Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons

Townhall.com The Blogspot for Political, Conservative and Republican Blogs and Bloggers


Wednesday, May 21, 2008
Yet Another Classless Criticism of McCain's Military Service
Posted by: Mary Katharine Ham at 9:51 AM

This appears to be becoming a strategy:

Gillespie noted that McCain was the son and grandson of admirals and called him part of the "Navy royalty."

"Admirals' sons," Gillespie said, unopposed for the Democratic nomination in the 1st Congressional District held by Republican Rep. Jack Kingston, "were treated like royalty. They were privileged people. They were given a silver spoon. Their careers were prepared for them."

Gillespie, a former Army officer who served in Iraq, said McCain was the kind of admiral's son who became a "maverick."

McCain, Gillespie added, was "somebody who needed to stand out, someone that needed to draw attention to themselves and ... was usually out for themselves."

He said his "heart grieves" for McCain's suffering as a POW.

"After that," Gillespie said, "he was somewhat of a celebrity and it went to his head. ... I think he was a self-promoter for the last four years (in the Navy.)

Asked to cite specific examples, Gillespie responded, "I don't have one right now."

Geraghty reminds us that this has happened twice before. Stay classy, Obama supporters.





Tuesday, May 20, 2008
Should McCain Appear on 'SNL' and 'The Daily Show?'
Posted by: Mary Katharine Ham at 11:00 AM
Laura Ingraham disagrees with me on this one (see us discuss it on O'Reilly last night). I can see the argument from fellow conservatives that this kind of thing is beneath the dignity of the office, but I can't entirely agree. Reagan's humor was one of his best qualities. It made him beloved and allowed him to parry everything from assaults on his age to the American value system (remember those old Communist jokes?).

In '84, Reagan had the luxury of being able to wait until a debate to deliver his immortal line:
In the first televised debate, Mondale put in an unexpectedly strong performance, questioning Reagan's age and capacity to endure the grueling demands of the presidency (Reagan was the oldest person to serve as president -- 73 at the time -- while Mondale was 56). However, in the next debate on October 21, 1984, Reagan effectively neutralized the issue by quipping, "I will not make age an issue of this campaign. I am not going to exploit, for political purposes, my opponent's youth and inexperience."
It was a clever, quick-witted retort delivered in a dignified setting, and it had even Mondale in stitches. He undermined the age attack perfectly with his clear presence of mind.

McCain did the same on "SNL" and does it frequently with quick retorts in the town hall style meetings he loves so much. He cannot wait until official debates start to neutralize the age issue. He cannot tarry until the Democrats finally pick a candidate and he is given a setting that suits the dignity of the President of the United States.

I think comedy shows, somewhat counterintuitively, are McCain's milieu. He's comfortable and likeable in these settings, and in the case of "SNL" and "The Daily Show," they often give him a chance to hit on policy issues. When he appears on these shows there's a little bit of a challenge in it for Obama, who should be the one owning these stages. "I can operate on your turf, Junior," McCain seems to say. "Now, look what happens when you try to play on mine. You start saying Iran's not a threat. Amateur."

Don't get me wrong. He will not turn the masses of Obama drones toward him with these appearances, but he does escape the "humorless conservative" label and upholds the McCain brand, which at this point is a damn sight better than the Republican one if you're looking for a win in November. These appearances, for what it's worth, also put the one Republican that young people are more inclined to vote for in front of young people. It's not gonna win him the youth vote, but it's a decent (if not perfect) conduit for a couple conservative ideas.

Bottom line, it's good politics, and I don't think he's done anything to disgrace the office. It's the same quick wit we loved in Reagan; he's just practicing it in different venues. I think it's something conservatives need to do.





Monday, May 19, 2008
On Like Donkey Kong
Posted by: Mary Katharine Ham at 4:28 PM
I've been out-of-pocket today working on magazine stuff, but I'm on O'Reilly tonight talking about McCain's SNL appearance and the age issue, among other things. The lovely Laura Ingraham's guest-hosting, so tune in!




Friday, May 16, 2008
Huckabee FAIL at NRA Convention
Posted by: Mary Katharine Ham at 4:56 PM
In Internet parlance, what Mike Huckabee just did is properly termed FAIL, preferably Photoshopped prominently over his head in the awkward video in which he jokes about Barack Obama being shot at.

