Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons

Townhall.com The Blogspot for Political, Conservative and Republican Blogs and Bloggers


Wednesday, February 06, 2008
Reaganauts For McCain
Posted by: Matt Lewis at 4:20 PM
Some former Reagan insiders have teamed up to support John McCain.  Here's the letter they just released:

Wednesday, February 6, 2008 

A Memorandum for Our Conservative Colleagues  

    Some thirty years ago, we and thousands of other grassroots conservatives helped a man then deemed a "maverick conservative" take on the established order in Washington and the Republican Party. Ronald Reagan's run for the nomination in 1976 nearly succeeded in denying a sitting president another term. 

    In the mid-1970s, the GOP was crippled by corruption, and betrayal of conservative principles had brought the party to its knees. Expectations of a firm and principled stand against the Soviet Union had been converted to the misty-eyed policy of "detente." The reigning Republican Establishment considered Reagan an interloper, an ill-informed and a somewhat primitive and uninformed one at that. 

    While the Establishment embraced "detente" with the Soviets, Reagan rejected it as unrealistic, a flawed and dangerous approach to a powerful and determined adversary. The Reagan concept, founded on the principle of peace through strength, was that the United States possessed the resources, human and financial, and the determination, ultimately to persuade the Soviet Union and its allies to give up the quest for world domination.   Reagan believed that American power must be wielded cautiously but decisively in the pursuit of our national interests. That power, he believed, emanates from the American people, and not from a few powerful elites. 

    In short, Reagan challenged the reigning Establishment and in so doing, remade the Republican Party, at least its base, into a movement that for thirty years challenged the status quo rather than merely embrace it. 

    In the intervening years since the Reagan presidency, a new status quo, inconsistent with mainstream conservative principles and actions, has taken hold in the Republican Party, promoting practices, programs and principles inconsistent with the Party's character and traditions. Just as Ronald Reagan did in his time, John McCain now challenges this Establishment "orthodoxy." 

    The Old GOP Establishment said terrible things, untrue things, about Ronald Reagan. Some in this new Establishment are also saying terrible and untrue things about another maverick conservative, John McCain. Reagan was a threat to the Establishment; so, too, is John McCain. Reagan did not waver, holding fast to his basic principles. John McCain now soldiers on, espousing conservative principles. Some conservatives disagree. 

       Because the US corporate income tax rate is uncompetitive and counterproductive, and causing job loss, John McCain backs a corporate tax rate of 25 per cent, spurring investment in equipment and new technology. Lowering corporate income tax rates will strengthen the demand for dollars and fight inflation and recession simultaneously. He wants to make the Bush income and investment tax cuts permanent and repeal the Alternative Minimum Tax. John McCain’s pro-growth stimulus plan is precisely what our economy needs today. 

    Senator McCain knows that true conservatism is rooted in the people, which is why in the recent candidate debate at the Ronald Reagan Library, he declared himself a "Federalist." McCain knows what the Founders and Reagan knew; the ultimate goodness and dignity of American citizens is the repository of what makes America great and special. 

    In 1974 Ronald Reagan addressed the very first Conservative Political Action Conference held in Washington. Reagan brought as his guest someone of whom both he and Mrs. Reagan had grown very fond; a young American Vietnam War hero, Lt. Commander John McCain, who had been so terribly tortured while in captivity for six years in Vietnam.

    As long-time Reaganauts, we are proud of our work over these many years, helping to advance conservative principles, and as "certified" Reaganauts, we are proud to stand with another old friend of Ronald and Nancy Reagan, John McCain, who is our best and safest choice in 2008. Some fellow conservatives find it hard forgive past positions on campaign finance or other matters. When you stop to reflect, however, with whom--among those out there--are we going to be more secure in terms of domestic security than with John McCain?  Who has greater understanding of and experience with the foreign policy and national security challenges we will face than John McCain?

    We urge you, fellow Reaganauts, to join in supporting a man of character, conservative temperament, a "maverick" in the Reagan tradition who has and will continue to stand up to the corrupt elites in Washington, and will not join them.


    That man is John McCain.  

    Sincerely, yours in the cause, 

         Dick Allen

         Frank Donatelli

         Peter Hannaford

         Jack Kemp

         Craig Shirley

Richard V. Allen was active in all national Reagan campaigns, and from 1977-80 was Reagan's Chief Foreign Policy Advisor, then first National Security Advisor in the Reagan Administration. Awarded the Reagan Revolution Medal in 1983, He has been active in conservative circles since the early 1960s.  

