Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons

Townhall.com The Blogspot for Political, Conservative and Republican Blogs and Bloggers


Wednesday, January 28, 2009
No Tehranian Honeymoon
Posted by: Carol Platt Liebau at 2:53 PM
A piece from the BBC finds "remarkable" the "vitriol" in Ahmadinejad's remarks directed to President Obama and the US.

Only the naive left would be surprised.  Ahmadinejad thinks he smells weakness and inexperience -- and therefore intends to see how far he can go.   Let's hope the belligerence stops with words.

Didn't Joe Biden warn us about this?




Wednesday, January 28, 2009
A Republican Stimulus Package
Posted by: Michele Bachmann at 2:44 PM
Today, Congressmen Dave Camp (R-MI) and Eric Cantor (R-VA) will be offering a Republican substitute to the Democrats' trillion-dollar spending bill. So you're not confused, this substitute is different from the RSC's Economic Recovery bill I've talked about in recent posts, but still very effective in reducing tax rates for all Americans and stimulating the economy.  It's certainly a better cure for what ails us than the Democrats big spending package.

Below are a few of the highlights of the Camp/Cantor substitute, and how it will impact Minnesotans and families across America .

The legislation will reduce the lowest individual tax rates from 15% to 10% and from 10% to 5%.

As a result, every taxpaying-family in America will see an immediate increase in their income with an average benefit of $500 in tax relief from the drop in the 10% bracket and $1,200 for the drop in the 15% bracket. A married couple filing jointly could save up to $3,200 a year in taxes.

And according to research done by The Heritage Foundation, 272,306 filers in Minnesota’s 6th District will benefit from the reduction in the 10% bracket and 228,926 filers will benefit from the reduction in the 15% and the 10% brackets.

The legislation allows small business to take a tax deduction equal to 20% of their income.

In fact, small businesses (those employing less than 500 individuals) employ about half of all Americans, yet they can be subject to tax rates that siphon away one-third or more of their income. This legislation will immediately free up funds for small businesses to retain and hire new employees.

In Minnesota, there are 498,606 small businesses with 500 or fewer employees and according to the Small Business Administration Office of Advocacy, they represent 98.0% of the state’s employers while having created 78.4% of the state’s net new jobs from 2004 to 2005. It's vital that we lower the tax burden on these small businesses.

The legislation also includes a home-buyers credit of $7,500 for those buyers who can make a minimum down-payment of 5%.

This credit will go a long way in giving potential buyers the incentive they need to purchase homes now to help turn around our stagnant real estate market.

For more information about the plan, check out the website for the Office of the Republican Whip.




Wednesday, January 28, 2009
Obama Mocks DC Snow School Closings
Posted by: Matt Lewis at 2:37 PM
I actually agree with him on this one.  But now that he has said it, how much do you want to bet his children's school won't close the next time roads are treacherous???




Wednesday, January 28, 2009
The Gingrey "Clarification"
Posted by: Carol Platt Liebau at 12:23 PM
Rep. Phil Gingrey has issued a statement to "clarify" his "misunderstanding" with Rush Limbaugh.  Apparently, he feels that his comments "read much harsher than they actually were intended."

I am not going to comment on the substance of the controversy, as Rush is infinitely more qualified than I to do that.  But I would like to point out that the episode is, in my view, emblematic of the ongoing behavior of some elected Republicans, who seem more willing to "take on" the grassroots of their own party than they are to confront the opposition.

Look, having worked on Capitol Hill, I do understand how frustrating it can be to do the best one can and still get hammered by "friendly fire."  But in the end, as the hoary old cliche goes, politics is about addition, and any politician worth his salt knows one "adds" nothing by attacking those on one's own side.  It's Rush's and Sean's and the rest's job to hold the GOP's feet to the fire, and it should be taken no more personally than, say, the penchant of Democrats to try to expand government.  It's just what they do.  They don't exist simply to disseminate favorable talking points for the GOP leadership (even though we all know the leadership badly needs such services).

Part of the problem with at least some elected GOP'ers is a certain tone-deafness when it comes to PR, even within their own party.  This is a remarkable manifestation of that phenomenon -- and a timely reminder, once more, of how the inside-the-beltway bubble makes it seem less risky to vent frustration with the conservative grassroots than, say, with Nancy Pelosi's reflexively left wing shock troops.

Rep. Gingrey has apologized.  As he should.

