Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons

Townhall.com The Blogspot for Political, Conservative and Republican Blogs and Bloggers


Sunday, January 25, 2009
Short-term AS IN Forever
Posted by: Jonathan Garthwaite at 8:49 AM
Do you really think that the $1 Trillion in stimulus is a one-time event?
Democrats want to use the big spending package designed to jump-start the staggering economy to send billions to long-term programs to help poor and disabled school children.

President Barack Obama's recovery plan amounts to the biggest increase ever in federal money for schools. Many Republicans say it is not a short-term boost but an immense expansion that will be impossible to roll back.






Sunday, January 25, 2009
TV Me
Posted by: Amanda Carpenter at 7:34 AM
I'll be on CNN's Reliable Sources with Howard Kurtz this morning to talk about all kinds of media fun this week: Inauguration coverage, Blagojevich, Gitmo and whatever else might pop up!




Saturday, January 24, 2009
Media Men on Palin
Posted by: Amanda Carpenter at 10:41 PM
I'd like our readers to watch this clip and write in the comments if you think Chris Matthews is slamming Sarah Palin here or not. In the clip below he's talking about the possibility of the Governor landing a book deal. "If she can read and if she can write, she's going to make some money" he said.

"The only politician I know who can write is Barack Obama," Matthews concludes.

What do you think about this? Seems like he couched his statements just enough to keep himself safe, but still sounds a touch condescending to me.

Oh, and did you see this clip of Glenn Beck calling Palin a "hot grandma"? That happens at 1:00 into the clip. I think Palin handles the awkward compliment rather well and Beck ended up doing a fine interview But, is this appropriate? She's a GOVERNOR, not a beauty pageant contestant!






Saturday, January 24, 2009
Obama High-Water Mark 68% Approval
Posted by: Jonathan Garthwaite at 10:33 PM
It's all downhill from here.




Saturday, January 24, 2009
Subpoena Requests Snare Top Obama Aides
Posted by: Amanda Carpenter at 4:01 PM
From the AP:
SPRINGFIELD -- Sweeping federal subpoenas of Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich’s administration include requests for records involving David Axelrod and Valerie Jarrett, senior advisers to President Barack Obama.

Among 43 subpoenas released by the Blagojevich administration Friday, one from Dec. 8 seeks notes, calendars, correspondence and any other data that relate to Axelrod, Jarrett and 32 other people and organizations.

That was the day before the FBI arrested Blagojevich, a two-term Democrat, on charges that he tried to trade his appointment to replace Obama in the Senate for campaign contributions. Wiretapped conversations show Blagojevich thought Jarrett was interested in the seat and he wanted campaign money or a high-paying job in return, according to a sworn statement.






Saturday, January 24, 2009
A Meaningless Cliche, and Some Meaningful Bravado
Posted by: Carol Platt Liebau at 3:12 PM
A friend just emailed me this story from yesterday's Washington Post, wherein John McCain excoriates his fellow Republicans for having the nerve to question whether it's appropriate for the Secretary of State's husband to be receiving donations from foreign sources.  In that context, McCain had this to say:

I remind all my colleagues: We had an election.  I think the message the American people are sending us now is that they want us to work together, and get to work.

These claims are not new, coming from McCain.  But they are meaningless.  After all, the American people certainly want politicians to "work together," but only on behalf of causes with which they agree (no one would want politicians united, say, in a drive to raise taxes on everyone by 50%).  So the claim isn't true as a universal, but only (perhaps) in a particular situation.

What's more, McCain is plenty willing to speak out when he disagrees with the policy on the table -- one thing he touted in the campaign was his "independence," i.e. his unwillingness to go along with policies he opposed.  So, in the end, McCain's call for "working together" only seem to apply when he objects to people objecting to the matter at hand.  As I said, the whole "let's work together" thing is a meaningless exhortation designed to bully those who have the effrontery to do anything with which McCain disagrees. 

McCain seems totally on message with the new President's bracing reminder to Republicans that "I won."  It boggles the mind to think of the press reaction had President Bush asserted the same (true) fact -- certainly in 2001, but even, too, in 2004.   This is bravado with meaning --  quite likely a signal that Obama's "bipartisanship" extends only to rhetoric and concessions that mean little to him, rather than all the way to real compromise.

 





Friday, January 23, 2009
Obama Rescinds Mexico City Policy
Posted by: Amanda Carpenter at 6:16 PM
It didn't take long for President Obama to deliver the abortion lobby its first major victory.

Obama overturned a longstanding policy that prohibited tax dollars from being used to fund abortion in foreign countries on his third day as president and a day after thousands of pro-life activists left Washington.

The "Mexico City policy" was originally instituted by Republican President Ronald Reagan.until Democratic President Bill Clinton repealed and Republican President George W. Bush reinstated it in 2001.

