Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
TOP NEWS      
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!

Friday, May 16, 2008
Huckabee FAIL at NRA Convention
Posted by: Mary Katharine Ham at 4:56 PM
In Internet parlance, what Mike Huckabee just did is properly termed FAIL, preferably Photoshopped prominently over his head in the awkward video in which he jokes about Barack Obama being shot at.

For a guy with normally great comic instincts and political skills, this is quite the loser. Expect to hear about it and the accompanying stereotypes of NRA members and Republicans for days, now.

Good Lord.

Update: Oh, good. Tim can ask him about it on Meet the Press. FAIL.





Friday, May 16, 2008
Speech! Speech!
Posted by: Mary Katharine Ham at 10:33 AM
I'm speaking at the May meeting of the Conservative Women's Network at The Heritage Foundation at noon today in Washington, D.C.

I don't think they show this particular event online, so I'll just take my video camera over in case I say something worth capturing for posterity. Ha.

Update: I'm also working on a video today, which I'm planning to release early next week because the editing won't get done until too late today. You can hold me to that, since I'm kinda pumped about the idea and don't want to let it fall by the wayside.








Wednesday, May 14, 2008
Hillary Regrets Her 'White Americans' Remark
Posted by: Mary Katharine Ham at 4:16 PM
Well, this is pretty straight-forward:
BLITZER: Now, your great friend and supporter Congressman Charlie Rangel said and I’m quoting now. "It’s the dumbest thing you could have said."
 
CLINTON: Well, he’s probably right.







Wednesday, May 14, 2008
Conservatives on the Polar Bear Ruling
Posted by: Mary Katharine Ham at 3:45 PM

Awww: Just because they're cute doesn't make them endangered.

Iain Murray, author the "Really Inconvenient Truths" points out that the allowances for oil exploration and limitations of ESA's jurisdiction the secretary included in the ruling won't last long:
The Secretary was compelled to make a listing he clearly didn't want to make and that comes with all sorts of foreseeable detrimental consequences of exactly the sort I describe in my book.  In an effort to obviate those consequences, the Secretary has attempted to erect some barriers that will have all the legislative strength of tissue paper.  It will take just a few seconds of a new administration to blow through them and bring about the dire consequences Sec. Kempthorne has obviously foreseen.  The ESA needs to be reformed for all sorts of reasons that I discuss in the book, but this is perhaps the most urgent now. 
Here are some of the caveats Sec. Kempthorne included:

Kempthorne said, “Listing the polar bear as threatened can reduce avoidable losses of polar bears. But it should not open the door to use of the ESA to regulate greenhouse gas emissions from automobiles, power plants, and other sources.”

To prevent the environmental lobby from using this listing as a means to prevent domestic energy development Kempthorne proposed a rule to allow this type of activity in the area if it is permissible under standards dictated by the Mammal Protection Act.

This rule has not been adopted.



Kevin Hassett of AEI on the far-reaching, litigious consequences of the designation:

The first is the possible wide geographic reach of the global warming argument. The snail darter almost killed a single dam. The polar bear could, in theory at least, stop everything.

Suppose someone wants to build a coal-burning power plant in Florida. Environmentalists might challenge the construction on the grounds that the plant will emit greenhouse gases leading to global warming and an increased threat to polar bears.

The problem with speculative categorization of polar bears as endangered based on speculations of global warming results based on laregly speculative studies is that none of it may actually be true or even caused by global warming:
An October 2007 NASA study concluded that changing wind patterns are responsible for sea ice loss. New wind patterns have compressed sea ice and moved it into the Transpolar Drift Stream which has taken the ice to lower latitudes where it has melted.
The whole thing makes domestic oil exploration and production a lot harder:

The classification would open the door for environmentalists to challenge any new forms of energy production -- including oil exploration in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) or new power plants and factories that emit fossil fuels. It also would jeopardize a highly promising arrangement in Alaska’s Chukchi Sea, which contains an estimated 15 billion barrels of oil and 76 trillion cubic feet of natural gas.

Now is not the time to cut back on domestic oil production. With gas prices soaring to nearly $4 per gallon in some parts of the country, there’s hardly been a better time to embark on energy exploration in the United States to reduce our dependence on foreign oil.

Liberal logic requires that we list an animal as endangered when its population is thriving:
At present, polar bear populations are robust and, according to native people, are considerably larger than they were in previous decades.[29] Predictions of polar bear endangerment are based on two sets of computer models: one set predicts how much Arctic sea ice will melt as a result of global warming, and the other predicts how polar bear populations will respond. But computer models of climate are known to be fraught with problems, and the ecological models used to predict polar bear response are equally limited.






