Sunday, April 20, 2008
|
|
A Bulletin From The Washington Post: John McCain Has Lost His Temper In The Past!
|
|
Posted by:
Hugh Hewitt at
11:39 AM
|
Perhaps the ongoing meltdown in the Democratic Party has demoralized the partisans inside the Post, or perhaps it is a just a very slow news cycle for reporters assigned to cover John McCain.
But Michael Leahy's page 1 "McCain: A Question of Temperament" is going to be an exhibit in the museum of media bias and agenda journalism for a long time.
McCain has long been known to have a temper similar to Bill Clinton's and a lot of other extremely driven leaders. It explodes on occasion. Big deal.
But it is obviously going to be part of the anti-McCain narrative, along with age, building in the MSM. The sudden appearance of such a story --on page 1 no less when the Obama bitterness hurricane got buried by the Post-- is one of the best indicators yet that those confident of an Obama win in November are beginning to understand that the inexperienced and very left-wing three year senator from Illinois is going to need a lot of help.
McCain ought to send a thank-you to Leahy. There's nothing like a wave of agenda journalism attacks on the GOP nominee to rally conservatives to him.
Leahy, btw, is the author of an unflattering portrait of Michael Jordan during the time of Jordan's comeback with the Washington Wizards, When Nothing Else Matters: Michael Jordan's Last Comeback. The reviews suggest there's a lot of reporting on Jordan's anger in that book as well, and perhaps Leahy has an eye for anger, or perhaps he hasn't figured out that occasional anger is pretty much a given in any extraordinarily competitive man. Do you want to bet that Obama has had his share of flare-ups, but that they have gone unrecorded because the stakes were so mall or the stage so obscure?
|
|
...Now, will you please tell us how many people he has "decked", "punched-out", body-slammed", "cold-cocked".
I look forward to that information. We have to "out" this violent man for who he is! |
|
|
Lost his temper you say? So have i and everybody I know . . . so what's the Washington Post's problem? |
|
I just want to point out that in January, Hugh approvingly quoted Rich Lowry's talk of "rank dishonesty" by John McCain.
But Hugh is, above all else, a partisan, so all of his attacks on McCain now fall by the wayside. I'm guessing we'll be hearing no more about Juan Hernandez. Because now that McCain is almost certain to be the GOP nominee, it's no longer a problem. |
|
..he is an advocate without principle. He does more pirouettes than a ballerina. His only principle is obtaining and keeping power. His advocacy is in the service of that "principle." It puts food on the table.
You do not listen to Hugh for earnest discussion on conservative thinking (does such discussion even take place any more?). You listen to Hugh to hear what tactics the Reep noise machine is using to bum's rush the American public into voting for them again. |
|
|
and the xenophobic right will use it as a reason why you should vote for Lyndon LaRouche. |
|
Sailor, McCain.
Paddy-O....you know anything about this?
And from years gone by, there was a stage show, in the 1970s called "Give 'em Hell, Harry," which was most about Harry Truman's legendary bad temper, barnyard mouth and generally being a cranky old man.
I recall two dimocrat dinosaurs from the Media's Jurrasic Park, Molrey Safer and Mike Wallace interviewing Truman's surviving daughter, and deciding that cranky, cussing old men make good executives. Don'y look for a revival anytime soon, folks.
These guys are trying to make this the MSM meme: McCain is old! McCain is unstable!
Smell the magic, dimocrats, because every time you see John McCain, you are looking at your next President. |
|
Commenting on McCain.
FBputz thinks Willaim Ayres is "cool" because he undertakes armed violence to achieve political goals that FBputz approves of. But, at the end of the day, people like FBputz and Ayres are riduculed and marginalized.
Anmd, because of Ayres' avowed love of armed violnce to achive political goals within this country, babakazama's association with Ayres is relevant and casts grave doubt upon babakazama's judgment.
And, yes, sometimes political violence is necessary: like when ChiChi Guevara was executed. That was sheer poetic beauty.
For a little but of "Give 'em Hell Harry:"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C4WnpgAzvpY
There is James Whitmore portraying Harry Truman as dimocrats love to remember him: Angry and old. |
|
He attacked McCain without abandon when Mitt Romney was running against him. I defended McCain from those attacks. I also dished it out against Mitt. Fair enough.
But at the time, I said if Romney became the GOP nominee, I would support him. Hugh essentially said the same thing about McCain. To Hugh's credit he is living up to that pledge. Of course Hugh has reservations about John McCain. Many of you do. McCain would be first to admit he is not perfect (only John Kerry reaches a level perfection in his own mind). While there are differences between McCain and Romney, they pale compared to the differences between either of those two and the Democratic Party alternatives.
On Immigration, McCain with all his flaws is far better than Obama and Hillary.
And lets not forget McCain is substantially better on:
Restricting spending and imposing fiscal restraint, lowering taxes (and drawing a line against raising them), and fighting earmarks and pork spending bills.
And if you claim to be a conservative and are willing to give Barak Obama and a Democratic controlled congress the free choice of Federal Judges and Justices without a fight...you are really not a conservative.
|
|
...but he is not running for president.
Obama is a Lawyer.
Is their any narrative to his, "advocacy without principle".
NOPE.
Not worth spit to mention that. It's onlyabout "issues" with Obama---don't bring up character, judgement, relationships of Obama---you'll be properly smitten, cut off at the knees.
It's far more important to castigate the real villains, conservative Lawyers. The ever-powerful Hugh Hewitt's. He who wields more attention, impact, potential damage than some little activist lawyer from Chicago running for president. Ha ha ha ha ha.....pathetic.
Hillary is a Lawyer. Any attention to this by the duplicitous, Pathetic Liberal? Show me. Nary a word.
Billy-boy Clinton is a Lawyer. Any warnings by the Left and Pathetic Liberal as to this man's principles? Negative.
All they did was defend him, support him, shill for him throughout the entire 1990's.
The man could do no wrong.
Yet......he's a lawyer. |
|
|
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0408/9730.html |
|
Don't put words in my mouth.
The WUO was woefully misguided. They may have started with good intentions, but they went down an evil path when they started bombing.
Now, will you say the same thing about Oliver North, when he BROKE THE LAW in order to aid terrorists in Nicaragua and the so-called Axis of Evil member Iran? How about George H.W. Bush and Ronald Reagan, who at least pulled a Sgt. Schultz ("I know nothing, I know nothing") regarding the Iran-Contra operation?
|
|
|
Most of us quit name-calling as our main means of discourse by the second grade. Apparently that's not so with those on the right. |
|
like...John McCain. And it is not just the far right. Yes he was a hero in Vietnam. Not for being shot down (although his low altitude flights over Hanoi were certainly heroic), but for refusing to cooperate with the North Vietnamese. You can disagree with him on policy, but you cannot take that away from him.
