Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons

Townhall.com The Blogspot for Political, Conservative and Republican Blogs and Bloggers


Sunday, July 29, 2007
Musharraf Widens The War
Posted by: Hugh Hewitt at 11:20 AM
The Taliban/al Qaeda have had a sanctuary since 2002 in the Waziristan region of Pakistan. That may be ending according to an article in the Times of London (HT: Powerline):



Last week soldiers sealed all the roads into Miran Shah, the provincial capital, occupied the hills around it and fired the first artillery salvo in what Musharraf’s many critics have called a war on his own people.

On Friday morning the army moved into parts of Miran Shah itself after militants blew up government buildings overnight. Most of the 60,000 townspeople are feared trapped, but hundreds of families have fled their mud homes in villages nearby and headed east for the sanctuary of Bannu, a town in the neighbouring North West Frontier province.

I watched last week as some of the 80,000 troops deployed in Waziristan dug in alongside the highway outside Mirali, a small town 10 miles east of Miran Shah. Almost all the checkpoints on this stretch of narrow road were empty. Three lay in rubble because the militants had blown them up. No troops drove along the road. They shuttled to the nearby Afghan border by helicopter.


I have to agree with John Hinderaker's reaction: "It's always hard to evaluate these reports; we've heard similar things before. But if Musharraf is serious about going after the extremists hiding in Waziristan, it can only be a good thing."

I asked Tony Snow about Musharaff's efforts last week:

HH: Are you confident of the Musharraf regime’s stability? Or is there reason for us to start worrying about that regime going south?

TS: No, I’m not going to sit around and speculate about stability. Come on, Hugh. But I think what you can see is that the Musharraf government realizes that there is a concerted threat not merely at the Red Mosque, but there have been acts of violence throughout Pakistan. And what’s he doing? He’s doing a surge. There are a hundred thousand or so troops now on the border, and they’re going and they’re fighting hard. They’re not only taking casualties, but dishing out casualties.

HH: So you’re comfortable, you think the Bush administration believes that Pakistan is doing what it has to do?

TS: Well, look, I’m not going to try to give you a global view of…could they do more? Do they need to hit a different target? They’re doing what they need to do in terms of taking the fight to the enemy. And what we’ve said is you need some help, we’re there to help you.


If Musharraf has realized that Pakistan can't continue on half modern and half medieval, that will be a very good thing. Tony won't comment on the regime's stability, but it cannot be great if it is forced to allow a large swath of its land to be governed by the Taliban.

I am surprised we don't ever see Iran offer the proximity of a nuclear state imperiled by a radical Sunni insurgency as the rationale for its nuclear program. A Taliban Pakistan with nukes is a nightmare as great as a Mullah-led Iran with nukes. (For more on Iran's ambitions and stability, see last week's interview with Michael Rubin).






View in ascending order View in descending order
KGK writes: Sunday, July, 29, 2007 5:03 PM
Saudis
I commend Pak. if they are not prevaricating. I do not fear their nukes, but perhaps India should. Or , I hope, that China does! But, I am more concerned about the Saudis. Their madrasses and Wahabi malarky is still being funded world-wide and especially in the USA. They are not doing their best to chase Al Q or any other terrorist groupings out of the ME and with W giving them 20Billion in aid, I fear they will simply play the game while these education units poison anyone Muslim pupil who is affected by that drivel. Perhaps they will even learn, however, that Islam IS NOT PEACE. LOL
ET1 writes: Sunday, July, 29, 2007 3:36 PM
The "No score in our...
soccor" crowd is not waiting for the fat lady to sing.

The PAKS have been "whooped", Iraq PM has "no attentetion (sic) of sharing power", a "clash of personality" for alliances that rub the Iraq PM and his sect the wrong way.

Cassandra is a piker compaired to todays leftist. Just as history forgets the "nattering nabobs of negativism", leaders that prepare for failure get what they prepare for

Which is the better saying:
1. Every silver lining has a cloud.
2. Better red than dead.

"a nuked up Pakistan, under radical sunni control, is immensely dangerous, and provides a rationale for the shiite regime in Iran."

"Is there a reason why our leadership thought that Saddam constituted a graver threat than this?!"

If we are going to attack nuclear power that may be taken over by muslum terrorists, then the UK is a stones throw away. They have capitulated to muslums in the past, are doings so now and will in the future.

For those on the left who have advocated political dialog, nonagression and not interfering in civil wars, your complaints about what is happening in Pakistan now ring hollow. They just show how quickly the left forgets their own positions.


Liberal Patriot writes: Sunday, July, 29, 2007 2:08 PM
This IS serious..
Hugh is right--a nuked up Pakistan, under radical sunni control, is immensely dangerous, and provides a rationale for the shiite regime in Iran.

Is there a reason why our leadership thought that Saddam constituted a graver threat than this?!
John Konop writes: Sunday, July, 29, 2007 1:55 PM
Heat Rises Between Iraq PM and Petraeus


Is it not clear now that Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki’s has no attentions of sharing power with the Sunnis? Do we have any choice but to recognize each group separately and stop pushing a strong federal government?

