Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons

Townhall.com The Blogspot for Political, Conservative and Republican Blogs and Bloggers




Monday, November 24, 2008
What's Truly Hateful . . .
Posted by: Carol Platt Liebau at 3:23 PM
I've never been a fan of hate crimes legislation.  But if the laws are on the books, they should be enforced on behalf of -- and against -- all groups equally.  That's the essence of equal protection of the laws.

Yet, as this National Review op/ed points out, there has been a dramatic targeting of Mormons in the wake of the passage of California's Proposition 8.  So far, there has been little of the denunciation in the press that would be heard loud and clear across the land if, for example, Mormons were treating gays the same way that gays are now treating them.

Feminists lost their "moral authority" to opine on the treatment and status of women as a group when, first, they decided to give Bill Clinton a pass on some of the most obvious inappropriate workplace behavior ever and then when they ganged up on only the second woman to have a real shot at national office.  Those in the gay rights movement and the press, who have treated the American public to pious denunciations of "hate" in all its forms are about to meet the same fate as the feminists, whose hypocrisy has been laid bare.

It's a sorry day for America when any kind of hatred is ignored or condoned.  It's an even sorrier day when some groups are deemed to be "entitled" to engage in behavior that would be denounced as (and would be) wrong if it were indulged in by another group. 

Contrary to the accusations lodged against the supporters of Prop. 8, it isn't inherently hateful to believe that marriage should be restricted to one man and one woman who aren't related to each other (as it has been since the dawn of time).  It is hateful to assault -- in word or deed --  those who are exercising their freedom of conscience to vote in the way they believe is best.








Monday, November 24, 2008
Alan Colmes Just Can't Stand Sean Hannity Anymore
Posted by: Jonathan Garthwaite at 3:10 PM
Radio Equalizer has the story on Alan Colmes' departure from FNC's Hannity & Colmes at the end of the year.




Monday, November 24, 2008
"Fairness" Can Wait
Posted by: Carol Platt Liebau at 3:10 PM
It seems that the president-elect may be reneging on his promise to raise taxes on "the rich," according to a report in the NY Post:

Obama's top advisers said yesterday he's "likely" to back off from his vow to speed up the elimination of a tax break for the wealthy.

The about-face on the issue comes as the US careens toward recession, and as Obama says he wants Congress to approve huge new spending and new tax cuts to stimulate the economy.

Holding off on a pledge to "soak the rich" makes good sense.  What's most noteworthy (aside from the breaking of another left-pleasing campaign promise) is the implicit concession that underlies it: That tax increases (yes, even those on "the rich") only stifle economic growth -- thereby reducing the number of jobs that can be created and the amount of money circulating in private enterprise (thereby helping more people earn better livings).  And that hurts everyone, "rich" and poor alike.

By making the right decision -- delaying the implementation of his tax increases -- President-elect Obama has essentially admitted that tax increases are bad for the economy.  So why would you ever raise them?






Monday, November 24, 2008
Pretty in Mink Conservative Ladies Calendar!
Posted by: Amanda Carpenter at 2:38 PM
I was thrilled with the ladies over at Clare Boothe Luce Policy Institute asked me to be a part of their annual calendar featuring conservative women again this year. I was even more excited when I found out the concept for it was going to be "Pretty in Mink" and we were all going to be modeling beautiful fur coats!

Photobucket

Lots of awesome, conservative women participated, including Ann Coulter, Michelle Malkin, Star Parker, KellyAnn Conway and Kate Obenshain. I am "Miss July" 2009, see above. I don't have any of the other ladies' photos, but if you want to check out the other pics ABC News has them up HERE.

If you want to order one of your very own calendars for yourself or as a Christmas present you can get them HERE for $25. College students get them free!

Update: Apparently my photo made some liberal want to throw up. Or just spew something sort of green looking. I can't really tell. The lefties over at 23/6 staged their own photo session to mock us.






Monday, November 24, 2008
Checking Out "Card Check"
Posted by: Michele Bachmann at 11:37 AM
When the 111th Congress convenes in January, one of the first pieces of legislation Congressional leadership will bring to the floor is the Employee Free Choice Act, also known as "card check."

The House passed the bill last year 241 to 185 – over my opposition, but it was hung up in the Senate as the Democrats were unable to get the votes needed to pass it. Having made substantial gains in the House and Senate, "card check" is going to be a top priority in the new Congress. It's also another reason to keep your eyes on the outcome of the Senate races in Minnesota and Georgia. Democrat victories in both of those states likely means smooth sailing for the bill.

The Coalition for a Democratic Workplace has launched a nationwide campaign to educate the public on how dangerous this legislation really is.  It eliminates the secret ballot for workers.