Frank Donatelli worked in all three of Ronald Reagan's presidential campaigns and was White House political director for the last two years of the Reagan Administration.  He is a former Executive Director of Young Americans for Freedom and was a founding director of the National Conservative Political Action Committee.   

Peter Hannaford's association with Ronald Reagan dates from 1971 when he was appointed vice chairman of the Governor's Consumer Fraud Task Force. Pete had senior positions in the 1976 and 1980 Reagan campaigns. Five of his nine published books are about Ronald Reagan.   

Jack F. Kemp was a Special Assistant to Ronald Reagan in 1967, served as a Member of Congress from 1971-89, and co-authored the Kemp-Roth legislation (Reagan's tax rate cuts).  He is known as a long-time friend to Reagan in his national campaigns, and has held many leading positions in American conservative organizations. He served as Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, 1989-93.  

Craig Shirley, author of Reagan's Revolution: The Untold Story of the Campaign That Started It All, has been President and CEO of Shirley & Banister Public Affairs. In 1980, Shirley managed a critical independent campaign in support of Reagan after he lost the Iowa Caucuses to George H. W. Bush. Shirley is now authoring Rendezvous with Destiny about Reagan’s 1980 campaign.  



View in ascending order View in descending order
Virginia Patriot writes: Thursday, February, 07, 2008 9:58 AM
Be A Maverick! No McCain Votes!

The Stupid Party

The RNC wants an amnesty candidate.

Don't vote for one.

Another amnesty will result in Democrat majorities for decades, or until they are supplanted by the La Raza Party, why doesn't the RNC know that? How stupid do you have to be to import voters for the opposition at the same time you alienate your own voters? Nominating any of the amnesty supporters is a losing proposition, we will not support them. If the GOP intends to surrender our sovereignty and abandon the rule of law, they will find in November 2008, that they still have their big money/cheap labor donors, but they do not have voters. GOP-RIP
Uncle Roger writes: Thursday, February, 07, 2008 9:44 AM
Casting a big shadow
Ronald Reagan is remembered in part because he cast a big shadow. He broke with conventional wisdom and believed he could bring down the Soviet Union and end the Cold War and he did. At the time he was virtually the only one who thought it could happen.
Richard Nixon is remembered in part because he cast a big shadow. He was the innovator who created the policy of detente, at the time highly praised as a step towards peace.
Ford and the two Bushes have not really cast as big of a shadow. George W's one big undertaking is his committing the USA to forever war against an enemy we cannot see, identify or locate.
Now we have McCain and Huckabee, two guys who are willing to break with the past. McCain keeps saying (if anyone's willing to listen) that it's time to end the age of mammoth (George W Bush league) deficits. This is radical thinking and LONG overdue. Earmarks have to end. Tax cuts are nice but let's couple them with *real* (not make believe) deficit reduction. Contrary to the pure nonsense of Dick Cheney, deficits *DO* matter. In a few years, the Bushes will be forgotten and we're going to be hosting "Reagan-McCain" fundraising dinners instead of the perennial "Eisenhower-Reagan" dinners. This November, I will proudly cast my vote for McCain and Huckabee, our next GOP standard bearers.
chip writes: Thursday, February, 07, 2008 4:37 AM
Reagan humbled, so what?
Brian, maybe you can read between the lines and show us where Reagan approved of McCain's policies and his practice of subverting the conservative agenda. I know I can read between the lines and surmise that you have some bigoted tendencies towards Mormons. And it doesn't take much effort at all to see that you're a vacuuous non-analytical thinker when I see you taking childish, petty potshots at people who support Romney. All in all I think you'd make a better Democrat.

Now why don't you run along and deal with the pressing issue of where you'd like to see George Soros installed in a McCain administration. Maybe he could Minister of Deconstructing the 1st Amendment since you get your knickers in a bunch over conservatives being on the airwaves.
Just a suggestion.
seansfm writes: Thursday, February, 07, 2008 2:07 AM
McCain is the most believable
heir to Reaganism. He's the only one who was actually there, and actually a part of it.

Romney's problem: he says, "I'm the real conservative," and it's just not believable. Hey, I think Romney is well qualified to be President, but he should run on his own credentials, and be his own man.

