|
this proves to me that afermative action didn't work then or now.the standard should be fixed again. |
|
|
clown! This is a numbnut caricature of a human male. Actually he is a yellow stained imitation of a male...he is a amaphrodite. He obviously doesn't have the cahones to be a male but yet can't be a legitamit female. Don't know what the fk he is! |
|
"So much for intellectual honesty, eh."
Frank has no intellect and no honesty so how would he know. Frank is missing a brain stem. |
|
"Certainly however to say I have stopped is utter garbage."
Frank is an endless stream of garbage. |
|
3. and yes I do irrate you; don't be stupid! yeah you're here writing these posts to me cause you think I'm such a great guy. You are a schumck.
No you don't You sadden me. Racism is a serious issue. Your "boy who cried wolf" approach to it has no positive use to anyone. Other, of course, than someone hell-bent on perpetuating the issue for political gain.
Very, very sad. |
|
GO HOME........
(the Daily Kos short-bus is honking for you.............they're waiting)......
tick...tick...tick...tick... |
|
"I mention Carol's time at harvard with Obama whenever she brings it up and WHENEVER I REMEMBER TO BRING IT UP."
As the two links above clearly show this is another flat out lie. You bring it up when she makes no mention of it at all. You just bring it up whether the thread is about Gitmo or the economy. As I said. Nothing to say but say it over and over again regardless of the subject.
"Certainly however to say I have stopped is utter garbage."
"gotta remember it irritates you so. sure hope it irritates her."
Again, proving just how juvenile you are. You don't irritate me. It's a pretty sad way to spend your every waking day. Do you do anything constructive or positive in your life? I hired an additional employee for my business today. Gave someone a job. An additional employee, not a replacement. The look of joy on the face of someone can make your day. No amount of your idiocy, lies and BS can take that away today. Try it sometime. Try doing something vaguley positive with your miserable little existence. See if you can get through just ONE DAY without calling anyone an idiot or a racist.
|
|
Question:
Why is Sonia Sotomajor MORE QUALIFIED to sit on the Supreme Court than Miguel Estrada? |
|
"this is utter crap; if I peg you as a racist-like paddy or ronna-chances 99.99% you are."
Ah, we got there at last. When all else fails pull out the good ole race card.
Thanks for proving my point, Everyone that points out your strange behavioral traits, proves you are a liar or disagrres with you in any way must therefore be a racist. Why? Just because you are an African-American? What if I am too? Then what? Am I still a racist? Or do you then look like a complete fool? I bet at least I can name the town in Afica I am from. Can you?
I think this debate is now over. As you are so fond of saying. "Case closed".
|
|
More of your lies Frankie boy.
http://710knus.townhall.com/blog/g/d1253c82-d10c-4042-8f37- 5e144ee964b7?comments=true
A Carol thread about a Howard Fineman piece on the economy.
No mention of Harvard yet your first post is...
Frank writes: Wednesday, April, 01, 2009 12:26 PM
poor carol
perhaps you have some actions of Obama's that you can point to from your time on the Harvard Law Review together that might further prove your so called point?
You are a liar.
Plenty more examples of your idiocy out there. |
|
"That would be wrong. I mention the harvard law review whenever carol speaks about her time twith Obama there."
Utter garbage.
http://townhall.com/blog/g/392988d0-cdf6-41ae-aa60-586a17e3 2e8e?comments=true
A thread about Gitmo. No mention of Harvard.
Your first post:
Frank writes: Monday, January, 26, 2009 3:24 PM
I'll take EU opine
over that of a bitter ex-classmate with an axe to grin anyday.
Seems Carol hasn't gotten over being outshined by Obama when he ran the Harvard law review and all she could do is sit in a corner with ther bad hair.
Twenty years is a long time to be bitter...
You are a liar.
|
|
The whole point, which you know only too well, but try desparately to deflect, is that it is YOU who can't let things go...until it's pointed out to you how childish and silly your behavior is.
You couldn't "let go" of your juvenile posts to Carol about Harvard that you made on EVERY single thread of hers until it was pointed out what a child you were. You stopped the same day.
You mentioned Rush Limbaugh in every single post until it was pointed out to you how childish your behavior was. You stopped the same day.
You made illegitimate race accusations in almost every single post until it was pointed out to you how childish your behavior was. You stopped the same day...well almost. Just can't seem to wean yourself off that one can you?
Even the dumbest dog can be "trained" not to poop on the carpet. Well, almost. And boy, have you been "trained". Over & over again. |
|
|
God doesn't get a lot of ink in Newsweek either....! :-) |
|
GOD and The Bamma?
Answer: GOD doesn't think HE's The Bamma..!
Nyukk..Nyukk..Nyukk...Ain't'a had this much fun since them hawgs ate baby sister! |
|
I'll have to take you word for it. If the post is from frank or vlad or axeman or munck or the like....I don't even bother reading it.
