Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons

Townhall.com The Blogspot for Political, Conservative and Republican Blogs and Bloggers


Thursday, March 20, 2008
Just Because...
Posted by: Mary Katharine Ham at 5:22 PM
It's the traditional Maundy Thursday celebration of Ray-Ban acrobatics...








Thursday, March 20, 2008
Obama's Speech Betrayed His Own Image
Posted by: Mary Katharine Ham at 10:47 AM
And, voters are noticing, In Pennsylvania:
“People are not happy with Obama,” Gill said. “It’s the race stuff.”

“He lied to Anderson Cooper,” said Rodica Mitrea, an aesthetician and immigrant from Romania, referring to an Obama interview Friday with the CNN anchor.

“The speech plays only among the elites,” Ceisler said. “The average person on the street cares about the economy and the war and everyday life.”

Glenn Peter, 54, a patron at Rauchut’s Tavern, said he heard finger pointing, not reconciliation. He took issue with Obama’s explanation that Wright’s observations of a racist America were reflecting the racial scars of his past.

“I don’t want to hear that you are blaming us for him saying this,” said Peter, who is white and worked at an auto parts factory until it was shuttered several years ago. Cutting ties with the church “would have been the best way to do it. That way, I could have been able to listen to him again.”

“It was a great speech,” one man said. “But what concerns me is that on the website for his church, they say they are unabashedly Afro-centric. … The underlying message is they are perpetual victims and they enjoy the victim status and by proxy, me as a white person is their victimizer. And as long as we perpetuate these divisions, we will never heal.”

“Now I am 100 percent for Clinton and zero percent for Obama,” Mitrea said.










Wednesday, March 19, 2008
Chris Matthews, Dancin' Machine
Posted by: Mary Katharine Ham at 11:39 AM
His surprisingly unawkward moves combined with David Gregory's obvious skill make MSNBC pretty much the "Soul Train" of cable news networks. Sorry, CNN.




Wednesday, March 19, 2008
How to Own a Shotgun in D.C.
Posted by: Mary Katharine Ham at 10:09 AM
A D.C. resident illustrates the ludicrous laws that bind her right to bear arms in the nation's capital, rendering her perfectly good firearm a pretty useless paperweight in the event of an attack on her or her personal property.









Tuesday, March 18, 2008
Wimping Out: Obama's Squandered Chance at Post-Racialism
Posted by: Mary Katharine Ham at 3:20 PM

Look, there are things I like about Barack Obama. Until the most vitriolic of the Jeremiah Wright sermons surfaced, Obama's post-racial rhetoric was appealing to me. I believed that he believed it, and that his candidacy really did have the power to lift the nation and the Democratic Party, which has trafficked shamelessly in racial demagoguery for decades, above the "racial stalemate" he speaks of.

The new revelations of Rev. Wright and the fact that Obama chose him as a close spiritual adviser for 20 years makes it nearly impossible for me to buy what the Messiah is selling.

Today, his distancing speech was more a justification speech than anything else. Rev. Wright and other, older black citizens are understandably still angry about discrimination they experienced, he said, and those frustrations are given voice at dinner tables and in fiery sermons. This is all right, Barack posits, because white people are angry, too, for much less justified reasons, like affirmative action.

Barack Obama is uniquely positioned to talk about race in America in a new way. It would have served his post-racial aspirations to do so today. He did not take that opportunity.

He was more eloquent than most, and less overtly divisive than other black leaders would have been, but the message was the same. Black people are angry because they were mistreated, and hateful people like Rev. Wright are only guilty of not understanding that the country can change, and has changed. Obama gives Wright a pass on perpetuating the pernicious notion that the Man is keeping his parishioners down, despite the fact that one of those parishioners is quite conspicuously running for President of the United States of America and winning.

The truth is that the firm belief of preachers and leaders like Wright in the perpetual victimhood of the black community, the sheer audacity of their hopelessness, has arguably done more to injure the black community over the past 20 years than many other things, including white racism. How many young black men, pray tell, has the good Reverend convinced that the American dream is irredeemably corrupted by white racism, and therefore not worth pursuing?