Obama nixed it by way of an executive order on Friday, hours after pro-life activists ended their annual March for Life protest on Capitol grounds.

Liberals referred this the "Global Gag rule." Immediately after the executive order was announced, feminists groups like NARAL Pro-Choice America and the Feminist Majority mailed out statements to their supporters, urging them to thank Obama.

Christian leader and Family Research Council President Tony Perkins is deeply disappointed with Obama's action.

"At a debate last year at Rick Warren's Saddleback Church, then-candidate Barack Obama vowed to find 'common ground' on the issue of abortion and that he, as President, would work to 'reduce the number of abortions,'" Perkins reminded. "His action today flies in the face of that vow and probably sets a record as the most quickly broken campaign promise ever leaving the question, how many more broken promises to families lie ahead?"







Friday, January 23, 2009
Who Are the "Little People" Now?
Posted by: Carol Platt Liebau at 5:01 PM
About a year ago, Barack Obama announced his intention to raise taxes on some Americans, i.e. the "top 1%" (although, laudably, he may delay those plans given the current economic crisis).  It's all just a matter of "fairness," the Democrats tell us with some regularity.

It's remarkable, then, that Democrats are so sanguine about the under-taxpayers in their midst.  Caroline Kennedy and Tim Geithner are the most recent examples, but the mind strays also to Charlie Rangel.

Famously, Leona Helmsley was once said to have proclaimed that "only the little people pay taxes."  (Liberal) media commentators loved to characterize Helmsley's awful comment as the apotheosis of the Reagan '80's.  But now it seems as though the left is willing to demand that regular Americans to pay higher taxes, then look the other way if Democrats in (or auditioning for) government posts choose not to play by the same rules.

If paying taxes is supposed to be a patriotic act, as Joe Biden once informed us, it would be interesting to see what commentary the vice president has on the "patriotism" of some of those in his party.  Leona Helmsley's "little people" were, presumably, those not rich enough to hire people to help them evade their commitments.  Are the Democrats' "little people" those who don't have enough political influence to ensure that the powers that be will look the other way?




Friday, January 23, 2009
Friday Afternoon Moment of Zen
Posted by: Matt Lewis at 4:22 PM
As music videos go, this one is pretty fun...






Friday, January 23, 2009
Someone Hits Duncan
Posted by: Matt Lewis at 2:18 PM
Not sure who is behind this, but it seems someone may have finally figured out how to beat Duncan

In addition to pushing a pretty compelling message (reminding members that -- fairly or not -- Dems have fared well under Duncan's tenure), the fact that this is humorous -- at a time when RNC members are no doubt sick of receiving attack emails and mail -- probably makes this especially effective ...







Friday, January 23, 2009
“NOT EASILY BROKEN” IS EASILY EMBRACED
Posted by: Michael Medved at 2:03 PM

After two weeks in theatres, the fine new film “Not Easily Broken” has earned nearly $10 million at the box office, assuring robust profitability for this low budget labor of love. Bishop T.D. Jakes, dynamic pastor of a flourishing mega-church in Dallas, wrote the book that inspired the film and helped to produce the handsome movie adaptation.

Starring Morris Chestnut and Taranji P. Henson, two superb African-American performers on the verge of major stardom, the movie shows the way that Christian faith and traditional values can help a stressed-out, upwardly mobile husband and wife in keeping their troubled marriage together. Like the similarly moving “Fireproof” in 2008, “Not Easily Broken” demonstrates the existence of an eager audience for a marriage-saving message that’s simultaneously hopeful and realistic—an audience that’s become a powerful force in all ethnic communities.






Friday, January 23, 2009
"I'm not going to discuss the matter"
Posted by: Jonathan Garthwaite at 1:41 PM
President Obama apparently launched the first military action of his presidency this morning but WH press secretary Robert Gibbs wouldn't talk about the story during his daily press briefing. He was repeatedly asked but would not budge from "I'm not going to discuss the matter." Long live transparency.




Friday, January 23, 2009
Roskum Blames Pelosi for Silencing GOP
Posted by: Amanda Carpenter at 1:17 PM
Rep. Peter Roskum (R.-Ill.) has some complaints about the way Speaker Pelosi is running the House this session.

In spite of all the talk nationally about bipartisanship Democrats have "accepted very little input from the minority" about the forthcoming economic stimulus bill Roskum said.

"And I think that's obviously coming from Speaker Pelosi," Roskum told reporters on a  conference call Friday afternoon.
 
He took issue with the inability for Republicans to offer amendments to the bill, saying, "It got to the point where it's become absurd. Instead of offering amendments members were simply speaking about them."

GOP Whip Rep. Eric Cantor (Va.) and Rep. Jeb Hensarling (R.-Tex.) also participated in the call to draw attention to their party's concerns about the stimulus bill, which focused mainly on wasteful spending.

