear this directly from the mouths of so many. They are verbal in their support of this "history making pres", but in the voting booth their vote will reflect otherwise. They did this with Kerry in 2004 "Oh, he is going to win big!"...and then he lost terribly.
Screwtape writes: Monday, September, 29, 2008 11:19 AM
Michael
For some reason economic problems historically favor the democrats. It has nothing to do with Obama. Why anyone would think the dems are strong on the economy after the debacle they just help create is beyond me.
Pasadena Phil writes: Monday, September, 29, 2008 12:05 PM
Christina
Read the polls. The problem with you noseholders is that facts mean nothing. Polls only matter when they suggest that maybe you are right. Otherwise, it's McCain is the only one standing between us and a complete collapse of Western civilization. Well wrap you head around this: if that "bailout" bill goes through, the American free market system is DEAD. This isn't a bailout, it is the creation of a permanent facility for seizing private assets to create funding for low-income housing.

Where is McCain in all of this? His support has been reduced to Lieberman, Grahamnesty, and Bill Clinton. What a team!
continuum writes: Monday, September, 29, 2008 12:49 PM
Obama Will Win Because . . .
Obama will win because both the Senate and House Republicans became greedy and corrupt in the previous 12 years.

For every William Jefferson there were dozens of Republicans in the local, state and federal governements gulping at the trough of greed.

Throw in sex scandals like Foley, Vitters, Craig and numerous other local and state pols, and you have a Republican brand in rebuke.

Obama is winning because the previous 12 years of Republican politicians totally lost their moral compass.
dirk writes: Monday, September, 29, 2008 12:59 PM
Polls?
Think about this - the polls go up and down for the candidates - who are these people that are going back and forth? Are that many people first supporting one and then the other? If not, what's going on? It seems to me that the pollsters assumptions - how many dems, repubs, inds - to include is what always makes the polls go up and down. I don't think they really have a clue. I certainly have no idea who's "really" ahead.
Sign Up to Post Your Comments Sign Up to Post Your Comments
Please take a few seconds to sign up, then you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, create your own blog and more! If you are already registered, click here.
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.
 


Your Blog Postings:
Last updated 31 Minutes 43 Seconds Ago
Last updated 51 Minutes 11 Seconds Ago
Last updated 52 Minutes 20 Seconds Ago
Last updated 59 Minutes 2 Seconds Ago
Last updated 1 Hours 9 Minutes 34 Seconds Ago
 

Archives of our Conservative, Republican, Political Blogs

Blog Search



Townhall Conservative, Republican, Political Blogs Townhall Blogs
Townhall Conservative, Republican, Political Columns Columns
Your Townhall Conservative, Republican, Political Blogs Your Blogs
By Month
 December 2009
 November 2009
 October 2009
 September 2009
 August 2009
 July 2009
 June 2009
 May 2009
 April 2009
 March 2009
 February 2009
 January 2009
 December 2008
 November 2008
 October 2008
 September 2008
 August 2008
 July 2008
By Issue
 A Culture of Life
 Budget & Government
 Campaigns & Elections
 Education
 Energy & Environment
 Faith & Family
 Foreign Affairs
 Health Care
 Immigration
 Jobs & Economy
 Judges & Courts
 Media & Culture
 Property Rights
 Safety & Security
 Science & Technology
 Second Amendment
 Social Security
 Tax Relief
Advertisement

Comments Comments

Jo
 Re: JAM DOWN
  By Molotov
CHILDREN PUT AT RISK IN NEW HC....
 Re: What's the Next Step?
  By gwen
How our government works
 Re: JAM DOWN
  By Kenny Z
DanNV
 Re: What's the Next Step?
  By Molotov
K.G.
 Re: What Was Nelson's Price?
  By Carlos
MASS DEATH FROM HEALTHCARE FOR KIDS....
 Re: What's the Next Step?
  By gwen
SJA RE: 3:10 post
 Re: China And India Walk Out Of Copenhagen
  By clarityseeker
"Tom", maybe your new, but please
 Re: HC Bill's "Concessions" on Abortion = Zero
  By cottoneyed
Good Question
 Re: What's the Next Step?
  By DanNV
Tom Ketchum...(12-19 @ 2:35 PM):
 Re: HC Bill's "Concessions" on Abortion = Zero
  By Bea
What in the hell is that post
 Re: HC Bill's "Concessions" on Abortion = Zero
  By cottoneyed
snot and applesauce
 Re: Al Franken Denies Lieberman Extra Minute To Speak -- McCain Fires Back
  By dreadnaught
KG
 Re: What Was Nelson's Price?
  By Tom Ketchum
Jo 2:09 PM
 Re: JAM DOWN
  By Bob Munck
Bea
 Re: HC Bill's "Concessions" on Abortion = Zero
  By Tom Ketchum
Power at the cost of freedom
 Re: JAM DOWN
  By Libertad
Superb Post, K.G.:
 Re: What Was Nelson's Price?
  By Bea
With the passage of this monstrosity,
 Re: HC Bill's "Concessions" on Abortion = Zero
  By cottoneyed
Vampire's Reflection
 Re: What Was Nelson's Price?
  By Carlos
vamp deflected
 Re: What Was Nelson's Price?
  By mike

The Latest on Town HallThe Latest on Town Hall


Blog Roll Blog Roll