Rising above all that racial resentment cannot be achieved by one politician taking the high road and covering over the sins of those who divided before him. If Obama were serious about post-racialism, he would have spent many of his words today on castigating men like Wright, who preach the very division he wishes to rise above.

But what does he ask in this speech and of whom does he ask it? How will we form a "more perfect union," according to Obama, and who needs to do the forming?
For the African-American community, that path means embracing the burdens of our past without becoming victims of our past. It means continuing to insist on a full measure of justice in every aspect of American life. But it also means binding our particular grievances – for better health care, and better schools, and better jobs - to the larger aspirations of all Americans -- the white woman struggling to break the glass ceiling, the white man whose been laid off, the immigrant trying to feed his family. And it means taking full responsibility for own lives – by demanding more from our fathers, and spending more time with our children, and reading to them, and teaching them that while they may face challenges and discrimination in their own lives, they must never succumb to despair or cynicism; they must always believe that they can write their own destiny.
I appreciate the nod to personal responsibility in the black community at the end of that paragraph, but it's overshadowed by the fact that Obama refuses to condemn those who have risen to power preaching the systematic abdication of exactly that responsibility. Note that while Obama conceded that not all of whites' race issues are entirely unjustified ("And yet, to wish away the resentments of white Americans, to label them as misguided or even racist, without recognizing they are grounded in legitimate concerns – this too widens the racial divide, and blocks the path to understanding."), he did not ask the black community to try to understand them.

But he did ask that of white Americans. In fact, that should be the white community's first priority:
In the white community, the path to a more perfect union means acknowledging that what ails the African-American community does not just exist in the minds of black people; that the legacy of discrimination - and current incidents of discrimination, while less overt than in the past - are real and must be addressed. Not just with words, but with deeds – by investing in our schools and our communities; by enforcing our civil rights laws and ensuring fairness in our criminal justice system; by providing this generation with ladders of opportunity that were unavailable for previous generations. It requires all Americans to realize that your dreams do not have to come at the expense of my dreams; that investing in the health, welfare, and education of black and brown and white children will ultimately help all of America prosper.
In short: Black people, continue to ask more of this oppressive society in which you live without becoming victims of that oppression. White people, try to learn not to be so darn oppressive, huh?

The white "resentment" that Obama speaks of does not primarily come from direct effects of affirmative action or the welfare state. It comes from the societal message that the majority of white people, who have had no part in oppressing anyone, are asked again and again and again to take responsibility for ills they did not cause (and, in many cases have been caused by earlier attempts at assuaging white guilt, like paternalistic welfare). They are lectured about creating a healing "dialogue" in which they don't feel free to speak, lest they employ the wrong politically correct buzz word and confirm their "inherent prejudice." They must feel guilt for "institutional racism" when many of them have never been a part of any racist institution. They're flagellated for benefiting from "white privilege" when many of them don't feel terribly privileged at all.

And, despite engaging in this years-long culturally honored guilt-fest to atone for sins they did not commit, they know that they'd instantly become trogolodytic racists in the eyes of the world for one wrong word, while Jeremiah Wright is excused and even applauded in some quarters for a 20-year stream of hate.

As Shelby Steele explains it
:

I call this white guilt not because it is a guilt of conscience but because people stigmatized with moral crimes--here racism and imperialism--lack moral authority and so act guiltily whether they feel guilt or not.

They struggle, above all else, to dissociate themselves from the past sins they are stigmatized with. When they behave in ways that invoke the memory of those sins, they must labor to prove that they have not relapsed into their group's former sinfulness.

Obama asks white people to perform the same rites every leader before him has, atoning for the country's historic racism by understanding more fully and funding more heavily, and doing it without question. He asks little to nothing of anyone else.

Politically, it will likely work, because white guilt is a powerful thing indeed. Practically, it achieves none of the ascendancy Obama has promised. Philosophically, it's a cop out.