If you're going to prop up a candidate as "the real conservative" to stop McCain -- you should at least pick a candidate who's believable when you make that claim. Romney's a good guy, but he just ain't that guy.
JASinCA writes: Thursday, February, 07, 2008 1:35 AM
What is the point of all the Reagan talk
Reagan is a conservative icon but he was president 20 years ago. This election is not going to be about then but now. Does anyone really think the Democrats are going to waste time arguing the Reagan record when there is a Republican in the White House right now?
sluggo writes: Wednesday, February, 06, 2008 11:26 PM
Authors of the letter
Each and every one of you is a sellout to conservatism and conservative principles. Go back to lobbying each other for the good of your friend in the Senate.
chip writes: Wednesday, February, 06, 2008 9:52 PM
Here's a little info
John McCain's Hispanic outreach director is Juan Hrenandez, the always smiling representative for illegal immigrants who promotes open borders and a "Mexico First" agenda. McCain is the founder of an organization called The Reform Institute, which is funded in part by George Soros. It was George Soros who initiated the McCain-Feingold legislation which brought all those lovely 527 groups who like smear and lie about our brave men and women dying for our country. How does that make you feel? Is Soros your definiton of a conservative? Is George Soros your idea of an honorable man? Is Juan Hernandez what you're bargaining for? Be careful what you ask for. You just might get it.
JimP writes: Wednesday, February, 06, 2008 9:41 PM
DON'T BE FOOLED
Reagan was a maverick who moved everything to the right. McCain's maverick moves have all been to the left. Someone must have slipped these gentlmen some kool-aid, I am sad to say.
JimmyJames writes: Wednesday, February, 06, 2008 9:28 PM
Embarasing
McCain and Huckabee deserve each other. McCain has trouble remembering his voting record(except for the SURGE) and Huckabee is an eerily similar version of another sleazeball from Hope(less), AR. with an R instead of a D next to his name. Is this what We want as "Standard bearers" for our party?! If that's what's become of the GOP, then you are correct sir, The times, they ARE a-changin'!!
chip writes: Wednesday, February, 06, 2008 9:23 PM
Be scared
To all you so-called conservatives who are cynically appealing to a fear of Hillary, I say this, you are the ones who have the most to lose. Those who stand on principle have already lost. We have tolerated McCain's shenanigans for years and finally gotten so fed up that we can no longer take the assault on our conscience. We give up. We admit defeat. But only defeat in a battle. You who cave on principle yet again are the ultimate losers because you have not only sold out on principle but you have become more concerned with winning at all cost than standing up and saying "No more!" You are no better than the Dems who will pander and cave for a mere win. But what sort of win is it? It's short term, it's craven, and it's pathetic. Basically, it's Clintonesque. You've lost your principles and your identity.

Like Janice Joplin once opined, Freedom is just another word for nothing left to lose.

I am free. You who support McCain may have short term gain but you will lose the war because you have sacrificed that which is most important, you're principles. And you can do that without me.
chip writes: Wednesday, February, 06, 2008 9:08 PM
Thanks for the reminder
You may get your wish. But you'll stiil
Shannon writes: Wednesday, February, 06, 2008 8:02 PM
meg
Are you serious???

You actually question McCain's citizenship???

OK it's real simple. If a US citizen has a child overseas, then the child may qualify for dual citizenship, depending on the country of birth. But, given that his father was in the Navy, there are provision for military families in these cases.

John McCain is a US citizen.

But, I think you already knew that and were just trying to stir up some sh@t.
SRS writes: Wednesday, February, 06, 2008 7:33 PM
Oh joy
... to see that the venom for McCain still remains. Please, oh please, keep this going until November.

Justice John Paul Stevens badly needs to retire, and having Hillary or Obama in the WH is what is needed to ensure that we replace him with another liberal.

Maybe if we Democrats are lucky, Scalia and Kennedy will also hang up their robes, and we can keep a liberal majority for the next 30 years.

Back on the venom theme - what say we replace the GOP elephant with a cobra?

Hillary OR Obama in the WH. Yes!!!!

