Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons

Townhall.com The Blogspot for Political, Conservative and Republican Blogs and Bloggers


Thursday, May 15, 2008
The Place to Discuss Our Fundamental Principles
Posted by: Fred Thompson at 9:59 AM
Spending some time on the campaign trail has confirmed a couple of thoughts I’ve had before I entered the Republican primary race.

First, conservatism is alive and well in America; don’t let anyone tell you differently. And by conservatism, I don’t mean the warmed-over “raise your hand if you believe …” kind of conservatism we see blooming every election cycle. No, I’m speaking of the conservatism grounded in principles based upon enduring truths: an understanding of the importance of human nature in the affairs of individuals and nations. Respect for the lessons of history, the importance of faith and tradition. The understanding that while man is prone to err, he is capable of great things when not subjugated by a too-powerful government. These are the principles that inspired our Founding Fathers, and resulted in a Constitution that delineated the powers of the central government, established checks and balances among the branches of government and further diffused governmental power by a system of Federalism.

Second, change – whether it “real change,” “bold change” or the “change we can believe in” variety others are selling – isn’t itself an innovative policy or a particularly strong leadership stance. In fact, from Burke to Buckley, there has been an acknowledgement that change in the political arena is inevitable and necessary, and we in the U.S. tend to experience it in regular, 2, 4 and 6 year intervals, so 2008 is hardly our first rodeo. The challenge for conservatives is calibrating whether the change being proposed is consistent with our principles and our philosophy, and whether that change is appropriate.

Our nation has some serious issues to work through for today … and for the next generation. Now isn’t the time for conservatives to be looking for a tailored message or a politically expedient route to victory if the end result is going to be the inevitable slide toward the liberalization and secularization of America, and the growth of government and loss of freedom that inevitably ensues. For us conservatives it must be about principles and policies that are grounded in freedom, free markets and the rule of law. That’s what I’ve been talking and writing about for the past few years, and that’s what I want to talk write about here on Townhall and in the new Townhall Magazine.

I joined Townhall and am writing exclusive commentaries for Townhall Magazine because I see them elevating the discourse on issues based on these principles -- smaller government, individual liberty, standing for common values that have become all too uncommon, a strong national defense and, most of all, an optimism and belief in America.

I’m glad to be back here in familiar territory, and we’ll be talking to you soon.

UPDATE:  Appearance on Fox & Friends Friday morning to discuss Bush's speech, Obama's overreaction and Townhall Magazine.



View in ascending order View in descending order
Qat writes: Thursday, May, 29, 2008 10:39 AM
Speak up! Speak often!
Fred, we need to hear from you more often. When do you plan to blog again. Coca-cola knows that if they stop advertising even for one day, their sales slide. The conservative agenda is losing sales, because people like you are not keeping it in front of voters. My voice is irelevant to many people, but yours matters. Speak up daily. Keep convervatism on the lips of the public. It can't get into people's hearts until they receive the message by means of eyes and ears.
blowhardnow writes: Monday, May, 19, 2008 6:36 PM
"Serious Things"
Oh what a hoot you are PPhil. Such weighty serious things that you must discuss on the internets. Sounds like you are wound just a little tight. Boy do you assume things. If I want to relive the old days with the Senator then I have just as much right as you with your "very serious things". Like the Senator really gives a rat's butt what some anti-social recluse thinks. Can you spell delusional self-important wack job?
Pasadena Phil writes: Sunday, May, 18, 2008 10:57 PM
Gomez Cooley
That would be fine except the day after Fred posted this piece, he appeared on Fox and argued voting for McCain on the standard McCain campaign talking points. Same old Fred. No fight. "If you like me, and here are a few more conservative essays to read, vote for McCain." Z-z-z-z-z-z-z-z-z-z.
RecknHavic writes: Sunday, May, 18, 2008 10:35 PM
Letdown
W/ all do respect Senator Thompson, you let us down. I'd a fought the good fight for you, but you weren't willn to fight the good fight for me.
Gomez Cooley writes: Sunday, May, 18, 2008 8:13 PM
Fred08
Fred08 is not dead. We are still standing strong at http://www.thompsoncoalition.com

It is time for Conservatives to come together, stand together and fight together for what we believe in. I nominate Fred Dalton Thompson for President of the United States - the clear Conservative choice.
GunsmitKat writes: Sunday, May, 18, 2008 8:27 AM
John McCain and Gorebal Warming
The best thing that Fred Thompson could do for us would be to enlighten John McGore about the real facts of climate change and the most important fact that humankind has nothing to do with it. It's a political scam and nothing more, well, nothing more than a few hypocrites making millions off it.
TNboy writes: Sunday, May, 18, 2008 12:58 AM
I am Sans Pareil.
I know that Federalism and States rights was a great surrender to the liberals, that is why fake conservatives like Fred Thompson and John McCain promote them so much.

Isn't this something that we had anyways?

This was something to be settled for if we lost to the liberals, not something to shoot for.

One supreme court discision and they are all gone. Social conservatives have known that for quite some time. If liberals manage to be the ones to amend the constitution then they are all gone also. You see, they are weak and unstable, there are ways of destroying them.

This is all part of the lie of Fred Thompson being conservative.

If someone really cared about social conservative values they would want to stop the killing of babies in any state of their nation, they wouldn't like the idea of gay marriage in any state of their nation either.

Fred Thompson doesn't really care about those issues which is my point to everyone. Fred Thompson is there to spread a message of appeasement to them and mask it as something conservative.

The left has plans to force themselves and their policies on you through ledgistration. Your state issues will become null and void.
leewolf writes: Saturday, May, 17, 2008 4:39 PM
Rule of law
Fred: It's great to see you back in the fray. You are a great conservative.
I'd like to comment on the idea that we are a nation of laws. It is really hard to believe in the "good" of law given these few examples:
The OJ Simpson murder trial
the "almost" impeachment of President Clinton for blatant perjury.
the unbelievable legal "pretzel" created in order for the 4 idiots on the California Supreme Court to find in favor of Gay Marriage.
These only underline our need to put John McCain in the White House. Activist judges have and are causing unthinkable damage to the very bedrock of this great nation.
You've got your work cut out for you.

PC will be the end of us all
LEE
elvis writes: Saturday, May, 17, 2008 2:11 PM
Sans...good comments! thanks!
It is nice to discuss and not brawl..if you know what I mean?
I think...Tancredo is awsome in many ways!
If Romney had been elected he probably would have
given him a hefty position relating to the @#$$%
Illegal immigration mess!
You may be right..about Hunter..I think now that you mention it. Gee, if so, that is so, a little
surprising to endorse and not know such about his
policies!?
As a mormon, we are very hard on each other,
it isn't right but we know we are very misjudged as a people and get upset when a mormon screws up! I liked Mitt because he seems very humble and bright..quite a combination! I can't stand
H. Reid(mormon) most mormons are very unliberal
As for his CONVERSION to conservativism...
The apostle Paul CONVERTED in one day! ha ha
Thanks again...take care
elvis

I Am Sans Pareil writes: Saturday, May, 17, 2008 1:41 PM
Elvis...re: Tancredo
I think it may have been a calculated political move. His endorsement was a slap at McCain with the hope (or promise) of a cabinet position in a Romney administration.

About Hunter & The Huckster...correct me if I am mistaken but wasn't there a quote from Hunter AFTER he made the announcement that said something to the effect of how he didn't really know about Huck's policies or positions but thought "he is a good man".

Race, Sex, Religion...three things we're told time & again should not matter seem to be ALL that matters this election year!


W/O=
elvis writes: Saturday, May, 17, 2008 1:27 PM
WHY....?
Don't I get answers to these 2 questions that are
logical,non hostile?
1. Why did Tancredo endorse Romney?
(please be serious and friendly)
2. Why did Hunter endorse Huckabee?
(when huckabee was a real Illegals
butt kisser & Hunter was not)
Let's see..both were baptist!
Hunter was above that ..or was he!?
I have asked this for months and all I get is silence...! Hmmm?smile. The reason I asked this question is because these names keep coming up!

elvis
gunsmoke writes: Saturday, May, 17, 2008 12:29 PM
WELCOME BACK!
Oh course, I and many of the rest of us know that you never really left us.

It is good to see you sharing your wisdom and your leadership with us again.

I know that the Presidential race was a tough one on you and your family. I know that you did not take the decision to get out lightly and that it was a tortured experience. I hope that all is well with your family and I hope that your mom is doing better.

Senator, I don't blame you one bit for the decision you made. You conducted yourself the one way that you know how, with honor. You were treated like a joke by the media. The media that out and out lied and contrived stories about almost every step in the process. I know you found it hard to believe how cavalierly the media and so many Americans took what we took so seriously.

I contributed, I made phone calls, and I want to thank you for your service to our beloved republic, INCLUDING OFFERING YOURSELF AS A PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE!

Its GREAT to know that you recognize that principled conservatism is alive and well.

I hope you recognize that principled conservatives are still very much in search of principled leadership.

I hope that you will recognize that your wisdom and leadership is VALUED very highly by many of those principled conservatives.

And most importantly, I hope that you will offer your leadership again. What a different world we would live in today had President Reagan given-up the fight for good in Kansas City in 1976 after the brutal defeat he suffered at the hands of the Republican Party establishment.

We don't even know, and thankfully we NEVER will know what may have happened if he had given-up. He changed the world. He made history, and he did it by asserting, leading with, and standing firm on FUNDAMENTAL CONSERVATIVE PRINCIPLES.

Think about it Senator. Many of us are ready, willing and able to renew and continue the fight. Your leadership is needed for the elections of 2010 qnd 2012 and beyond.
baseballdoc writes: Saturday, May, 17, 2008 10:24 AM
I AM SANS PARIEL

.....Maybe what this Country needs is four years of OBAMA in order to wake up to how bad thing really can get ...in crime lingo it is called "GETTING SCARED STRAIGHT" in drug lingo it is "GOING COLD TURKEY" ...

.....McCain is not the answer ...he is a part of the problem ...the GOP has jumped the tracks and no longer represents Conservatives ...vote for LIBERTY ...vote LIBERTARIAN .....COLOSSUS
Redlac writes: Saturday, May, 17, 2008 10:16 AM
Voting
McCain is increasingly becoming his own worst enemy. He started out saying he wanted to expand the military - as does Obama. Then, he floated the idea of a $2500 individual and $5000 family tax credit for health insurance, and now, we have his "cap and trade" program for energy. Obama is no choice, but McCain is becoming less of one every day. Every time he discovers that he can't win simply on Iraq, he proposes another program to deal with what the public is actually talking about. Which isn't Iraq for 80% of them. It's health care, high fuel prices, foreclosures, and the like. What we call bread and butter. And every time he goes there, he sounds remarkably like the Democrats.

And if he gets elected - these programs will all be laid at the feet of the GOP - however screwed up they are - and you can count on that being the case.

I can't blame people for searching for other alternatives. And neither can you.
baseballdoc writes: Saturday, May, 17, 2008 10:15 AM
SAURUS

.....Don't stay home ...make a statement ....vote Libertarian ...at least they offer Liberty ...while the others offer only regulations and loss of individual rights .....COLOSSUS
I Am Sans Pareil writes: Saturday, May, 17, 2008 9:54 AM
TNboy
Do you have ANY CONCEPT of where the disappearing line between "States Rights" & "Federal Protections" lies today?

Until you answer that cogently I won't even get into the other 'points' you raised.
Just cast your vote for Ron Paul and feel superior to the rest of us. It should make you happy for one day at least.


W/O=
I Am Sans Pareil writes: Saturday, May, 17, 2008 9:47 AM
Snookered? By whom?
ronwik writes: Friday, May, 16, 2008 12:24 PM
Fred...when he did get into some of the debates....didn't spend enough time on talking about the issues... instead he made it a priority, right off the bat to attack Mike Huckabee about his policies!!!

You sound like Obama the Libs..."we're being attacked!!!"

FACT: Fred was the only one whose lips were moving & brain was working when Social security was the "ISSUE".

FACT: The Senator also voiced the BEST (only) PLAN to solve the illegal immigrant "ISSUE".

FACT: Fixing the 'entitlement' mess we've been thrust into was ANOTHER of Thompson's central "ISSUES" that none of the other pretenders had a clue about.

FACT: Fred told us the HARD COLD TRUTH about our Energy Policy...the rest talked in platitudes about how 'we can be energy independent' by a date certain. THEY sounded like the Dem-Lite product they actually were.

The only other serious conservative candidate was Duncan Hunter and the MSM dispatched him pronto with a decidedly biased lack of coverage. Only when conservatives RALLY & ADMIT they got 'played' by the Media (even FOX was all Rudy all the time) out of getting a conservative to vote for in the general will things get better.