More than anything, Obama's promise of post-racialism depended on a popular, charismatic, biracial man, uniquely positioned to do so, taking the lead in a national conversation on race, inviting white people to participate in it, and taking demagoguery to task no matter what color its face. If Obama had had the courage to do that, his candidacy might indeed have yielded results as lofty as his rhetoric.

So much for that.








Tuesday, March 18, 2008
Obama's More Perfect Union Speech
Posted by: Mary Katharine Ham at 10:57 AM
Text, here.

Update: Allahpundit is the greatest headline writer evah.

Update: Deflect, deflect, deflect. It's not Rev. Wright's fault for saying horrible, hateful things, nor my fault for having the bad judgment to associate with him for 20 years. Nope, it's the fault of the media for presenting Wright as a hateful caricature, despite the fact that Wright is a hateful caricature.
Given my background, my politics, and my professed values and ideals, there will no doubt be those for whom my statements of condemnation are not enough. Why associate myself with Reverend Wright in the first place, they may ask? Why not join another church? And I confess that if all that I knew of Reverend Wright were the snippets of those sermons that have run in an endless loop on the television and You Tube, or if Trinity United Church of Christ conformed to the caricatures being peddled by some commentators, there is no doubt that I would react in much the same way.
Update: He cannot disown Wright? Really? This rationale makes no sense to me, and sounds weaselly:
I can no more disown him than I can disown the black community. I can no more disown him than I can my white grandmother – a woman who helped raise me, a woman who sacrificed again and again for me, a woman who loves me as much as she loves anything in this world, but a woman who once confessed her fear of black men who passed by her on the street, and who on more than one occasion has uttered racial or ethnic stereotypes that made me cringe.

These people are a part of me. And they are a part of America, this country that I love.
There are plenty of people I know who are part of America, this country that I love, with whom I would never choose to associate myself closely for 20 years.

Update:
  The anger is justified!
But for all those who scratched and clawed their way to get a piece of the American Dream, there were many who didn’t make it – those who were ultimately defeated, in one way or another, by discrimination. That legacy of defeat was passed on to future generations – those young men and increasingly young women who we see standing on street corners or languishing in our prisons, without hope or prospects for the future. Even for those blacks who did make it, questions of race, and racism, continue to define their worldview in fundamental ways. For the men and women of Reverend Wright’s generation, the memories of humiliation and doubt and fear have not gone away; nor has the anger and the bitterness of those years. That anger may not get expressed in public, in front of white co-workers or white friends. But it does find voice in the barbershop or around the kitchen table. At times, that anger is exploited by politicians, to gin up votes along racial lines, or to make up for a politician’s own failings.

And occasionally it finds voice in the church on Sunday morning, in the pulpit and in the pews. The fact that so many people are surprised to hear that anger in some of Reverend Wright’s sermons simply reminds us of the old truism that the most segregated hour in American life occurs on Sunday morning.
Update: White people are angry, too! White anger formed the Reagan Coalition, don'tcha know?

Update: Ed Morrissey: "Hey, let's focus on the real bad guys -- corporations!!"

Update:
For we have a choice in this country. We can accept a politics that breeds division, and conflict, and cynicism. We can tackle race only as spectacle – as we did in the OJ trial – or in the wake of tragedy, as we did in the aftermath of Katrina - or as fodder for the nightly news. We can play Reverend Wright’s sermons on every channel, every day and talk about them from now until the election, and make the only question in this campaign whether or not the American people think that I somehow believe or sympathize with his most offensive words. We can pounce on some gaffe by a Hillary supporter as evidence that she’s playing the race card, or we can speculate on whether white men will all flock to John McCain in the general election regardless of his policies.

We can do that.

As I just did in the most-watched speech of the week, on national television.






Tuesday, March 18, 2008
Blogging While Female
Posted by: Mary Katharine Ham at 10:40 AM
John Hawkins interviewed a group of women bloggers today for the second installment in a series, "Blogging While Female."

Our very own Amanda Carpenter was featured the first time around.