Wednesday, May 14, 2008
Former Duke Lax Player Makes Bittersweet Return to Duke Field
Posted by: Mary Katharine Ham at 12:30 PM
Photobucket
Colin Finnerty, center in green, poses with former teammates after scoring three goals on Duke in a NCAA tournament game at Duke's home field. (Photo courtesy of the Duke Men's Lacrosse Parents Group)

Colin Finnerty, one of the three Duke lacrosse players falsely accused of rape in 2006, returned to Duke's lacrosse field this weekend-- in a Loyola jersey.

The Garden City, N.Y. attackman scored three goals in what was his first appearance on the field since his 2006 season at Duke was abruptly canceled after eight games and his coach resigned after false accusations of rape and assault were brought against team members.

Loyola fell to Duke, 12-7, but Finnerty's hat trick got generous applause from the home crowd:
He scored three goals, receiving a hearty ovation from the home fans after each one.

"It was a great feeling to be back with the playoff atmosphere," Finnerty said. "It felt great to be scoring. I was happy to be stepping up for my team.

"It was a lot of emotion with the fans from Duke supporting me. I'm not surprised by their character."

After the game, Finnerty posed with several of his former teammates for a photograph near midfield.

"They're great guys, all of them," he said. "There's nothing but good vibes between us."

Said Toomey: "I hope it's a little bit of closure coming down here. I think there's a piece of his heart that's still at Duke."

Duke defenseman Tony McDevitt said his teammates have special feelings toward Finnerty.

"He played awesome," McDevitt said. "We would like him to not score so much."
The Duke team, which is top-ranked and top-seeded in the NCAA lacrosse tournament this year, will meet Ohio State in the quarterfinals this weekend, and is heavily favored to win the whole thing. Finnerty and fellow accused teammate Reade Seligman were invited back to Duke in good standing after the disastrous Duke lacrosse had finally ended. They both declined. Seligman transfered to Brown Univeristy, and Duke lost four blue-chip recruits as the program was rocked by former Durham D.A. Mike Nifong's dereliction.

This year, five players returned as fifth-year seniors after being granted an extra year of eligibility by the NCAA. The ruling is a rarity from the strict governing body of collegiate sports, but Duke associate athletic director Chris Kennedy felt compelled to make “an extraordinary request for an extraordinary situation,” and it was granted.

All five fifth-year seniors are elite players, led by Danowski’s son, Matt, who won the Tewaaraton Trophy last year as the best men’s player in college lacrosse. He is a finalist again this season, leading Division I with 84 points (36 goals, 48 assists). He is also only 3 points from tying the N.C.A.A.’s career record of 343.

Along with Danowski, the Blue Devils have two defensemen, McDevitt and Nick O’Hara, who were preseason first-team all-Americans. They join midfielder Michael Ward, a preseason second-team all-American, and goalie Dan Loftus, a preseason third-team all-American, as the fifth-year seniors who make the Blue Devils one of the most productive teams ever.

“They’re the best team out there, I don’t think there’s any question about that,” Starsia said. “I don’t mean to discredit anyone else. They’re the best team in the field, and part of it is certainly because of their unusual experience.”

For second-year coach John Danowski, who took over for Mike Presler when he resigned, this year is a bit smoother than his first, during which the team was still plagued by Nifong news coverage and even threats.

It's gratifying to see them succeed. If only there were as much coverage of Colin Finnerty's hat trick and the Duke's lacrosse team's class in cheering a former teammate as there had been of the lies told about them all in 2006.

Good luck, boys. Bring home the title.

Update: A little trip down memory lane with my Tour of Things that Didn't Happen in Durham:








Wednesday, May 14, 2008
President Gave Up War-Time Golf for Troops
Posted by: Mary Katharine Ham at 11:23 AM
Yikes, from the annals of political tin-earism. Seriously.
For the first time, Bush revealed a personal way in which he has tried to acknowledge the sacrifice of soldiers and their families: He has given up golf.

“I don't want some mom whose son may have recently died to see the commander in chief playing golf,” he said. “I feel I owe it to the families to be in solidarity as best as I can with them. And I think playing golf during a war just sends the wrong signal.”
How long before a snark about this shows up in an Obama stump speech? I don't even give it a day.





Wednesday, May 14, 2008
Kucinich: Catch the Fev-ah!
Posted by: Mary Katharine Ham at 11:08 AM
Dennis Kucinich seems to be regularly updating his YouTube channel despite having dropped out of the race in January.

Today, witness the electricity of this visionary leader and wonder at the inexplicable fact that he didn't catch fiyah all around this great nation of ours:







Wednesday, May 14, 2008
Barack Obama: Middle East Expert
Posted by: Mary Katharine Ham at 10:49 AM

Just compare the coverage of this to the McCain's Sunni/Shia terror funding "gaffe" of a couple months ago, which of course was actually not that much of a gaffe at all since terror funding crosses such religious lines frequently:
Obama posited -- incorrectly -- that Arabic translators deployed in Iraq are needed in Afghanistan -- forgetting, momentarily, that Afghans don't speak Arabic.