For a guy with normally great comic instincts and political skills, this is quite the loser. Expect to hear about it and the accompanying stereotypes of NRA members and Republicans for days, now.

Good Lord.

Update: Oh, good. Tim can ask him about it on Meet the Press. FAIL.





Friday, May 16, 2008
Speech! Speech!
Posted by: Mary Katharine Ham at 10:33 AM
I'm speaking at the May meeting of the Conservative Women's Network at The Heritage Foundation at noon today in Washington, D.C.

I don't think they show this particular event online, so I'll just take my video camera over in case I say something worth capturing for posterity. Ha.

Update: I'm also working on a video today, which I'm planning to release early next week because the editing won't get done until too late today. You can hold me to that, since I'm kinda pumped about the idea and don't want to let it fall by the wayside.








Wednesday, May 14, 2008
Hillary Regrets Her 'White Americans' Remark
Posted by: Mary Katharine Ham at 4:16 PM
Well, this is pretty straight-forward:
BLITZER: Now, your great friend and supporter Congressman Charlie Rangel said and I’m quoting now. "It’s the dumbest thing you could have said."
 
CLINTON: Well, he’s probably right.







Wednesday, May 14, 2008
Conservatives on the Polar Bear Ruling
Posted by: Mary Katharine Ham at 3:45 PM

Awww: Just because they're cute doesn't make them endangered.

Iain Murray, author the "Really Inconvenient Truths" points out that the allowances for oil exploration and limitations of ESA's jurisdiction the secretary included in the ruling won't last long:
The Secretary was compelled to make a listing he clearly didn't want to make and that comes with all sorts of foreseeable detrimental consequences of exactly the sort I describe in my book.  In an effort to obviate those consequences, the Secretary has attempted to erect some barriers that will have all the legislative strength of tissue paper.  It will take just a few seconds of a new administration to blow through them and bring about the dire consequences Sec. Kempthorne has obviously foreseen.  The ESA needs to be reformed for all sorts of reasons that I discuss in the book, but this is perhaps the most urgent now. 
Here are some of the caveats Sec. Kempthorne included:

Kempthorne said, “Listing the polar bear as threatened can reduce avoidable losses of polar bears. But it should not open the door to use of the ESA to regulate greenhouse gas emissions from automobiles, power plants, and other sources.”

To prevent the environmental lobby from using this listing as a means to prevent domestic energy development Kempthorne proposed a rule to allow this type of activity in the area if it is permissible under standards dictated by the Mammal Protection Act.

This rule has not been adopted.



Kevin Hassett of AEI on the far-reaching, litigious consequences of the designation:

The first is the possible wide geographic reach of the global warming argument. The snail darter almost killed a single dam. The polar bear could, in theory at least, stop everything.

Suppose someone wants to build a coal-burning power plant in Florida. Environmentalists might challenge the construction on the grounds that the plant will emit greenhouse gases leading to global warming and an increased threat to polar bears.

The problem with speculative categorization of polar bears as endangered based on speculations of global warming results based on laregly speculative studies is that none of it may actually be true or even caused by global warming:
An October 2007 NASA study concluded that changing wind patterns are responsible for sea ice loss. New wind patterns have compressed sea ice and moved it into the Transpolar Drift Stream which has taken the ice to lower latitudes where it has melted.
The whole thing makes domestic oil exploration and production a lot harder:

The classification would open the door for environmentalists to challenge any new forms of energy production -- including oil exploration in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) or new power plants and factories that emit fossil fuels. It also would jeopardize a highly promising arrangement in Alaska’s Chukchi Sea, which contains an estimated 15 billion barrels of oil and 76 trillion cubic feet of natural gas.

Now is not the time to cut back on domestic oil production. With gas prices soaring to nearly $4 per gallon in some parts of the country, there’s hardly been a better time to embark on energy exploration in the United States to reduce our dependence on foreign oil.

Liberal logic requires that we list an animal as endangered when its population is thriving:
At present, polar bear populations are robust and, according to native people, are considerably larger than they were in previous decades.[29] Predictions of polar bear endangerment are based on two sets of computer models: one set predicts how much Arctic sea ice will melt as a result of global warming, and the other predicts how polar bear populations will respond. But computer models of climate are known to be fraught with problems, and the ecological models used to predict polar bear response are equally limited.






