Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons

Townhall.com The Blogspot for Political, Conservative and Republican Blogs and Bloggers


Tuesday, October 10, 2006
So Not Da Bomb.: Was NorK Nuke a Dud? (Update: Michael Yon Hears "Non-Nuclear" From Well-Placed Source)
Posted by: Mary Katharine Ham at 4:06 PM

Tick, Tick, Tick, Tick, BOOM, Dynamite?

The experts are saying, if it was nuclear, it was very small and likely not a complete success. In fact, it's the least successful of any first test, ever. You know that's stickin' in Dear Leader's craw. I can't wait until the state-run news service reports it. Ha.

Throughout history, the first detonations of aspiring nuclear powers have tended to pack the destructive power of 10,000 to 60,000 tons — 10 to 60 kilotons — of conventional high explosives.

But the strength of the North Korean test appears to have been a small fraction of that: around a kiloton or less, according to scientists monitoring the global arrays of seismometers that detect faint trembles in the earth from distant blasts.

The Washington Times is quoting American intel guys:

U.S. intelligence agencies say, based on preliminary indications, that North Korea did not produce its first nuclear blast yesterday.

U.S. officials, speaking on the condition of anonymity, said that seismic readings show that the conventional high explosives used to create a chain reaction in a plutonium-based device went off, but that the blast's readings were shy of a typical nuclear detonation. 

Allah's been following this all day, and he's got a munitions expert in his comments. Interesting stuff.

John at Op-For doesn't think it was conventional explosives:

It is science fiction to think that the Norks can slip hundreds, if not thousands, of tons of TNT into a single entry mine shaft withour our spy sats detecting the activity. Remember it was those space assets that blew the whistle on the North's nuke operation in the first place. 

Sorta related, Drudge is claiming this political ad, produced for Republicans by the director of "Scary Movie" and "Airplane," was deemed a bit too explosive for the '06 season.  


Update: Another dud, in Italy this time.

Update: Michael Yon hears "non-nuclear" from a well-placed source.

The explosion may have been an actual nuclear test — this is unknown — but the source reports the outcome was non-nuclear. The source stressed the importance of bearing in mind that though the explosion occured in North Korea — if it was actually a test and not merely a dictator clamoring for attention and influence — the test may have been by or for the Iranians. The source reported that American physicists with access to the information see no sign of nuclear activity, however. My source also mentioned that Japanese sensors picked up no radiation signatures.

 



View in ascending order View in descending order
Ennuipundit writes: Tuesday, October, 10, 2006 4:25 PM
Nice use of Drudge
In case anyone is wondering, I have a post at both my Townhall and Wordpress blogs covering what we do next, regardless of what type of blast this was, and what NorK was looking to accomplish.
jerubaal writes: Wednesday, October, 11, 2006 2:22 AM
I explained it before Drudge, I'll
explain it again.

A nuclear weapon, if not perfectly constructed, can "fizzle". Fizzle is when the design or timing of the high explosive or the composition of the fissile material is not sufficiently precise to obtain an optimum fission before the device itself is destroyed by the explosion. This results in a partial nuclear explosion and a radioactive mess.

550 tons of explosive were most likely not detonated; it was much, much smaller than that. Unless the Norks know what went wrong, which seems unlikely, they will either have to get outside design help to complete their warhead or they will require many, many more tests to get a functioning device. It seems likely that North Korean engineering and mathematical capabilities are not what we would expect from a northeast Asian country.

We know it was not a successful nuclear detonation. I am unaware of any miniaturized nuclear weapon with a yield as low as 550T. They could exist, but North Korea does not have such an extremely advanced warhead design, and it would not have wasted its pathetic resources on a surgical nuke.
jerubaal writes: Wednesday, October, 11, 2006 2:37 AM
For perspective purposes
a 550T nuke could do as much damage as one sortie by 4 B-52s. It was not, as one commenter suggested in his blog, a super-high-teh ultra-low yield demonuke.
Sign Up to Post Your Comments Sign Up to Post Your Comments
Please take a few seconds to sign up, then you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, create your own blog and more! If you are already registered, click here.
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.
 