GA_GOP writes: Wednesday, February, 06, 2008 7:30 PM
Sad
I know now why I changed registration to Independent. When it was pointed out that Nancy Reagan favored McCain soomeone said she was insignificant, 83, and senile. When Bob Dole writes a letter he's a washed up loser and not likely a war hero. Joe Lieberman who stood up to his own party is an idiot. Jack Kemp is a loser has been and should shut up. I'm sure Phil Gramm is probably the same. You Romney people really do need your own party. I hear Putin has some openings.
Shannon writes: Wednesday, February, 06, 2008 7:30 PM
Reagan
If Reagan was alive and well today, you so called conservatives would throw him overboard. You people attack those who actually knew and worked with him. You conservatives have hijacked his cause just like a bunch of terrorists.

You even ridiculed his wife, Nancy, for her affection for John McCain.

Shame on you all..
chip writes: Wednesday, February, 06, 2008 7:24 PM
The elitists need to shut up
McCain and his band of condescending sycophants better get their mind right. So far they've done nothing to help their cause. Apparently they think talking down to us and trying to place a guilt trip on us is sufficient. They have utterly failed to realize that we are not petulant children who can be cajoled with high minded platitudes and threats of what Hillary may bring. We have very serious misgivings and outrage at the prospect of a McCain Presidency. Mr. Kemp, et. al. better change their tone entirely. They are driving us father away and hardening our resolve. We are the true Reaganites. They have become the elite establishment, and they're too insulated and arrogant to realize it. If McCain has any hope of establishing a trust for him, he and his tools better be prepared to kiss our backsides. It is THEY who have abandoned us, not the other way around. It is they who have become so removed from reality that they can't see the nature of our outrage. It is they who have the unmitigated gall to try and appeal to fear of Democrats instead of trying to understand that we have legitimate concerns. And finally, it is THEY, who will suffer the most in November if they refuse to come to us on bended knee. I remind them that we will exercise our power in whatever manner they leave us. It is WE THE PEOPLE whom THEY are to serve, not the other way around. If they want to serve, they can start by demonstrating proper humility and a recognition that they need us more than we need them.
LawDaddy writes: Wednesday, February, 06, 2008 6:38 PM
This is the same Jack Kemp...
... who ran as Bob Dole's VP and got his clock cleaned by Algore in the debates. It was, perhaps, the WEAKEST debate performance I have ever seen in my LIFE. It was even weaker than the VP debate in '92 when Perot's VP (Adm. Stockdale) kept forgetting where he was.

Jack Kemp: If you can't smackdown Algore in a debate, why would we trust YOUR pick for POTUS? Just go away, you has-been.
LawDaddy writes: Wednesday, February, 06, 2008 6:33 PM
Please don't soil the name of Reagan...
... by placing it in the same headline as the name McCain. Show at least a sliver of respect for The Man. I beg you.
chip writes: Wednesday, February, 06, 2008 6:30 PM
What is this tripe?
What an insulting, condescending bunch of BS! How arrogant can anyone be? These so-called Reaganouts have the nerve to suggest that Mccain represents the anti-establishment when he IS the establishment. They whine about McCain getting criticized, comparing it to Reagan, when the truth is that Romney is the one THEY consider to be an interloper and who has suffered the lies of McCain. They talk about the intervening years in which Reagan's princiles have been eroded by the status quo, when it's McCain who has been eroding those principles. They remind us that power emanates from the people and not a few elites, when it is THEY who are the elites. And they insult true conservatives by believing we won't see through such vacuuous spew.

I say it's time we remind them that we do have more power than they think. These A-holes have left true conservatives no means by which to demonstrate that it is WE who hold the power, but to disengage from the Republican Party and let the chips fall where they may. And come November, that's exactly what I'm going to do. The Republican Party needs an enema.
SMILE writes: Wednesday, February, 06, 2008 5:58 PM
That is disgusting
It is like they are trying to wreck the Reagan legacy, by saying McCain is representative of it.
PC writes: Wednesday, February, 06, 2008 5:54 PM
Romney vows to go to convention
Tagg Romney said today. They are looking at the possibilities. Good for them. McCain has not become acceptable since yesterday - no matter what he says at CPAC tomorrow or ever.

Wendy and Cato are exactly right.

BTW: McCain would do better to be honest and tell conservatives that he has differences with us, but that the Iranian nuclear threat is real and would become a disaster under a dem. There's a slight chance that would change some minds.

Why doesn't he talk about Iran?
Cato writes: Wednesday, February, 06, 2008 5:42 PM
Reagan would not support McCain
Reagan believed in tax-cuts, US sovereignty, individual liberty, and free markets.