The far left of the Democratic Party tend to have antipathy and distain to any traditional notions of heroism. They embrace radicals of the left as their heroes. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/04/19/gingrich-left-win g-of-the_n_97584.html Hillary is acknowledging it because it is true. Obama knows it too but has to balance appeasing that wing and still acting in a manner acceptable to the center of this country. |
|
If the GOP admires heroes, explain their ruthless attacks against war heroes who happen to be Democrats, like John Kerry and Max Cleland.
It seems to me that the only thing the GOP cares about is power.
For a real story about a real war hero, I recommend the film Little Dieter Needs to Fly, by Werner Herzog, about Dieter Detmer, the only American to escape from a POW camp in Laos during the Vietnam War. |
|
The Singing Revolution, about the (mostly) peaceful effort to rid Estonia of the Soviet Union.
There's an amazing scene in the film when the faction trying to prevent independence is protesting outside the capitol and are surrounded by pro-independence folks.
It's a situation that easily could have erupted into violence, but the pro-independence crowd parted, allowing the pro-Soviet crowd to escape. |
|
"righties", grow up?
You have to be joking with this crowd; cannot be remotely serious?
hillary and Obama are "going at it". Hillary has provided to the public, the media, nearly every "discovery" regarding Obama's "character". She and her campaign-Libs have done a bang-up job in name-calling of Obama---but, you have already forgotten this, or, remain in yoru blissful state of denial. Once again, it's all about "righties", that "vast-right-wing-conspiracy" crap, that, "culture-of-corruption" tripe.
Just above, your pal, Pathetic Liberal, makes a hollow, feckless, duplicitous remark about Hugh Hewitt being nothing more than an, "unprincipled" Lawyer. Obama a self-interested lawyer? Hillary an "unprincipled" lawyer? her husband a "pirouetting" lawyer?
NOPE-----Nada de nada, Nothing, Nyet, Goose-Egg, Zero, Zip, Nil, Nein.
Nicht Wahr?
This small detail is not even in the ball park of you disengenuous lefties.
You overlook this trash-talk of your brethren to cast your stones, point your fingers, elsewhere.
The transparency makes it surpass laughable.
Really, poking holes in your rhetoric is tantamount to shootin' fish in a barrel.
You and your pal, Pathetic Liberal are boors, second-raters, louts; Not name calling at all---just a fact. |
|
and, I know, I know, fbear David Petraus is a betrayer. Conservative ire for John Kerry goes back to his winter soldier testimony when he slapped every soldier across the face declaring they were "reminiscent of Jengkis Khan." Some may have thought that just some cute, Bostonian pronounciation of "Genghis," but it was because he had no bloody idea who he was talking about but it sure sounded good. Capt. I-made-secret-trips-into-Cambodia Talltales is no hero except to himself and perhpas to some mysterious CIA guy passing out souvenior hats like some corporate flunky.
My heroes are the guys in Iraq and Afghanistan who feel duty-bound to hang it all out there for the USA, not knucklehead poseurs like John F-ing Kerry. They're not sitting comfortably sipping a Coke and writing silly posts on a blog about EVUH republicans calling a spade a spade (not a racist statement), they're shooting, getting shot at, and cursing up a storm at their enemy keeping themselves and their country safe and are proud to do so. Lefties like to paint them as pathetic losers and victims of "Bushco" - case in point the meaning of Obama's inane comments to Petraus before Congress a few weeks last go around.
As for Hanoi Hilton survivor John McCain, I sure $%#%@&^%^W hope he cusses like a sailor!! I hope that piece 'o @$#^&$# Michael Leahy gets an earful real soon. |
|
The President needs to have a more secure grip on his emotions and ability to resist outbursts.
McCain can not.
It is a serious flaw and it will not serve him nor the country well should he be POTUS.
That, said... he is still the lesser of evils here. |
|
the guiding principles of his nation.
"Broke the Law" can mean a lot of things. Bill Clinton did it, and was lauded by the dimocrat party. Rosa Parks did it and right minded people the worl over rejoiced in her moral victory.
Colonel North armed and trained men willing to fight the evil empire, and in so doing he defied liberal orthodoxy in Congress. He is a hero.
John Kerry is no hero, though he thinks that he is. Lt. Cleland is a tagic figure, who has never characterized himself a hero. Only liberals, who NEVER served think Lt. Cleland a hero, and then only to the extent that it is a political expedient.
JFK was a Democrat, and a war hero. Always will be.
John McCain is a war hero, just as Kennedy was.
Saying that "Weather Underground" was 'well intentioned is like saying that Hitler built a great highway system, or that Black Americans were better off under Jim Crow Segregation. It is a pig in lipstick.
AND, babakazama's friend and confident, Willaim Ayres has NEVER renounced the political violence you 1/2 condemned, FBEAR. In fact, in a calumn published in the NYT, Ayres stated that he had NO REGRETS about bobming and thet he wished he had done more.
THAT is why it is relevant. That is ANOTHER reason why babakazama's judgment is poor, unreliable and downright out of sync with occupation of the Oval Office. |
|
Myth: Salvador Allende was overthrown and murdered by Chilean puppets of Richard Nixon and Henry Kissinger.
Reality: Allende, a manic depressive, comitted suicide, after a democracy movement, grossly unhappy with Allende's attempted allingment of Chile with the USSR, overthrew his government.
Allende had in his cabinet a KGB Agent, named Pablo Neruda, who like Ezra Pound, was a 'poet' who oncee hid out in Italy.
Allende's greatest contribution to Latin American Democracy, Stability, Equality and Trade was retiring himself.
Adios, Salvador.
American Liberals/Lefties (FBEAR) get all dewey-eyed over Salvador. To them, allignment with the evil empire was a good thing. |
|
|
This Post story would matter for someone who doesn't have a 4 decade long career of public service. If his "temperament" hasn't thwarted his ability to serve thus far, why should it be an issue now? |
|
Not because he was liberal or a Democrat, but because he betrayed his comrades by lying at the Winter Soldier hearings. John Kerry brought that entirely on himself. Did the GOP take advantage of it, sure, but it was not some Rovian plot. I thank Kerry for his service in Vietnam, but I think his testimony following that service was exaggerated and in some cases completely fabricated.
Max Cleland was attacked about his policies and politics (mostly about demanding job protections for newly designated TSA workers as a condition for voting for Homeland Security), not his military service by the GOP. Georgians picked Saxby Chambliss over Cleland. Ann Coulter and a couple of others accused Cleland of playing up his war injuries for sympathy--but Ann Coulter is not a GOP spokesperson. She is a silly opportunist who says outrageous things for her own benefit and book sales. Her comments were wrong and should be denounced. |
|
you cannot honor service for what it is--left, right, and center. It is all political with you. Gore and Kerry serve, despite their reservations about the war, and you guys ridicule them. Bush and Cheney do not serve, despite their support for the war, and they are some kind of paragons of courage.
This is the moral relativism into which conservatism has descended.. |
|
S/A86, since when is a military junta that goes on a killing rampage a "democracy movement"?
Of course, you don't mind killing rampages carried out against people perceived as leftists.