PS
Pasadena Phil - I usually agree with a lot of what you write, but this time I think you're off base.
Bob Barr is a Dem-Lib stooge (look at his policies & voting record) and his place in this election is to syphon votes from McCain & help Obama become POTUS. Huck-Lite just richer $$$ (the Libs pay better than Angry Juan).


For God And Country
W/O=
Redlac writes: Saturday, May, 17, 2008 9:01 AM
Cont'd
The GOP will have to reinvent itself again. And it will take time. The first step is to rededicate ourselves to conservative principals, and the second will be to rebuild the party at its base, much as transpired in the 70's. Liberalism will, after all, provide no meaningful solutions.

It begins again - however discouraging that thought is. We should not forget in the heat of this particular battle, that the issues of entitlements, federal deficits, trade deficits, and the increasing liklihood that in the absence of action, that the dollar will lose its status as the international currency, will increasingly dominate our public agenda over the next 10 years. And to solve this will require conservative solutions, as neither tax cuts, tax hikes, nor spending will resolve these issues.

Conservatism has lost battles, but still won wars. At this point, we are caught up in the moment and will very likely lose this particular battle, but the war is not lost. The real war, the one related to the issues described above, after all, has not even begun. Fred, you mentioned some of this - but the public and the GOP was not ready to accept these unpleasant realities. But as they are forced to begin making choices - and they will be - these issues will come back to the table. And conservatives will be at that table.
Redlac writes: Saturday, May, 17, 2008 8:54 AM
Welcome Fred
You are dead right that conservatism is an enduring philosophy that is not dead. We should never forget that when Goldwater began the conservative movement as it later became, there was a perception that conservatism was dead. Yet, he lit a fire. Later, we saw as a handful of Southerners started an organization known as the Southern Republican Chairmans conference - when there were no Southern Republicans to speak of, which eventually led to the South becoming a Republican stronghold. This was also based on Conservative principals. Reagan then coalesced all of this into an even stronger movement. Today, people are confused precisely because the GOP became enamored with power and abandoned many of those conservative concepts. Indeed, it became the problem, not the solution. This is not going to change for this election. But the pendulum can and will swing back as Conservative thought has had such resurrections since the days of Burke and the 18th century.

Right now, the general public is discouraged with the GOP and their leadership. They don't like long wars, don't like presidents who promise short wars and deliver long ones, are dissatisfied with high fuel prices and foreclosures, are worried about the economy as they sense that we are losing our competitive abilities in a global world, and see the rule of law ignored as our elites pander to those who migrate across unprotected borders and settle here, while ignoring the laws we have created to control such migrations.

orlandocajun writes: Saturday, May, 17, 2008 6:58 AM
Conservatism is alive and well...
It's just not alive and well in Washington. We already know that the vast majority of this country is conservative, and unfortunately, uninformed and disinterested in politics, or the destruction of the country by our political elite.

The only thing that will save us, and the atheists, is help from the almighty (and no I don't mean Obama).
xpressit writes: Saturday, May, 17, 2008 3:07 AM
BrickHouse
No leadership... not just in DC.
Unfortunately, McSham has a grip on the Party now... and you know what they say about power. It does promise an interesting convention though, if Paulinistas don't completely ruin it. Maybe something will be said. But many of us are from Missouri when it comes to "Republican".
Brickhouse writes: Saturday, May, 17, 2008 2:40 AM
Saurus, not a shambles
Granted there's no leadership on the Republican side in Washington, D.C. and our nominee totally sucks, we aren't in a shambles. Gotta keep your chin up. Look at how many conservatives are riled up and standing at attention, just waiting for signal to all push in the same direction.

Conservatives punish politicians who campaign as conservatives, but later when in office do things that aren't conservative. We have standards and principles that we demand from our leaders; unfortunately, liberals and socialists don't have any such requirements. They don't discuss morality, ethics, freedom, burden of government, etc.

November (and beyond) is a long, long way off. Anything can happen between now and then. I think what we need to do right now is to remind people that America was much better off before this Democrat Congress gained power to "Change" things. Before they changed things, gasoline was lots cheaper, housing and the economy were stable and strong, food didn't cost nearly so much as it does now, and lots of other things.

We just need to shove in the same direction. Hopefully Fred's commentaries might point out a direction or an objective we could all work together on. We'll see.
Roger Berry writes: Saturday, May, 17, 2008 1:49 AM
Not rocket science
"A life of leisure and a life of laziness are two things. There will be sleeping enough in the grave"
Benjamin Franklin

Between Fred, Huck and NBC we gained McCain and lost Romney.

We don't need a Schwarzenegger clone in the Whitehouse.
RightWingRocker writes: Saturday, May, 17, 2008 1:31 AM
You can still run.
Candidate Thompson,

I, and many others like me, have not accepted your withdrawal from the race. I cast my vote for you in my state's primary mere days after you passed the buck, and intend to do so again uin November.

Senator Thompson, your message was uniquely free and uniquely American. I, and many others like me, would ask you and your readers to consider the platform of a true conservative party, geared towards bringing former Republican conservatives and other conservative factions together under one umbrella - a party so strong as to force the Republican Party into third -party status (with the proper support):

Fred, I would like to ask that you and your readers take a few moments and go over the platform of the Federalist Party (which I put together), and see if you think you can stand on it. I don't know any conservative who couldn't.

http://rightwingrocker.blogspot.com/2008/04/platform.html

Furthermore, I'd ask the Senator to consider a possible run on a Federalist Party ticket. It's a party in infancy, but a party with a message that no other has available.

Will you stand with us?

RWR
http://www.rightwingrocker.com
Randy writes: Saturday, May, 17, 2008 1:09 AM
Fred Thompson
Senator, we're glad you are back.
SNAFU writes: Saturday, May, 17, 2008 12:44 AM
Still the man!
I pinned my hopes on FDT's candidacy, contributed to the campaign--and will probably still write in the name of Fred Dalton Thompson when I vote. (Unless I vote for Bob Barr.)

I sure would like to see FDT running as a third-party candidate. Hope springs eternal!
nanajan writes: Saturday, May, 17, 2008 12:26 AM
Welcome
I am so glad to hear you will be a regular on Townhall. I have been an admirer of yours for a long time (since you first ran for the senate when I dubbed you the country gentleman).

I hope your family is doing well. I also hope that your mother recovered from her illness.

I followed you throughout the primary and clung to your every word.
I look forward to hearing more from you.

saurus writes: Friday, May, 16, 2008 11:04 PM
Part of the problem - not the solution
Fred - I supported you from the moment it was floated you'd run for President. I pushed your name out there to all my friends and family and associates. I put up every article of note on my blog. I put my faith in you to do the rigfht thing by us and actually give us a choice we could believe in, rather than another Republican vote against.

And what did I/we get .... we get John McCain - a man who stands for every principle anathema to conservatives. And yourself, if your speeches were true.

The Republican Party is in a shambles, becoming just another big spender/nanny government/"global warming" (sic) nightmare. Spending at an all time high. Pork spending higher than most Democrats (hello Ted Stevens). Illegal alien amnesty.

Enough. NO Republican will get my vote this November. Not one penny will I give the NRCC or any other entity.

You deserted us in our time of need, sir.

I will stay home. What difference will it make?
GreenEyedMarine writes: Friday, May, 16, 2008 10:09 PM
Hello from Cleveland Ohio
Wow, I missed you, Senator!

The one thing that I have missed since is that I haven't been able to tune in and listen/read your thoughts on the state of the world today. With the Obama-mania going on and then some republicans abandoning McCain during America's time of need...well, let's just say that it is comforting to hear the voice of reason.

I’m heavily involved with the Republican Party in Northeast Ohio, and hear the "I'm NOT voting for McCain!" on a semi regular basis. I truly fear for the future of the U. S. and I want to know: How do you get it across that if you don't vote for McCain, you might as well have voted for Obama?

For the people out there that are dismissing my thoughts, hear me out: During the '06 election the Ohio AG race had a moderate Rep (Betty Montgomery) running against a liberal Dem (Marc Dann). I heard throughout the campaign that people weren't going to vote for her because "she isn't conservative enough". Sure enough, she lost, but not by much. So, Ohio was stuck with a lawyer that had never been a prosecutor and had made his name protecting pedophiles as our AG.

Guess what? Marc Dann has just been forced to resign. Sexual, well, just about everything, being the reason. Can Ohio recover from this? Eventually, yes.

Can the entire nation recover from having Obama as President for 4 years?

I will be out there fighting for McCain. I hated the immigration and the campaign finance policy. I will suck it up and deal with it like a U.S. Marine; Protect my Country until my last dying breath. I pray that the rest of the Republicans begin to understand, this is a fight we cannot afford to lose.

Senator, it’s great to have your guidance again. It was missed horribly!
xpressit writes: Friday, May, 16, 2008 10:08 PM
P-Phil
That's right. Any support for Fred was not transferrable. These politicians assume too much: that their support is trasferrable on command. It is insulting to independent, informed people. Because the opponent is worse form of liberal does not cut it. At this point, I am not sure he/she is. And the Republican brand should not be automatically transferrable to McCain's policy views and politics. He assumes a lot too.
Con4fred writes: Friday, May, 16, 2008 9:02 PM
Dear Fred
I am, and have been a strong supporter of yours. I supported you with donations (maxed out), I supported you by volunteering, and I did my best to educate people why you would have been the absolute best choice for POTUS.

With that in mind, and with all due respect, I cannot, nor will not take your advice concerning voting for John McCain. This and your short lived involvement with McCain-Feingold are the only 2 things that I can put into a negative column. As far as your positive side, I could go on all night.

I'm thrilled to see that you will be blogging here on a regular basis and am hoping you do not get offended by what some of your past supporters write about you. These people are mostly upset because you were forced out so soon. They blame you instead of putting the blame where it squarely belongs. Please do not hold this against them as they are simply mis-guided and mis-informed.

One request: Please go to the convention and explain to the party leadership that Conservatives are on the brink of deserting the GOP forever. You can also tell them "it's our party and we want it back". And..... If McCain offers you the VP position, please take it like you stole it.

Thank you.
FRedStates.com writes: Friday, May, 16, 2008 8:51 PM
Great to have you back!
I have no problem supporting John McCain... but would have preferred Senator Thompson. But as they say... "You don't have to fall in love... just fall in line." The prospects of a President Obama are just too scary to mess with... so Go John McCain... in the mean time thanks for your efforts Fred... anybody who says you didn't try probably was there... it's hard to get traction when the media kept throwing ice under your tires before you even got out of the drive-way.

http://www.FRedStates.com
Your Anti-Obama / Pro John McCain Superstore
Brickhouse writes: Friday, May, 16, 2008 8:39 PM
Rather have called you "Mr. President"
Fred-- We would have rather called you "Mr. President" than we would Senator McCain, though we're glad we will still have access to your thoughts on issues that really matter to conservatives. Conservative Republicans are lacking a loud, strong voice for leadership in Washington, D.C., but conservative media is making great strides in rallying the troops to work towards a common cause. Look at the results Rush has been able to accomplish by pushing a wave in the conservative movement. Those disgusted Republicans stuck with McCain decided to do something meaningful with their vote, and they voted in the best interest of America. It's about winning our country back and putting her back on it's foundation.

America has been sliding off her track since Bill Clinton's time in office. Alot of damage needs to be undone, and we're hoping we can recover from more damage from McCain. America would be brought to her knees by Obama or Hillary; our enemies would attack us the moment we are low enough. We all know it.

We need more conservative leadership to fight the battle we are up against; these nuts are trying to destroy our country, and they call themselves patriots. Obama, a patriot? Gotta be kidding!

Help us out Fred; the deck is stacked against America by the mainstream media and socialists. Rush is the only one who actually has a game plan for conservatives to DO something and put up a fight in their "bitter" and "gun-clinging" corners.

We'd like to know how to win with McCain in November, and after that, we'd like to know how to stop McCain and the Democrats from getting along too well. What choice do we have? Obama and Hillary would be detrimental.
Pasadena Phil writes: Friday, May, 16, 2008 8:35 PM
This is what Fred will try to sell
"If you like me, vote for McCain". That's pretty much what he was selling the morning on that Fox interview.
TNboy writes: Friday, May, 16, 2008 6:52 PM
Why I will never vote for Fred.
You guys who support him just love to deny reality. Either that or you are just being stubborn, which is fitting of Fred Thompson.

Fred Thompson supported McCain-Fiengold when few conservatives did. Fred's judgement was poor and he was stubborn about it. Maybe he was too lazy to actually read it.

Fred Thompson voted against the impeachment of Clinton. Again something that few conservatives did, and with good reason wouldn't you think? But stubborn old Fred didn't care.

Fred Thompson let social conservatives down by saying that he would not support any constitutional amendment to a right to life, nor to make marriage between a man and a woman. Fred told them that he wasn't going to dance to their tune, then got angry when they took their vote elsewhere.