They're all the same anyway.... |
|
The resident blatherer says:
"after all who would post his same tired old post over and over again(oh yeah, an Encore-snort)?"
Just a reminder -
32 mentions of Rush Limbaugh in one day.
Over 15 accusations of racism in the same day.
Something like 40 or 50 mentions of Carol's time on the Harvard Law Review with Obama. He used to mention that on EVERY single blog post of Carol's. EVERY SINGLE ONE. And note how she NEVER responded to his childish behavior once.
And he has the nerve to criticize anyone for repeat posting. What a joke. At least we got him "trained" off all those little obsessions, didn't we, huh?
|
|
"So she was unqualifeid for Princeton and came n first in her class."
I doubt that she was unqualified; the Ivys get 8-12 QUALIFIED application for every position. She may, for example, have had lower SAT scores than some of the others, possibly due to being too poor to hire an SAT tutor. Are SAT scores a precise measure of how qualified you are? No.
"What does that say for all those poor "more qualified students" whom she outperformed?"
That we don't have any measure that is guaranteed to predict success. A lot of it is up to the individual.
"because TH thinks the middle word in the phrase is obscene. (whack jobs got dirty minds)"
Conservatives rarely have the level of education or achievement that causes them to encounter that phrase. |
|
"I thought Obama was the first black EIC at the Harvard Law Review."
That position ceased to exist before WWII; the equivalent is now called "managing editor" and is the person doing the day-to-day management work on a particular volume. Platt-Liebou was managing editor; Obama was President. Susan Estrich was the first female President. |
|
|
And his grades were mediocre. |
|
"If I'm not mistaken, ODumbo was editor of the Harvard Law Review"
You are mistaken.
"other than any moron can be the editor of a Law Review"
So we should assume you overslept the day of the tryouts? |
|
If I'm not mistaken, ODumbo was editor of the Harvard Law Review.........
So what's your point Munckey Boy?????
(other than any moron can be the editor of a Law Review) |
|
"Sonia Sotomayor demonstrates just what is wrong with affirmative action"
In the days when Sotomayor was admitted to Princeton and Yale, both institutions were notorious, even in the Ivy League, for admitting the idiot offspring of rich and famous alumni. Both schools actually had rich-kid remedial courses to bring them up to the level of dressing themselves in the morning and finding their classrooms. Of course, this was described as a way of maximizing alumni contributions, but it was most definitely wealthy white person affirmative action.
"unqualified people reaching positions for which they have no aptitude"
She graduated summa cumlaude and was editor of the Law Review, so it seems that that wasn't the case here. |
|
Play the "You may be a loser" home game....
1. Ever been kicked off a blog? 5 points
2. Ever been kicked off THIS blog? 10 points
3. Ever been kicked off this blog and came back? 15 points.
4. Ever changed your moniker? 10 points each occurrence.
5. Ever copy and save the posts of a poster you disagreed with? Game over....you're a loser.
6. Ever copy and save the posts of a poster you agreed with? -10 points....unless you used it later and claimed it as your own...then you're a loser too.
7. Ever call another poster "Hitler?" 25 points
8. Ever been called "Hitler by another poster? -25 points....unless your name happens to be Hitler, or you are THAT Hitler.
9. Ever refer to another poster as a "teabagger?" Game over....you're a loser.
10. Ever attend a "Tea Party" in the 2009 context. Game over....you are definitely NOT a loser.
Add your points. If you have any....YOU ARE A LOSER. Thanks for playing. |
|
|
Now I am trying to hold it down to talking ABOUT Frank instead of 'to' him. And you're right about Vlad too, he is probably off in a corner pouting. |
|
|
now that's a laugh! Shouldn't he be saving that title for when he talks about his idol, the secretly Communist, Hitler worshipping, dictator wannabe, Obama? |
|
|
Sonia Sotomayor demonstrates just what is wrong with affirmative action - unqualified people reaching positions for which they have no aptitude because government thinks that makes it "fair." |
|
|
See ignoring Frank works. He is now answering his own posts and I think Vlad has left as he probably had blood running from his eyes he was so frustrated. |
|
|
Go fox, go! I am glad to see another con having the balls to tell these liberal pieces of dung to go to hell and leave us alone here on OUR blog site. They must be getting paid to spout empty bladder waste because what they say has no merit, no validation no substantiation. They are the sludge that clogs the system of moral character and should be washed away with a power hose like the repulsive bile they truly are. |
|
Affirmative Action is no substitute for merit-based promotions/admissions/awards. Affirmative action is just the "liberal" way of focusing on race.
Affirmative action says to minorities "you're not REALLY qualified, but since you're (anything but white)we'll take you anyway". It encourages mediocrity.
As Reagan said, it's "the soft bigotry of low expectations".
Don't tell me you're all for soft bigotry. |
|
..IN a light bulb, but can certainly screw UP a light bulb.
