Wednesday, February 07, 2007
|
|
Salon: John Edwards Fires Bloggers
|
|
Posted by:
Mary Katharine Ham at
3:22 PM
|
|
That's what Salon's reporting (direct link added).
The right-wing blogosphere has gotten its scalps -- John Edwards has fired the two controversial bloggers he recently hired to do liberal blogger outreach, Salon has learned.
The bloggers, Amanda Marcotte, formerly of Pandagon, and Melissa McEwan, of Shakespeare's Sister, had come under fire from right-wing bloggers for statements they had previously made on their respective blogs. A statement by the Catholic League's Bill Donohue, which called Marcotte and McEwan "anti-Catholic vulgar trash-talking bigots," and an accompanying article on the controversy in the New York Times this morning, put extra pressure on the campaign.
Speculation from sources that the two bloggers might be rehired was bolstered by Jennifer Palmieri, a spokeswoman for the Edwards campaign, who said in an e-mail that she would "caution [Salon] against reporting that they have been fired. We will have something to say later."
"Right-wing fascists and wingnuts" will take the blame on the left side of the blogosphere, but they shouldn't, says The Anchoress:
Make no mistake, this firing is not the fault of “right wing nutjobs” who demanded it (I, btw, hoped they would not be fired, as I wrote here - despite the Hater’s Creed to the contrary, the Anchoress supports free speech and a blogger’s right to say anything she/he damn well chooses to, as long as it’s not “fire” in a crowded theater, and quotes are accurate. If what they say is stupid, offensive, childish, hateful or nuts…no one has to read them. Turning the page is always an option.)
No, this firing has occured because it was a sloppy hiring to start. John Edwards can only blame himself.
Of course, that won’t stop the left from carrying on about how these bloggers are being crucified and silenced, blah, blah, blah. They’re not, of course. They’re still perfectly free to blog - they can still say any damn thing they want to. And, they’ve just become that much more famous. They’ll go on television to talk about how oppressed they are. Maybe they’ll write books or plays about being silenced, and they’ll never catch the irony that they’re talking, talking, talking about being silenced in George W. Bush’s America.
Frankly, it probably would have played well for us if they had remained on staff. I'm not sure how long Marcotte could have kept up with the diplomatic prose.
Allah noted this morning what we would have to look forward to if this scenario played out:
If you think you’ve seen the worst of Marcotte, wait ’til the axe finally falls and she gets to respond to the uproar at Pandagon, using her idiom of choice instead of the diplospeak the campaign’s momentarily forced on her. The “patriarchy” will be blamed, the F-bomb ostentatiously deployed (conspicuous profanity being shockingly “unladylike” and therefore mandatory for the liberated consciousness), and the anti-Christian insults will come faster and furiouser — and filthier — than ever. Which, ironically, will only confirm the campaign’s good sense in deciding to can her. And of course, virtually to a man/woman, the nutroots will rally behind her. If that means mainstreaming someone who enjoys a little Virgin Mary/semen humor as part of her arguments about birth control, hey. The right wing is criticizing her; that’s all they need to know, just like it was all they needed to know about Jamilgate vis-a-vis the AP.
A couple folks have e-mailed and E.M. has blogged that righties should watch out for the fallout on this. The liberal bloggers are a-comin' for us because we a-came for them. This is true, of course, but they were always gonna hate no matter what. We've always known that we, as conservative bloggers, will get a pass from the media and the political establishment much less often than liberals will. It's one of the reasons the right blogosphere's big bloggers are mostly clean bloggers, and if they're not totally clean, they're thoughtful commentators, not just temper tantrums in type.
We shouldn't give Amanda Marcotte a pass simply because the press won't give right bloggers a pass when they're hired by politicians. That's the way the world works. If we lie down in hopes that the left blogosphere will play nicer, we'll just get rolled without ever getting a shot in (kinda like, you know, the Republican Majority). Marcotte and Edwards both should have known this wasn't going to work, and it's not our fault that we pointed out the obvious.