Throughout this primary Fred proved that he was more than willing to divide conservatives and ensure a McCain nomination.
johnh1 writes: Friday, May, 16, 2008 6:14 PM
Sgt Relic
Count me as four.
Cubsfan writes: Friday, May, 16, 2008 6:14 PM
The real Conservative
We Conservatives should have rallied to Fred. Huckabee is awfull and Romney is a flip flopper. Mccain is just plain wrong. Good luck Fred.
Jackpine Savage writes: Friday, May, 16, 2008 5:34 PM
Welcome home Fred
As many have said before on this thread, the Thompson campaing was the 1st one I ever donated to.

It wasn't the "star Power" it was the fact tht the man was the only candidate I saw that actually Got It.

I'm looking forward to the reasoned logic of Mr. Thompson.

Virginia Patriot writes: Friday, May, 16, 2008 4:31 PM
xpressit
Me too.
xpressit writes: Friday, May, 16, 2008 4:12 PM
so it goes
Seems to me all the talk Thompson did about the border control and the illegal alien issue, for him to now support John McCain is crazy. So we get more of the same, with a cherry on top. I'm with others wondering how much Fred is part of the problem not the solution?
smoorhea writes: Friday, May, 16, 2008 3:48 PM
Welcome Back
I don't buy that you let us down. I think it was all these conservatives who listened to the MSM when they said you got in too late, instead of following their principles. I am glad to see you back.
xpressit writes: Friday, May, 16, 2008 3:42 PM
Silence in not golden
FT>“Now isn’t the time for conservatives to be looking for a tailored message or a politically expedient route to victory if the end result is going to be the inevitable slide toward the liberalization and secularization of America, and the growth of government and loss of freedom that inevitably ensues.”

Lets get past the semantics:

The second, politically expedient route is what causes me heartburn – especially as this election year unfolds. So far along "election road" it has been the expedient or expedience that has won out. Some will claim that is not so, and why there is a struggle going on in the Republican Party. (all a good thing, so they say) I’m sorry, but to the albeit nomination of Juan McCain, it has been a drive toward (political) expedience. It has gotten so bad even those like Tom Davis have [finally] realized the name Republican is so damaged it would not sell as dog food. Its true.

What is now the meaning of Republican, certainly one impressed on younger new voters, will be the Democrat light version of expedient politics. A love fest of reactionaries -- reactive mainly to Democratic left demands. (and just as appeasing toward IT as some want to be toward terrorism. ‘Just give it what it wants’)

Tue conservatives have been resisting this message for years. Now for it to turn full cycle as the status quo with the coronation of John McCain is reprehensible. How disappointing and frustrating is that? And with him grabbing hold of the reigns of the Party, he seems all the more determined to shove it down our throats. So what is left for members of the Republican Party? A giant 60’s style protest burning our registrations on Capitol Hill? Maybe that is what is necessary. But even after it sees the error of its way, if it does, what will symbolize a new beginning for Republicans or at least conservatives?

Jake writes: Friday, May, 16, 2008 3:29 PM
How can Conservatives get behind McCain?
Fred,
You state conservatism is alive and well. Well,you better tell that to J.McCain is doing everything he can to distance himself,betray, and ignore those of us who believe in the conservative philosphy. McCain, as much as you may think otherwise, is NO conservative and has never espoused conservative principals.
The Republican party is dead for all practical purposes---especially when you standard bearer has done everything he can to walk hand-in-hand with the democrats.
elvis writes: Friday, May, 16, 2008 3:28 PM
last not but least
comment from elvis today!
Reagan wasn't afraid to say those stinking liberals have controlled the gvmnt. for 45 years
and we have no more courage to take on the enemy!
The taking of the american hostages by Iran
under the nose of jimmieeee carter(gutless),etc.
Do you hear any GOP say the democrats are doing this bad thing and they are doing that bad thing? No! It was almost a cuss word...LIBERAL, during the reagan administartion..they sorta crept back into the closets because Reagan took
'em on! He went to the public by radio,etc!
Like the person before me said..what has kissing up to the liberals got us!?
elvis
dave writes: Friday, May, 16, 2008 3:24 PM
Fred - Still Influential
Mr. Fred Thompson,
Sir: I was NOT enamored of you due to your "star power". Fact is, I do not remember watching your TV show and was not aware having seen you in a movie until you entered the race.

I became aware of you when an "old" fraternity brother sent me an article by "Fred Thompson". It was an article concerniong illegal aliens! My reply was, "I don't know who this guy is, but I would vote for him as president." The more I learned, the more convinced I became that you most closely resembled the "ideal" conservative candidate. Too bad your candidacy was sabotaged!

Having re-read that original article, I am convinced that your still remain influential. Oklahoma and Arizona adopted into law the proposals you listed in that(firswt) article. The result is large numbers of illegals self-deported to Mexico and other states. Additionally, the Feds have incorporated and expanded your proposal into the SAVE Act (THE REST OF YOU NEED TO GET BEHIND YOUR REPRESENTATIVES TO SUPPORT THE SAVE Act).

The proposals and recommendations you make in support of conservative principles DO impact those in positions to "serve" America. You remain one of the few, nationally prominent people who enforce true conservatism and remind us of the INTENT of our Constitution.

Thank you, and keep up the good fight.
mrflibbleisvryx writes: Friday, May, 16, 2008 3:23 PM
Glad to see you again, Mr. Thompson!
Your campaign was the first and only political effort I have ever donated to. I actively campaigned for you and am proud of it (I still wear my FredHead pins and my "Don't blame me... I voted for Fred" shirt)!!!

I joined Townhall.com today because of your post and I hope to see more of you in the future!
LanceBoil writes: Friday, May, 16, 2008 3:16 PM
Good to have you blogging to the masses
Fred, it was great meeting & hearing you first hand in Myrtle Beach last February, sorry that the campaign didn't work, hope your Mom is better, and you and you're family are well.

I'll echo a lot of the opinion here in wishing you were still a candidate for this years election. Our country is dealing with serious issues and unfortunately, it seems we have narrow choices of any candidate who has the leadership our counry so sorely needs.

Others have attacked you claiming you lacked the "fire in the belly" to campaign. I always considered that a positive trait, trusting more in a reluctant leader who assumes the role for the sake of the cause, rather than one who leads simply for the role of leadership itself. Like solders in battle, no one wants the "gung-ho" guy sharing his foxhole, but rather someone who has courage tempered with caution. You always said you didn't want to be President, but that you felt the need to serve for the greater good. To me, that spoke volumes of your character & integrity.

But please keep the "greater good" in mind as this election moves on. While you have already publicly said you don't want the VP spot, please reconsider if the position is offered by McCain himself. The Vice Presidency is a indeed closely equated to "a bucket of warm spit", but again, for the greater good, please serve.

It's my opinion, that from a party perspective, it's the only way to unify a fractured party, and the only viable hope of having a winable ticket.

And if you change your mind & decide to run again, I still got 30 "Fred '08" yard signs in my garage, ready to go up in my neighborhood again.
mrbmrb writes: Friday, May, 16, 2008 3:00 PM
page 2
conflict inevitablly rsults in some sort of solution between the two extremes, a result that is almost alway more liberal. then we start all over again if someone say thesis antithesis synthesis. more power to you. its ideas, not technology that pushes changes in mans institutions, although technology nmay hasten a giiven end, or slow it down,. important to remember the seeming inevitability of all this. sound fsmiliar to anyone.
mrbmrb writes: Friday, May, 16, 2008 2:56 PM
dear dave
i dontremember saying a word about democrats or republicans. as i remember what i wrote. i was talking about human society since the beginning of time. since the first groups became groups. im sure techniology has something to do with it. it is however much nore definitive to ascribe it to the following. one group in a society inevitably rises to the top and because they do for whatever reason, start thinking that this is the natural order of things..
this of course, leavees anothe groups not at the top. the grouopd at the top naturally sees to it , as much as they can, that everyting is organized so that they can remain on top. lower goup eventually becomes p o d as split becomes wider between the groups and doew something about it, New laws , revolution, intnse conflict. )see page 2
Linda D writes: Friday, May, 16, 2008 2:39 PM
How sad it is this election season.....
.... to be faced with a RINO vs. either one of the socialists/Marxists. Sure, we could vote for a 3rd-party candidate; but, to what end? Isn’t the future of our country, as well as coming Supreme Court appointments, worthwhile enough to hold our noses and cast a vote, at least, for a chance to have someone in the WH who may listen? Does anyone think Obama will listen? Or, the Shrill One?

If conservatives think they need to “send a message” to RINO’s, let’s not do it with this presidential election. Please, it is too important. Once McCain is in, we can just all, hopefully, band together and get our voices heard during his tenure. We all came together to get the Shamnesty thing dropped, twice, by faxing and phoning the Senate. It will be tough, being even more in the minority in Congress; but, if the people rise up and holler even more loudly, maybe we’ll have a chance. Meanwhile, we need to focus on advancing conservative principles at every opportunity. And, with Fred writing, speaking, and, hopefully, bending McCain’s ear whenever possible, we have some hope of taking the GOP back from the “moderates” and Dem-lites.

Bipartisanship -- what a crock! Just what has it gotten us so far? If McCain never used that term again it would be just fine with me. For the next few years we may just have to learn from the Harry Reid play book -- obstruct and obstruct, until they give up. What a bunch of wimpy RINO’s we have in D.C. “Reaching across the aisle” hasn’t accomplished much, has it? Yet, I fear for the country if the Dems control both houses and the WH. God help us.

Linda D in Nevada
Linda D writes: Friday, May, 16, 2008 2:34 PM
Welcome, Senator!

How wonderful to see you here at TH! Yes, I was a supporter and was sad to see you get out when you did. But, I accepted your decision, knowing you probably “saw the writing on the wall.” For awhile I was just so angry at the voters who apparently didn’t do enough of their own research to see what I and so many others clearly understood: You were the most conservative, yet electable, man running. Others were swayed by 15-second sound bites, clever quips and obvious pandering to any and all groups, solely to gain votes.

IMHO, the “evangelicals” were also responsible for buying into Huckabee’s nonsense. Of course, evangelical doesn’t always mean “conservative;” but, do they really think a Right-to-Life Amendment is possible right now? Fred had the right approach -- get Roe v Wade overturned, get the matter back to the States and then work at the local level to prevent the baby killing. When you read the principles of federalism, you realize just how important it is to get back to those principles. Let’s hope Fred will teach us more.

It’s great to see some familiar names here and some new ones who have posted thoughtful and sensible comments. Sad, though, that some have chosen to resort to non-productive vitriol.

Linda D in Nevada
Pasadena Phil writes: Friday, May, 16, 2008 1:51 PM
Sandy
Bob Barr is not about the Libertarian Party any more than McCain is about the Republican party. This election has not been about issues from the beginning and by design. There is not point arguing over issues. Your choice for November is to choose whether you want white or black liberal president. The liberal part is not in play, only the race. No accident IMHO.

Of course, you could vote AGAINST the one-party system by voting for Bob Barr or another 3rd party candidate. Just pick one but don't over-intellectualize it. Any one accomplishes the same goal: no mandate for the liberals.
Sandy writes: Friday, May, 16, 2008 1:22 PM
Bob Barr is not the answer!
It is surprising that the Libertarian Party would consider a candidate that has affilated himself with the ACLU. The ACLU has been very instrumental in the banning of religious displays of any kind, therefore they are against religious freedom. The ACLU has also been a major supporter of illegal immigrant causes, such as the case in Hazleton PA shows. They are illegal, not American Citizens. I resent my tax payer dollars going for attorneys to support the illegals. I would not resent my tax payer dollars going for deportation.
elvis writes: Friday, May, 16, 2008 1:17 PM
A political savvy person told
Fox news that he expects the GOP to lose at least
20 seats in the HOUSE! And this person is a fairly objective person!
Now if obama gets elected and those losses occur
we are talking about something terrible that we haven't seen in our lifetime...! Obama is the most liberal senator in the D.C. GARBAGE CAN!
ELVIS
Sandy writes: Friday, May, 16, 2008 1:11 PM
Ron Paul
You know, Ron Paul was not such a bad guy, and I actually agreed with some of his policies. What turned many many people off from him were his rude, crude and overbearing supporters. And, they are still out there doing their damage to an otherwise decent candidate.
Sandy writes: Friday, May, 16, 2008 1:06 PM
mrbmrb
It would be helpful if you would learn to spell, and at least try to punctuate correctly. Your posts are almost unreadable.
Redhead writes: Friday, May, 16, 2008 1:06 PM
Welcome!
Welcome back, Fred.
dave writes: Friday, May, 16, 2008 12:51 PM
mrbmrb
(everything) is more liberal today. WHY???

Part of the reason is technological advances! As knowledge has increased, laws, procedures, education, even religion have been "modernized" to keep up with the advances.