That's simply the flip side of the mindset of Stalin, that it's okay to summarily execute "enemies of the revolution."
So, when does the killing stop? |
|
This Washington Post hit piece is merely another example of Orwellian moral equivalency about 'anger.'
Ironically, the Washington Post would never write a d-i-s-p-a-r-a-g-i-n-g hit piece about Islamic Jihadist "anger."
On the occasions when the Post does say that Jihadists are angry, they fault the West for 'causing' them to be angry, rather than fault the Jihadists for murdering innocents as an appropriate projection of their anger.
It's all just an Orwellian game to the Post.
Truth is, not all anger is equal. And not all anger is "bad."
As human beings, we all have tempers---it's just a matter of w-h-a-t elicits our anger and h-o-w we demonstrate it.
McCain has a temper, but at least he's appropriately angry at Islamic Jihadists and lefties who wish to raise taxes and spending.
On the other hand, Barry H. Obama is not angry at the Islamic Jihadists. He's not even angry at unrepentant domestic terrorist Bill Ayres for his attacks on American targets.
Obama is not even angry that his beloved mentor and spiritual advisor hates America.
What does make Barry angry is that rich folks have money (!), and that America and Israel wish to defend themselves from Jihadist aggression.
And Barry gets angry when reporters ask him questions about why he should be given the keys to 1600 Pennsylvania Ave---it makes him really angry when people do that !
...and how about that nice fellow who was videotaped asking Obama for an autograph a couple weeks ago ? (since posted to YouTube.)
That made Obama pretty angry. |
|
Thus speaketh the Bloviator who parks his pompous carcass at Hugh's Free Speech site, at will.
Want to try the same statement at kosroid.com and substitute "kos" for Hugh and count your shelf-life there?? Nope, I didn't think so. |
|
..for free speech. What a horse's arse!
And btw, pomposity takes several forms. In my case, it is evidently that I think carefully, construct proper sentences, take a paragraph or two to spell out my thoughts. In your case, it is a patronizing and jocular demeanor--masking, of course, deep, unresolved insecurity. |
|
|
Hey, what about me? Well, I'm glad to defer to my friend Labor Lawyer, who is civil and diffident as the day is long, and deeply insightful as well. And even so, they hound him. What a bunch of stinking rats. And Joe, for sure, is a rational guy. |
|
I rest my Case on Blovie Boy. Need. Appetite of the never sated kind. Attention & stroking. A mini-Billy Bubba. Very mini!
In the 8-months I've been here, he has expended untold thousands of(Great, Bigggg 8th Grade)words on HIS OWN BEHALF. "Yep, Ackly Kid, you're a real Prince." |
|
|
..then it is I that needs to teach YOU about irony. I was totally kidding, you self-serious lout. |
|
|
Again, you're absolutely right about LabLaw--and Joe, for that matter. They are both in a class by themselves. |
|
Thank you both for your service. Thanks to all who served--even Jeremiah Wright.
And for the series of posts above, well I suppose we call could sit around and roast marshmellows and sing Kumbaya--but I would prefer to pass a bottle and discuss real issues. We are going to have our disagreements. They will be heated. I have some profound disagreements with some (Patriotic Liberal on the left and Pasadena Phil on the right), but I respect them both and they both make salient points.
Even if they are wrong and I am right. |
|
of what I said.
The 'leftists' as you call them who were retired in Chile were trying to lead a Marxist-Leninist Revolution...and killing people themselves. The killing stopped when the security services of Chile had retired the bad guys! Then they handed the government over for democratic rule, whether Liberal or Conservative.
Augusto Pinochet killed a lot of Chileans. Almost 1/100th the number of Cubans killed by Fidel Castro. Pinochet goes abroad, and the New Left demands Pinochet's arrest. Castro goes abroad, and twink-a-zoids leftiesd in this country swoon.
William Ayres is someone who killed other Americans to advance his political ideas. Ayres never renounced this...in fact he affirmed and celebrated it.
That babakazama is pals with Ayres is relevant, whether you want it to be or not, FBEAR.
And, if it is irrelevant, the electorate will ignore it.
You sniff, moan, and compare this to Jesse Helms 'ties' to General d'Aubisson, an irrelevance.
BTW...I knew d'Aubisson and Jose Napoleon Duarte...both fine men...much better than babakazama or William Ayres. |
|
Another thing Pas Phil and I have in common is that we both live in Pasadena. I'm a native to these parts and he's a frigging BoSox fan--but he's definitely an interesting and formidable guy.
I'm with you. Drink a shot and tell me how it is. And if you are going to take a swing, then stop whining when I land a blow. Call me Blovie or Pathetic or Nancy or whatever else--just don't call me late when "Family Guy" comes on.. |
|
|
I hear bears do something in the woods and the Pope does something in the Vatican. |
|
|
"ME", "ME", notice "ME", hey what about "ME", "ME", notice "ME", please notice, "ME", oh, come on notice, "ME", PLEASE!! |
|
|
I think the embargo is off. Neo and CS have been snarling at me directly. |
|
Yep, I know you were self-deprecating. It's what's called "Kidding on the square."
Sioux me. :-) |
|
|
but others of Conservative tilt have every right to bridle at being called racists by the Deeply Decent & High Minded! PC-Crap is a LIE. And, cheap, at that. |
|
|
..went to that Coliseum game. Frigging buenos were out of control: drinking, taunting, brawling. My son saw four fights. I saw three. Still can't get over it. And my friends tell me its almost the same at the Ravine. Baseball is dying. The brand needs some radical surgery. Start by firing Selig. Come down hard on rowdy fans. Limit pitching changes. Outlaw whip-it bats. Do not permit batter time-outs. Reduce admission fees. Reduce salaries. Stop trying to tap every revenue channel. Tons of other things. The game must be saved. |
|
We found something we agree upon. You just wrote a beautiful post about the troubles of baseball. First lets get rid of Selig. No owners in that position please. The rest will figure out later, but first Selig
Thank you Patriotic. |
|
..that "racism" is a BS allegation--not because we are not racist, but because we all are. Who cares? It's shorthand. You want to know racists? Latinos are the most racist breed in the world.
One thing that perplexes me about the conservative attack on multiculturalism (and on that one, the right is right): why do they use multiculturalist tactics when they can? We were "racist" to question whether Iraq could function as a democracy. They advance mediocrities like Condi Rice and Larry Elder because they're black, basically. I mean, which side of the argument are you on??! |
|
Did you all see the latest Zogby poll on PA? Hillary is up by six which is her largest lead in a while for this poll. The last day on the rolling polls shows a 15pt lead 53-38 for Clinton. The late break is goin for her. As I stated earlier, just to prove to the LIBS on this site of my complete confidence in the weakness of Obama's candidacy, I pledged if HILLARY DOES NOT WIN BY AT LEAST 11 PTS in PA.....
I will be gone form this site forever.
Patriotic Liberal and the rest will not have to put up with me any longer.
But we know, don't we....what's going to happen......Clinton wins Big. Obama fails to close again.