McCain believes in a nanny-state, US subjection to the UN, government controlled markets, and tax-hikes.
Wendy writes: Wednesday, February, 06, 2008 5:26 PM
Correction:
They are wishy-washy politicians, not "great men," bigkam. They have no integrity. If they did, they would not support McCain. And some of us are not "Rombots," as you call it, but are absolutely terrified of a McCain Presidency. Please go out and buy yourself a clue, because your ignorance and simplistic thinking are an embarassment to the human race. If you had put half the effort into thinking and analyzing McCain's platform as you do blogging and voting, you would not have that problem, and maybe we would not be facing the prospect of two leftists running against each other for President in '08.
bigkam writes: Wednesday, February, 06, 2008 5:07 PM
How did I know...
That the angry, disheartened Rombots would go after these great men? You people should be ashamed of yourselves. It's time to move on, Mitt's done.
arngret writes: Wednesday, February, 06, 2008 5:07 PM
Mclame
He is not even 100th the president material f Reagan. No Comparison!!
GA_GOP writes: Wednesday, February, 06, 2008 5:06 PM
Amazing
The very people who were with Reagan are being told they didn't know what he was. And no, Newt is not supporting Romney. Romney's penchant for saying anything and expecting people to believe it must be contagious. Just a couple of examples are "I saw my father march with MLK" and "I was endorsed by the NRA". Both of which were outright distortions.
Oregon Elephant writes: Wednesday, February, 06, 2008 4:54 PM
This is just balderdash
It's interesting that it seems there is a generational thing going on here. There is the old guard Republicans (associates of Reagan like Kemp, Gramm, Rudman, Dole, etc) who are much more collegial and senatorial, and tend to like McCain. Then there are the Gingrich Republicans, who are more conservative, more activist, and tend to vote Romney.

I think this is a fight that will split the party in two until it's resolved. Say hello to President Hillary.
Wendy writes: Wednesday, February, 06, 2008 4:54 PM
Explanation
Uncle Roger, let me explain the answer to your question to you. It is clearly difficult for you to think in principles, so I will type slowly.

McCain = FDR. He is a total statist. He wants complete, unchecked collectivism in the United States. If in power, he will have no resistance from Republican Congressmen, who will cooperate with his leftist agenda out of party loyalty, confusion as to what constitutes "conservatism," and fear of McCain's mercurial, vengeful temperament. The result will be that America will go to hell in a handbasket quickly, and the notion of limited government/free markets will get the blame for it, because McCain is pretending to be a small government conservative.

Clinton at least retains some notion of individual rights. If in power, being ineffectual as all leftists are, she will not be able to get her act together completely. When she does, she will be openly opposed by Republicans, who have some inkling that Hillary's agenda is bad. The result will be that America decays slowly, and more people will question whether government is the answer to all our problems. This will set the stage for limited government platforms in the future.

Does that clear it up for you?
AnthonyKW writes: Wednesday, February, 06, 2008 4:50 PM
threat to the establishment???
"Reagan was a threat to the Establishment; so, too, is John McCain."

How is John McCain, a 25 year member of Congress, a threat to the establishment?? This statement cannot be backed up!

One of the reasons I support Mitt Romney is because he really IS a threat to the establishment in Washington.
jtb-in-texas writes: Wednesday, February, 06, 2008 4:47 PM
Reagan would not support McCain...
...but the wide-stanced toe-tappers of the GOP elite have no problem with attempting to use a great man's name to destroy the Constitution Reagan loved...
Wendy writes: Wednesday, February, 06, 2008 4:44 PM
Wendy
Have you self-described "Reaganauts" actually read McCain's "foreign policy and national security challenges" platform in Foreign Affairs? He wants to convert the U.S. military into health care providing humanitarians in Africa. That is how he wishes to "remake" us. McCain is a liberal. Not maybe. He is a liberal. You are either ignorant or liars. Which is it?
mike writes: Wednesday, February, 06, 2008 4:42 PM
reagonauts
this is delusional !!! trying to tie the two together by the use of the term Mavericks

Reagan was a maverick relative to the establishment Rockefellar wing --- McCain is the establishment-- sticking it to the conservatives

Mike Kistler
Uncle Roger writes: Wednesday, February, 06, 2008 4:36 PM
I could not agree more!
Finally a word of sanity instead of the mindless demagoguing of people like Ann Coulter and Glen Beck. What is wrong with people who seem to think a vote for a pro-choice, socialized medicine promoting, tree hugging, anti-military feminist like Hillary Clinton is a vote for a strong conservative? I cast my first vote for Ronald Reagan and this fall I will proudly cast my next vote for the coming GOP ticket of McCain and Huckabee.
Sign Up to Post Your Comments Sign Up to Post Your Comments
Please take a few seconds to sign up, then you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, create your own blog and more! If you are already registered, click here.
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.
 