Truly, this interview may be the only chance you ever get to see me talk about something called "gender issues." Ha. Not generally my milieu, that, but we chatted a bit about my hate mail, such that it is (I'm fortunate not to get too much), opportunities for women in the blogosphere, and the feminist blogs on the other side of the aisle.

Also interviewed are the very talented Ann Althouse, Kathy Shaidle, the irreplaceable E.M. Zanotti, and longtime buddy La Shawn Barber. Enjoy both their thoughts in this interview and their blogs every day.







Friday, March 14, 2008
Gaza to Golan in Pictures
Posted by: Mary Katharine Ham at 11:38 AM
Same disclaimer on this post as the last one. I'm trying to get it out quickly before Sabbath dinner, so forgive me on specific dates and name spellings, where they don't show up.  More explanation later, but I wanted to get something up.

Photobucket
This is one of the Ethiopian, Jewish immigrants we met at an immigrant absorption center in Jerusalem. All of them live in government-funded centers for up to two years when they get to the country, so that they can learn Hebrew. The nation has to invest in some serious assimilation (private or public money) in order to cope influxes of large immigration populations into a relatively small overall population.

Photobucket
The Hall of Names, at Yad Vashem, the national museum of the Holocaust. Really poignant, the museum is also a huge ongoing, open-source project that strives to put names and stories of victims with the statistics.

Photobucket
That's Gaza, right past the reservoir. The tall buildings were Fatah officer's quarters until Fatah folks in Gaza were, err, removed by Hamas. We were in the town of Sederot (pop. about 21,000, I think), where we met with a woman who told us of the toll of 2,700 rockets shot into the town since 2005. Women in Sederot only put one child at a time in their cars and drive around without seatbelts, because the air-raid siren only gives you 15 seconds of warning before you have to be under cover. It's not enough time to undo carseats or move two children. She, incidentally and totally mind-bogglingly, is a pacifist (spelling corrected because I don't write so well when I'm in a hurry) who wishes to negotiate with Hamas.

Photobucket
Tel Aviv skyline.

Photobucket
The Mediterranean in Tel Aviv.

Photobucket
The Golan Heights.

Photobucket
This is me, in the foreground. In the background, Syria.

Photobucket
Rainbow in the Hula Valley in Northern Israel.

Photobucket
A military expert points out a former Hezbollah training camp (the sandy part of that hilltop),  which overlooked a small Israeli town (red roofs) right on the Lebanon border in 2006. The tree line beyond the houses is the border, essentially. Talk about close proximity.








Tuesday, March 11, 2008
Also, Because This Doesn't Belong in a Post About Anything Holy...
Posted by: Mary Katharine Ham at 7:54 PM
How 'bout that Eliot Spitzer, huh? I always thought he was such a nice boy. Wow.




Tuesday, March 11, 2008
The Old City, in Pictures
Posted by: Mary Katharine Ham at 7:45 PM
I just want to get some pictures up while my Internet connection is working, so I'm going to caption these quickly and not get into too much of the politics. I'm avoiding dates on the ancient history because I'd need to double-check them for accuracy and I can't count on my connection, here. Nonetheless, I hope there's some informative stuff. The trip is fascinating and powerful, so I'll have much more later. My bags are finally here, so now I have a video camera (and clean clothes!), and may be able to get some shots tomorrow.

Photobucket
This is our guide in the Old City of Jerusalem, Ian, who's a prominent archaeologist and gave the single best summary of the entire history of the Jewish people that I've ever heard delivered in a 5-minute summary.

Photobucket
Global hot spots necessitate hot soldiers, right? Behind this guy is the Western Wall (you can spy men praying in the bottom left of the picture) and the Dome of the Rock, the third most holy place in Muslim theology. The close proximity of the two symbols of huge religious significance is, of course, illustrative of the entire conflict, and one of the reasons why Jerusalem remains in dispute as far as Palestinians are concerned.

Photobucket
This is the Western Wall, but beyond the area where you see people praying. The ground I was sitting on when I took this picture was underground until the 20th century, when archaeologists started peeling the layers back to reveal the true size of Herod's great Temple Mount. The wall, according to Ian, at its peak was about the height of the tree, in the upper left of the picture. The notches in the wall, above Ian's head, were cut into the wall to pipe water to a swimming pool during Muslim dominance of the city. The swimming pool was one of the layers removed to reveal the original ground and the ritual Jewish baths previously hidden.