Mostly, when GOP was in power, our governmental systems evolved to maintain or advance our country while adhering to the constitution. When Dems were in power, they created laws and systems far removed from the dictates of advancing knowledge and technology. Once created and ruled by liberal Supremes, those lib ideologies became "written in stone".

Both GOP & Dem politicians seek continuous re-election. The difference is the degree of "doing whatever it takes". Obviously, Dems have "gone off the deep end" for remaining in power and - as BHO's mentor says - American be d%#@*%ed.

For 40+ years, I was a Dem - but then the jackass party deserted me (or at least my eyes were finally opened).
Virginia Patriot writes: Friday, May, 16, 2008 12:39 PM
Fred, Not Voting For McCain
Sorry, if your aim is to get us to vote for McCain, it won't work. The GOP has abandoned the priciples you write about.
maggie  writes: Friday, May, 16, 2008 12:36 PM
Go Fred !
The word of reason has returned.Clear,direct,and true.
marjon writes: Friday, May, 16, 2008 12:35 PM
BFD, another looser!
Is Fred trying to convince us or himself he is a conservative?
MrRoy writes: Friday, May, 16, 2008 12:28 PM
The Place to Discuss Our Fundamental Pri
Well Fred, where have you been? Someone needs to counteract the whitewashed left wing anti Ameican duppies that have dominated the Democrat party of years.
DJ Drummond writes: Friday, May, 16, 2008 12:28 PM
Will He Answer?
I am glad to see Mr. Thompson back in the media, but I have to say he needs to fix some fences. Is Fred really different from all the "I'm The Next Reagan" candidates we saw in the GOP race, or is it just an act? A good first step would be for Mr. Thompson's next post to address all the questions and comments from the readers here. If nothing else, it would show he paid attention to what we think, and not just his own opinion. Conservatives are starving for real leadership, but it needs to be authentic, not just an act like a sequel to "Law & Order".

We need the real thing, Fred. After what happened last fall, you need to show us more than the failed candidate who quit when things got rough.

elvis writes: Friday, May, 16, 2008 12:21 PM
Interesting comments... Mormons./mitt
Martel made some interesting thoughts..but when
he implied that Romney couldn't be elected because of his faith... I couldn't help but wonder if he's right?! America is still very
stupid in some ways! The Iowa voters that voted for Huckabee admitted that they voted for him on a religious basis(3 out of 5 admitted it!)As for his cult comment...well, that told me a lot about
martel that doesn't impress me! Christ led a cult
their was no CHRISTIANITY before christ..his teachings were offensive to the major religions at the time and different,etc.! Enough said!
Ex-Tex may be right, the texas mess(polygamy) would have been red meat used by the democrats
in Nov. and how many voters outside of the conservatives really know anything about anything
they just let the media (garbage) lead them!They
believe anything that they read!
As for who if anyone played a role in trying to stop Romney...it would be a tag team of Juan/mike
huckaberry! As a latter day saint...I think the time was wrong! When this country gets in a huge
mess maybe voters will think ohhh my gawd....
who has a track record of great success..who is a
problem solver..then call mitt to rescue!
elvis
dave writes: Friday, May, 16, 2008 12:18 PM
Mary Newlon - none
You posted my exact thoughts! Bless you!

I supported Fred for POTUS long before he tossed his hat into the ring. Maybe if he had entered earlier ... Personally, more than ANY candidates, I believe Fred had the dimmies running scared. I am convinced he "lost" due to independents and cross-over Dems voted in the GOP primaries (opposition party means of somewhat controlling potential nominees).

McCain was on the bottom of everyone's list until Fred dropped out, and now ... Well, OK! I STILL believe in Fred and trust what he says, so I will support McCain for POTUS.
blackjuju writes: Friday, May, 16, 2008 12:09 PM
Legisilating morality and family values
is not the way to make things better.
blackjuju writes: Friday, May, 16, 2008 12:04 PM
Another problem
is how "social"conservatives want roe v wade overturned and states rights restored but also want a constitutional amendment defining marriage as between one man and one woman.many of these people also support the federal drug laws and policies that are costing the taxpayers a fortune.The constitutional limits on Federal control and power need to be restored and observed first.
blackjuju writes: Friday, May, 16, 2008 11:49 AM
It's hard to run Conservative
when such a large percentage of the electorate gets a government paycheck.Back when Reagan was elected the baby boomers were still working.Fred was the only candidate that at least said "entitlement" programs need to be reformed.This country needs immigrants to pay social security and medicare tax,that is legal,skilled,educated immigrants that pay their own way.
mrbmrb writes: Friday, May, 16, 2008 11:48 AM
shhhhh here comes god
allconservatives should spend time reading the comment posted on this thread. how many times is f, Thomopson looked upon as a virtuayl saviour to the republican cause. this man is a loser. remember. his fat A s might have allowed him to at least put up a better fight then he did but he stood there, looked aroud slowly, signed, and gave up, trhats the good part. you are choosing a loser to help rescue a losing cause. granted that two negatives added make a positivr, m but not in this case. if Thompson is the best you can do im going to cancel any plane i had for working on the obama campaign and take a long vacation this summer.
Sandy writes: Friday, May, 16, 2008 11:44 AM
You are brilliant!

How many many times I had read that Fred was alot of people's second choice. He came out in many polls (for whatever they are worth) as the most popular second choice. The only people that Fred angered were those crybabies that are still holding it against him for getting out when he did. They gave their money to him, they worked on his campaign, they were finally excited about a candidate more than ever before. I read it all above and elsewhere. They will get over that!
Fred is the natural Dark Horse Candidate. I would be willing to bet my house that those very same crybabies would run back to Fred and welcome him with open arms, along with a majority of Republican and Moderate voters. It has taken people seeing the worst possible choice before our eyes to wake up. Fred will be that Dark Horse! He is brilliant! Amen




none writes: Friday, May, 16, 2008 11:29 AM
Fred Thompson and Townhall
Glad to hear from you again, Senator Thompson. If your name is on the ballot in my state, I will still vote for you though I am a registered Democrat. This is probably the most serious Presidential campaign of my life-time and I have to weigh all things very carefully. I cannot vote for either Obama or Clinton, whichever comes out to get the nomination. And, I understand your decision to pull out of the race. There are probably other circumstances behind your reasons that we do not know about. It it naive and mistated to judge your decision. No one could offer me the job......I wouldn't let them finish the invitation.....
We are happy to hear from you again and miss you on TV....You have alot to say and look forward to your input. Hopefully, there will be a place for you in this administration which I believe John McCain has a great chance of heading up. He must distance himself though, as much as he can from the attitude and policies of George Bush...He has been a disaster and to tell you the truth, I felt it from the git-go in 2000. The arrogance has caused his 28% ratings in this country. Humility goes a long way and you can be humble and strong. It doesn't mean you are a weakling....He just never grew up.
God Bless you, Senator Thompson. Keep telling it like it is....Mary Newlon
Jude writes: Friday, May, 16, 2008 11:25 AM
Apology to Doc
Sorry, I saw the post by ju and your post came more into focus.
Aeroplane writes: Friday, May, 16, 2008 11:20 AM
Fred! Thanks for trying.
I thought you kicked a$$ in the debates. Very sorry to see you step down, but real excited to see you back on the scene. You can do a lot of good for the country still. You've got a fan in - all all places- Vermont.
Pasadena Phil writes: Friday, May, 16, 2008 11:19 AM
Good bye Fred
I've heard enough. Fred is running interference for McCain and is now officially part of the problem. Case closed.

We conservatives can now focus on Bob Barr. Fred just doesn't "get it". If he does, he is just too lazy to do what is right. He needs to read Peggy Noonan's WSJ column today.

http://online.wsj.com/article/declarations.html

Sorry Fred. Once again, you show up writing columns and not willing to fight for the cause. I like you but stop wasting our time. We have serious work to do and the GOP Titanic is not going to be how we get it done even if you are the pilot.
Joy writes: Friday, May, 16, 2008 11:15 AM
2012 TO LATE
If Conservatives think they can wait until 2012 and come back for change, think again. If you let the Left Wing Liberals back in Congress and a Left Wing Liberal President in, there will be too much lost in the next 4 years to ever gain any freedom back.

We need to ask who believes in the Constitution and will protect our liberty using that as their guidelines. We never did, never will have someone who is 100% Conservative as President or in Congress, we need someone who then believes in our Constitution and will appoint Judges who believe in it also. We need a Congress who will allow these Judges appointed.

We do not have a Congress who believes in the Constitution. They only believe in wanting to be re-elected, we need to send them home packing.

Think before you vote in 2009 and if you do the right thing, then Conservatives will have a much greater chance in 2012 to claim this Nation By the People and For the People.

Get Obama and Clinton OUT of OFFICE.
Joy of Iowa
Reggie writes: Friday, May, 16, 2008 11:13 AM
Fred Thompson
I saw a very relaxed, intelligent and quite witty gentleman on Fox and Friends this am.
Name: Fred Thompson. Some of you need to back
off and do some of your comments over on Obama
and Clinton sites. Fred has many words of wisdom
for the American people to hear. He is objective, but, yes loyal to conservative
principles America was founded on. His bid for the presidency was not to be and when he saw this,he stepped down and actually, was the
better man for doing so when he did. This in no way affects what he can do for his country.
He will be a wise counsel for John McCain and the VP that is chosen by McCain. I hope to see more of him in the future. He keeps my hopes
alive for this country.
Slinkiecat writes: Friday, May, 16, 2008 11:13 AM
Glad you're back, Fred!
I also supported you and donated to your campaign as well as to Duncan Hunter's. I am a conservative first and Republican second. McCain may be a Republican, but he is far from a conservative. Our only hope is that he will choose a true conservative for VP, one that will be strong enough to hold McCain to the right track, and one who will take up the mantle when McCain's term is up.

I love reading your articles and seeing you on FOX News Channel. You are the hope for conservatives in a time when there is little reason to hope.
Jude writes: Friday, May, 16, 2008 11:11 AM
Doc?
Was that bit of idiocy directed to me--hard to tell. Real conservatives have to have brains. Running on pure emotion is a lib thing or for populist lemmings or true haters and bigots.
Qweenmumof7 writes: Friday, May, 16, 2008 11:07 AM
Maine
I said nothing about Romney's faith. What I did say (and think I might be on to something here) is that while I think Thompson is a great guy, and was excited when he was first 'announcing', 7 months later, he enteres with a wimper. That sucked conservative votes -regardless of the religion issue - from him. Huck sucked the other votes.
Jude writes: Friday, May, 16, 2008 11:02 AM
Doc?
Was that bit of idiocy directed to me--hard to tell. Real conservatives have to have brains. Running on pure emotion is a lib thing or for populist lemmings or true haters and bigots.
Qweenmumof7 writes: Friday, May, 16, 2008 10:48 AM
Charles
So basically your telling me that anyone who is not defined as 'christian' by the SBC, or folks like you, are second class citizens, and cannot every rise to high office.

Give me a break.

Romney 2012
TF writes: Friday, May, 16, 2008 10:43 AM
Come Back Fred!
As you can see from many of these comments, you really let us down. I, as well as many others, saw a real conservative leader in you! We were excited! Then you quit early! Still don't understand why. But get back in there!! We need you!
Doc writes: Friday, May, 16, 2008 10:37 AM
ju
WTH is it too you? Take your BDS and head back over to huffypuffy and do not worry about conservatives. Really what is it too you?

http://www.audacityofhypocrisy.com/

http://eclipptv.com/viewVideo.php?video_id=956&title=Vietn am_Veterans_Against_McCain&vpkey=62acaf320c

http://www.immigrationshumancost.org/text/crimevictims.htm l
Free Ramos and Compean
Jude writes: Friday, May, 16, 2008 10:32 AM
Conservatives Were "Hucked"
Carl and Sans Pareil, I think you are on the mark. I was a delegate to the WV Republican Convention where Huckabee supporters played out their role to the hilt. Listen carefully to Mr. Holier Than Thou (and so clever, too) Mike; he's still playing games to up the value of his personal brand.
lbknight47 writes: Friday, May, 16, 2008 10:27 AM
Glad your back Mr. Thompson!
When you entered the race I thought "there is our hope". You came on like a Roman Candle, Hot sparks and died in a fizzle! Some of my friends say you really didn't want it that bad but I had my hopes. OK, enough of the dribble here's the meat! The Republican party needs some real leadership and the sad thing is all the groundwork is layed out and just waiting for someone to pick it up and run with it. By the Groundwork I am referring to the Constitution and the laws of our land. Who is that one person who will stand up and declare that we WILL live by that law. Who will protect our borders, be strong on national defense ? Who will put the Government back where it needs to be, lower taxes, less government at the State level ? Who will put our pitiful Education system back on track? Expose the corupt Teachers unions for what they are ? Who will kill all this Pork spending that is breaking our finical system ? Who will put Supreme Court Judges on the bench that defend the laws, not write them as they see fit ?? This in my opiniom is just the tip of the Iceberg of what true Conservative Idealism is about. I like what Newt Gingrich is saying and I believe the results of the polls he has taken say it all. When can we expect the True Republican party to stand up on the Capital step and tell America " WE ARE BACK "!!!!
Jude writes: Friday, May, 16, 2008 10:21 AM
Common Sense Conservative
Fred, we need your commentary and that of every solid, thinking, freedom-loving American. Thanks for your decision to help redevelop the conservative movement. You have a knack for getting across a point in simple,accessible terms.