And anything else they get their hands on. Like Cacafornia. |
|
|
|
.....is the flash-point of the dumbing down of America.
If you want your country to remain strong, you look for the best PERSON available for the job....not the best woman....or the best hispanic.....or the best black.....the best person....period.
If you look for the best non-white person, YOU are the racist, and there is a good chance you have eliminated the best person for the job. |
|
...She acknowledges that it was Affirmative Action that got her started.
Most minority Libs never claim that, they always use the conservative message, "It was through hard work, great struggle against terrible odds, and the foresight of my poor immigrant grandparents that inspired me to succeed."
Not much, but it's something... |
|
"I got news for you-we're no longer here to "discuss" things with hateful cons like yourself and your lover BK".....
WHO the hell do you think you are, weiner face????
"we're no longer here to dicuss things with hateful cons"...........
This was started, and still is, a CONSERVATIVE BLOG!!!!!!
Who are you to come to THIS blog and tell conservatives "we're not going to discuss things with you".....??????
THIS blog doesn't belong to you panty-waist uber-liberal cry babies.......
YOU pompous jackasses own Daily Kos, Media Matters, Huffington Post, etc.......
Why don't you go back there and take Vlad the Bunghole Impaler, Vampires Constipation, Munckey Dung, Molly/Rachel/Whatever the hell she's calling herself today, and the rest of your mental midget playmates with you??????
I'm sure at those sites you CAN set the agenda......
Adios.....and don't let the door hit you in the a$$...... |
|
When I was an undergraduate, our admissions department let it be known that for several years they'd been trying a "Huck Finn" program in which they'd admit a small number of people almost at random from the pool of qualified applicants. They typically had 12-15,000 applicants for 1000 positions, of which 85-90% were thought to be capable of doing the work and getting the degree. Of course, we all immediately assumed that we were a Huck Finn; they never told anyone who they were.
A few decades later, after tracking everybody, they announced that the Huck Finns, whoever they were, got slightly better grades, were slightly more likely to get advanced degrees, and contributed slightly more to the University. No conclusion was reached. |
|
A liberal I once knew was appalled to learn that the tank full of live lobsters at the seafood restaurant we entered would soon be killed and consumed.
She skulked out to her car and retrieved a large trash bag. Then, when nobody was looking, she put all the lobsters into the bag and ran out the door.
I saw her the next day and asked what became of the lobsters.
"Silly," she replied. "I set them free in the woods, of course.....!" |
|
|
while Estrada had zero judicial experience, he should have been confirmed. ditto with Sotomayor--who is substantially more impressive than Estrada. |
|
Great stuff! I advocated Affirmative Action 25 years ago. Groups long underrepresented in the professions was a national disgrace. Nowadays we have moved past racially and gender based A.A. and we should, as President Obama advocates, broaden the concept to include economically disadvantaged individuals. There are lots of poor whites who would qualify, richer blacks who wouldn't. Dig?
To remind us that Sonia is an A.A. baby shows one of the many successes this idea has had over the years, and I thank TH for the plug, as unintended as it no doubt was. |
|
|
Gee you really got Vlad and Frank all twisted up. Vlad must have blood coming out of his eyes at this point. Job well done. |
|
How many liberals does it take to screw in a lightbulb?
Lefty answer: Uhhhhh, how big is the lightbulb?
Conservative answer: Liberals can screw in a light bulb....?! |
|
the illuminating responses from the drooling drones?
Paddy, another laugh, many thanks! |
|
|
...she may not have been the best applicant, which seems to be par for her course. "Good enough" is the Obama standard. |
|
"Why is Sonia Sotomajor MORE QUALIFIED to sit on the Supreme Court than Miguel Estrada?"
Because she's been nominated by the president. Read your constitution; that's the only way you get on the Supreme Court. |
|
|
I gotta make these questions tougher. You win! |
|
"Aren't they ALREADY stumps....?"
WTF does that even mean? Hahahaha! |
|
|
Aren't they ALREADY stumps....? |
|
"Why is Sonia Sotomajor MORE QUALIFIED to sit on the Supreme Court than Miguel Estrada?"
Oh yeah, well what about Nixon? Huh? He was an unindicted co-conspirator. And Joe McCarthy - he was one of yours. Drank himself to death - typical wingnut.
You are not only ignorant beyond belief, you are NOT American in any sense of the word; you are a traitor to the United States, its people, the Constitution, and to anything moral or decent. You are indeed more vile than cockraoch sh!t and I would spit in your face were I ever to see your sorry, scum sucking a-s-s in public.
[Hey, sorry DTOM, I'd love to talk about Sotomayor, but I'm just trying to keep it on your level. Just looking out for you, dude! You're welcome!] |
|
Question:
Why is Sonia Sotomajor MORE QUALIFIED to sit on the Supreme Court than Miguel Estrada? |
|
"Sotomayor says that her acceptance to Princeton University and Yale Law School was contingent on affirmative action policies."
So?
|
|