Photobucket
This pile of rocks came tumbling down when the Romans conquered the city. Each rock, 3-6 tons, was burned to weaken it or toppled by mechanical force. The entire Western Wall is built without concrete of any sort. Instead, the rocks were cut smoothly and laid on top of one another. The whole feat of engineering is still partly unexplained, but they think workers probably used long ramps, scooting 10-ton rocks down them to the foot of the mountain after they had cut them out of the stone at the top of the hill.

Photobucket
This is on another side of the Temple Mount. In this picture, rocks from the Christian, Jewish, and Muslim areas of the city sit right next to each other.

Photobucket
The Western Wall.

Photobucket
This is inside the Church of the Holy Sepulchre, which is said to be the spot where Jesus walked up Calvary to his death. All of this stuff is to some extent guesstimation when it comes to placing these actual events, but the long history of the traditions make the spots holy and moving, nonetheless. Above is the stone on which He was placed after He died (well, technically, the real one is under this one, as people were destroying the real one when it was on display by cutting pieces of it to use as relics in other places.) It's also said to contain the place where Jesus was buried.

Photobucket
Early Christians left their mark on the church when they took the pilgrimage there.

Photobucket
So, this is the security fence/wall/barrier, or whatever it is anyone of any given political persuasion calls it. Standing on this hill, in the Jerusalem neighborhood of Gilo, which was hit hard by snipers across the valley in the second intifada, it's amazing there was no wall built sooner. When you're able to feel the proximity of the two areas, it's really astounding to think that the passage was mostly free for so many years despite repeated terror attacks (though not on the scale of the second intifada). Most of the fence is actually chain-link fence instead of wall, but it's electronic, so it alerts IDF every time someone tries to jump over or cut through. IDF's response time is under 10 minutes, if I remember correctly, and the fence slows down would-be attackers enough for them to often foil them.





Monday, March 10, 2008
Where in the World?
Posted by: Mary Katharine Ham at 1:33 AM
Photobucket
This is the view from my hotel. Israel being as small as it is, there's likely something internationally significant in this picture, but I don't know my geography well enough yet to tell you what. I'll keep you posted, though.

I'm in Israel for the week, on a trip with a handful of other journalists run by American Israel Education Foundation, which is affiliated with AIPAC. Also with me, Michael Goldfarb of the Weekly Standard, Richard Starr of the Standard, James Kirchick of TNR (yes, that James Kirchick, Ron Paul commenters), a couple Slate writers, a Politico editor, and Commentary blogger Noah Pollak.

We're meeting with a vast array of local intelligence officials, politicians, Abbas' chief of staff, and regular Israelis to get an understanding of the country and its complex geopolitical position. We're walking the Old City of Jerusalem today, and traveling throughout the country all week long.

I made it to Israel, but my bags didn't, so I have the clothes on my back, a pair of slacks and toiletries purchased at a Jerusalem mall (much like an American mall, but "KFC" looks different in Hebrew), and my still camera and laptop. I'll have plenty of pictures, and as much writing as I can get done while I'm here. If my video camera shows up, I'll try to post video, too.

In the meantime, enjoy the never-ending saga of Hillary and Obama.





Friday, March 07, 2008
Minimum Link and Maximum Joy
Posted by: Mary Katharine Ham at 12:48 PM


I've been working on other projects today, so I'm off the blog more than I'd like to be, but I'll check back in later. Here are a couple random stories for fun.

Global warming? Global coldening? All the same to a CNN anchor.

Has anyone tried sending Uma Thurman to Kill the Farm Bill, yet?

Which is longer? The lifespan of a fruit fly or the lifespan of an earmark moratorium in the U.S. Congress?

Clinton to implement protectionist baseball trading practices, if elected, to protect the Yankees from the exploitative tactics of scrappy, lower-budget clubs.

