Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons

Townhall.com The Blogspot for Political, Conservative and Republican Blogs and Bloggers


Monday, October 29, 2007
Why Not Ask About Pakistan's "Right to Exist"?
Posted by: Michael Medved at 9:45 AM

      Does Pakistan have a right to exist?

      Though a Newsweek cover story recently labeled the turbulent South Asian state “the most dangerous nation in the world” no one dares to ask this obvious question.

       In fact, Pakistan represents an arbitrarily constructed, chronically unstable, perpetually embattled, deeply dysfunctional and undeniably shaky creation of the retreating British Empire. Before 1947, the territories eventually designated as “Pakistan” (the name means “Pure Land” in Urdu) comprised an integral part of British India. The hastily and sloppily drawn borders corresponded to no historic nation state, and represented only a desperate concession to Muslim agitators who wanted no part of a newly independent, Hindu majority India. The creation of Pakistan led to an explosion of unspeakable barbarity and bloodshed, with “Independence Riots” claiming a total of at least 500,000 lives (some sources say more than a million). Meanwhile, Pakistan’s creation created the greatest refugee crisis in recent history; UN figures indicate that more than 14 million human beings fled their homes in desperation, with Hindus and Sikhs trying to escape the hostile new Muslim state and find safe haven in India, and Muslims moving from India to Pakistan.

      During most of its 60 year history, Pakistan has suffered from dictatorial military rule – in contrast to the surprisingly durable democracy in its gigantic neighbor, India. The majority of the nation remains both illiterate and impoverished—with little of the spectacular economic progress that his made India into a high tech and commercial powerhouse. In 1971, the eastern portion of Pakistan engaged in a bloody struggle against federal forces to separate itself into the new country of Bangladesh. Border wars with India over the disputed province of Kashmir have flared up on two major occasions, with the issue still unsettled at a time that both combatants possess nuclear weapons. Now a new crisis looms as General Musharraf tries to hold onto power in the face of twin challenges from rabid Islamist fanatics and former Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto, recently returned from exile.

      In light of this history, it’s shocking that few Americans or Europeans question the troubled and divided nation’s existence.

      Instead, agitators on the international left love to challenge the “right to exist” of Israel – a far more stable, prosperous, democratic and, yes, peaceful nation than Pakistan. Though formally recognized as a modern state at almost exactly the same time as Pakistan (1948 rather than 1947), Israel occupies similar borders to the ancient Jewish commonwealth that flourished for more than a thousand years. Moreover the transfer of refugee populations – with 700,000 Palestinian Arabs fleeing the territory of the new state of Israel, and more than 800,000 Jews fleeing Arab states and finding new homes in Israel --- represents scarcely 10% of the massive population shift (involving more than 14 million people) attendant to the birth of Pakistan.

     This doesn’t stop the President of Iran, or the terrorist organizations he openly supports (Hamas and Hezbollah), or twenty states in the Arab League (except for Jordan, Egypt and Morocco), from regularly denying Israel’s very existence – excluding it from maps, referring to the Jewish State as “Occupied Palestine” or “The Zionist Enemy.”

     This Islamist intransigence raises the obvious question: on what basis does Pakistan constitute an “authentic,” “well-established,” “respect-worthy” nation, but Israel does not?

      On every conceivable basis—history, international recognition, authorization by world bodies (The League of Nations supported a Jewish homeland on the site of Israel in 1923, a decade before anyone even proposed the idea of Pakistan), stability, functioning economy, democratic institutions, rule of law, enforceable borders, successful self-defense on multiple occasions, desire of peace with neighbors, support by a majority of its own citizens, respect for religious and ethnic pluralism --- Israel contrasts favorably with “The Islamic Republic of Pakistan.”

      No, the nightmarish, basket-case nation on India’s northwestern border won’t disappear or dissolve. But its persistence (despite horrendous civic unrest, Islamist fanaticism, rampant militarism, and nuclear threats to its neighbors and the rest of the world) should help persuade antagonists and skeptics that Israel will remain at least as permanent a feature on the world stage.