Wednesday, May 14, 2008
Former Duke Lax Player Makes Bittersweet Return to Duke Field
Posted by: Mary Katharine Ham at 12:30 PM
Photobucket
Colin Finnerty, center in green, poses with former teammates after scoring three goals on Duke in a NCAA tournament game at Duke's home field. (Photo courtesy of the Duke Men's Lacrosse Parents Group)

Colin Finnerty, one of the three Duke lacrosse players falsely accused of rape in 2006, returned to Duke's lacrosse field this weekend-- in a Loyola jersey.

The Garden City, N.Y. attackman scored three goals in what was his first appearance on the field since his 2006 season at Duke was abruptly canceled after eight games and his coach resigned after false accusations of rape and assault were brought against team members.

Loyola fell to Duke, 12-7, but Finnerty's hat trick got generous applause from the home crowd:
He scored three goals, receiving a hearty ovation from the home fans after each one.

"It was a great feeling to be back with the playoff atmosphere," Finnerty said. "It felt great to be scoring. I was happy to be stepping up for my team.

"It was a lot of emotion with the fans from Duke supporting me. I'm not surprised by their character."

After the game, Finnerty posed with several of his former teammates for a photograph near midfield.

"They're great guys, all of them," he said. "There's nothing but good vibes between us."

Said Toomey: "I hope it's a little bit of closure coming down here. I think there's a piece of his heart that's still at Duke."

Duke defenseman Tony McDevitt said his teammates have special feelings toward Finnerty.

"He played awesome," McDevitt said. "We would like him to not score so much."
The Duke team, which is top-ranked and top-seeded in the NCAA lacrosse tournament this year, will meet Ohio State in the quarterfinals this weekend, and is heavily favored to win the whole thing. Finnerty and fellow accused teammate Reade Seligman were invited back to Duke in good standing after the disastrous Duke lacrosse had finally ended. They both declined. Seligman transfered to Brown Univeristy, and Duke lost four blue-chip recruits as the program was rocked by former Durham D.A. Mike Nifong's dereliction.

This year, five players returned as fifth-year seniors after being granted an extra year of eligibility by the NCAA. The ruling is a rarity from the strict governing body of collegiate sports, but Duke associate athletic director Chris Kennedy felt compelled to make “an extraordinary request for an extraordinary situation,” and it was granted.

All five fifth-year seniors are elite players, led by Danowski’s son, Matt, who won the Tewaaraton Trophy last year as the best men’s player in college lacrosse. He is a finalist again this season, leading Division I with 84 points (36 goals, 48 assists). He is also only 3 points from tying the N.C.A.A.’s career record of 343.

Along with Danowski, the Blue Devils have two defensemen, McDevitt and Nick O’Hara, who were preseason first-team all-Americans. They join midfielder Michael Ward, a preseason second-team all-American, and goalie Dan Loftus, a preseason third-team all-American, as the fifth-year seniors who make the Blue Devils one of the most productive teams ever.

“They’re the best team out there, I don’t think there’s any question about that,” Starsia said. “I don’t mean to discredit anyone else. They’re the best team in the field, and part of it is certainly because of their unusual experience.”

For second-year coach John Danowski, who took over for Mike Presler when he resigned, this year is a bit smoother than his first, during which the team was still plagued by Nifong news coverage and even threats.

It's gratifying to see them succeed. If only there were as much coverage of Colin Finnerty's hat trick and the Duke's lacrosse team's class in cheering a former teammate as there had been of the lies told about them all in 2006.

Good luck, boys. Bring home the title.

Update: A little trip down memory lane with my Tour of Things that Didn't Happen in Durham:








Wednesday, May 14, 2008
President Gave Up War-Time Golf for Troops
Posted by: Mary Katharine Ham at 11:23 AM
Yikes, from the annals of political tin-earism. Seriously.
For the first time, Bush revealed a personal way in which he has tried to acknowledge the sacrifice of soldiers and their families: He has given up golf.

“I don't want some mom whose son may have recently died to see the commander in chief playing golf,” he said. “I feel I owe it to the families to be in solidarity as best as I can with them. And I think playing golf during a war just sends the wrong signal.”
How long before a snark about this shows up in an Obama stump speech? I don't even give it a day.





Wednesday, May 14, 2008
Kucinich: Catch the Fev-ah!
Posted by: Mary Katharine Ham at 11:08 AM
Dennis Kucinich seems to be regularly updating his YouTube channel despite having dropped out of the race in January.

