Wednesday, November 15, 2006
|
|
"Jihad" In The Draw
|
|
Posted by:
Dean Barnett at
4:18 PM
|
|
As you know, I’ve been engaging in conference calls the last few days with the handful of congress-people who seek to lead the Republicans out of the darkness in the 110th Congress. Over at NZ Bear’s site, the furry one has compiled a list of questions that blog readers wanted posed to the ladder-climbing reps. One of the most interesting, and least tendentious, was the following:
What books have you read about Islamic terrorism against America and the West?
I wanted to ask this question at the conference calls, and have done so three times (so far). I want to make clear that I didn’t want to ask the question to capture any of the representatives in a “gotcha” moment. Here in Boston, we have a local TV newscaster by the name of Andy Hiller who every four years delights in cornering a presidential candidate and asking him something like who’s the Director of Intelligence in Pakistan. When the candidate stumbles or evades, Hiller struts around like a peacock. I’ve always felt this shtick makes him more closely resemble an ass, but that’s just one man’s opinion.
I wanted to ask this question to gauge how much our leading congressmen are doing to get themselves up to speed on the most seminal issue of the day. Because the goal wasn’t to embarrass anyone, I won’t name names in this post, although if you’re really interested you can go to the audiotapes which are somewhere out there on the web and check it out for yourself.
FIRST, THE BAD NEWS. Not a single candidate was able to mention a specific book. The one candidate who tried created inadvertent hilarity by saying, “Gosh, I have a book in my draw. ‘Jihad’ or something like that.” That representative then apologized but quickly recovered a sheen of omniscience by reminding us all that he/she has spoken to constituents who have served in Iraq, and through these conversation she has learned a lot.
This rep’s answer wasn’t even the worst. One of the other congresspeople said that he/she hadn’t read any books on the topic, but then trumped any knowledge we book-readers might get by reminding us that he/she receives information from classified intelligence briefings!
This answer was unsatisfactory for a number of reasons. First of all, as we learned a few weeks ago, many of the highest ranking members of our intelligence agencies don’t know the difference between a Shia and a Sunni. Second, there is a prevailing sentiment amongst many CIA-types that if Israel would just have the common decency to erase itself from the map, then it would be kumbaya-time for the West and the Islamic world. In addition to being morally abhorrent, this view is also grossly ignorant. The forces of radical Islam have never been so modest as to limit their goals to Israel’s annihilation. It wouldn’t be a bad idea to listen to them.
Lastly, I can’t imagine these alleged classified briefings go into great detail regarding the last couple of centuries of Islam and the birthing of Radical Islam. There is nothing in Lawrence Wright’s “The Looming Tower” or Walid Phares’ “Future Jihad” that is classified. I’m not entirely comforted by the notion that our congress-people are depending on the CIA and FBI to teach them their history.
The third congressperson who I posed the question to also didn’t mention a specific book. He did, however, talk some good talk about Radical Islam and the danger that it represents. Happily, he didn’t shy away from the politically incorrect stance of actually using the word “Islam” when discussing Radical Islam. So if we were grading on a curve, he’d get an A.
BUT I DON’T GRADE ON A CURVE. I find it almost inconceivable that our most highly ranking elected officials are so intellectually incurious that they haven’t bothered getting themselves up to speed on the most pressing issue of our day.
The name Newt Gingrich has come up a lot during these conference calls. Whatever Gingrich’s faults were, he was a creative and active thinker. Most of the congressmen have gone out of their way to praise Newt and his legacy. Somehow I don’t see Newt educating himself on the most important issue of our time by merely consuming the spoon-feedings doled out by the known incompetents who populate our intelligence agencies.
Compliments? Complaints? Contact me at Soxblog@aol.com
|
|
I have not read any books about terrorism, but I have read an awful lot of information on the Internet, from Fox News, and NPR.
For more "In Depth" coverage, I read National Review.
Whistleblower from World Net Deily also covers current topice in depth.
I find this more current than books; since the war on terror is changeing so much, I believe that it's just difficult to keep up.
Many of these same authors write columns, which I read.
I seek out AUTHORS that I believe are reliable. Amir Taheri on Iraq and Michael Barone and Dick Morris on politics come to mind. |
|
|
|
we read "The Conservative Soul" out loud to detainees at Gitmo. They'll crack like eggs. "Oh no! Not another chapter on Oakeshott!" Admittedly crueler than waterboarding, but probably much more effective.