"We only have a certain number of them and if they are all in Iraq, then its harder for us to use them in Afghanistan," Obama said.

The vast majority of military translators in both war zones are drawn from the local population.
Naturally they speak the local language. In Iraq, that's Arabic or Kurdish. In Afghanistan, it's any of a half dozen other languages -- including Pashtu, Dari, and Farsi.
And, then again:
"We need agricultural specialists in Afghanistan, people who can help them develop other crops than heroin poppies, because the drug trade in Afghanistan is what is driving and financing these terrorist networks. So we need agricultural specialists," he said.

So far, so good.

"But if we are sending them to Baghdad, they're not in Afghanistan," Obama said.

Iraq has many problems, but encouraging farmers to grow food instead of opium poppies isn't one of them. In Iraq, oil fields not poppy fields are a major source of U.S. technical assistance.
Combine this with the fact that even Obama's most committed foreign policy supporters admit his entire philosophy is "accidental," and you've got a real recipe for geopolitical success, here. That is, if you like your success crispy and nuked with a side of smoked Western civilization. Yummy!

Now, with as much flack as the Left has given the Bush administration (sometimes rightly) for its incomplete understanding of the Middle East before moving into Iraq and the high premium they place on Obama's superior "judgment" on such matters, don't you think this comment from him will get a ton of coverage from Left blogs and Chris Matthews? Yep, I'm waiting.





Wednesday, May 14, 2008
Carville: 'Great Likelihood Obama Will Be Nominee'
Posted by: Mary Katharine Ham at 10:42 AM

The staunch Clinton ally argued she should stay in until early June, but conceded this pretty significant point:

"I still hear some dogs barking," Carville said, according to The State newspaper. "I'm for Senator Clinton, but I think the great likelihood is that Obama will be the nominee."

"As soon as I determine when that is, I'll send him a check," he added.

Asked about who might share a ticket with Obama, Carville floated Clinton's name, as well as that of Clinton ally Gen. Wesley Clark. Carville also mentioned Kansas Gov. Kathleen Sebelius and New York City mayor Michael Bloomberg as possible running mates, according the Greenville News.







Tuesday, May 13, 2008
Feel-Good Link of the Day
Posted by: Mary Katharine Ham at 4:43 PM
The U.S. Marine Corps exceeds its recruiting goals by 42 percent, and the San Francisco Chronicle must report on it.

Tee hee. I hope these guys took the news in stride.





Tuesday, May 13, 2008
Obama Could Not Be Clearer About His Israel Stance
Posted by: Mary Katharine Ham at 4:25 PM

It says something about Obama's stance that the very statement meant to make his position crystal clear, delivered by his own representative on Jewish issues, is one of the more clumsy, opaque, convoluted sentences of the entire campaign:
“We’re going to continue to keep making this case with initiatives to make it clear that his support for Israel could not be more unequivocal,” Mr. Wexler said.
Got it. All clear now that I've diagrammed the sentence.

As is the case with all things Obama, I think he's being deliberately vague to allow for maximum interpretations and minimum consequences. This tendency got him into trouble in his interview on Israel with "The Atlantic:"

JG: Do you think that Israel is a drag on America's reputation overseas?

BO: No, no, no. But what I think is that this constant wound, that this constant sore, does infect all of our foreign policy. The lack of a resolution to this problem provides an excuse for anti-American militant jihadists to engage in inexcusable actions, and so we have a national-security interest in solving this, and I also believe that Israel has a security interest in solving this because I believe that the status quo is unsustainable. I am absolutely convinced of that, and some of the tensions that might arise between me and some of the more hawkish elements in the Jewish community in the United States might stem from the fact that I'm not going to blindly adhere to whatever the most hawkish position is just because that's the safest ground politically.

Obama's advisers have since stated that the "wound" of which he speaks is clearly the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and not Israel itself. That interpretation is only marginally better for Obama, in my mind, but the tactic is undoubtedly helpful for him.

Credulous news organizations like the NYT will report that Obama's making all the right moves, and valiantly assuring Jewish voters of his staunchly pro-Israel stance in the face of relentlessly unfair GOP attacks on irrelevant associations and misinterpreted statements.

Gaza phonebankers will assume his outreach is posturing and read the very real signals of his associations, staff, and comments as proof that Gaza GOTV should kick into overdrive.

A deliberately blank canvas makes a dangerous presidential candidate, and the problem with Obama's pro-Israel stance persists-- it's anything but clear.

(You know what? I blame the staff!)





Tuesday, May 13, 2008
When Does Hillary's Leverage Run Out?
Posted by: Mary Katharine Ham at 3:50 PM

An open question to my fellow bloggers...