Today, witness the electricity of this visionary leader and wonder at the inexplicable fact that he didn't catch fiyah all around this great nation of ours:







Wednesday, May 14, 2008
Barack Obama: Middle East Expert
Posted by: Mary Katharine Ham at 10:49 AM

Just compare the coverage of this to the McCain's Sunni/Shia terror funding "gaffe" of a couple months ago, which of course was actually not that much of a gaffe at all since terror funding crosses such religious lines frequently:
Obama posited -- incorrectly -- that Arabic translators deployed in Iraq are needed in Afghanistan -- forgetting, momentarily, that Afghans don't speak Arabic.

"We only have a certain number of them and if they are all in Iraq, then its harder for us to use them in Afghanistan," Obama said.

The vast majority of military translators in both war zones are drawn from the local population.
Naturally they speak the local language. In Iraq, that's Arabic or Kurdish. In Afghanistan, it's any of a half dozen other languages -- including Pashtu, Dari, and Farsi.
And, then again:
"We need agricultural specialists in Afghanistan, people who can help them develop other crops than heroin poppies, because the drug trade in Afghanistan is what is driving and financing these terrorist networks. So we need agricultural specialists," he said.

So far, so good.

"But if we are sending them to Baghdad, they're not in Afghanistan," Obama said.

Iraq has many problems, but encouraging farmers to grow food instead of opium poppies isn't one of them. In Iraq, oil fields not poppy fields are a major source of U.S. technical assistance.
Combine this with the fact that even Obama's most committed foreign policy supporters admit his entire philosophy is "accidental," and you've got a real recipe for geopolitical success, here. That is, if you like your success crispy and nuked with a side of smoked Western civilization. Yummy!

Now, with as much flack as the Left has given the Bush administration (sometimes rightly) for its incomplete understanding of the Middle East before moving into Iraq and the high premium they place on Obama's superior "judgment" on such matters, don't you think this comment from him will get a ton of coverage from Left blogs and Chris Matthews? Yep, I'm waiting.





Wednesday, May 14, 2008
Carville: 'Great Likelihood Obama Will Be Nominee'
Posted by: Mary Katharine Ham at 10:42 AM

The staunch Clinton ally argued she should stay in until early June, but conceded this pretty significant point:

"I still hear some dogs barking," Carville said, according to The State newspaper. "I'm for Senator Clinton, but I think the great likelihood is that Obama will be the nominee."

"As soon as I determine when that is, I'll send him a check," he added.

Asked about who might share a ticket with Obama, Carville floated Clinton's name, as well as that of Clinton ally Gen. Wesley Clark. Carville also mentioned Kansas Gov. Kathleen Sebelius and New York City mayor Michael Bloomberg as possible running mates, according the Greenville News.







Tuesday, May 13, 2008
Feel-Good Link of the Day
Posted by: Mary Katharine Ham at 4:43 PM
The U.S. Marine Corps exceeds its recruiting goals by 42 percent, and the San Francisco Chronicle must report on it.

Tee hee. I hope these guys took the news in stride.





Tuesday, May 13, 2008
Obama Could Not Be Clearer About His Israel Stance
Posted by: Mary Katharine Ham at 4:25 PM

It says something about Obama's stance that the very statement meant to make his position crystal clear, delivered by his own representative on Jewish issues, is one of the more clumsy, opaque, convoluted sentences of the entire campaign:
“We’re going to continue to keep making this case with initiatives to make it clear that his support for Israel could not be more unequivocal,” Mr. Wexler said.
Got it. All clear now that I've diagrammed the sentence.

As is the case with all things Obama, I think he's being deliberately vague to allow for maximum interpretations and minimum consequences. This tendency got him into trouble in his interview on Israel with "The Atlantic:"

JG: Do you think that Israel is a drag on America's reputation overseas?

BO: No, no, no. But what I think is that this constant wound, that this constant sore, does infect all of our foreign policy. The lack of a resolution to this problem provides an excuse for anti-American militant jihadists to engage in inexcusable actions, and so we have a national-security interest in solving this, and I also believe that Israel has a security interest in solving this because I believe that the status quo is unsustainable. I am absolutely convinced of that, and some of the tensions that might arise between me and some of the more hawkish elements in the Jewish community in the United States might stem from the fact that I'm not going to blindly adhere to whatever the most hawkish position is just because that's the safest ground politically.