I'll put together a reading list for the rest of us in the next couple of days. Recommendations are also welcome in this thread. Educate a congressman! |
|
I'm at this moment reading Dave Hunt's, Judgment Day! Islam, Israel And The Nations I would recommend this book to all Americans no matter what your political or religious persuasion is. And also John Hagee's Jerusalem Countdown. Dave Hunt's book is excellent, a must read!!! |
|
Dean, Thank you, thank you, thank you!! These congressmen need the depth and breadth that you get in a book to be able to understand the full context of the terrorism today. |
|
|
I would even say a few books. Maybe several! |
|
Intel briefs are a miniscule part of the information. Why doesn't it seem common sense to try to gather as much information as you possibly could on the subject? Of course, get the briefs - but the books are a good step in the right direction. Why not go the extra mile and try to gather as much information as you can, all the way from a soldier in Iraq to the Iraqi government? It's all out there, they just need to look for it...
I always will recommend the military paper Stars and Stripes as a source of information. While the news comes mainly from AP, what I look for are the letters and columns from the soldiers' point of view. I'll try to stick some of them on my blog today. |
|
|
|
DB:
And your point is........./ |
|
"America Alone" by Mark Steyn should be at the top of any modern legislator's reading list. Factoid from the book: The British Empire was possible because the British were the first nation to conquer infant mortality. Suddenly the 8-10 children that most families had to have 2-3 survivors all survived, and needed to be exported. Imagine the Baby-Boomers x 3 or 4 with only a tiny island to live on. Fastforward to today. Europe is averaging 1.3 kids per woman = Civilizational suicide. The US is at 2.1 kids per woman = minimum civilization sustainment. Yemen is over 7 kids per woman = Civ explosion. The average age in Palestine is 15.5yrs. They have LOTS of children to export. Any legislator who is unaware of these basic facts is leading blindly. Happy Reading!
|
|
|
Give me a break if most are unread then they are also uninformed and lack the required knowledge to keep their jobs. They should be voted out of office. Unfortunately, new blood is scarce- it's time to recruit some quality replacements- I recommend we look to the growing number of Iraq war vets. It's also a shame the old Oklahoma QB left Congress cause he sure fits the bill to become a leader. |
|
|
Agreed. Would love to see new faces. Thanks for your follow-up on the book question, Dean. Looming Tower should be required reading in Congress. Excellent book, thoroughly researched. |
|
To get some of those books, in your guys' opinion? Local bookstore, Amazon, etc..?
See you all tomorrow! |
|
|
Dean, I'm about as anti-Jihad as they come. I see calamity down the road if we don't deal with this problem. I see Europe going down the tubes for their lack of action. And I haven't read one book on how bad the Islamo-fascists are. I'm convinced already. Why would a congressman have to help someone's Amazon numbers if they're already on board? |
|
I just finished America Alone and agree it is excellent.
Previously, I read Oriana Fallaci's, The Force of Reason and highly recommend it. Fallaci does a compelling job of tracing the decline of Europe and the role of the "footsoldiers" in selling out to Islam.
Currently, I am very impressed with Lee Harris', Civilization And Its Enemies. A very thoughtful book that raises the issue of how civilizations fail and traces the history of various civilizations that met or failed to met the challenge of a "ruthless" opponent. |
|
Wow, the big lie is a live and well about the failure of the border fence to deliver for the Republicans.
If these criminals-who the illegals aliens are- are given a "path to citizenship" you'll be in the permanent minority for a generation.
|
|
That's right, not with SanFranNan as the elected one in charge of something or other. Heck, no more worries about Jihadi's attacking my bod, cuz we're withdrawing prematurely without reaching climax.
So, why waste time and effort reading about something that'll be no longer relevant since the good Ol USA is no longer in the fight; we's surrendered, Dear!
Or, perhaps you're suggesting there'll be a future after 2008 and we need to get ready for that? Is that your point, Bubba Dean? If it is, well, what's on the reading list? Anything at all to prepare us, and the USA, for the great nightfall about to come down on us?
|
|
Jerome Corsi's "Atomic Iran" tells you all you need to know. It is a must-read for Ultra-Conservatives, a.k.a. TRUE Conservatives. Here's an excerpt from pages 17-18 that is highly instructive in how the TRAITOROUS DEMS will treat Iran especially if they ever retake the White House...
"...the Tehran Times on February 8, 2004, published an email memo that was received by the Iranian government's Mehr News Agency(a noted mouthpiece for the mullahs)from John Kerry's campaign that indicated the Democratic candidate, if he were elected, could be expected to be much more favorable to the mullahs than President Bush would be. The e-mail held out to the mullahs a heartwarming message: 'It is in the urgent interests of the people of the United States to restore our country's credibility in the eyes of the world. America needs the kind of leadership that will repair alliances with countries on every continent that have been so damaged in the past few years, as well as build new friendships and overcome tensions with others.' The news agency highlighted the importance of the e-mail by publishing it under the headline, KERRY SAYS HE WILL REPAIR DAMAGE IF HE WINS ELECTION.