"There is such a huge portion [of money], hundreds of billions of dollars, not dedicated to the economy by stimuluting jobs." Cantor said.





Friday, January 23, 2009
More Democrat Naivete
Posted by: Carol Platt Liebau at 12:12 PM
From this morning's New York Times:

Mr. Blair [Obama nominee for intelligence director] also suggested that some interrogation procedures [for detainees] would need to remain secret so potential adversaries could not train to resist them.

“We don’t want to provide open intelligence support for those who are coming after us,” he told members of the Intelligence Committee.

Remarkably, as the piece goes on to detail, congressional Democrats, including Sen. Dianne Feinstein, oppose this common sense approach.  She, among others, wants to legislate what methods can be used -- making the information unavoidably public.

It shouldn't take a rocket scientist to realize two things: If we publicize which interrogation methods can (or cannot be used), first, our enemies can be trained to resist them.   Second, our forces lose the psychological advantage that comes with being able to threaten an unresponsive terrorist with certain measures (even if he has no intention of using them) -- because, in fact, his adversary knows as well as he does what's actually allowed.  This is like handing a not-insubstantial weapon to our enemies. 

Surely if the Obama White House is willing to restrict access for journalists to its own political activities, it should be willing to restrict access to information about American interrogation methods for our enemies.






Friday, January 23, 2009
I'm Not Being Rude (I Promise...)
Posted by: Matt Lewis at 11:16 AM
Several folks are mad at me for not returning their emails.  Unfortunately, I never received them.

If you have emailed me at Townhall.com, and have not heard back, this is because I no longer work at Townhall or have a Townhall email address (sadly, the emails are not bouncing back)... 

As always, you can reach me here.

... Sorry for the interruption -- now back to politics!




Your Blog Postings:
Last updated 5 Minutes 47 Seconds Ago
Last updated 12 Minutes 43 Seconds Ago
Last updated 15 Minutes 52 Seconds Ago
Last updated 16 Minutes 35 Seconds Ago
Last updated 44 Minutes 28 Seconds Ago
 

Archives of our Conservative, Republican, Political Blogs

Blog Search



Townhall Conservative, Republican, Political Blogs Townhall Blogs
Townhall Conservative, Republican, Political Columns Columns
Your Townhall Conservative, Republican, Political Blogs Your Blogs
By Month
 December 2009
 November 2009
 October 2009
 September 2009
 August 2009
 July 2009
 June 2009
 May 2009
 April 2009
 March 2009
 February 2009
 January 2009
 December 2008
 November 2008
 October 2008
 September 2008
 August 2008
 July 2008
By Issue
 A Culture of Life
 Budget & Government
 Campaigns & Elections
 Education
 Energy & Environment
 Faith & Family
 Foreign Affairs
 Health Care
 Immigration
 Jobs & Economy
 Judges & Courts
 Media & Culture
 Property Rights
 Safety & Security
 Science & Technology
 Second Amendment
 Social Security
 Tax Relief
Advertisement

Comments Comments

Bob Munck!
 Re: Capitol Goes Into Lockdown
  By arch
NOTW 12:48 AM
 Re: Capitol Goes Into Lockdown
  By Bob Munck
arch 12:46 AM
 Re: Capitol Goes Into Lockdown
  By Bob Munck
Bea
 Re: Capitol Goes Into Lockdown
  By arch
Great Fun, I had tons of laughs....
 Re: Capitol Goes Into Lockdown
  By Bea
Bea
 Re: Capitol Goes Into Lockdown
  By arch
Vlad was Muncks Halfback!!
 Re: Capitol Goes Into Lockdown
  By arch
Hey Arch and Homer....Where are you
 Re: Capitol Goes Into Lockdown
  By Bea
monk?
 Re: Capitol Goes Into Lockdown
  By NOTW
Give it up Bob!
 Re: Capitol Goes Into Lockdown
  By arch
Origanalist 12:09 AM
 Re: Capitol Goes Into Lockdown
  By Bob Munck
Origanalist
 Re: Capitol Goes Into Lockdown
  By arch
I'm outa here
 Re: Capitol Goes Into Lockdown
  By Origanalist
Mr. Munck Has an Insatiable Need to.....
 Re: Capitol Goes Into Lockdown
  By Bea
Munck;s veal cheeks!
 Re: Capitol Goes Into Lockdown
  By arch
Let the Federal Government Self-Destruct
 Re: Byron York: Get Going For The 2010 Elections
  By Take Back the Government
Bea writes:
 Re: Capitol Goes Into Lockdown
  By homer noble
Bob Munck
 Re: Read Her Lips: You'll Pay For Abortions
  By arch
The DC Rules of the Game
 Re: Byron York: Get Going For The 2010 Elections
  By Take Back the Government
Bea
 Re: Capitol Goes Into Lockdown
  By arch

The Latest on Town HallThe Latest on Town Hall


Blog Roll Blog Roll