Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons

Townhall.com The Blogspot for Political, Conservative and Republican Blogs and Bloggers


Friday, September 28, 2007
GOP Consultants Agree with Newt (Sort of) ...
Posted by: Matt Lewis at 2:07 PM

Yesterday, during an interview with Rob Bluey and Ed MorrisseyNewt Gingrich said this:  

I think Republican consultants are mostly very stupid. I think they have no education. I think they have no sense of history. ... If I throw away African Americans, and then I throw away Latinos, and then I throw away suburban women, and then I throw away people under 40, and then I throw away everything north of Philadelphia -- there's a morning where Republicans can't get to a majority.

When Newt talks about "throwing away" votes, he is talking about what consultants refer to as "targeting."  The concept is simple: Campaigns live in a world of limited resources, so it makes sense to ignore "hard-to-get" votes and instead, focus your time, talent, and treasure toward likely voters you deem to be undecided and/or persuadable.  The problem with this, as Newt points out, is that over time it means you are losing -- not gaining -- supporters. 

I asked a few top GOP consultants to chime in on Newt's comments.  To my surprise, they thought he made some good points ...

Terry Nelson who served as Political Director for the Bush-Cheney 2004 campaign, as well as campaign manager for John McCain told me this:

Newt is right. We have to compete for these constituencies in order to win elections. And we have a message for them, so we should not be shy about saying what we believe. If we don't, we will lose. This is one of the reasons the Bush-Cheney campaign focused so much on expanding our vote with these voters.

Glen Bolger, one of the Republican Party's leading political strategists and pollsters, said:

Well, Newt  is right about the math being very difficult when we throw away a number of key groups.  The observation he makes that is off the mark is the implication that consultants are the ones coming up with the policies that have turned off African Americans, Latinos, suburban women, young voters, and Northeastern voters.  Americans don't all agree on issues, and that splits groups up.  Appealing to a broader swath of African Americans requires a sea change in policy and emphasis that has other impacts.  So, it's not that easy.  Simply saying we'll buy black radio won't convince African Americans to vote GOP. It's going to take a lot more.  Younger voters have moved away from the GOP because of their concern about Iraq.  That war was a policy decision, not a political decision by consultants.

Dan Hazelwood a top Republicans Strategist and voter mail expert explains:

Newt is half right. But (it) is not consultants ONLY. Consultants deal with how to get to Tuesday within the reality of what is. Newt is saying what he is best at, a vision for several years of why voting republican will make a positive difference in the daily life of a majority of Americans. The party needs this. Any quality consultant needs to have a plan to appeal to swing voters. He’s right you throw away too many voters and you can’t get a majority.

And Carlyle Gregory, a strategist who, in the past, has consulted for Gingrich and former Majority Leader Tom DeLay told me this:

I agree with Newt, sort of.  Any political party that defines itself by what it is not will never be a majority party.  But why single out Republican consultants?  How about Republican office holders, party leaders and party activists?  The last time I checked, Republican consultants, and I am one of that number, have not cornered the market on stupidity.  We have lots of company.   

Coalition building is hard work.  Thinking and acting like a majority is much tougher than whacking your enemies and throwing red meat to your partisans.  When I came of age in politics we were a minority party with a minority mind-set.  We knew the American public didn't like us or our ideas and the only way we could achieve victory was to fool the voters into thinking we were really Democrats or eviscerating our enemies.
 
In the 80's Ronald Reagan gave us hope and confidence in our ideas and our eventual success.  In the 90's Newt Gingrich taught us how to think like a majority. 
We need to relearn both lessons.

... Interestingly, none of these top GOP consultants knew I was talking with the others.  And they all started off by agreeing Newt had a point -- which -- I think -- is telling ...

Update - 2:41:  I just heard from media consultant Paul Wilson, who thinks the party -- not consultants -- are to blame:

Newt, whom I respect greatly, is frustrated by life right now and has taken his aggression out on us consultants ... Consultants deal in the here and now.  We are asked to win elections today even though we are sadled with the history of our party ... Where was the national party in trying to help Ken Blackwell?  I went to Howard University and listened to the white chairman of the Republican Party trying to persuade black students to join our party.  Excuse me it didn't work.   Ken should have been there ...