Your Blog Postings:
Last updated 2 Hours 3 Minutes 12 Seconds Ago
Last updated 2 Hours 21 Minutes 32 Seconds Ago
Last updated 2 Hours 34 Minutes 11 Seconds Ago
Last updated 4 Hours 4 Minutes 22 Seconds Ago
Last updated 4 Hours 27 Minutes 45 Seconds Ago
 

Archives of our Conservative, Republican, Political Blogs

Blog Search



Townhall Conservative, Republican, Political Blogs Townhall Blogs
Townhall Conservative, Republican, Political Columns Columns
Your Townhall Conservative, Republican, Political Blogs Your Blogs
By Month
 December 2009
 November 2009
 October 2009
 September 2009
 August 2009
 July 2009
 June 2009
 May 2009
 April 2009
 March 2009
 February 2009
 January 2009
 December 2008
 November 2008
 October 2008
 September 2008
 August 2008
 July 2008
By Issue
 A Culture of Life
 Budget & Government
 Campaigns & Elections
 Education
 Energy & Environment
 Faith & Family
 Foreign Affairs
 Health Care
 Immigration
 Jobs & Economy
 Judges & Courts
 Media & Culture
 Property Rights
 Safety & Security
 Science & Technology
 Second Amendment
 Social Security
 Tax Relief
Advertisement

Comments Comments

Munck
 Re: Authorities Say Terrorism To Blame For Christmas Plane Bombing In Detroit
  By NOTW
axe,
 Re: This Christmas, 78% of Americans Identify as Christian
  By Crispian
NOTW 1:51 AM
 Re: Authorities Say Terrorism To Blame For Christmas Plane Bombing In Detroit
  By Bob Munck
Munck
 Re: Authorities Say Terrorism To Blame For Christmas Plane Bombing In Detroit
  By NOTW
arch
 Re: Authorities Say Terrorism To Blame For Christmas Plane Bombing In Detroit
  By NOTW
Moronic Design
 Re: This Christmas, 78% of Americans Identify as Christian
  By Bob Munck
NOTW 1:19 AM
 Re: Authorities Say Terrorism To Blame For Christmas Plane Bombing In Detroit
  By Bob Munck
NOTW
 Re: Authorities Say Terrorism To Blame For Christmas Plane Bombing In Detroit
  By arch
mike (and arch).
 Re: Authorities Say Terrorism To Blame For Christmas Plane Bombing In Detroit
  By NOTW
Mike
 Re: Authorities Say Terrorism To Blame For Christmas Plane Bombing In Detroit
  By arch
Kevin
 Re: Early Morning God Thought
  By killer
Patriotic Chicagolander 9:11 AM
 Re: Authorities Say Terrorism To Blame For Christmas Plane Bombing In Detroit
  By Bob Munck
cottoneyed
 Re: This Christmas, 78% of Americans Identify as Christian
  By mike
arch
 Re: Authorities Say Terrorism To Blame For Christmas Plane Bombing In Detroit
  By mike
Mike Take heed!
 Re: Authorities Say Terrorism To Blame For Christmas Plane Bombing In Detroit
  By arch
cottoneyed
 Re: Authorities Say Terrorism To Blame For Christmas Plane Bombing In Detroit
  By mike
One more thing, Mike,
 Re: Authorities Say Terrorism To Blame For Christmas Plane Bombing In Detroit
  By cottoneyed
Mike, he brings
 Re: Authorities Say Terrorism To Blame For Christmas Plane Bombing In Detroit
  By cottoneyed
Why is it?
 Re: Authorities Say Terrorism To Blame For Christmas Plane Bombing In Detroit
  By arch
Mike, I've been posting here for
 Re: This Christmas, 78% of Americans Identify as Christian
  By cottoneyed

The Latest on Town HallThe Latest on Town Hall


Blog Roll Blog Roll