Obviously, she's been considerably bolstered in her dream to plow on by the revelation that fully 67 percent of Democratic voters wish her to plow on. Even among Obama voters, the number's in the 40s. Talk about some validation. I'm particularly amused by the fact that the American electorate continues to mystify the Washington punditry and media by not acting in the manner pundits prescribe for the Democratic Party. It mystifies Beltway types so much, in fact, that the defiance of Democratic voters is the lede in this story:
Pushing back against political punditry, more than six in 10 Democrats say there's no rush for Hillary Clinton to leave the presidential race – even as Barack Obama consolidates his support for the nomination and scores solidly in general-election tests.
"Why aren't they listening to us???" the media asks overtly and a little pathetically in this story.

The media turned the fire hose of negative commentary on Hillary post-Indiana and -N.C., as predicted, partly because they knew she'd fare well in Kentucky and particularly West, by God, Virginia, thereby extending the justification for her Veritably Mathematically Impossible, by God, Campaign. They hoped to make their criticisms, get the supers 'rats jumping off the ship, so to speak, and that the combination would impress upon her the need to leave the race.

Her plaudits for dropping out, from both the media and Obama, would have been great indeed had she done it pre-West Virginia, but the costs to her outweighed the benefits. Why quit while you're sorta-kinda ahead (in the ridiculous parlance of this ridiculous campaign, that is) for a couple days?

Now, she'll whoop up in W.V. and likely in Kentucky next week (she's leading by 25 percent), and her argument for her "broad coalition" will limp along despite the fact that Obama's superdelegate count is rising faster than the thrill up Chris Matthews' leg.

She'll lose in Oregon, which has 52 delegates to give, and she's trailing in South Dakota (June 3), but she's likely to take Montana and Puerto Rico, and she's leading her states by larger margins than Obama leads his.

Given how far she's come and the fact that there are only 21 days left until the end of primaries, period, at what point do the benefits of dropping out outweigh the benefits of staying in, and how's the Obama campaign gonna make it worth her while? Add to the scales the fact that Democratic voters are pretty pumped about getting to have a say in this process, and the people of the remaining few primary states would be disproportionately ticked by having their chances revoked at the very end of this improbable process, and you've got a very delicate situation. (Don't you love the way the Democrats devised this system?)

We're dealing with a pretty small window, here, in which she'll bolster her standing with a couple strong wins and he'll continue to scrape away at superdelegates, bolstering his own.

Perhaps Clinton just continues to rock on until June 3rd, then using the dual bargaining power of being both a potentially destructive annoyance to the party throughout the summer and the idea that the party owes her for having energized new voters and for her potential to keep blue-collar types within the ranks.

Does she settle on one of these bargaining chips-- either the diligent party servant or the dangerous candidate scorned? I think we all know which might suit her better.

And, at what point is her bargaining power greatest? Does she ever lose her leverage, or are the Clintons so powerful that regardless of her behavior, she's guaranteed a pay-out or a position at the end of all this? Thoughts, guys? The clock is a-tickin' on this thing. Just thinking out loud.







Tuesday, May 13, 2008
Gaza for Obama
Posted by: Mary Katharine Ham at 2:58 PM
Here's the video of the al-Jazeera report as a companion to AC's report:





Friday, May 09, 2008
So, Maybe That 'Hamas Endorsed Obama' Talking Point Wasn't So Unfair?
Posted by: Mary Katharine Ham at 7:05 PM
Still a bit of a cheap shot from the man who says Jeremiah Wright's off-limits, but Obama's associates always do speak loudly about his priorities. Today, an adviser gets canned for hangin' with Hamas:

A Middle East policy adviser for Barack Obama has left the campaign after acknowledging having held talks with Hamas, FOX News confirms.

The Times newspaper in London first reported Friday that the campaign was severing ties with the adviser, Robert Malley.

Malley said he had been in contact with the Palestinian group, but only through his work for a “conflict resolution think tank,” and not on behalf of the Obama campaign, the newspaper reported.

I'm sure this has nothing to do with Obama's actual policies or feelings about Hamas, of course.




« Previous12345678910191192Next »

FEATURES FEATURES

Combating America's Energy Concerns

Posted by: Michele Bachmann
5/16/2008

The Campbell Quiz

Posted by: John Campbell
5/16/2008

Nothing "False" About Bush Attack

Posted by: Michael Medved
5/15/2008

Your Blog Postings:
Last updated 41 Minutes 56 Seconds Ago
Last updated 1 Hours 15 Minutes 56 Seconds Ago
Last updated 1 Hours 18 Minutes 9 Seconds Ago
Last updated 1 Hours 57 Minutes 58 Seconds Ago
Last updated 3 Hours 19 Minutes 50 Seconds Ago
 

Archives Archives

Blog Search



Townhall Blogs Townhall Blogs
Columns Columns
Your Blogs Your Blogs