Update: Today, Jim Geraghty succinctly skewers the GOP for "employing an operative class that is much more skilled at skewering intraparty rivals than at taking the fight to Democrats in a difficult environment."  Exactly -- but I fear that the problem isn't limited to the "operative class" . . . it's endemic in the elected/political class, as well.






Wednesday, January 28, 2009
Package Stimulates Government Growth, Not Much Else
Posted by: Michele Bachmann at 12:06 PM
Today, the House is set to vote on the Democrat's $825-billion dollar "stimulus" package that according to them is primed to immediately jump start the economy. But as we know, there are serious doubts from respected economists about the bill's ability to resuscitate our stagnant economy.

Republicans at the House Ways and Means Committee have done some great work breaking down 1) the percentage of tax cuts and government spending that reaches the economy under the Democrat “stimulus” bill, and 2) the difference in tax relief that American families, workers and businesses would receive from the Democrat and the Republican plans comparatively.

Here's a link to their research that lays out their case perfectly with graphs to match.

I'll close the post with the Committee's "Bottom Line" from their research:

"The nonpartisan CBO confirms that tax cuts get more money into the hands of American families and our economy faster than government spending. The American people know tax cuts are a better way to stimulate the economy than borrowing money from China just to increase federal spending and raise the federal deficit. If the Speaker was interested in answering the President’s call to reach a bipartisan, American solution to this crisis, she would work with Republicans to increase tax relief for every working American—which is what the Republican alternative does."





Wednesday, January 28, 2009
Replacing Kristol
Posted by: Carol Platt Liebau at 12:01 PM
Hugh is right -- many of the names being floated to replace Bill Kristol aren't that conservative, certainly when it comes to social and/or faith issues.

I like the Byron York suggestion, though.

Over at Beliefnet, another name was floated yesterday -- that of my friend and Lincoln Fellow compatriot Josh Trevino.  Smart guy -- RedState founder, former Bush speechwriter, former think tanker, military service, the works.  

Would it kill them to have a voice from outside the NY-DC axis? Just sayin'. 




Wednesday, January 28, 2009
Winning 76 Million Dollars Playing Lawsuit Lottery
Posted by: John Hawkins at 11:19 AM

The legal system we have in this country is absolutely insane. It's geared up to produce lawsuits, is extremely easy to abuse, and the results of going to court are often so completely random and over-the-top, that the results of lawsuits seem to be completely random at times. For example, take the case of Timothy Hoffman,
"A Merritt Island man who was paralyzed when he answered a dare to do a belly flop in the Indian River has been awarded $76.6 million by a Brevard County jury. Timothy D. Hoffman, who was 20 at the time of the accident on Jan. 16, 2003, broke his neck when he sprinted down a dock in Port St. John and slammed headfirst into the bottom of the shallow river. The former construction worker is unable to move his legs or arms but has limited movement in his shoulders, said his attorney, Donald Van Dingenen of Winter Park. Hoffman's mother quit her job to take care of him. He lives in his parents' converted garage, requires assistance to eat and dress, and cannot use the bathroom normally, Van Dingenen said. His father is a construction worker who has to travel out of state to take jobs to support the family during the recession. A jury late Wednesday in Viera decided that Hoffman should receive $1.5 million for past medical expenses, $89,000 for lost earnings, $21.7 million for future medical expenses, $583,000 for loss of future earnings, and a whopping $52.8 million for pain and suffering. The judgment is one of the largest in Brevard history, Van Dingenen said. Whether Hoffman will collect, however, is questionable. The defendant, C&D Dock Works, filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy in May because of the incident, said its former owner, Charles Brunty. A judge in November 2007 ruled that the company was negligent. C&D was the general contractor on the job, to which Hoffman was sent by a temporary labor agency. Brunty said he hasn't worked for months and could not afford a lawyer, so no one defended the company in court. "There was no negligence on my part," Brunty said. There was a rail at the edge of the water, he added, indicating a potential danger. ...The accident happened while Hoffman was waiting for a sea wall to harden. Accounts diverge. In one, Hoffman's boss and co-workers put up money -- either $10 or $20, according to varying versions -- to goad him to enter the chilly water. In another, Hoffman offered to jump into the river in exchange for the money. It is undisputed that he fell about 10 feet into about a foot of water and landed on his head, breaking his neck between his fifth and sixth cervical vertebrae.
What happened to Timothy Hoffman is terrible. However, it's also entirely his own fault and has absolutely nothing to do with the company that was just driven out of business by a 76 million dollar judgment. In fact, any rational person would be left scratching his head trying to figure out what C&D Dock Works is supposed to have done wrong here. After all, it wasn't as if C&D Dock Works was negligent or caused Hoffman to jump off the dock -- it's just that they happened to be the people with the deepest pockets who were tangentially connected to this incident in some fashion. Therefore, they're being looted. There is absolutely nothing just, moral, or even sane about that. However, as long as trial lawyers' unions keep pouring their ill gotten gains into the Democratic Party, this game of lawsuit lottery will continue, and real justice will remain on holiday in this country.