Deacon writes: Friday, May, 16, 2008 10:08 AM
I think Fred is right...
when he says there is plenty of conservatism out here in the country. Why? Because we live in the real world. We have to pay for what we get with the money we earn. Buy too much stuff and before long you lose your a**. Not so with the DC elites. They can spend like there is no tomorrow and when they run short on cash they cheapen the dollar to create more money to buy more stuff. They also cheat many old people out of appropriate increases in social security by changing the way inflation is calculated. DC is full of cheats and liars and crooks.

Fred you need to direct your thoughts at the cheats, liars and crooks if you want to correct the errors in our country. The conservatives out here already are walking the walk and talking the talk. Good luck my friend.
baseballdoc writes: Friday, May, 16, 2008 9:59 AM
SORRY FRED

.....I donated, campaigned, and you walked away and stuck me with the check ...you ran a weak and half-hearted campaign and I have to agree with a previous poster ...I don't believe you wanted it ...I think your purpose for getting in the race was to run interference for your buddy McCain ...

.....If the election was down to one vote ...and McCain needed my vote to win ...he would not get it ...I will never vote for McCain ...I will only vote for those who support what I believe in and right now ...that looks like Bob Barr .....COLOSSUS
Grady writes: Friday, May, 16, 2008 9:38 AM
We Missed You
Welcome back Mr. Thompson,

I am glad Sean Hannity finally figured you out, but it was too late. I was one of your early supporters and then Romney. Please illuminate the RNC problems for our readers and why it was so difficult for you to gain any momentum. A VP spot may not be good for your family or career but it would be good for mine. Otherwise I fear our party will be hummiliated by the incompetent hippies that seem to be in charge now. Thank you sir, you are a true Patriot.
mrbmrb writes: Friday, May, 16, 2008 9:37 AM
Fred Thompson
Fred Thompson will spend the first three weeks back, looking for the script he is supposed tom read from, assuming he decided to do the work necessary. lazy is still his most serious drawback, as i underrstand it, and laziness dont go way as you get older. he will find this election a little more difficult that memb=orizing the 8 lines per episode thath he had while on Tv. glad to have you back Fred. With all the problems the Reps ar having your appearance as savious for some tells me all i need to, know about the state of reps chances come November. just dont do harm.
johnh1 writes: Friday, May, 16, 2008 9:31 AM
Fred
Do you still have old open borders Spencer Abraham on your team? John McCain already has smiling Juan Hernandez as his Hispanic outreach guy, so I'm not sure he could find a place for Spence. But John has this speech coming up in July at La Raza and he will probably need all the help he can get afterward, explaining why giving the speech was necessary to core conservatives like you and me...maybe Spence could help put some spin on it.

Just a thought...
John Rebrovick writes: Friday, May, 16, 2008 9:24 AM
Great!
I am glad to know that Fred Thompson is on the field for conservative principles in any capacity. It is apparent that conservatism has lost this time out, no matter which of the candidates ultimately wins the presidential election. Accepting that is a bitter pill, but in the end, if conservative voices like Fred Thompson's stay on point, the country will right itself when it wakes up to the damage that the left's policies inflict.
maggie  writes: Friday, May, 16, 2008 9:18 AM
A ray of hope for the
Conservative Party. I have never heard truer words spoken so clearly about our government or our country ,than by you. I 'm looking forward to reading your next piece.Keep them coming,we true conservatives need a refresher course more now than ever.
Darvin Dowdy writes: Friday, May, 16, 2008 8:37 AM
"Hey Fred..."
Doubtful that you'll ever read this "but" I want to get something off of my chest regarding Mr.RICH GALEN. I'm convinced that he went to work for McCain and the GOP Rino Hierarchy long before your campaign ever ended.

Mr. Galen put you on a bus, traveling the back country of Iowa, NH and SC. Out of site/out of mind. Out of the national limelight. What a brilliant strategy for diminishing your dynamic!! In your gut you knew something was wrong. But you trusted and kept dutifully doing what you were told. You continued to run the traditional/ conventional GOP style campaign. Designed to keep you out and down.

Rich Galen sabotaged your campaign, sir! And I believe purposely. But whether purposely or not, he did!

My question: when are you going to get fighting mad about what the GOP did to you? They systematically squeezed you, Hunter and Tancredo out. They had a plan to do so and they did it.
DD
Doc writes: Friday, May, 16, 2008 8:26 AM
Fred
I will admit I was mad as Hel! the day you dropped out. But I had to get over it and start working against McAmnesty! I have since planned to vote independent just to keep from voting for McAmnesty. But please people, do NOT write in a name, some states do not count write in’s and we need to show the GOP just how serious we are that McAmnesty’s brand of politics will never pass for being a real conservative. Do not vote for him, but please vote, and tell your conservative friends to vote also!

http://www.audacityofhypocrisy.com/

http://eclipptv.com/viewVideo.php?video_id=956&title=Vietn am_Veterans_Against_McCain&vpkey=62acaf320c

http://www.immigrationshumancost.org/text/crimevictims.htm l
Free Ramos and Compean
marine43 writes: Friday, May, 16, 2008 7:27 AM
one more thing
We conservatives will either stay home or write in a canidate for pres. Then the M.S.M. will say SEE! They want democrats!!!! Makes me sick. How many times and how freakin many ways do we have to tell the repubs GO RIGHT !! Fools are gonna hand it to the libs s.o.c.i.a.l.i.s.t.s. And we will all take it up the ..ss. more beurocrats, tellin us what to eat ,drink, and drive! We could have crushed these loosers once and for all. Newt is even on board with the global scam! We need someone with balls like Dr Savage. Time to sweep all the turds out of Washington! Remember they are supposed to Represent us!
Liberty writes: Friday, May, 16, 2008 7:22 AM
Proud liberal
"Conservatives don't believe in freedom. They believe in coercing people to obey their morality. Conservatives put a stable nation above freedom and will squash freedom in the name of The State."

Nope. You're talking about the big government neoconservatives who hijacked the conservative movement. By the way, they came from the Democratic party. Their principles have absolutely nothing in common with conservatism.

Listen to this.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4df1soW7Dho
Miguel Diocuore writes: Friday, May, 16, 2008 7:21 AM
My main concern: Israel
Hello Senator,

How would you approach the threat of a Palestian state?

Miguel Diocuore
hocndoc writes: Friday, May, 16, 2008 7:20 AM
There are no "Moderate Conservatives"
Many of us have the perception that no one at the top of the Party is listening to us.

Fred, your campaign was not lost because of your stand on the issues. It was lost because voters who only get their news from the mainstream media only caught a glimpse of your candidacy at the South Carolina debates.

Stop being nice. Do not disappear again. Speak Conservative words to and for Conservatives to those not-so-Conservative leaders of the Republican Party.
marine43 writes: Friday, May, 16, 2008 7:16 AM
SORRY TO SAY
Fred , you left us swingin......
sans pareil writes: Friday, May, 16, 2008 7:01 AM
Gerry
The REAL problem is...

We have idiots VOTING for President!!!


W/O=
Gerry writes: Friday, May, 16, 2008 6:54 AM
Thanks.. not
I'm glad you're not dead, but I thought you were a serious candidate for president. You let us all down. We're stuck now, with virtually no choice. We have idiots running for president.
souixz writes: Friday, May, 16, 2008 6:50 AM
Great to hear from you again!
I was lucky enough to be able to cast a vote for you in MI! Too bad the media kept many in other states from getting the same chance. The one conclusion I have come to is the Primary system needs an overhaul. Maybe a rotating system of regional Primaries. Keep up the good work. You were missed.
sans pareil writes: Friday, May, 16, 2008 6:47 AM
Carl - re 12:52 am
I completely agree that it was Gov Huckabee who put the conservative movement into a tail spin. The proof is there for anyone to see if they just take a peek.

1) The Huckster & McShame had that 'mutual admiration' thing going on from the very start of the campaign.

2) Strategically, Huck's candidacy was supposed to (and did) split the Southern Conservative Vote thereby making it impossible for Sen. Thompson to get any traction.

3) When it became obvious to everyone that the GOP was going to end up with Angry John, Mitt Romney dropped his run "for the good of the party" (and future considerations you can be sure) but Un-Likeable Mike stayed in!!
Huck's decision to remain in the race was one of personal vanity...he could NOT ALLOW the Mormon to garner more votes/delegates than he would have if he stepped back at the same time.

4) Sen.McAmnasty traveled to Tennessee at a crucial point in the proceedings and, IMHO was looking for an 'endorsement' from his 'old friend' Fred Thompson (we all know that ODD feeling we get when Angry John says "friend" dont we) BUT came away EMPTY!!!

But that is all ancient history now and, the FUTURE is all we've go to look forward to. I only hope Fred is doing the same because the immediate future might not look so bad if the stars align correctly in the next couple of months.
Suppose Fred were to wait until AFTER the two conventions when the tickets are finally written in stone (running mates, etc.) before getting into the General Election Race. How many disaffected Republicans, conservatives & Reagan Democrats do you think would welcome the move & give their vote to the man?
The advantage would be to give the Senator's supporters a LOT of time to organize a viable 3rd party candidacy and draft Fred as their standard bearer.
Adios Sen.Juan McAmnasty & Bye-Bye Barry.

Pipe dream? Maybe. Maybe not.


W/O=

Iowa PatN writes: Friday, May, 16, 2008 6:41 AM
Dump McAmnesty-- He's No Conservative
Fred,

I am proud to have voted for you at the Iowa caucus, where you finished third, ahead of McAmnesty. I was impressed by your rule of law and fiscal responsibility positions, especially on the amnesty bill and the $9+ trillion federal deficit. I wish you were the Republican nominee so we could win. I fear that McAmnesty is trying to kill the party--I heard that one of his aides told the NY Times yesterday that McAmnesty will run against W and the Republican Party, and he will also NOT help Republican candidates! He looks like a 40+ state disaster to me, and he will take down many good people with him. Since he will NOT have enough pledged delegates to secure the nomination before the convention, I am hoping the party will say they want to give voters a choice this fall, dump McAmnesty, and run a real Republican conservative, say a Fred Thompson. Please do your best to keep the Party conservative--that's the only time they win!
Sissy Willis writes: Friday, May, 16, 2008 6:32 AM
Hats off to you, Senator Thompson!
As I blogged all last year, Fred Thompson's the one, and I've got the baseball caps to prove it. :-)

http://sisu.typepad.com/sisu/fred_thompsons_the_one/index.h tml

It's so nice to have you back where you belong.


Calabash writes: Friday, May, 16, 2008 5:44 AM
Sam & TNboy
Thank you for your contributions to this thread.

When Fred posted this article, the first thing I thought of was his "scare speech about a nuclear bomb coming to an American city."

At Woodstock, at least there was a warning about some bad acid.

Is Fred going to ultimately attempt to persuade us to drink the Kool-aid, and vote for his friend, McCain?
electric-rascal writes: Friday, May, 16, 2008 5:41 AM
Thank you and welcome back!
Some here seem to think that if Fred had only morphed into someone other than himself, he would have garnered more votes and attention. Should he have become a plastic, pandering chameleon like so many other candidates? No, then he would have no longer been Fred and would have been worthless.

There's much debate here about which candidate siphoned votes from whom, but frankly these days most people seem to be easily (mis)led and eagerly prefer style over substance (Obama and Huckabee are glaring examples); I find no fault in Fred in this regard.

I believe that our dismal choice of presidential candidates is a result of a carefully crafted plan by the leftist media and their influence on the poorly educated and impressionable majority of the American public.

Message to Fred: Please continue to be a principled voice of federalism, personal responsibility and freedom to our nation- a nation that hasn't experienced a candidate for office that has focused on these cherished and enduring fundamentals in a long, long time.

I don't regret any of my contributions to your campaign and my "Fred08" bumper sticker proudly remains on the back of my automobile.

May God bless you and your family.
Trelaina writes: Friday, May, 16, 2008 5:33 AM
Thank you
Fred, thank you for this site which I will be bookmarking and checking often.

I hope your friendship with John McCain means he will consult with you as he makes plans for this country. After hearing his Global Warming NONSENSE speech, I'm finding myself afraid to vote for him again (after a lot of work to convince myself that it is the right thing to do).
grubby writes: Friday, May, 16, 2008 4:29 AM
Fred
I suppose you realize by now that you made an unforgivable error by making noises and teased your supporters about running as early as 3/07, threatened to announce 7/4/07 yet didn't until 9/07, by which time the air was leaking out of the balloon. 6 months! You let uncounted numbers of us down. The delay was a strategic mistake of the 1st magnitude.