      







Your Blog Postings:
Last updated 16 Minutes 56 Seconds Ago
Last updated 28 Minutes 32 Seconds Ago
Last updated 31 Minutes 29 Seconds Ago
Last updated 55 Minutes 41 Seconds Ago
Last updated 1 Hours 7 Minutes 6 Seconds Ago
 

Archives of our Conservative, Republican, Political Blogs

Blog Search



Townhall Conservative, Republican, Political Blogs Townhall Blogs
Townhall Conservative, Republican, Political Columns Columns
Your Townhall Conservative, Republican, Political Blogs Your Blogs
By Month
 November 2009
 October 2009
 September 2009
 August 2009
 July 2009
 June 2009
 May 2009
 April 2009
 March 2009
 February 2009
 January 2009
 December 2008
 November 2008
 October 2008
 September 2008
 August 2008
 July 2008
 June 2008
By Issue
 A Culture of Life
 Budget & Government
 Campaigns & Elections
 Education
 Energy & Environment
 Faith & Family
 Foreign Affairs
 Health Care
 Immigration
 Jobs & Economy
 Judges & Courts
 Media & Culture
 Property Rights
 Safety & Security
 Science & Technology
 Second Amendment
 Social Security
 Tax Relief
Advertisement

Comments Comments

One thing sure to occur
 Re: Re: Beck Has No Sympathy for Carrie Prejean
  By cottoneyed
Hey Papi,
 Re: Re: Republican Lowden the Clear Front-Runner in Nevada
  By Crispian
Christians Are Hypocrites
 Re: Re: Beck Has No Sympathy for Carrie Prejean
  By Independent_voter
Munck
 Re: Bush: "I Went Against My Free-Market Instincts"; Beware of This "Temptation"
  By NOTW
Baradiel 6:35 PM
 Re: Bush: "I Went Against My Free-Market Instincts"; Beware of This "Temptation"
  By Bob Munck
It's true...
 Re: Re: Beck Has No Sympathy for Carrie Prejean
  By Paul
May
 Re: Re: Beck Has No Sympathy for Carrie Prejean
  By Good man's wife
twomay,
 Re: Re: Beck Has No Sympathy for Carrie Prejean
  By Crispian
Your forget
 Re: Shouldn't It Be 14 Counts?
  By Baradiel
Tea Party: Dhimmi media?
 Re: Fort Hood Shooter's Business Cards Advertised Extremism
  By K.G.
You Go Carrie,,,,,
 Re: Re: Beck Has No Sympathy for Carrie Prejean
  By colt.45
Bob Munck
 Re: Bush: "I Went Against My Free-Market Instincts"; Beware of This "Temptation"
  By Baradiel
Crispian has the hots for Jillian
 Re: Re: Republican Lowden the Clear Front-Runner in Nevada
  By Papi Mike
T.C.
 Re: Fort Hood Shooter's Business Cards Advertised Extremism
  By Tea Party
Riders on the Storm 6:10 PM
 Re: Bush: "I Went Against My Free-Market Instincts"; Beware of This "Temptation"
  By Bob Munck
Yes it does matter
 Re: Shouldn't It Be 14 Counts?
  By Tea Party
Riders on the Storm
 Re: Bush: "I Went Against My Free-Market Instincts"; Beware of This "Temptation"
  By Baradiel
Riders on the Storm,
 Re: Glenn Beck: No Sympathy for Carrie Prejean
  By Crispian
Munck
 Re: Bush: "I Went Against My Free-Market Instincts"; Beware of This "Temptation"
  By NOTW
Welfare?
 Re: Bush: "I Went Against My Free-Market Instincts"; Beware of This "Temptation"
  By Dose of Reality

The Latest on Town HallThe Latest on Town Hall


Blog Roll Blog Roll