I get a job at the McCain's White House polishing the head of Abe Lincoln.
I can't wait!! |
|
|
..these days, I prefer reading about baseball to actually watching it. But that can change, if the custodians of the game clean up their act. |
|
|
..errant predictions are the bread and butter of this site. |
|
I meant to say Clinton will win by at least 11pts or I will be gone. Obama will not keep it 10 or under.
I do not know why I can't write and think at the same time anymore. I'm getting old like McCain..hmmmmmmmmm.....!? |
|
is starting underperform to the polls. Ohio, Texas and even Mississippi is evidence to that being true. Obama has been unable to break into Clinton's lead amoung the Catholic Blue Collar workers. Obama is going to need to win NC with a decent margin to finally finish Clinton off. Obama will not finish Clinto off Tuesday nigth with a close loss.
West Virgina?
Kentucky?
Puerto Rico?
Besides NC where does Obama win again? |
|
|
..but if you're right, maybe Big Al Gore will step in. |
|
Maybe as Obama's VP at the convention.
The Clintons would leave out the back door having a total fit.
God that would be fun to watch.
Al Gore will be on his short list. I wonder if Gore would be interested? It would be hard to turn down. I believe HRC will be off the list. Obama will not send a messeage of going backwards. |
|
Nyuk Nyuk Nyuk
Please...you're killing me.
Please nominate Albert Gore. |
|
|
I only wish we did. Gore/Obama would obliterate you guys.. |
|
|
algore to the rescue, algore to the rescue........ |
|
Howard, are you ready?
ARG has Hillary up 52-41.
I'm a conservative and a McCain supporter, so I must be two-fold stupid, but I do believe that is an ...11!...point margin.
I think she wins by 12 or better.
What is going to be impressive for Hillary (and extremely embarrassing for Barry) is, despite Barry spending over 13 million dollars on tv ads alone, she is going to win Pennsylvania by double-digits. All the Obamabot spinning over the past 6 weeks -about how Ayers, Wright, Michelle, and Barry's pathetically weak debate performance don't matter- is about to be shattered by actual registered Democrats. Remember, Pennsylvania is a CLOSED primary. They won't be able to blame Rush Limbaugh and the GOP crossovers for this.
The mainstream press is going to be extremely bitter Tuesday night. There is going to be a lot of long faces on cable tv that evening. I have little doubt Olberman, Anderson Cooper, Campbell Brown, Donna Brazile, Chrissy Matthews, Roland Martin, Jonathan Alter, etc. will blame the VOTERS for Obama's inability to win in Pennsylvania.
However, blow-out wins by Clinton in West Virginia, Kentucky, and Indiana may make them pause. The Obamabots will claim a victory by Barry in North Carolina proves his viability in the fall, but considering 35% of the primary voters there will be AA, Barry should easily win it. If North Carolina is close at all, it only proves what a fiasco Barry has become.
White, middle & working class older voters will be THE SWING VOTERS of 2008. The press is about to have to confront a reality they didn't want to think about-they DON'T like Barry Obama.
|
|
Albert Gore? babakazama? Dream on.
Go twist up another reefer, PL, you clown from the Crown City.
Albert Gore didn't even win his home state, and with the dead weight of the babakazama deplosion, he would do as well as Walter Mondull did in 1984.
The first black president says that babakazama is unqualified. Scrape the easter bunny off of the pavement...he melted. |
|
Not every American sniffs glue like you. Gore may have lost TN, but he won the popular vote--despite Bush specifically making a play for popular votes in the final day of the campaign.
And, after the failed Bush Presidency, Gore stands like a living veto on all those who maligned him. Just as he appeared ridiculous when Bush rode tall, now he rides tall as Bush appears ridiculous.
As for Barack, the guy is attracting huge crowds--the biggest crowd of any campaign this year on Friday. The combined assault by the corporate media and right-wing foamers only strengthens his street cred. Look for a "reverse-Bradley" effect on Tuesday. We'll see. And in any event, as VP candidate, he'd be nothing but upside. You are not the voice of America. We know you don't like the guy. America has a different opinion--but they will need some time to really get used to him. Which they will.. |
|
I thought between the Broom Pilot and babakazama you guys had fielded the "Dream Team."
What happened? babakazama and Hillary Rod'em are supposed to be the VARSITY.
WTF is a "Reverse Bradley" effect? You are the one sniffing glue. WTF is that? Is that where Bill Bradley explains the 'white skin privilege' again for a broader audience?
"Reverse Bradley" like not losing? What you fail to realize is that BOTH of your candidates are losing the dimocrat primary rather handily.
There is no winner of the dimocrat primary system other than John S. McCain.
Gore ALWAYS looks ridiculous. ALWAYS. Especially blathering on with Melissa Etheridge in the background.
I haven't had this much fun since Dan Rottenkowsky went to Prison. |
|
""the guy is attracting huge crowds--the biggest crowd of any campaign this year on Friday"" about babakazama.
So what? A record crowd once turned up for a Ricky Martin Concert. Will they be sober enough to vote? Will they vote if their chocolate hero gets derailed by Hillary Rod'em.
""the guy is attracting huge crowds--the biggest crowd of any campaign this year on Friday""
Record crowd? OOoooo sounds like a mob of idiots. |
|
A lest you forget, Al Gore has racked up huge amounts of political capital in his stellar, "Global Warming" charade.
Ted Turner could be in his cbinet---after he chimed in with that pathetic Liberal, "CRYSTAL BALL" prediction on Charlie Rose, claiming that in 10 years we will all be reduced to cannibalism. This a result of increasing average global temp's. of 8 degrees; wiping out agricultural crops, and othe relements in the food chain.
Yeah, bring on Al Gore, please. Please, bring him aboard. That's all we need. One more definitive clown to complete the troika of this year's DEMOCRAT PARTY menu of narcissists.
YeeeeHawwwwww!
>;D
|
|
"..mediocrities like Larry Elder and Condi Rice."
Yeah, Bay-beeeeee, that doggoned Condi is such a half-wit nuthin'....I figure you don't like Larry because he's a.)Conservative...b.)Has great success taking on and thrashing the sh!t outta race hustlers on your side...c.)Is a HUGE Black Conservative success(a no-no in Lib World)..and writes best sellers about as fast as anybody around.
But, Condi a (snicker, snicker, giggle..)is a mediocrity! She's got a resume of Life, Academia and Service to her country that Hillary + Obama x 10 would still come up short. Please. |
|
It further illustrates his failed ability to recognize true character and superb contributions and service to the people--in Condi's case.
Larry Elder is a clear thinker, something Pathetic Liberal will never be. He thinks he has found complex truths in the things of which he speaks----however, he has leapfrogged clarity to get there.
One needs to find true clarity before ever discovering Truth. And that is not only beneath him, it entirely escapes his grasp.