AP-A key aide says Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki’s relations with Gen. David Petraeus are so poor the Iraqi leader may ask Washington to withdraw the overall U.S. commander from his Baghdad post.

Iraq’s foreign minister calls the relationship “difficult.” Petraeus, who says their ties are “very good,” acknowledges expressing his “full range of emotions” at times with al-Maliki. U.S. Ambassador Ryan Crocker, who meets with both at least weekly, concedes “sometimes there are sporty exchanges.”

It seems less a clash of personality than of policy. The Shiite Muslim prime minister has reacted most sharply to the American general’s tactic of enlisting Sunni militants, presumably including past killers of Iraqi Shiites, as allies in the fight against al-Qaida here.

READ MORE

http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/heat-rises-between-iraq-pm-and-petraeus

Joe writes: Sunday, July, 29, 2007 11:49 AM
I can only hope this is true
unfortunately we have heard this before.

Musharaff is in a tough position. Imagine if George Bush could have his military decisions changed by Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid. That and Pelosi and Reid were trying to litterally kill him too.

Plus every time Musharaff has sent troops into the tribal areas, they have been whooped.


That is the situation facing Musharaff. I hope our assistance can turn the situation for him.
jtb-in-texas writes: Sunday, July, 29, 2007 11:47 AM
Since Muslims are rewarded for lying
to unbelievers, according to the Quran, how can we be certain of which side ANY of them are on--other than by their actions?

Sign Up to Post Your Comments Sign Up to Post Your Comments
Please take a few seconds to sign up, then you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, create your own blog and more! If you are already registered, click here.
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.
 


Your Blog Postings:
Last updated 13 Minutes 41 Seconds Ago
Last updated 30 Minutes 20 Seconds Ago
Last updated 33 Minutes 38 Seconds Ago
Last updated 41 Minutes 27 Seconds Ago
Last updated 58 Minutes 18 Seconds Ago
 

Archives of our Conservative, Republican, Political Blogs

Blog Search



Townhall Conservative, Republican, Political Blogs Townhall Blogs
Townhall Conservative, Republican, Political Columns Columns
Your Townhall Conservative, Republican, Political Blogs Your Blogs
By Month
 November 2009
 October 2009
 September 2009
 August 2009
 July 2009
 June 2009
 May 2009
 April 2009
 March 2009
 February 2009
 January 2009
 December 2008
 November 2008
 October 2008
 September 2008
 August 2008
 July 2008
 June 2008
By Issue
 A Culture of Life
 Budget & Government
 Campaigns & Elections
 Education
 Energy & Environment
 Faith & Family
 Foreign Affairs
 Health Care
 Immigration
 Jobs & Economy
 Judges & Courts
 Media & Culture
 Property Rights
 Safety & Security
 Science & Technology
 Second Amendment
 Social Security
 Tax Relief
Advertisement

Comments Comments

Scientific Integrity
 Re: Only Global Warming Critics Can Save Climategate Scientists
  By Robert
needless descent into the gutter
 Re: Twenty lessons your teenage daughter will learn from the Twilight movies
  By dreadnaught
jay---you are right.
 Re: Past Two Weeks Has Seen Increased Support For More Troops In Afghanistan
  By clarityseeker
Eugene 3
 Re: Here Comes the Judge?
  By Jo
Eugene 2
 Re: Here Comes the Judge?
  By Jo
Eugene 1
 Re: Here Comes the Judge?
  By Jo
Journalistic Standards
 Re: ACORN and "Journalistic Standards"
  By Robert
Liberals and Leftists...those who belong
 Re: ACORN and "Journalistic Standards"
  By clarityseeker
And this story further reveals...
 Re: ACORN and "Journalistic Standards"
  By clarityseeker
Seadawg...Wouldn't It Be Refreshing If
 Re: Shocker: Palin #1
  By NeoConScum
Carol---thank you for this...
 Re: ACORN and "Journalistic Standards"
  By clarityseeker
Where are the Republican Leaders?
 Re: Past Two Weeks Has Seen Increased Support For More Troops In Afghanistan
  By jay
NOT To Worry, Lefties...The No-Agenda
 Re: ACORN and "Journalistic Standards"
  By NeoConScum
Grace
 Re: Shocker: Palin #1
  By Seadog
GO, Sarah...!
 Re: Shocker: Palin #1
  By NeoConScum
What are you afraid of?
 Re: The 9/11 Never Forget Coalition Announces NYC Terror Trials Protest
  By Darrell
E-mails
 Re: Weather Channel Founder & 30,000 Other Scientists Want to Sue Al Gore for Global Warming Fraud
  By Adam
little eugene
 Re: Shocker: Palin #1
  By zeke proctor
Speaking of Palin
 Re: ACORN and "Journalistic Standards"
  By Careful with that axe, Eugene
The drive-by's are owned.
 Re: ACORN and "Journalistic Standards"
  By Joycey

The Latest on Town HallThe Latest on Town Hall


Blog Roll Blog Roll