Your Blog Postings:
Last updated 37 Minutes 57 Seconds Ago
Last updated 1 Hours 15 Minutes 9 Seconds Ago
Last updated 1 Hours 15 Minutes 45 Seconds Ago
Last updated 1 Hours 16 Minutes 7 Seconds Ago
Last updated 1 Hours 16 Minutes 17 Seconds Ago
 

Archives of our Conservative, Republican, Political Blogs

Blog Search



Townhall Conservative, Republican, Political Blogs Townhall Blogs
Townhall Conservative, Republican, Political Columns Columns
Your Townhall Conservative, Republican, Political Blogs Your Blogs
By Month
 December 2009
 November 2009
 October 2009
 September 2009
 August 2009
 July 2009
 June 2009
 May 2009
 April 2009
 March 2009
 February 2009
 January 2009
 December 2008
 November 2008
 October 2008
 September 2008
 August 2008
 July 2008
By Issue
 A Culture of Life
 Budget & Government
 Campaigns & Elections
 Education
 Energy & Environment
 Faith & Family
 Foreign Affairs
 Health Care
 Immigration
 Jobs & Economy
 Judges & Courts
 Media & Culture
 Property Rights
 Safety & Security
 Science & Technology
 Second Amendment
 Social Security
 Tax Relief
Advertisement

Comments Comments

Nelson's price
 Re: What Was Nelson's Price?
  By skypastor
As the year draws mercifully to an end..
 Re: Obama in Copenhagen: Our Dramatic Breakthrough "Limits Warming To No More Than 2 Degrees"
  By Patrick Michael
Monk
 Re: Say What? Pelosi Claims Copenhagen Conference is About Jobs...?
  By NOTW
NOTW 12:58 AM
 Re: Say What? Pelosi Claims Copenhagen Conference is About Jobs...?
  By Bob Munck
munck
 Re: Al Franken Denies Lieberman Extra Minute To Speak -- McCain Fires Back
  By mike
green jobs
 Re: Say What? Pelosi Claims Copenhagen Conference is About Jobs...?
  By mike
mike 12:44 AM
 Re: Al Franken Denies Lieberman Extra Minute To Speak -- McCain Fires Back
  By Bob Munck
corndog
 Re: Updated: Man Faces Up to Year in Prison for Being Naked in Own Home
  By mike
Actually Obama is telling the truth
 Re: Obama in Copenhagen: Our Dramatic Breakthrough "Limits Warming To No More Than 2 Degrees"
  By Dave M
Monk
 Re: Say What? Pelosi Claims Copenhagen Conference is About Jobs...?
  By NOTW
mike 12:10 AM
 Re: What Was Nelson's Price?
  By Bob Munck
Munck
 Re: JAM DOWN
  By NOTW
Jo 11:42 PM
 Re: Say What? Pelosi Claims Copenhagen Conference is About Jobs...?
  By Bob Munck
munck
 Re: Al Franken Denies Lieberman Extra Minute To Speak -- McCain Fires Back
  By mike
axeman
 Re: What Was Nelson's Price?
  By NOTW
Jo 11:21 PM
 Re: JAM DOWN
  By Bob Munck
ladies and gentlemen
 Re: Obama in Copenhagen: Our Dramatic Breakthrough "Limits Warming To No More Than 2 Degrees"
  By mike
Jo 11:57 PM
 Re: Al Franken Denies Lieberman Extra Minute To Speak -- McCain Fires Back
  By Bob Munck
careful
 Re: What Was Nelson's Price?
  By mike
"Jo" all one need do is remind them
 Re: JAM DOWN
  By cottoneyed

The Latest on Town HallThe Latest on Town Hall


Blog Roll Blog Roll