And to think the media portrayed you as the grumpy old man! Compared to the dhimmi-lite Manchurian Candidate the repubs are stuck with now, you're a youngster.

As far as the POTUS is concerned, I can't help but think your moment has come and gone.
TANATAAFL! writes: Friday, May, 16, 2008 4:23 AM
Betrayal
I believed in you, the wife and I gave even when we could not afford to, you betrayed many like us. You were just in as a spoiler for McCain, (to hell with him) so shove off Fred and stuff it where the sun don't shine.
konniebay writes: Friday, May, 16, 2008 4:17 AM
Fred
Fred, Fred, Fred. We are headed into socialism. We are screwed as a nation. We either get a Dem socialist or your good friend, John McCain, who will take us there at a slower pace. The Republican Party doesn't want or need its conservative base and your bud keeps sticking his finger in our eyes.
You say conservatism is alive and well. It sure isn't alive and well in the Republican Party and so we have no one. I never thought in my lifetime I'd see the United Socialist States of America but we're on our way and our Constitution is about to be under attack. All your pretty words will not save us, Fred ole boy, especially when your bud, McCain, won't listen to you either.
Cigarman writes: Friday, May, 16, 2008 4:00 AM
re: Fred...Strike The Match!!!
Third Party...I'll follow...
dee writes: Friday, May, 16, 2008 2:45 AM
GRAND OLE PARTY
As a resident of NC I had a hard time voting in the GOP Primary Alan Keys to prove I wasn't a racist or Ron Paul to support the constitution.
I read today that the Libertarians may run Ron Paul as president and Barr as VP. Well after McCain address LARAZA that should about finish him. At least house republicans have gotten the message, I don't think I would have gone as low as the recalled dog food but I would have said Chines imported fake as a description of the new re-defined GOP. When congress passed the MFNT status for China I sent back my RNC membership card, and it's been downhill for the GOP ever since, now I have to turn off Fox news when Carl Rove comes on , and I swear I live where they must be finding the 20% who still support Bush. Something must happen to change the choices we have in the fall or we are going to wake up and find that we live in the socialist middle country of the North American Economic Union. Pray Harder!!
activated writes: Friday, May, 16, 2008 2:27 AM
Vote for me
and some of you would based on your statements, hell you would vote for bozo the clown. All I would have to do is insult everyone, spit running down my chin, get caught drunk driving, make outlandish comments, in short, put on a good show. Fred didnt need a horse and pony show, he just told it like he saw it, he didnt put up with any nonsense in the debates,(show of hands) he schooled them all in what rights gitmo scum would get if they were moved to the US. He has no baggage, again thats what many of you like in a candidate, He is a strong family man, loves the USA, again a sore point with many of you, supports the military, another minus for some.

I wish he would have stayed in the race, but at least I can read his conservative wisdom here!
FRED 2012???
Hammer writes: Friday, May, 16, 2008 1:16 AM
Standing Strong for America&Conservatism
Fred,

It was worth enjoining you during your campaign's launch in Columbia, SC last September and haulin' my four-year old daughter across the Savannah river to meet you in Aiken, SC this past January... and all the Thompson Troop phonecalls in between.

Thank you for continuing to speak strongly for America, federalism and conservative principles.

Should we not be looking forward to a future PAC as well?

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Fred Thompson's fundamental, conservative principles that have unified us for over two centuries:

-First, the role of the federal government is limited to the powers given to it in the Constitution.

-Second, a dollar belongs in the pocket of the person who earns it, unless the government has a compelling reason why it can use it better.

-Third, we don't spend money we don't have, or borrow money that our children and grandchildren will have to pay back.

-And the best way to avoid war is to be stronger than our enemies. But if we’re caught in a fight, we need to win it because not doing so makes us much more likely to be attacked in the future.

-Also the federal judiciary is supposed to decide cases, not set social policy and bad social policy at that.

-And the bigger the government gets, the less competent it is to run our lives.

*from Fred Thompson's message to Iowa voters, December 2007


FOWG writes: Friday, May, 16, 2008 12:54 AM
Spot on
bigurn writes: Thursday, May, 15, 2008 1:55 PM
"I'm Proud of You, Fred
I read your earliest papers about Federalism, was transfixed by your grasp of intellectual discourse, and loved your simple way of articulating it. I contributed my hard-earned dollars to a campaign (yours) for the first time in my life.

I'm glad you've found a voice, and I'm glad I'll be able to hear from you from time to time.

Stay in the game. I'll be here ready to work for you again."


This is prcisely what was on my mind. (I am still crushed by Fred's withdrawal.) I have no one to vote for POTUS now.

carl writes: Friday, May, 16, 2008 12:52 AM
election 2008
Yes, it is good to hear from Fred Thompson, the only person out there making any sense. If he were the nominee, we would be looking at a Reagan-type landslide for the GOP, with coat-tails. As it is, we are now faced with the WORST pair of choices (it doesn't matter who) for POTUS in the history of the nation! Sadly, this comes at a very critical juncture in world history.

Several of the commentators have been accusatory and critical of Fred for his "less than energetic" campaign. I say, that if you truly want to place blame for the debacle we are about to endure, you need look no further than Mike Huckabee and his supporters! They have destroyed the Party, and may take the nation down with them because of their arrogant stupidity. It was clear from the beginning that Huckabee had NO chance, but rather than stay out or get out and save the country from McCain, he stayed in and divided the conservatives. We will all suffer for this. The real question is, will we learn? I doubt it.
lifesaver writes: Friday, May, 16, 2008 12:28 AM
Are you our dark horse candidate?
The growing dissatisfaction with the apparent Republican nominee requires a very positive attitude that he (McCain) will not be nominated. Fred Thompson, be prepared to step in as a surprise candidate AND nominee.
We don't need a McCain, we need a miracle, and God, in His wisdom, can provide that miracle if we all focus and pray for the best for our country. How about a Fred Thompson - Duncan Hunter ticket for 2008? Pray! It can happen! submitted by lifesaver
tacodawn writes: Friday, May, 16, 2008 12:16 AM
Thank you Sir
I look forward to your wise words!
Texas Lady writes: Friday, May, 16, 2008 12:09 AM
Missed You Fred
It is so nice to see you writing/blogging again. After reading everything you had ever written and watching every interview you gave for close to 12 months, I have missed hearing your common sense, rational, conservative and wisdom filled opinions.

Still wish you were the GOP nominee though.

Can't wait to read more here on Townhall.

One request, will you please set McCain straight about what illegal immigration is doing to this country?



ChipsMaster writes: Thursday, May, 15, 2008 11:48 PM
Happy, No, Relieved To See You Fred!
By the amount of the flies buzzing around the ol' horse even in here, to the finger-waggers with barely half a clue but, especially for the millions who discovered and learned so much from you, we desperately need the wisdom and reason only you have shown without fail...as it has also been nothing but a circus of clowns without you.

Thank you for writing again Fred.






canalcat writes: Thursday, May, 15, 2008 11:23 PM
Maybe a Second Chance, FRED!
Hi Fred!

Welcome. I look forward to your articles but really, I hope for a little bit more. A great many of us picked our conservative choice for the nomination for president and not a one which resembles a conservative made it. Although I have utmost respect for John McCain and I will vote for him, I believe he will be more of a moderate...maybe a watered down Bush if elected.

Mr. Thompson of all the candidates that ran for the Republican nomination I believe that you best represented the Conservative principles that we desired. That said, I believe that you sir with the assistance of other party elders, should organize for the purpose of promoting and building the Conservative base. It isn't going to do much good for folks like you or Newt or Victor Hanson or others to write articles on Conservative blogs or in Conservative media. Most of us Conservatives are aware of the problems. There are many, many good Conservative writers and talk show hosts and just regular Conservative folks who need to get organized. We need someone to bring us all together and advertise and promote.

Maybe this is a Second Chance Mr. Thompson.

By the way I just read quotes from Lee Iacocca's new book and he too appears to be quite upset about the way things are going.

Whether it's Newt's Contract with America, Lee's "K" Car promotion, Victor's "Mexifornia" or your video conversation with Michael Moore, you folks have much to offer and if we can get all your heads together and start promoting the Conservative ideals in mass media rather than just Conservative media we will be back on track in no time.
CaptainObvious writes: Thursday, May, 15, 2008 11:18 PM
Thanks Fred
You are the only candidate for any office to whom I have ever donated.

You are the only reason I'm signing up here today.

You announced your run for office when everyone else was supposed to, not when a power-mad media decreed, and I respect you more for marching to the beat of your own drum.

You eschewed the insane demand for glitz and spectacle in your campaign that we've been trained like sheep to expect.

You instead approached us with common sense and dignity, and a calm reason that for some reason we've all forgotten is supposed to be a GOOD quality in a President.

You treated the pursuit of office as a burden of service to the people which you were willing to endure, rather than some kind of personal quest for glory and influence, showing a humility we've all forgotten is supposed to be a GOOD quality in a President.

You spoke to people who had the brains to listen, and those who would only give their vote to someone who pandered to limelight extravagance, absurdity, and steaming piles of manure aren't worthy of their voting priveleges in the first place.

You've said some things that I've disagreed with, but I have never for a second doubted your competency in the inalieniable values of conservatism which are undeniably indispensible for the prosperity and progress of the nation.

Thanks Fred, from the bottom of my heart.
sbenn writes: Thursday, May, 15, 2008 11:00 PM
Help Us Fred!
McCain violates and infuriates us almost daily. He won only 20% of the conservative vote and now is our presumptive candidate. We are dreaming you will ride into the convention on your white horse and save us. I know he is the best of the 3 choices left just because he will place conservatitive judges in place, support the war and oppose abortion. However, I know that many will not vote for him. I fear Obama or Clinton as president but see McCain driving more to them each day. He needs to listen to his party and adopt your white papers on illegal immigration, your common sense stand on global warming and so many other issues. He seems to have accepted your ideas on taxes. Please, for the sake of our nation, put pressure on McCain to come to the party he has chosen to represent for his principles. Teach him that he must listen to the people of the party and not walk further away from us each day. Support of illegals, global warming, NAU and, oh so many things, will lose this election for him and good conservative candidates running for other offices. The congress has a lower approval rating then the president so why does he want to please the Democrats and join them? He has to decide to be for us, stand with us and then he can win. he is running out of time
sbenn writes: Thursday, May, 15, 2008 10:59 PM
Senator Thompson, we still need you!
Fred,it is wonderful and refreshing to read your common sense article and I look forward to more. You are the first candidate I have ever been excited about and worked to get elected. I have voted for the best of the candidates in the past but none came up to your level nor inspired me. I just cast a vote for them and no more. You opened my eyes as to how our nation could and should be. When you left, your last words of "Stand Strong" have held the core supporters together. You have new websites that sprang up after you left. I have no doubt that if you had stayed in for super Tuesday you would be our candidate now. The true conservative states had no chance to choose a candidate. I voted for you after you dropped out. Help us and lead us now.
Loadmaster writes: Thursday, May, 15, 2008 10:53 PM
Howdy!!! as Minnie would say
FDT...your a breath of fresh air on a sunny morning. Trust me we were disappointed with you having to drop out of the biggest race in my life time (and yours) but we will get through this and we will be stronger. It's going to take kicking some GOP leadership buttocks but it has to be that way. I'll let you get the first kick. All levels of the GOP have got to head their head out of the sand and grow some "johnsons" or we will wonder in the wilderness for 40 yrs.

Now is the time for true conservative leadership. Are you ready this time to go all the way? The group needs you more than we ever have.

God speed to you and yours. If you ever get down to Ginders Switch stop by and say "HOWDY".
Pasadena Phil writes: Thursday, May, 15, 2008 10:51 PM
Birdman II
Let me make it real simple for you: yes.

I am not a Libertarian and neither is Bob Barr. He is a Republican. Anyone who dares run in any other party than Dem or Repub is automatically labeled a nut. I don't care. I am not voting FOR anyone. I am voting AGAINST the one-party system. It is THAT simple so don't risk pulling a pizza muscle trying to find a trap door for me to fall through.
farshooter writes: Thursday, May, 15, 2008 10:50 PM
You got a photo of the packing, kaydee?
If not, you are just shoveling . . . well, let's just call it dirt. Unnecessary, malicious, perhaps libelous dirt, at that.

It's flagged...and that is why.
Birdman II writes: Thursday, May, 15, 2008 10:26 PM
Pasadena Phil
http://www.partialobserver.com/article.cfm?id=2824

Bob Barr For President Because if he runs as a Libertarian, he'll ensure McCain's defeat. (by James Leroy Wilson)

"America needs another option, a candidate who would make a better President than McCain, Clinton, or Obama. And who, if he doesn't win, would draw more votes away from McCain than from the Democrat, assuring McCain's defeat."