John Hawkins is a professional blogger who runs Conservative Grapevine, Right Wing News, and Right Wing Video.






Wednesday, January 28, 2009
Approps Chairman Obey's Son Lobbies for Park Money
Posted by: Amanda Carpenter at 10:57 AM
There’s a curious disparity in the amount of money allocated for national parks between the House and Senate versions of the stimulus bill.

The Senate version would give $802 million to National Parks, while the House version of the bill, being voted on today, would give a whopping $2.25 billion.

It might help that the National Parks Conservation Association’s Senior Vice President of Government Affairs, aka lobbyist, is closely connected to House Appropriations Chairman David Obey (D.-Ohio).

The NPCA's chief lobbyist is Obey’s son, Craig Obey. And Chairman Obey has a powerful role in distributing tax dollars for special projects and funds, like national parks, as the most senior person on the Appropriations Committee.

Think that might have anything to do with the billion increase in aid? The NPCA issued a statement yesterday that said the Senate's $800 million was "disappointing" and "called on Congress and the Administration to support the more aggressive national park investment included in the House bill."

I put an inquiry in with the NPCA's communications team to find out if Craig Obey lobbied for money in the stimulus bill.






Wednesday, January 28, 2009
Heh ...
Posted by: Matt Lewis at 9:22 AM
Politico has some suggestions regarding which conservative writer should replace Bill Kristol at the NY Times.

... trouble is, most of the people they recommend aren't really that conservative.







Wednesday, January 28, 2009
GOP: Stimulus a 'Back Door' to Universal Health Coverage
Posted by: Matt Lewis at 9:11 AM
From today's NYT:

With little notice and no public hearings, House Democrats would create a temporary new entitlement allowing workers getting unemployment checks to qualify for Medicaid, the health program for low-income people. Spouses and children could also receive benefits, no matter how much money the family had.

In addition, the stimulus package would offer a hefty subsidy to help laid-off workers retain the same health plans they had from their former employers.

Altogether, the economic recovery bill would speed $127 billion over the next two and a half years to individuals and states for health care alone, a fact that has Republicans fuming that the stimulus package is a back door to universal health coverage.






Wednesday, January 28, 2009
Good Idea
Posted by: Amanda Carpenter at 8:47 AM
Doug Lambert over at GranitGrok has an interesting job creation idea.

He writes:

With all the talk of bailouts and stimulus packages necessary to preserve jobs, you'd think that when an opportunity arises for the Magic Obama to save some 90,000 jobs-- without going the bailout/stimulus route-- he would jump all over it. Indeed, the funds are already approved, simply awaiting the President's approval. Perhaps if they were so-called "green" jobs, or maybe in the abortion field it would already be a done deal, but instead, they are within the (gasp!) vital US national defense industry. From the website PreserveRaptorJobs.com:

Production of the world’s most advanced fighter aircraft, the F-22 Raptor, is in jeopardy. Your help is needed to urge the Obama Administration to save more than 95,000 American jobs and more than $12 billion in national economic activity. Keeping the production line of this model aerospace program open is not another bailout; rather, it simply requires that the new administration release funds already authorized by Congress to continue a successful program. By law, President-elect Obama must decide whether to continue the Raptor program during his first weeks in office.






Wednesday, January 28, 2009
Eliminating Talking Points
Posted by: Amanda Carpenter at 8:42 AM
This morning we hear the Democrats have decided to nix the $200 million spending item to revamp the National Mall. Yesterday, they gave up the millions in matching funds for contraceptive services.

Ok, that's two wins for the taxpayer. Out of $825 billion. We're still losing.

I'm glad the Democrats are so worried about eliminating the GOP's talking points. I wish they cared more about keeping me out of tax debt.





Wednesday, January 28, 2009
www.REIDistributethewealth.com
Posted by: Amanda Carpenter at 7:21 AM
The National Republican Senatorial Committee is taking some shots at Harry Reid under John Cornyn's helm.