Update - 2:58: Political strategist Chris LaCivita tells me:  

I agree that there are several STUPID consultants --  but it’s the candidates who hire them that are real stupid.

Good point.  





Your Blog Postings:
Last updated 8 Minutes 45 Seconds Ago
Last updated 14 Minutes 53 Seconds Ago
Last updated 38 Minutes 11 Seconds Ago
Last updated 1 Hours 5 Minutes 17 Seconds Ago
Last updated 1 Hours 9 Minutes 53 Seconds Ago
 

Archives of our Conservative, Republican, Political Blogs

Blog Search



Townhall Conservative, Republican, Political Blogs Townhall Blogs
Townhall Conservative, Republican, Political Columns Columns
Your Townhall Conservative, Republican, Political Blogs Your Blogs
By Month
 July 2009
 June 2009
 May 2009
 April 2009
 March 2009
 February 2009
 January 2009
 December 2008
 November 2008
 October 2008
 September 2008
 August 2008
 July 2008
 June 2008
 May 2008
 April 2008
 March 2008
 February 2008
By Issue
 A Culture of Life
 Budget & Government
 Campaigns & Elections
 Education
 Energy & Environment
 Faith & Family
 Foreign Affairs
 Health Care
 Immigration
 Jobs & Economy
 Judges & Courts
 Media & Culture
 Property Rights
 Safety & Security
 Science & Technology
 Second Amendment
 Social Security
 Tax Relief
Advertisement

Comments Comments

Frey
 Re: Climate Change Debate on Hold
  By Spudder
Frey
 Re: Climate Change Debate on Hold
  By Spudder
UnBalanced: You Fool
 Re: Billions in Aid Going to Areas That Backed Obama in '08
  By K.G.
Al Franken
 Re: AFL-CIO, Sen. Franken Get Cozy
  By Not of this World
Bob Munch: The population of Norway
 Re: Politico: What Obama’s Poll Numbers Mean
  By Marty
Quite Right: Currently the Fat Old Rich
 Re: Billions in Aid Going to Areas That Backed Obama in '08
  By K.G.
Bob Munch: My age has been revealed
 Re: Politico: What Obama’s Poll Numbers Mean
  By Marty
balanced 12:32: Name the author
 Re: Billions in Aid Going to Areas That Backed Obama in '08
  By Marty
The Plumber
 Re: "Bruno:" You Don't Have to Wait for The End (Guest Blog by Diane Medved)
  By Sky Pete
Xian--"Wealthy White Old Men"?
 Re: Billions in Aid Going to Areas That Backed Obama in '08
  By Julie
I'm sorry, but...
 Re: "Bruno:" You Don't Have to Wait for The End (Guest Blog by Diane Medved)
  By johnsq316
Marty 12:23 AM
 Re: Politico: What Obama’s Poll Numbers Mean
  By Bob Munck
arch 12:18 AM
 Re: Politico: What Obama’s Poll Numbers Mean
  By Bob Munck
HOUSE OF SAUD DESCRIPTION
 Re: Billions in Aid Going to Areas That Backed Obama in '08
  By balanced
MARTY
 Re: Billions in Aid Going to Areas That Backed Obama in '08
  By balanced
PERCEPTOR II
 Re: Billions in Aid Going to Areas That Backed Obama in '08
  By balanced
Yikes, this is going to be a problem
 Re: From the Department of Crazy: Racism Alive and Well
  By Andrea
Bob Munch 12:03: I gave you more info
 Re: Politico: What Obama’s Poll Numbers Mean
  By Marty
Munk Gets Owned!!
 Re: Politico: What Obama’s Poll Numbers Mean
  By arch
Don't Try To Claim You're Any Better...
 Re: Disservice to MJ, Disservice to Ourselves
  By The7Sticks

The Latest on Town HallThe Latest on Town Hall


Blog Roll Blog Roll