Is that how you see it Phil?

According to the article, Barr,

(1) ... now sits on its National Committee and is a lobbyist for the Marijuana Policy Project.

(2) Once an arch-conservative, he now works with the ACLU.

(3) Barr now supports gays in the military

(4) and opposes a Constitutional Amendment defining marriage.

Regarding (1), I don't care a whit about the Marijuana Policy Project. Why should Barr's lobbying for this excite me?

Regarding (2), I am opposed to the ACLU. It does not stand for America and if Barr is with it I am opposed to his position.

Regarding (3), homosexuals in the military pose a serious possible risk to morale. Homosexuals can do whatever turns them on; but when/if their activity interfers with a military mission, the homosexual must be gone.

And finally (4), if homosexuals insist on pushing their agenda (via politics and courts) to make this country roll over for them, then the alternative is to enact laws that define the meanings of words LEGALLY.

James Leroy Wilson says, "I resent our practice of slaughtering harmless foreign peoples in my name and on my dime"

That pretty well echoes what Ron Paul said and leaves me with the feeling that Barr give Wilson the same impression.

Please repeat why I should vote Libertarian.
kaydee writes: Thursday, May, 15, 2008 10:10 PM
Phil is full of it
Hey Phil,If you were from Nashville you would know where i'm coming from.It's no big secret.And maybe after we flag it we can go to the library and have a good old fashioned republican bookburning.
rinoHUNTER writes: Thursday, May, 15, 2008 10:05 PM
Pitiful "people"
Wow, some of you "people" and your comments, are just exactly pitiful.
Seems they will let anyone buy a computer. Grow up, or shut up. :)
Pasadena Phil writes: Thursday, May, 15, 2008 9:57 PM
Birdman II
"Should I vote Libertarian knowing they will not defend the country against Islam?"

A vote for Bob Barr is not a vote for Libertarians anymore than a vote for McCain is a vote for Republicans. This is a screwed up election where labels, brands and parties mean nothing. There is only one party and a vote for anything but McCain or Obama is a vote against it. Don't over intellectualize it. Just skip past Democrat, then skip past Republican and pick one of the others. They won't win but if Obama wins with 39% of the vote, believe me, WE WIN! Any president who wins despite having almost 2/3s of the voters voting against him has NO power and the system is sent for a loop. It really is that simple.
rinoHUNTER writes: Thursday, May, 15, 2008 9:56 PM
Backbone
From Government at the Brink, to "It's time for those who believe they have a stake in Western Civilization and it's traditions to get a little backbone, even if it offends somebody", many of us ACTUAL FEDERALIST PATRIOTS have been 100% aware of who you are, and what you STAND STRONG for. The rest, are just moot. Anyone here who thinks they know it all, well, you know. They
need to open their minds, to something more than the MSM that drives their lazy thought process. Good to see you back out here, Fred! You inspired me to enlist the best of Fred08, to create http://www.thompsoncoalition.com and we would really appreciate any feedback you may offer... We are working towards Conservative State and Local Government for now, and hope for a brighter future with actual Americans in office! Sure, we call 'em like we see 'em, so we cannot support John McCain, but we respect your decisions for the GOP at this time. It should have been you, and maybe someday it will. There is no power like God's power, and we will be
STANDING STRONG, from now on. We all thank you for that inspiration. You know where we are now, so please, drop us a line...
You can send us anything you like to kennyward@thompsoncoalition.com, and we will share it wisely. Our best to you, and your entire family. God Bless.
Kenny Ward, Founding Director
http://www.thompsoncoalition.com

For the rest of you, join us in the battle for the heart and soul of America! Ain't no time like NOW! Fight
for what you believe in, it is only an informed, educated and ACTIVE public that can stop the madness that is liberalism. For love of Country, do it!
GOT BACKBONE?
Pasadena Phil writes: Thursday, May, 15, 2008 9:52 PM
I am calling on everyone to flag
all comments like those by kaydee and sphere41 as offensive. I have been noticing many such comments today, particularly at Medved's lastest post, and I hope others come to the same conclusion as I have that they are offensive and inappropriate. Lord knows I get my share of low blows and take them because that is part of the game. But this is just vulgar pollution and so, unacceptable. Please help me flag these guys even if you find me detestable.
Birdman II writes: Thursday, May, 15, 2008 9:51 PM
Fred, where did you go?

2-3 primaries and out? Are one of those that just raised his hand once because he believed for a while?

I can not vote for Obama's change (from what to what?).

I can not vote for Hillary's health care (who pays the freight?).

I can not vote for McCain's open borders (among all the other things).

What is left? Should I write-in you, Fred, because you raised your hand once? Nay, you really don't want it. Besides, you don't have the stones for it. Look at the abuse Pres. Bush gets for making the hard decisions that go with the office.

Should I vote Libertarian knowing they will not defend the country against Islam? I don't know what is worse, shredding the constitution and sovereignty of the USA via the Dem/Rep coalition or bending over exposing the back of our necks for the Islamic sword.

Since we have Socialism caffinated (DNC) or Socialism de-caffinated (RNC) (and the Libertarians are eunichs), perhaps it is time to start a new party.
Virginia Patriot writes: Thursday, May, 15, 2008 9:46 PM
Fred Thompson
Would have made a decent President.

None of the remaining Democrats, including the one in the R jersey, will stop the inundation across our borders. We are losing our country.
Pasadena Phil writes: Thursday, May, 15, 2008 9:27 PM
se7en
"Fred Thompson will not be reading these. Don't waste your time. Can you really picture him, sifting through all these comments, looking for suggestions or praise or disappointment? Gimme a break."

Are you new here? A little unclear on the concept? I am 100% positive that Fred will read these comments. This is a Townhall exclusive, not a subscription to the syndicated columnists who are linked to hundreds of sites. That is why he is here. So think about what you say and try to be polite and constructive.
Pasadena Phil writes: Thursday, May, 15, 2008 9:14 PM
blowhardnow
Go away. Thompson isn't running for anything and he was a single heterosexual man at the time doing what all of us enjoy: the company of women. If his wives and girlfriends still love him, what on earth could you probably have on him? We have serious things to discuss here.
TNboy writes: Thursday, May, 15, 2008 9:12 PM
Fred Ruined This Primary.
Fred was the setup man who's job was to make sure that no "second teir" real conservative was nominated.

You see the plan was simple, if any of the clear and unquestionably conservative candidates were to emerge Fred Thompson would compete against him as the candidate who conservatives should vote for.

All the people who actually believed that Fred was conservative were fooled and blindly supported him. Those who knew better, and knew that Fred Thompson is not the conservative that the media and the enemies make him out to be, chose a candidate who actually was conservative.

So you had a fake conservative masked as a real conservative taking votes away from and spilting the vote to destroy the chances of any real conservative getting nominated.

Wake up people, Fred Thompson gave you McCain. Get rid of him or you will keep getting the same thing.
Pasadena Phil writes: Thursday, May, 15, 2008 9:09 PM
Hey, we all love Fred but...
I think it is only fair that we get right to the point if he is going to be any use. He isn't running for anything anymore and the GOP nominee is already a virtual lock so what is he here for? If he is just trying to take away any attention Bob Barr is getting from conservatives, he will quickly find himself right where he was when he bailed on us after his strip tease act followed by a laconic ambling campaign. I suspect that he is here to recapture some of the "magic" he had when the anticipation was high that he would run and then turn that into support for McCain. We don't need yet another false start and annoying detour from our conservative mission. Fred could have seized the nomination by taking the lead to fight the amnesty bill but..... crickets. High minded essays are great. I greatly enjoyed Fred's essays and completely appreciate that he is on the same page with me on what this country is about. However, is Fred going to be a tool for McCain? Or is he going to be a magnet for our frustrations to then be used to put great pressure on McCain to either prove to us that he can be trusted (kill the Feinstein amnesty provision that was approved in Senate committee on the Iraq bill e.g...) or even to step down as a fraud? We are tired of talking. We have been very clear and adamant and relentless with what we want. Conservatives outnumber registered Republicans so we deserve to be taken seriously, not being told to shut up or being called absolutists and bigots and so on. We are almost out of time. I like Fred and if you explore my blog, I was one of his first cheerleaders here at Townhall. But Fred, let's get to the point. Why are you here?
blowhardnow writes: Thursday, May, 15, 2008 9:08 PM
Mere Bulles and Merchants
Ah, Senator, don't you pine for the days of wine and women in the District. I was there for all of your escapades and I was sober. Perhaps we may use this little blog of yours to recount some of those old memories together. I am sure that I remember many more than you. Cheers!
Pasadena Phil writes: Thursday, May, 15, 2008 9:00 PM
Flaglady Roberta
Don't vote your fears. Vote against the one-party system. The GOP is running a liberal Democrat. Democrats are running an even more liberal Democrat. Libertarians are running a Republican (Bob Barr). I don't know which party is going to run a Libertarian but don't be afraid to vote for Bob Barr. By denying the winner a mandate, you are sending a very strong protest to those who pay for the elections: they may be able to buy the nomination but they can't buy the power that would come with it were they to get a mandate. Makes campaigns ever more expensive and risky to special interests. Don't be afraid. This is a great country and it was designed to allow 3rd party voting as a safety valve. Otherwise, the whole process has turned into a pressure cooker and we might as well just go straight to the shooting part.
TNboy writes: Thursday, May, 15, 2008 8:58 PM
Fred is part of the problem.
If you people don't start realizing that you will be seeing more GOP seats being lost to social conservative democrats.
Christopher writes: Thursday, May, 15, 2008 8:50 PM
Stop being "trolls" to Fred
Why don't you all stop being so judgmental of Fred Thompson and show some grace?

http://www.thompsoncoalition.com
Flaglady Roberta writes: Thursday, May, 15, 2008 8:50 PM
Senator Thompson--Read it or NOT
I don't care if FDT reads this or not.
I DO want it PUBLIC that I am glad to see Fred Thompson words.
I believed that THIS election was to be the most IMPORTANT in my LIFETIME. I STILL believe that.
I was on that Fred Train & I am Proud to say that I had the chance to PROUDLY VOTE for him in our Primary. It FELT GREAT to vote FOR a Candidate rather than AGAINST candidates.
You've asked that we stand behind McCain, and I probably but it is not because I believe in him, but rather I FEAR the others MORE.
I ask now WHAT CAN WE DO??
We want NATIONAL SECURITY, but HOW can we have with OPEN BORDERS & 20+ Millions of UNIDENTIFIED persons IN this country NOW?
We have Water shortages in Calif. , Gas Shortages all over and now there is talk of Food shortages, and yet we have accepted 20+ MILLION persons into this country just because their country was worse?
I'm sorry, but THIS is NOT what MY forefathers FOUGHT for & this is NOT what I fight for.
AMERICA--The US of A USED to be a SOVEREIGN NATION. We have been a MORAL Nation. WE ENDED Slavery, but NOW we are bringing it back with ILLEGAL Workers.
Of course we want PEACE, BUT there is an ENEMY of TERRORISTS who want us dead & buried & they NOW reside WITHIN our OPEN BORDERS. How many MORE must come before it is too late.
Many of us felt that Mr. Thompson was our LAST hope to pick up the VALUES of our Founding Fathers. The BASICS from which this Country was BUILT.
We are "floundering" like fish out of water now.
We can't see a direction and are gasping for air.
I look forward to hearing/reading FDT again. I hope that we can find some DIRECTION.
I, for one, MISS you Senator. I look forward to future communications.
Cheers & God Bless from your California FlagLady Roberta
W. A.  writes: Thursday, May, 15, 2008 8:37 PM
Was perusing Huffpost like an idiot.....
and found this site. Fantastic! The depression has lifted. Fred, you da man baby and as I read these posts, seems to me other folks feel the same way.

Not looking back. Where are we and where do we need to go?


W. A.
se7en writes: Thursday, May, 15, 2008 8:15 PM
Everyone addresses Fred Thompson...
MESSAGE TO ALL YOU who made comments:

Fred Thompson will not be reading these. Don't waste your time. Can you really picture him, sifting through all these comments, looking for suggestions or praise or disappointment? Gimme a break.

Save your fingers. Fred will not be reading these comments.
demitall writes: Thursday, May, 15, 2008 7:51 PM
Fred Thompson == finally signing up
Fred, I am enormously happy that you are actively blogging again.

Please don't take too much offense at the Ron Paul supporters, most are O.K. but some are somewhat 'off'.

In my opinion, after studying your voting records, stated positions, and seeing a lot of debates/interviews/videos; I wanted you in the oval office as president. I gave money a couple times and did a lot of grass roots (person to person) talking.