Of this I am certain. |
|
|
I AIN'T Gonna Leapfrog nobody named Clarity neither, Duuuuude! |
|
I think we have already discussed the difference between false clarity--of which you are a steward--and genuine clarity--which I possess. And, sorry, clarity does not precede truth--or at least, when it does, it is false.
As for your certitude, it is not worth a strand of a hair. You can be "certain" of things until the cow comes home. In fact, it is in the nature of your ilk--the narcissistic notion that merely because you believe something with heart, soul, and mind, that makes it true. |
|
..but she sure didn't cover herself with glory during the first Bush term. We'll just call it a bad few years.
As for Elder, are you kidding me? If he was white, no one would give a rat's keister what he thinks--or rather, he would just be garden variety right-wing spewer that you find in a bar, not on the radio. If he was white, even you or Shrieker would be before him in the "gimme a radio program" line.. |
|
because Condi did not seek "glory" as he opines, hers being more humble satisfactions, this purveyor of pathetic ideals dismisses her out of hand.
His choice of word, GLORY, not mine. Yet, that is how he judges others who stand up to do noble work.
Al Gore went the GLORY route, met the criteria for success in Pathetics' superficial world. Hollywood glory-seekers fawn over him. Gets the Nobel Peace prize for dime-store scientific findings.
As for his hollow narrative about clarity, it is what it is. And very much an integral component of who he is. |
|
Im very concerned about our politics.
The news seeks sensationalism not the truth.
My grandfather was one of the 1st steel union organizers. His beliefs were simple. Fair pay for fair work- Period.
He told stories to me how in those days the state police did the bidding for the Companies. How in the picket line one day- a tear gas canister was fired into the man next to him killing him immediately.
His sons and grandchildren lived to watch the Clinton NAFTA machine destroy not only the mills but the dreams.
The odacity of a former President showing up in beaver and allegheny counties after costing us hundreds of thousands of jobs is unbearable.
Michael Martino
Grandson of John B Martino
Steel Union Organizer
Union- Voting for Clinton is a vote to lose your blue collar job |
|
I recall two separate professors I had who spewed similar nonsense about "false" clarity, and the equally nonsensical claim that, clear understandings of an issue, all its parts does not precede truth.
One went to jail a few years later after he was found guilty of murdering his lover.
The other one continues to flush young minds with his sewage. The bigger point here is that this is a common narrative in the Liberal-infused, and immensely confused education system we are faced with. I rtealize that system is bigger than me, however, it does not make it correct. It does not represent our best. |
|
Read Blovie Boy's descriptives of Larry Elder and THINK for a hilarious moment WHO the descriptive really, really fits!!!!! Too(Unintentionally)Spot-On Perfect for B. Hussein Obama!
*..Blovie post at..930pm..*
*Just substitute Left Winger for Right and 2-bit Ward Politicain for Radio...!!* |
|
This is a conservative blog...most here will vote Republican.
Touching story about your grandfather's friend, but what does that have to do with babakazama? Have you seen how much 'corporate' money babakazama has taken on?
Why is corporate money corrupting when McCain, Hillary Rod'em take it, but not when babakazama takes it? |
|
..stop being ridiculous, Shrieker. In the first place, "not covering yourself with glory" is an expression meaning "not really doing very well." It is not about actually seeking glory.
And, also, get it out of your mind that I am an academic. I work in the financial markets. I have a BA from a very mediocre school. Enough of your stupid nonsense. |
|
No, you are wrong there. Barack is articulate and even brilliant. Sometimes, he is a bit halting, because he has to mind his speech. But take the speech he gave on Rev. Wright: that was the most coherent articulation on race, reason, and faith that I have ever heard. It made Romney's speech seem like vapid childplay.
Barack is where he is because of his genuine talent. Sure there have been lots of people eager to help him along, just as there have been lots of people eager to bring Elder along. But the difference is that Elder just regurgitates Republican talking points. He doesn't even bother with the "libertarianism" any more. Barack, on the other hand, is enunciating a new way--albeit to the left, but basically uncharted. You guys are trying to paint him as a garden-variety leftist, basically because it suits your political purposes and because you just don't get out much. There is a center-left that is coming. It is post-Boomer. It is liberal, but not in the way you are accustomed. It is humane without being sappy. It is fair without being self-insistent. It is a little jaded, hard to flimflam, and basically good-natured.
Elder, in contrast, is just a tool--a weenie. |
|
Mr. Hewitt also told the Associated Press yesterday that "Senator McCain is a great American, a lousy senator and a terrible Republican. He has a legislative record that is not conservative. In fact, it is anti-conservative."
- Hugh Hewitt - 2008 |
|
|
"Expect the talkers, led by Rush but seconded by Ingraham, Bennett, Prager, Beck, Hannity, Levin and me to spend the next few days putting down a marker: McCain is a very weak general election candidate, and if he was to win, would not govern as a conservative in any significant way. Our audiences are not, as MSMers like to imply, not only shrinking but mindless. They are growing, but they are incredibly independent of thought. They also take in and respond to good information, and now the information will be focused on John McCain and the choice before them." Hugh Hewitt - Jan 31, 2008 |
|
Rick Santorum, one of Mitt Romney's new, he-can-stop-McCain supporters, has recorded a tough robo-call for his candidate, raising the issue of the Arizona senator's temper.
"As a conservative I don’t agree with McCain on many issues and I don’t think he has the temperament and leadership ability to move the country in the right direction," Santorum says, sandwiching in the charge that has largely been absent from this campaign against McCain.
Per Romney sources, the call is going into California, Colorado, Alaska and a few other Super Tuesday states.
The full call:
"Hello, this is Senator Rick Santorum calling to let you know I am supporting Mitt Romney and urging you to support him next Tuesday.
"As Republican leader in the U.S. Senate, I worked hard to stop the democrats and help pass a conservative agenda. A few senators like John McCain stood in our way. John McCain voted against the president’s tax cuts, worked with Ted Kennedy to pass what many people call amnesty for illegal aliens and he even opposes the marriage amendment that says that marriage is between man and woman.
"As a conservative I don’t agree with McCain on many issues and I don’t think he has the temperament and leadership ability to move the country in the right direction. Please join me and other conservative in voting for Mitt Romney this Tuesday."
From Hugh Hewitt's blog - 2008
|
|
I can't wait to see Olbermanm on Tuesday night. For him to see his man fail to close out this nomination again is just tooooo good. All the lefties and all their horses can't put Humpty Dumpty Obama back together again.
Clinton will win by at least 11. You maybe right, maybe 12. At the end of the night it will be clear.....Obama has REAL Electoral weakness.
Remember - Philadelphia votes will come in first. Obama will be ahead early on. Don't fret....Clinton wins big. Myself..Howard Cosell stays yapping at the lefties...we all have a beautiful summer and fall watching a Obama that turns into the next McGovern and limps into November. |
|
|
Please direct the folks here where I ever said we should vote for Larouche. Exactly. You are a lying sack of s**t who has said anything you feel will further your point. The problem is that it is easy calling you a liar because I have a blog where everyone can figure out for themselves who is the liar. Anyone who comes here regularly knows my position. I have been posting here for almost 2 years and have been consistent throughout. DNC Joe, on the otherhand, likes to call anyone who doesn't approve of voting for his object of man-love, McCain, outrageous names or post lies about what that person ever said. When are you going to provide that ONE SINGLE EXAMPLE |
|
Stop bombarding us with how evil his opponents are.