Andrew Jackson's farewell address, just because.

What's on the menu at the White House when you're endorsed by the President? Hot dogs.

Hillary's nasty comments may cause her to lose Mississippi...worse than she would have otherwise lost it, I mean.

Surprise! Hillary's insincere on NAFTA, too!

Natalie Portman likes McCain, likes Hillary better, and thinks many comments about her are "sexist." But since she doesn't like Obama as much, she's most certainly racist, so why listen to her?












Thursday, March 06, 2008
For Whom the Marshmallowy Bell Tolls
Posted by: Mary Katharine Ham at 4:10 PM
For some reason, I feel like this contest is calling my name.

Peep flashback I, II, and III. It's quite the franchise. I wonder what the Easter season will bring...




Your Blog Postings:
Last updated 30 Minutes 48 Seconds Ago
Last updated 32 Minutes 59 Seconds Ago
Last updated 43 Minutes 24 Seconds Ago
Last updated 51 Minutes 31 Seconds Ago
Last updated 1 Hours 18 Minutes 54 Seconds Ago
 

Archives of our Conservative, Republican, Political Blogs

Blog Search



Townhall Conservative, Republican, Political Blogs Townhall Blogs
Townhall Conservative, Republican, Political Columns Columns
Your Townhall Conservative, Republican, Political Blogs Your Blogs
By Month
 July 2009
 June 2009
 May 2009
 April 2009
 March 2009
 February 2009
 January 2009
 December 2008
 November 2008
 October 2008
 September 2008
 August 2008
 July 2008
 June 2008
 May 2008
 April 2008
 March 2008
 February 2008
By Issue
 A Culture of Life
 Budget & Government
 Campaigns & Elections
 Education
 Energy & Environment
 Faith & Family
 Foreign Affairs
 Health Care
 Immigration
 Jobs & Economy
 Judges & Courts
 Media & Culture
 Property Rights
 Safety & Security
 Science & Technology
 Second Amendment
 Social Security
 Tax Relief
Advertisement

Comments Comments

Happy Birthday young lady
 Re: Long Live the Second Amendment
  By Outryder
Bob Munck
 Re: Climate Change Debate on Hold
  By Andrea
Even you are not that dense Munck!
 Re: Geithner: Stimulus Plan Heading in the Right Direction
  By arch
Vlad/Lucky Pozzo warning
 Re: Obama at the Vatican
  By arch
Munck>
 Re: Geithner: Stimulus Plan Heading in the Right Direction
  By arch
raffaella
 Re: Obama at the Vatican
  By arch
kayann
 Re: Obama at the Vatican
  By arch
Vlad proven liar by Arch!!
 Re: Geithner: Stimulus Plan Heading in the Right Direction
  By arch
Arch Proves Vlad/Lucky Pozzo a liar!!
 Re: Trumka, Rockstar
  By arch
arch 12:33 AM
 Re: Geithner: Stimulus Plan Heading in the Right Direction
  By Bob Munck
Only 10% of the Stimulus....
 Re: Geithner: Stimulus Plan Heading in the Right Direction
  By K.G.
Vlad/Lucky Pozzo warning
 Re: The Week in Blog: Liberals Love Cool Matt
  By arch
Notice about Vlad/Lucky Pozzo
 Re: Interview with Overstock.com CEO on Politics and Business
  By arch
Andrea 12:18 AM
 Re: Climate Change Debate on Hold
  By Bob Munck
kayann
 Re: Not Just the President -- He's Our Pal!
  By arch
Julie. Vlad is proven liar. No doubt.
 Re: Justice Ginsburg on Abortion as Population Control
  By arch
Munck!!
 Re: Geithner: Stimulus Plan Heading in the Right Direction
  By arch
Arch,
 Re: Justice Ginsburg on Abortion as Population Control
  By Julie
Arch
 Re: Not Just the President -- He's Our Pal!
  By kayann
BK
 Re: Climate Change Debate on Hold
  By inthemajority

The Latest on Town HallThe Latest on Town Hall


Blog Roll Blog Roll