In fact, it's indicative of the disturbing immersion of the Democratic Party in the Nutroots that the Edwards camp thought this would fly.
|
|
How is it possible for the left-wing blogosphere to defend these two harpies? This goes far beyond making fun of a Ted Haggard for his...extracurriculars. Are these people so deluded that they don't understand that insulting several million potential swing voters is suicidal? This isn't about freedom of speech, it's about political judgement. Or is that passe' in the "Democratic wing of the Democratic Party"? Would the "netroots" rally around a blogger who violently attacked homosexuals? Or favorably quoted "The Turner Diaries?", or had a Mel Gibson after several shots of Cuervo rant? One other thing. Why are so many lefty bloggers so enamored with the f-bomb? I haven't run across that much self-consciously gratuitous swearing since middle school.
|
|
The f-bomb shows that you're XTREEM and you don't dance to The Man's tune! It's all about being hardcore!!!!
*shrug*
Personally, I couldn't care less whether or not someone swears frequently, infrequently, or not at all. It works for some and falls flat for others. |
|
Anchoress states: "Of course, that won’t stop the left from carrying on about how these bloggers are being crucified and silenced, blah, blah, blah."
True, this does not silence them.
However, they are being crucified. But not by the right. They where fired by their lefty boss because they where to far left. They are being crucified by their own people. |
|
|
This reminds me of Jesse Jackson and his "Hymietown" remark, and his shock/outrage that people held it against him. After all, he was just talkin' to another brother. Why should he have to watch his language? How dare the press hold him accountable for his "private" conversations. Of course Jackson delivers far more votes than Marcotte, so the Democrats couldn't "fire" him. And he had to eat some public crow. Wonder if the Edwards campaign will try to do the same with Amanda and Melisa? |
|
|
That's poetic. More descriptive was that she lain supine as Edwards (that ambulance chasing patriarch) exposed her to the passion of his pink slip. She should consider Plan B this morning. |
|
This happened several days ago but this is the first time I had a chance to comment!
!!!!!!!!!!!GO MARY KATHERINE!!!!!!!!!! |
|
|
|
|
Actually, I agreed with what Biden actually said. And I am definitely not a liberal. Really, if you reread what Biden actually said, and think of the context he said it in, it's pretty straight nailing. |
|
Let's face it: the motives of Malkin, Coulter, et al is simply to use their exposure to become wealthy. Not sure if you saw it this past week but there was a very good Law and Order episode that took a pretty balanced look at a character like Coulter in terms of what she is really all about as well as the basic principle that no matter how mad these people rile you up, violence is not acceptable.
Malkin wants a television gig so bad it is disgusting. Minions is right -- and the dreaded "left" could learn a few lessons in hypocrisy from her moonie like followers.Slobbering adolescent behavior over MKH, Bethany, Michelle, etc. is pretty much the order of the day and her non-action on correcting her followers that this is not appropriate behavior of good christian conservatives only underscores her real motives.
Unfortunately the "blogoshphere" has quickly become a money making venture for too many people of all political stripes and ruined the idea that people could actually exchange ideas.
|
|
Contest, it is the run up we see for Presidential Nominations. More and more attention is paid to seemingly little details, as compared to big issues. Edwards wants to make his run as, apparently, the Anti War dude, with a side of the old "Two Americas" thrown in for good measure. Both are hugs issues, with more then just two points of view. So the focus shifts, if only for a cyber-moment, to the details of his staff. Considering he tried this run for the Presidency once before, I am actually surprised he would hire two lightning rod bloggers like this. Not because he might not approve of their point of view, or even their tactics. More because it draws oxygen out of the room, and his room ain't all that big in the first place. This kind of stuff always makes me wonder about potential future "hires", should he ever become President. His decision making ability seems, to me at least, suspect. And "suspect" isn't a term I particularly like hearing when it comes to the Presidency. |
|
|
|