As far as I'm currently concerned, none of the 3 (and really just 2) running now are 'good' choices, both have major issues. Obama back channels telling Canadian officials to ignore his 'campaign rhetoric' - leads me to two decisions, the first is that its flat out dishonest, and for the nay sayers who claim 'everyone does it' then the answer to that is 'well not everyone shows such poor judgement to leave an 'official' trail'. Either is bad... And stuff keeps adding up. As for McCain - talking to La Raza, etc is sort of turning me off.

Fred, also please ignore the people falling for the MSM spin or just flat out rabid other supporters.

It's good to see you still in the 'arena'. As for third party, we really don't need to fracture again, I'd vote for you, but it would effectively be a vote for Obama (as a vote for Nader is effectively a vote for McCain) (there are some cross-over exceptions but in general it's true). A VP slot would make me feel better about McCain, I'd REALLY like to see a 'real' conservative with 'real' conservative values, to offset McCain's lacking of many of them. Paulians PLEASE PLEASE don't lecture me about how Ron Paul is the only true conservative. I study all the choices and have looked at him as well and make up my own mind, and I will not be voting for him.

I wish you all the best.
nbpundit writes: Thursday, May, 15, 2008 7:50 PM
Welcome Mr Thompson
Looking forward to reading your columns.

Good Luck!
redneck hippie writes: Thursday, May, 15, 2008 7:48 PM
This is the time & this is the place!
The fight must go on!

Nice to have this conservative "big gun" writing and blogging-- I hope to hear Fred's voice loud and clear to join the outcry against congress' plans to destroy the economy and scrap our freedom, for the sake of the global warming hooey.

Fred Leads, Others Pander!

shelbysbest writes: Thursday, May, 15, 2008 7:25 PM
Welcome to your new conservative home!
Welcome back Fred! You've been missed!!! We're counting on you to lead the way so that our conservative voices will be heard. Fred, we're standing firm with you and your brand of conservatism and share your federalist's principles. Now, let's all get to work!
TNboy writes: Thursday, May, 15, 2008 7:23 PM
The whole Fred Thompson lie.
The media tried to make Fred Thompson look like some sort of super-conservative.

A lot of people bought it and a lot of people didn't.

In reality the historical and actual Fred Thompson is a moderate not much different than McCain.

Fred Thompson repressented big corrupt business of the Republican party masked as a conservative for the little people for the sake of their vote.

Make no mistake that this is what is causing Republicans to lose and will continue to cause republicans to lose.

The red state social conservatives are feed up with giving their support to corrupt big business republicans. These people are not rich, many of them are poor, and they have no interest in big corrupt business. They did it for the sake of social conservatives values and that alone.

But insted republicans and fake conservatives downplayed the fact that social conservative values are the most important and insted emphasized big money and big business which is what is bring them down. They did the opposite of what they should have.

Thats how it is. Continue to close your ears to it and continue to lose.

You see how a heavly republican seat in Mississippi was lost to a social conservative democrat.

farshooter writes: Thursday, May, 15, 2008 7:19 PM
Senator Thompson
I simply cannot vote for a Democrat this year, RINOs included. The last one I voted for was named Jack.

If McAMnesty is still the Republican presidential candidate this November, one of those Tennessee Write-In votes for you will be mine. I do NOT consider that a wasted vote; if Obama wins, he wins.
OCRight writes: Thursday, May, 15, 2008 7:06 PM
Good to hear your voice
Having been dispirited about the future of this country since January 22, 2008, I was thrilled to see your blog here today. Too many of us are frustrated and need to know that we are not alone, and our principles are shared by many others. I welcome, and look forward to more of your voice in the future. Conservatives need true leadership - thank you for offering to provide some.

To those using this opprotunity to bash Mr. Thompson for walking away from the campaign, Shame on you! You are the same people who wonder why Conservativism is struggling. It is because people like you choose to pick at our leaders rather than move forward. We have a long four years ahead - as Franklin said, "We must all hang together, or surely we shall all hang seperately." Get over your pettiness, roll up your sleeves, and get to work - It aint going to be easy.
Pasadena Phil writes: Thursday, May, 15, 2008 6:59 PM
Congressional Republicans ...
My theory: these guys have given up and are selling out big so that they will have a career with the companies they are selling out to. Corruption is a bipartisan and rampant industry in DC. We are now seeing what happens when you let politicians do what comes naturally without us barking dogs keeping them honest. Now they don't care. The GOP is running a big-government Democrat for prez who offers no coattails and can't even raise money for himself. What do you run on as a congressman? The Party platform? This whole election is about McCain who is so close to Obama on the issues that America is essentially going to have to decide whether they want a black or white president to deliver the same program.
Kathy writes: Thursday, May, 15, 2008 6:58 PM
Thank you!
I am so glad to see you back in the fray. I am grateful for your common sense approach to the issues facing all of us.
HankRearden writes: Thursday, May, 15, 2008 6:58 PM
Thompson's a good man
And he would have been a great candidate to run against the clowns seeking the democrat nomination. Problem is the drive-by's built him up to peak level before his candidacy even began. By the time the primaries rolled around the narrative had changed to he looked too tired, even though what he was saying was just basic, consistent conservatism. At that point it didn't matter what he said because the drive-by's painted the picture of the tired old man while simaltaneaously proclaiming Senator hot-head as 'the only republican who can win'. At least when he lost South Carolina he did the honorable thing and dropped out of the race so as to allow supporters like myself to vote for Romney without reservation, not that it mattered since democrats decided the election here in Florida. I don't see Thompson running for President again, but he is good buddies with McCain, and would be a welcome addition to a potential McCain administration, that is if McCain can shut up long enough to let us conservatives forget about why we don't want to vote for him.
VictorT writes: Thursday, May, 15, 2008 6:57 PM
Fred
Goodness gracious .. I can't believe the idiotic things people say.

Fred wasn't hungry enough ... Fred entered too late .. Fred's performance was lackluster. Fred let us down.

Fred Thompson is a real human being who doesn't covet power and doesn't like the current political circus that presidential campaigns have become. This is to be respected!

Fred Thompson is not a performer or sexy speaker like William Jeferson Clinton or Barack Obama. But what Fred has is honesty, straight talk, and a strong grasp of the Constitution.

We who criticize Fred are the disappointment .. .not Fred.

Fred left the race because we Republicans sent him a message. He'd be an idiot to not listen. I supported Fred fom beginning to end and would again and RESPECT his decision to leave the race when HE felt he should.

Fred ... I'm proud of you. You're a decent man and you have my respect and I look forward to your thoughts and contributions.

Victor
Slobberdog writes: Thursday, May, 15, 2008 6:56 PM
Looking forward to hearing from you
Welcome Fred,
I am holding my nose and trying to keep from upchucking as I support McCain. The alternative this year is simply too terrible to contemplate. Three more Liberal Judges legislating from the bench, a RADICAL flaming liberal in the White House, and a massivly increased liberal facist Congress and Senate--my god it hurts just to think about it.

This is not just another election year. 2008 will decide if this country remains a free society, or becomes a socialist republic.

Taxes will increase, citizens will loose their right to life (guns), political and religious opposition will be crushed.

God, I wish you had staid in the race.

Dan Lawson
Platteville, CO
Attila the Hunish writes: Thursday, May, 15, 2008 6:49 PM
Congressional Republicans ...
Have lost their way! The three by-elections lost recently to the Dems, two of which were Blue Dog Dems, is just another example of how some GOPers have been pandering to the Libs! Either the GOP comes back to Conservatism or it'll be time to start a new Conservative Party. It won't be the Libertarian Party, which has kooks and Fascists spoiling its broth!

Fred, you can serve this country by becoming a dominant consistent conservative voice, reminding one and all of the conservative principles imbued in our country's soul. Please speak up strongly and often! God Bless!
firebird61 writes: Thursday, May, 15, 2008 6:32 PM
Fred = Coolness
There's a certain coolness about Fred. He can walk down the worst streets of Baghdad and kick the terrorists into the next century without working up a sweat.
Stoic Patriot writes: Thursday, May, 15, 2008 6:11 PM
Welcome Fred!
I too jumped ship, except to Huckabee, but out of love for him rather than disdain for you. Immediately preceding your run for President you had a number of great articles posted here on Townhall. I look forward to many more!
Katablog writes: Thursday, May, 15, 2008 6:02 PM
Fundamental Principles = Don't Sell Out
Sorry Fred, I'm with the rest of the group, angry with you for only half-heartedly running for President, thereby allowing the news media to pick the most un-conservative candidate of the group as our nominee. Now what?

Does it make any difference how the "party" changes? Nope. Because we're stuck with Juan McAmnesty McCain who is no conservative and trying the best he can to lose this election by proving it. We have his July 2008 visit with La Raza, following his jump on the global warming hoax band wagon. And because he calls that straight talk, we're suppose to believe it? Sorry, can't be a fiscal conservative and still allow 20 million law-breaking blood suckers into the country for the rest of us to support.

How can you speak now Fred? The party's ruined. The game is over. We have no candidate.
zeppelin writes: Thursday, May, 15, 2008 5:38 PM
Roll up the sleeves and Get to Work
Senator, sir, I am most happy to see you return to the great conversation! What an interesting collection of comments have been evoked by your return.

It often seems too many of our conservative family are ready to throw out the baby with the bathwater. Certainly Lincoln did not give up on the the Republic when faced with secession. Nor did he decide to start over again. He pitched in with his heart, might, mind and soul and despite the best and worst efforts of his own side to derail him he succeeded in the end.

Sir, you have a real talent for words that express the ideals we both love. What you say and do now can help us rally 'round the flag. There are many other issues besides the Presidency where conservatism can tilt the balance towards victory. We need slogans, ideas, catchy phrases, and even soundbites to help us express truth and overcome the ignorance, hostility, and lies of the liberal/progressive left. There are people out there making a difference who need to be held up as examples to show the way. We need to solidify in words and deeds what conservatism is and does. We need to shine the light in the dark corners and expose the enemies of liberty.

Let's get to work, there's a lot to do!
LootSubu writes: Thursday, May, 15, 2008 5:35 PM
Awesome
So glad to see you on here. I'm a 21 year old college student from Ohio - I was never more excited to be a part of the political process than when I was supporting your bid as the pres. nominee.
Those were some exciting months and I thank you for them. It is unfortunate that conservatives are now stuck in a stalemate, but I have faith that everything will be alright in the end as long as long as we fight the good fight. I am glad that you will be sharing your thoughts and discussing topics of freedom and liberty here. I look forward to your future contributions.
johninoregon writes: Thursday, May, 15, 2008 5:34 PM
Hmm. "rule of law," you say....
"For us conservatives it must be about principles and policies that are grounded in freedom, free markets and the rule of law."

Yeah, Fred. How about reminding your fellow conservatives---and yourself---about the importance of the rule of law? Perhaps a little soul-searching on why so many conservatives have been willing to give Bush and Cheney a pass on on their repeated flouting of that bedrock principle?
texasps writes: Thursday, May, 15, 2008 5:28 PM
Three cheers for Fred Thompson!
Yes Sir! I agree, "Conservatism is alive and well in America". We're all waiting to enhance the movement.

I can't wait to read your future articles. Welcome! :-)
Kevin T. Keith writes: Thursday, May, 15, 2008 5:27 PM
Pull the Other One . . .
So they actually *pay* you for whistling past the graveyard?

Please, just find a sunset and fade into it.
Kuwull writes: Thursday, May, 15, 2008 5:24 PM
Back to something constructive....
Don't miss today's piece from Cal Thomas about Global Scamming.
We need to pick an issue and have a leader (Fred)that can possibly persuade the few real conservatives left in the R party to grow some nads and stand up and fight.
Standing and fighting is what the conservative base needs to see again. We are wandering, leaderless, in the wasteland.
Maybe, just maybe, this will force McShame to see the light in time to present an alternative to "Sold on Gore".
I think too few understand the dangers of the GW scam.
Scog writes: Thursday, May, 15, 2008 5:24 PM
Welcome
Welcome Mr. Thompson:

I know that you have endorsed Mr. McCain and I just don't think he can pull enough middle of the road votes to win. I hope that this will be an EARLY start for your next run for President!

JimP writes: Thursday, May, 15, 2008 5:18 PM
THANK YOU, SENATOR
Thank you for joining TownHall, Senator Thompson. I look forward to your posts and feel confident they will be of great help in promoting the conservative philosphy we share. Maybe you could get Sen. George Allen to sign up with TH, too. God Bless You.
libs are lame writes: Thursday, May, 15, 2008 5:16 PM
Pasadena Phil
If you bothered read the first sentence of my comment, you'd see who the comments are directed towards.
Carlos writes: Thursday, May, 15, 2008 5:15 PM
Tea Party ... @ 4:51pm

Very nice comments! You are an inspiration.
Pasadena Phil writes: Thursday, May, 15, 2008 5:07 PM
libs are lame
Did you even read Fred's statement? Who are you talkin