Sell us on how good your newest guy is... How's
he gonna help us stop gas from getting above $4/gal,
how's he gonna find/kill Osama Bin Laden, make a
commitment on our border security, help keep our
food prices lower, keep my health insurance costs
for me and my employer from going up every stinking year. Please Hugh, can't you stop blaming the MSM,
libs for everything. You helped sell us the last 7
years of what we got... |
|
Actually ARG has it 54-41 Clinton.
The following is from ARG!!!
Hillary Clinton leads Barack Obama 48% to 47% among men (45% of likely Democratic primary voters). Among women, Clinton leads 59% to 36%.
Clinton leads 63% to 32% among white voters (81% of likely Democratic primary voters). Obama leads 86% to 12% among African American voters (15% of likely Democratic primary voters).
Clinton leads 52% to 43% among voters age 18 to 49 (51% of likely Democratic primary voters) and Clinton leads 56% to 39% among voters age 50 and older.
Clinton leads 59% to 36% among voters without a college degree (63% of likely voters) and Obama leads 50% to 45% among voters with a college degree.
20% of all likely Democratic primary voters say they would never vote for Hillary Clinton in the primary and 32% of likely Democratic primary voters say they would never vote for Barack Obama in the primary.
|
|
|
We'll take that chance. As I game-theory it out, I'd rather lose with Barack than win with HRC. I would rather win with HRC than lose to McCain. But, hell, let's roll the dice and see if we can catch lightning in a bottle. What's the worst case scenario, four years with Gramps? He's barely a Republican anyway. The Boomer conservatives have already lost. |
|
|
For a white guy who lives in an upscale all-white neighborhood to be calling someone like me who lives in a town where white people are a minority a xenophobe YET AGAIN for insisting on border control is outrageous. If you haven't been paying attention, my position is very popular among blacks and legal Mexican-Americans. You are just a Republican hack and a political whore with no principles. Your man is going to lose in November once people realize that you can't squeeze a stolen ID in the space that separates all three candidates. Maybe it'll help to call the next presidency the McCain-Obama era just like all of his "conservative" legislation, you know, McCain-Feingold, McCain-Kennedy, McCain-Leiberman etc.... There is nothing sensible about advocating surrender to the opposition. It is the ultimate intellectual corruption. You, Joe, are a lying sack of s**t. It is just like to post something about me long after I left or when I am not there. |
|
Well the LaRouche comment seems to have pissed you off. The LaRouche part was a joke--but the rest of what I said is pretty accurate.
You have never promoted LaRouche (at least from what I have read of you). Unlike you who have spread lies and never backed off them about me, I will acknowledge that.
Rather, you simply hate McCain and want him to lose to either the Dems or Ron Paul, so a mythical third party will then rise from the ashes of the GOP. Who this third party conservative candidate will be, we do not know. Other than supporting Duncan Hunter (who must have disappointed you in giving his support to Huckabee) and then giving luke warm support to Mitt Romney, you have not disclosed who you are supporting.
As for your blog, it has some good points. However since you only post things on what appears a three month rotation--can you really call it a blog?
|
|
Are whites a minority in Pasadena? That can't be true. (Do Armenians count as white?) We are not a majority, but we are probably a plurality. Besides, the town is a collection of racial pockets. You don't get credit for being a man of the people simply because you live in a neighborhood that abuts a Mexican neighborhood.
Besides, Joe said something nice about you. I don't know why a smart and formidable guy like you lashes out like you do. There are a lot of guys around here who aren't worth much. See that you don't become one of them.. |
|
Because I disagree that sending every single illegal home is a bad idea. I am for sending many back but allowing some to stay (while still doing the things you and Virginia Patriot propose). That makes me "open borders?"
I must be under the influence of the Queen of England and the Pope. |
|
Geez, the libs want to blame Bush for gas prices. You can blame Bush for a lot of things but gas prices?
If Bush is to blame for gas prices, why is gas so expensive all over the world?
This is a world-wide phenomenon caused manly by the growing industrializaton of the rest of the world. Yes, folks, China now produces more greenhouse gases than the United States. Look it up if you don't believe me.
The Indians and the Chinese are no longer content to ride on public transportation or bicycles. Rising demand increases oil prices.
But IF you want to play the blame game, what were gas prices the last time the GOP controlled the House and Senate? Low $ 2.00 range.
What is it now after almost 2 years of Democratic control? $ 3.50
McCain wants to drop all the federal taxes on gasoline between Memorial Day and Labor Day? Why won't Pelosi and Reed get this through Congress and let the President sign it by Memorial Day?
What is Barry's plan to drop these prices IMMEDIATELY?
|
|
|
Didn't McCain go nuclear when Hugh called him a 'lousy Republican'? |
|
I didn't blame Bush for $4/gallon... maybe you do
My beef really is with Hugh and his ilk...
Sure, let's hear "Barry" or "McMean" tells us how
they are gonna try and get gas prices back to
something that doesn't drag down our paychecks, and
make our food prices go up... BRING IT ON! PLEASE!
I'm sick of tempers, Keating Five, Gang of 14,
Rezko, Ayers, Wright. Hopefully people who aren't
blog-addicts like us actually are interested
in something more important and interesting.
|
|
|
..are a function of the eroding dollar as much as anything else. And Bush carries some culpability for that--much more than the Dem Congress. |
|
|
Doesn't matter whose anger, when, where? After all Dems have lost their tempers generations ago when it was worth; Sec. of State Hull against the Japanese ambassadors. Harry Truman; often. But that was when the Dems actually had common sense. Today, they may get angry at trees or polar bears or snail darters or Nixon , even dead. But, as for real international evil? Never unless it is a jerky right wing dictator who is a thug and then they don't kill him. They boycott him!!LOL Nah, anger is good at the correct time. McCain angry at Reid, Leahy and Kennedy anytime after he is Prez will be an honor! At the Islamofascists, courageous. |
|
Pasadena Phil is angry from years in the barrios of Pasadena. He is bitter, clinging to his religion of getting rid of illegals and overturning the GOP. In fact, he claimed he would shoot his copy of Mexifornia when he heard VDH was saying postitive things about McCain. Then he accused me of lying about it, till eventually the quotes on the Corner made him grubble away.