Obama's advisers have since stated that the "wound" of which he speaks is clearly the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and not Israel itself. That interpretation is only marginally better for Obama, in my mind, but the tactic is undoubtedly helpful for him.

Credulous news organizations like the NYT will report that Obama's making all the right moves, and valiantly assuring Jewish voters of his staunchly pro-Israel stance in the face of relentlessly unfair GOP attacks on irrelevant associations and misinterpreted statements.

Gaza phonebankers will assume his outreach is posturing and read the very real signals of his associations, staff, and comments as proof that Gaza GOTV should kick into overdrive.

A deliberately blank canvas makes a dangerous presidential candidate, and the problem with Obama's pro-Israel stance persists-- it's anything but clear.

(You know what? I blame the staff!)




Your Blog Postings:
Last updated 32 Minutes 56 Seconds Ago
Last updated 38 Minutes 4 Seconds Ago
Last updated 40 Minutes 40 Seconds Ago
Last updated 42 Minutes 2 Seconds Ago
Last updated 57 Minutes 27 Seconds Ago
 

Archives of our Conservative, Republican, Political Blogs

Blog Search



Townhall Conservative, Republican, Political Blogs Townhall Blogs
Townhall Conservative, Republican, Political Columns Columns
Your Townhall Conservative, Republican, Political Blogs Your Blogs
By Month
 November 2009
 October 2009
 September 2009
 August 2009
 July 2009
 June 2009
 May 2009
 April 2009
 March 2009
 February 2009
 January 2009
 December 2008
 November 2008
 October 2008
 September 2008
 August 2008
 July 2008
 June 2008
By Issue
 A Culture of Life
 Budget & Government
 Campaigns & Elections
 Education
 Energy & Environment
 Faith & Family
 Foreign Affairs
 Health Care
 Immigration
 Jobs & Economy
 Judges & Courts
 Media & Culture
 Property Rights
 Safety & Security
 Science & Technology
 Second Amendment
 Social Security
 Tax Relief
Advertisement

Comments Comments

Stupid LDS KG
 Re: Pelosi: Buy a $15,000 Policy or Go to Jail
  By Careful with that axe, Eugene
Rep Oberstar MN
 Re: The Undecideds
  By Patrice
The docs shut them down
 Re: Dem Leader Hoyer: We'll have the votes by this evening
  By Patrice
Vampire Ref
 Re: Health Care Throwdown: Palin vs. Pelosi
  By Eugene
Davie the Bircher
 Re: Maine vote repeals gay marriage law
  By Careful with that axe, Eugene
Axeman
 Re: Pelosi: Buy a $15,000 Policy or Go to Jail
  By NOTW
NeoZionistTool
 Re: Maine vote repeals gay marriage law
  By Careful with that axe, Eugene
David
 Re: Maine vote repeals gay marriage law
  By Careful with that axe, Eugene
Nancy"face of pure evil" Pelosi,,,,,
 Re: Health Care Throwdown: Palin vs. Pelosi
  By colt.45
A final thought
 Re: Maine vote repeals gay marriage law
  By David
More lies
 Re: CBO: PelosiCare Cost Estimate = $3 Trillion Over 10 Years
  By Patrice
Crosseyed
 Re: Health Care Throwdown: Palin vs. Pelosi
  By Careful with that axe, Eugene
NeoZionistTool
 Re: Health Care Throwdown: Palin vs. Pelosi
  By Careful with that axe, Eugene
Here's anuddun
 Re: Maine vote repeals gay marriage law
  By David
Teabagger
 Re: Health Care Throwdown: Palin vs. Pelosi
  By Careful with that axe, Eugene
NeoConScum and dreadnaught
 Re: Maine vote repeals gay marriage law
  By David
Yeah trolls
 Re: Pelosi: Buy a $15,000 Policy or Go to Jail
  By Tea Party
"axe up his butt"
 Re: Health Care Throwdown: Palin vs. Pelosi
  By cottoneyed
TeaParty...
 Re: Health Care Throwdown: Palin vs. Pelosi
  By NeoConScum
I guess it does take an
 Re: Health Care Throwdown: Palin vs. Pelosi
  By cottoneyed

The Latest on Town HallThe Latest on Town Hall


Blog Roll Blog Roll