They have a new website to take direct aim at the Majority Leader called www.REIDistributewealth.com

Take a look at their ad below:






Tuesday, January 27, 2009
So Much for 4 Million New Jobs
Posted by: Amanda Carpenter at 10:04 PM
Barack Obama said his stimulus bill would create as many as four million new jobs.

Not so says CBO Director Douglas Elmendorf.

Elmendorf testified to Congress Monday morning the $825 billion spending bill could only be expected to create between 0.8 million and 2.1 million jobs by the end of the year.

Keep in mind, that's the best possible scenario.

No details how many of those jobs would be for sodding the National Mall.





Tuesday, January 27, 2009
Gibbs Defends National Mall Spending: Will Create Jobs
Posted by: Amanda Carpenter at 4:59 PM
White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs was asked to justify the $200 million included in the economic stimulus bill to revamp the National Mall.

He said, with a straight face, it would create jobs.

"Let's talk about the Mall for second," Gibbs said. "When we met on the first day of our presidency we were on the Mall, right? 1.8 million people stood on the Mall which happens to be the most visited national park we have, right? I think you can make a very credible case, and our economic team has, that reconditioning the National Mall will create jobs, probably though spending in small businesses."

How exactly does that make us more competitive with China, Mr. Gibbs?? Does a government lawnscaping program make us a better country, Sir? Those are the follow-up questions I would have asked. But, I wasn't there for the presser.

Roll the tape:





Your Blog Postings:
Last updated 6 Minutes 40 Seconds Ago
Last updated 9 Minutes 49 Seconds Ago
Last updated 10 Minutes 32 Seconds Ago
Last updated 38 Minutes 25 Seconds Ago
Last updated 55 Minutes 28 Seconds Ago
 

Archives of our Conservative, Republican, Political Blogs

Blog Search



Townhall Conservative, Republican, Political Blogs Townhall Blogs
Townhall Conservative, Republican, Political Columns Columns
Your Townhall Conservative, Republican, Political Blogs Your Blogs
By Month
 December 2009
 November 2009
 October 2009
 September 2009
 August 2009
 July 2009
 June 2009
 May 2009
 April 2009
 March 2009
 February 2009
 January 2009
 December 2008
 November 2008
 October 2008
 September 2008
 August 2008
 July 2008
By Issue
 A Culture of Life
 Budget & Government
 Campaigns & Elections
 Education
 Energy & Environment
 Faith & Family
 Foreign Affairs
 Health Care
 Immigration
 Jobs & Economy
 Judges & Courts
 Media & Culture
 Property Rights
 Safety & Security
 Science & Technology
 Second Amendment
 Social Security
 Tax Relief
Advertisement

Comments Comments

Bob Munck!
 Re: Capitol Goes Into Lockdown
  By arch
NOTW 12:48 AM
 Re: Capitol Goes Into Lockdown
  By Bob Munck
arch 12:46 AM
 Re: Capitol Goes Into Lockdown
  By Bob Munck
Bea
 Re: Capitol Goes Into Lockdown
  By arch
Great Fun, I had tons of laughs....
 Re: Capitol Goes Into Lockdown
  By Bea
Bea
 Re: Capitol Goes Into Lockdown
  By arch
Vlad was Muncks Halfback!!
 Re: Capitol Goes Into Lockdown
  By arch
Hey Arch and Homer....Where are you
 Re: Capitol Goes Into Lockdown
  By Bea
monk?
 Re: Capitol Goes Into Lockdown
  By NOTW
Give it up Bob!
 Re: Capitol Goes Into Lockdown
  By arch
Origanalist 12:09 AM
 Re: Capitol Goes Into Lockdown
  By Bob Munck
Origanalist
 Re: Capitol Goes Into Lockdown
  By arch
I'm outa here
 Re: Capitol Goes Into Lockdown
  By Origanalist
Mr. Munck Has an Insatiable Need to.....
 Re: Capitol Goes Into Lockdown
  By Bea
Munck;s veal cheeks!
 Re: Capitol Goes Into Lockdown
  By arch
Let the Federal Government Self-Destruct
 Re: Byron York: Get Going For The 2010 Elections
  By Take Back the Government
Bea writes:
 Re: Capitol Goes Into Lockdown
  By homer noble
Bob Munck
 Re: Read Her Lips: You'll Pay For Abortions
  By arch
The DC Rules of the Game
 Re: Byron York: Get Going For The 2010 Elections
  By Take Back the Government
Bea
 Re: Capitol Goes Into Lockdown
  By arch

The Latest on Town HallThe Latest on Town Hall


Blog Roll Blog Roll