Then again Phil is angry enough he might be mistaken for John McCain! Or Bill Clinton on a tear. |
|
|
If we agreed that Bush is responsible for everything that has gone wrong since 2000. We must also agree that Obama is not qualified to make the necessary corrections. Check mate! McCain will be president in 2008 because he is deemed by voters to be more qualified to make the necessary changes. Can Obama supporters list his qualification to make corrections to anything at a federal level? Oh yes, he just paid off his federal student loans - now he is qualified to be president, NOT! |
|
|
he has a back bone in what ever he passionatley believes in. Not like some democrats who just gives double talk and lie and skirt around the isses that the american public really want to know. |
|
|
go home: Furriana Muffington needs you. |
|
I'm glad you stipulated that Bush is responsible for everything that has gone wrong since 2000. But I wouldn't go that far. Let's just say he is responsible for a monumental strategic blunder in Iraq that has massively wasted lives, dollars, time, and moral capital in the critical fight against terrorism. And he is responsible to gaping deficits that has, among other thing, eroded the value of the dollar (leading to lower real incomes). And he is responsible for toxic and divisive leadership, as he sought to politically capitalize on the terrorist attack of 9/11, among other things. But "everything"? I wouldn't say he is responsible for UCLA's failure to win the NCAA tourney, despite three consecutive trips to the Final Four.
Still, leadership counts for a lot. It is funny that so many advocates of personal responsibility are blameless little ninnies when it comes to their own culpability.
As for Barack, the fact he recently paid off his student loans only gives lie to the notion that he's an elitist. Naturally, Prez Bush never had to worry about student loans, but many Americans do. The Presidency is a huge office, and there is no telling how a man might handle it. Nor are there any real qualifications for it. I mean, the job is like none other. In the final analysis, in my opinion, we are voting for a guy to set a tone. The actual execution depends on those who surround him (or her). And here too, if the experience of the past 16 years is any gauge, Dems are much better administrators than Reeps. |
|
|
Why are you always inviting people to leave? Do you have a problem with contrary POVs? Do you want to reside in a pathetic little echo chamber? Or are you just a bully? |
|
and by the time you get things ankle deep in here, I am sick of you.
But that's ok, PL.
Just keep on making the iodiot's case for babakazama, the country needs you.
|
|
|
If Pasadena becomes untenable when the Mexicans overrun it like the Alamo, you can always move to Paulville. http://www.paulville.org/ |
|
Importing voters for the socialists is stupid, leaving the border wide open during wartime is even more stupid.
I don't vote for stupid.
Hope you enjoy the new permanent Democrat majority your man is going to provide for his friends across the aisle with his amnesty plan.
Do you really need cheap labor that badly that you're willing to sell out your children's birthright?
|
|
|
"The actual execution depends on those who surround him"... You know like Rev. Wright and Ayers. Good Americans like that. |
|
Because you do not want a Demcratic majority, you are going to help a Democrat become President with a Democratic Congress.
You are right, border security will be soooooo much better.
As will judicial appointments, the war in Iraq, higher taxes, more spending, etc.
|
|
They tried to make me vote for McCain but I said 'no, no, no'
Yes it helps Barak but when the cons come back you'll know know know
I ain't got the time and if Buchanan thinks I'm fine
They tried to make me vote for McCain but I won't go go go
|
|
Cute.
Would McCain/Kennedy get your vote, regardless of what he does?
He's already come out for carbon taxes, amnesty, closing Gitmo and giving lawyers paid for by taxpayers to terrorists. He wants to cap CEO pay, tax the "rich", is there any line he could cross and lose your vote?
As long as he has an R jersey, he gets your vote, even if he comes out for surrender in Iraq? He has already come out for surrender here at home.
The best you can hope for on Justices is a David Souter, Warren Rudman picked him for GHWB and is advising McCain. |
|
Don't sell yourself short. You have a very high BS threshold. It pours out of you.
You ever hear the expression "don't BS a BSer?" To my experience, that is completely untrue. The BSers are the easiest ones to BS. But your "assumptive sell" doesn't fool me in the least. |
|
I am not going to let perfect be the enemy of good. The mood in this country is definitely in the Dems favor. McCain is moderately conservative and is far far better than Barak. If McCain can win this and can do things like simply not raise taxes and surrender to our enemies we will be better off.
As for judicial appointments, McCain is getting advised by Ted Olson on that. I trust Olson. The chances of a Souter are low, the chances of another Alito and Roberts are high.
Barak Obama? He might get advice on judicial picks from Ted Rall.
If McCain picks Tim Pawlenty as a VP would that bother you? http://www.startribune.com/politics/11222841.html
|
|
Don't know enough about Pawlenty to give a good answer. Doesn't really matter to me who he picks unless he dumps Juan Hernandez and amnesty. Not likely. Warren Rudman is also advising McCain, and he is the guy responsible for Souter. Souter was the one with Ginsburg on the 7-2 death penalty case recently.
McCain is likely to win without conservative voters if Obama is the Democrat nominee. Then he'll show you what he really thinks of conservatives.
|
|
|
|
Rick's being a good Republican. He explained well why Republicans should hold their nose for McCain. He didn't really convince this conservative. Did you notice the elephant in the room he didn't touch on?
Amnesty.
|
|
Joe,
In their hearts, I think these guys (VA Pat, Pasadena Phil, Scarlet Pimpernel) know that McCain is better for the country than Obama.
But voting 'in the best interest of the country' is not what animates them.
They're most animated with punishing McCain for not being a good enough Republican.
Of course, if they think McCain is a 'bad' Republican, what kind of Republican do they think President Barack Obama will make ?!
This notion that McCain will be bad on immigration, or he "might" nominate a Souter (even though Ted Olson is his judicial advisor), therefore we can't elect him, is just silly.
After all, the alternative is Obama, who is going to be ten times worse about immigration, and will most certainly nominate as many radical left wing Ruth Bader Ginsburgs to the Supreme Court as possible.
...not to mention appeasing Islamic Jihad, raising taxes, increasing spending, etc.
The irony is that VA Pat and Scarlet will lecture the lefty commenters at Townhall about how evil the Jihadists are, yet at the same time they don't mind if the appeasement nominee (Obama) becomes President. |
|
If a candidate does not support kicking all the illegals out, he cannot get your vote. So you would rather have Barak Obama win and open the flood gates.
Damn the other issues. McCain is not open borders, he is simply not doing enough on this issue for you. |
|
|
Their myopic view of the dangers we face make me worry for the future of our country. |
|
http://www.petitionspot.com/petitions/KILLEM
Here is a petition for you guys. |
|
|
McCain IS open borders. Go back and look at McCain/Kennedy. Disgraceful sell-out AGAIN of the American people. 1986 all over again, that's why it was rejected. He had not heard anything. If I thought he really would secure the borders and enforce the law, I might vote for him. I cannot believe that as long as Smilin' Juan is standing behind him. Do you know who Juan Hernandez is and what he stands for? Mexicans without borders, Mexico First, Reconquista, et al do not have America's interests in mind. |
|
Virginia Patriot,
Obama is for open borders.
...and he'll appease Islamic Jihad, raise taxes, increase spending, and nominate radical left-wing nuts to the Supreme Court.
And he'll try to take away your beloved arsenal of weapons.
You're comparing McCain to your fantasy ideal GOP nominee.