Kerry's campaign initially disputed the authenticity of the e-mail, but finally Kerry's top foreign policy aide, randy Beers, admitted: 'I have no idea how they got hold of that letter, which was prepared for Democrats Abroad. I scratched my head when I saw that. The only way they could have gotten it was if someone in Iran was with Democrats Abroad.'
Why was Kerry willing to look past the State Department's listing of the Iranian theocracy at the top of the roll of rogue regimes supporting international terrorism?
Some of the answer comes later in this book when we examine the list of Kerry's top campaign contributors. We will see a pattern that involves the senator's wanting to work with the mullahs, overlooking their nature to support terror, and accepting political contributions from the strong pro-mullah lobby within the United States. The list of politicians who have accepted such contributions includes many high-profile Democrats, including Bill and Hillary Clinton, Ted Kennedy, and Joseph Biden in addition to John Kerry.
The Carter example from more than twenty-five years ago - relying on diplomacy to achieve goals with Iran - appears to be the continuing modus operandi of the liberal-oriented foreign policy wing of the Democratic Party."
Here's another chilling excerpt on page 19 that our MSM will never show to the American People...
"On Sunday, October 31st, 2004, virtually on the eve of the U.S. presidential election, the Majlis, Iran's Parliament, met in Tehran. The 247 lawmakers present of the 290 total considered an inflammatory resolution. The bill before the Majlis would require the government to enrich uranium. The session was carried live on national radio. As the assembly voted unanimously to enrich uranium, the members of parliament took up an eerie chant: 'Death to America!...Death to Israel!'"
|
|
Dean, This is depressing. The most important issue of the day- and they haven't read a book. Books I've recently read: The Rage and the Pride, The Force of Reason, both by Oriana Fallaci. Between War and Peace, Victor Davis Hanson The West's Last Chance, Tony Blankley While Europe Slept, Bruce Bawer The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam, Robert Spencer Londonistan, Melanie Phillips Currently reading: America Alone, Mark Steyn Have started, or will soon start reading: Infiltration, Paul Sperry Preachers of Hate, Kenneth Timmerman Legacy of Jihad, Andrew G. Bostom, MD Eurabia, Bat Ye'or The Truth about Muhammad, Robert Spencer Militant Islam Reaches America, Daniel Pipes. So far, all are excellent books, great sources of information. What do we have to do to get our elected representatives to read them? |
|
Is that...could it be...an endorsment of Gingrich.
He he.
|
|
"Whatever Gingrich’s faults were, he was a creative and active thinker."
Whatever his faults "WERE", Newt clearly didn't use his time in "reclusion" to grow and develop as a man.
Clearly he has a gift, a talent, and there is a place for him.
But there is an old saying, that an anointing, a mantle without purity will utterly destroy.
I saw Newt hide his views from the camera regarding abortion - it took Sean Hannity some considerable trouble to prod him enough to make him confess to supporting "a woman's right to choose". To me, when an adulterer makes THAT stand, it says more than he wants it to - that is why he tried so very very hard to avoid answering Sean's pushy questions.
This was maybe a year ago, long after Newt first resurfaced - and Sean had noticed what I noticed - Newt was bent on being soooooooo useful to the Party - obviously laying groundwork for himself. And being wayyyyy careful about it.
He let himself be prodded that day and hated it. but he kept it as short as possible. That day.
Then a few months ago, he was back on the Hannity and Colmes show, regarding Border Security and "amnesty".
That day, Newt sided with Colmes, and felt so good about it he did something you rarely see him do - he was laughing in Sean's furious face, even when Sean warned him that he needed to seriously consider what it meant in himself to be in agreement with Alan, and totally opposed to Sean.
But Newt just kept laughing, enjoying it tremendously.
Bottom line, he isn't much for border security at all, but he is totally for finding a way to legalize all the illegal aliens that are already here, and he doesn't give a hoot what those rammifications might be. It was one of those "you might as well sit back and enjoy the ride" smirks he was wearing as he sneared at Sean! "Because it is going to happen anyway, whether you like it or not!"
Like I said, he was plumb tickled to be in total agreement with Colmes. You should have seen Colmes' face. He was delirious.
No to Newt! FLAT NO! |
|
Everyone in this country should read a Robert Spencer book at least once. I am no bigot on Islam (having lived and traveled extensively in that part of the world), but I have seen it in action and Spencer is not that far off the mark. Many Muslims hate him, but he is careful to footnote and back up what he writes about. There are philosophical underpinnings in that religion that make it different and dangerous. People need to know that.
Remember that Islam means submission, not peace.
|
|
No Iraq is not same as Vietnam, but it is always good to re-read a few historical classics:
The Bright and Shining Lie--John Paul Vann in Vietnam.
The Best and the Brightest (this is one Vietnam story that has repeated itself in Iraq)
and David Gergin's The Prize about the history of oil (especially the parts about the Middle East). |
|
|
|