You're holding up McCain against an abstract Reagan or Goldwater.
The comparison you should be making is "McCain against Obama"---those are the two guys on the ballot this November. |
|
|
Neither, thank you. There will be other choices on my ballot. |
|
|
|
|
McCain's been a hero, good man, but as a presidential candidate, he's got nothing. He's also way too old for the time. |
|
HIGHLY PRINCIPLED, and if you disagree with me then, you Sir, are Hitler, a Natzi, or PL!
Now, we settled that!, There is nothing wrong with Senator McCain to be firm and stand tall to the terrorists, the evil Islamofascists. Hey, Iranian Mullahs, beware, Mr. McCain, will not stand your misbehaving!, and might have a temper!
Let me tell you a secret, the Clintons, if she will not have the presidency, then, the plan is to let the next four years go to Senator McCain. She will be back in four years.
GUY ARTHUR THOMAS; HA...HA....HA...
THANKS FOR A GOOD LAUGH, HA...HA... |
|
We are not going to vote for Obama for a number of reasons, least of which is his choice of lapel pin. Is he more honest, thoughtful, moral and smarter than HRC? Probably, but that is a pretty low bar you have set. The real question is he more honest, moral, thoughtful and smarter than McCain? I doubt it - where do I start? Honest? The Rezco connection will speak volumes on that - the MSM will bury it but the truth will prevail. He has flat out lied about Rev Wright - he knew that he was pushing his anti-semitic, anti-white "theology" for years and thought he could get a pass for not hearing that particular sermon. Thoughtful? Prematurely engages his mouth to slam 75-80% of Americans with his "bitter" comment. Moral? I have a problem with someone who is friends with a bomber who is not sorry for what he did - yes, Barack, we know you were eight when he bombed someone, but you were an adult when he said he wasn't sorry. Most Americans would do the moral and right thing and not associate with such terrorists. Smarter? Where do I start - not smart enough to leave the racist congregation preaching the audacity of hate, not smart enough to avoid hanging around with a un-apologetic terrorist, not smart enough to think his slam of flyover country would not be repeated.
It will be a cakewalk in November. |
|
Mary Stella,
you a little crazy. Plus, you're a man. You ain't by any chance Vince P, are you? Just sayin'
|
|
Thanks for the compliment!
I grew up with boys!
Honestly, used to tell my playmates scarey ghostly stories at night, since I was 5, and 6, always got along with boys!, actually, I would say, yes, very well!
Ha, ha,..........
I will be anyone you want me to be!
How about a friend that will
tell the truth!
Obama, has no chance to become
the president.
He will spend tons of money, which is good for the economy [thank you Mr. Sorroooo- ].
Michael Moore, has endorsed Mr.Obama!
|
|
....is correct, of course. If Hill doesn't win the nomination, she needs to pray that McCain wins if she has any hope of ever polluting the Oval Office. If Obama wins, he will be the presumptive nominee in '12, even if he turns out to be so terrible as to make people long for the Carter Administration.
For Hill to then come back in '16 would be next to impossible as by then she will resemble the grinch more than an actual human being, and the party will not remember her by then....
She needs Obama to lose..... |
|
I do not believe Obama will be able to win the presidency.
He is a fuzzy rhetorical abstract.
The Clinton Machine will prevail. |
|
It isn't just a flag pin. That is merely a tiny symbol. A trivial issue. But it shows why Barak Obama acted like Dumbama.
When you have a string of controversial to offensive comments by Michelle Obama and Jeremiah Wright, along with associations with Weatherman, and an overall trendy salon anti American theme--then wearing a flag pin starts to gain traction.
Obama should have seen this coming. Even giving him every benefit of doubt, how is he going to deal with Iran, North Korea, Russia and China if he can forsee something like this? |
|
trying to get tough with MaryStella, Princess of our Dark NeoCon Cabal of Nefarious Evil Patriots.
She'll, as demonstrated numerous times, Dudds, slap the living snot outta your Lefty cheeks and darned well do it with a twinkle and a good manners.
Carry on, MaryS. Excuse the interruption. |
|
God Bless your gracious, kind Heart.
I have a feeling, dudley and I, are building bridges of tolerance.
Good news for Dudley, only Obama can make Hillary look good. She has to insist for more debates. I can not believe, Obama went to Harvard and Princton! I knew Obama will back off the Raleigh debate! |
|
|
Get over it, I hope he unleashes his temper and follow up actions against all of the scum that has taken over our country...Yes, LIBS I'm talking about YOU! |
|
it has been widely acknowledged that Barack Obama is THE most Liberal of senators in the U.S. of KKK A.
small point of correction?
Yeah.
Even moreso, it illustrates how fast and loose BJob is with her confabulatory arguments. It used to be alarming----now it's simply, "ho-hum".
Nothing this joker says contains any credibility.
I am sitting here laughing, because it's been quite some time since I even looked at one of her postings.
"2007 Most liberal Senator":
http://nj.nationaljournal.com/voteratings/
"2007 Most Liberal Senator":
http://www.npr.org/blogs/news/2008/01/obama_ranked_most_lib eral_sena_1.html
BJob, just another among the fatuous Left,
Bound and determined to prove herself bereft.
Only one thing more is so cherished by her,
To treat "Truth" to the gift of her Theft.
clarityseeker (2008)
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
>;D |
|
My post above addresses BJob's post of:
Monday, 4:57 PM |
|
What is supremely entertaining is how far LEFT the Democrat Party has moved----in elevating the senator who garners the ranking as most liberal of all senators.
You do the math.
The only one who cannot see the irony in this is BJob and her "sandbox cabal". |
|
|
He's a fickle lil'lefty when it comes to honoring bridges of tolerance. Easy does it, Princess. Just keep smacking the boy in that uniquely nice way you have. |
|
Thanks for the compliment? Princess? C'mon, Neo, even an old Lefty like you knows MaryStella's a man. Maybe he don't.
Now, you and me got a story to tell..you a little less flexible than I thought, but you'll do.
At the very foot of the mountain, tongue hanging out, shot in the face, he drinks from a pool of...like a prisoner on a death march..dirty water. In front of him, the mountain's razor-sharp volcanic slope seems an impossible task. Even his pit bull whines and crouches in fear. But, driven by sheer political will, he
More.. |
|
I shall say this only once, listen carefully!
I am a EUNUCH in charge of certain (now ex-president harem) whose wife desparately wants to be your president!
Of course, this will be OUR secret!
SHE won by a landslide in Transylvania, congratulations!
More.... |
|
Hey MaryStella,
No offense, boyo, come back up on the pavement. It's your sidewalk, boss. (Jeez, Neo, he's touchy, ain't he?) |
|
|
Dudds. Way too much need, if ya know what I mean. |
|
Neo,
ya gotta give up this MaryStella and Blovieboy stuff, it's having a negative effect on your unconscious life. Neither one of 'em's real.
Now, you and me are real. (The story will continue, right?..right.) |
|
to my well being.
This is well known. :-) |
|
|
|