In states like Minnesota, they have launched individual websites. Check out My Private Ballot - Minnesota to learn more about "card check," and to find out how you can take action and stand up for worker's rights. Also, if you're a Sopranos fan, I think you'll get a kick out of who they have as spokesman for the campaign.





Monday, November 24, 2008
Dawson is Officially 'In'
Posted by: Amanda Carpenter at 10:13 AM
From his press office:
“I am running to serve as chairman of the Republican National Committee because I’m ready to help lead our party’s turnaround.  We need to turnaround our fortunes in many regions of the country.  We need to turnaround our grassroots organization, our fundraising, our use of technology and new media, and our candidate recruitment.  We must move forward with the confidence that our message of optimism, hope, and freedom still resonates in the hearts of our fellow Americans.”
His release touts the fact that while he was South Carolina Republican Party Chairman "Republicans have won nearly 80% of the elections in which they fielded a candidate. In 2008, South Carolina Republicans won 82.22% of the races in which they fielded a candidate, a 2% improvement from 2004."

See more about him at his website www.katondawson.com. Hopefully, I'll be interviewing him soon. My interviews with candidates Saul Anuzis and Michael Steele are HERE.





Monday, November 24, 2008
Ken Blackwell for RNC Chair?
Posted by: Matt Lewis at 10:05 AM

According to Hotline:

"After receiving calls from RNC members asking him to run, ex-OH Sec/State Ken Blackwell is now considering a bid (Wake-Up Call! sources). Meanwhile, SC GOP chair Katon Dawson said yesterday that he is "in the race" for RNC chair"





Monday, November 24, 2008
Make It Flake (Again!)
Posted by: Amanda Carpenter at 9:54 AM
Photobucket
Rep. Jeff Flake (R.-Ariz.)

Earmark hawk Rep. Jeff Flake (R.-Ariz.) is once again making a bid for the appropriations committee where there are vacant spots to be filled by Republicans.

Flake is infamous for engaging in contentious stand-offs with Republicans and Democrats alike over wasteful spending. He was punished by earmarkers in his own party in 2006 for exposing GOP pork with the loss of his seat on the Judiciary committee. His irritated colleagues said he was “grandstanding.”

Fiscal conservatives who lobbied an aggressive “Make it Flake” campaign in 2008 were heartbroken when Republican leadership filled an open slot on appropriations with Alabama Rep. Jo Bonner who was trumpeting his earmarks on his government website the week he was selected.

The Republican Steering Committee will soon be voting to send new Republicans to the panel in January and Flake desperately wants to be one of them. Flake told Townhall he could help members of the Appropriations Committee focus on their traditional role rather than spending all their time rifling through the tens of thousands of funding requests that come from members each year. In 2008, 36,000 requests were submitted. “They are there to exercise oversight over all federal spending so what we’ve done is, in exchange for being able to earmark one percent of the budget we essentially give up all jurisdiction over our ability to conduct oversight over 99 percent of the budget!” Flake said. “We really sell ourselves short for just a smidgen of the budget.”

“If they want me on, there is certainly room and the question is are we ready to use appropriations committee for it’s intended purpose and that’s to scrutinize spending rather than be a vehicle for earmarks,” Flake said.

Conservatives are once again lining up their support to put Flake on Appropriations. The anti-tax advocacy group FreedomWorks has renewed their “Make it Flake” campaign at www.makeitflake.com.  “There are 59 members of the House Appropriations Committee,” the site says. “We think it is time to have at least one Committee member who doesn't take earmarks and who doesn't support pork barrel spending."

 The Club for Growth’s Pat Toomey made the case for Flake in the pages of the National Review writing, “[House Minority Leader] John Boehner should use his influence and leadership position to appoint Rep. Jeff Flake to the Appropriations Committee.”

The Republican Steering Committee, which makes all GOP committee assignments, will vote to send new members to the committee in January. As Minority Leader John Boehner will have five votes. Whip Eric Cantor will have two votes. The other members of the 29-person panel will have one vote each.






Monday, November 24, 2008
Tell Us What You Really Think...
Posted by: Matt Lewis at 8:16 AM
Steve Forbes told Wolf Blitzer that Henry Paulson is “the worst treasury secretary we’ve had in modern times ...”




Monday, November 24, 2008
Interviews with Saul Anuzis, Michael Steele
Posted by: Amanda Carpenter at 7:35 AM
I had the chance to sit down with two men running to become Republican National Committee Chairman last week. I wanted to talk to them about why they wanted the job and how they could rebuild the party.
Here is the link to my interview with Michigan Republican Party Chairman Saul Anuzis.

Here is the link to my interview with GOPAC Chairman Michael Steel.
(I've also been emailing with staff for South Carolina Republican Party Chairman Katon Dawson to chat. He's also running for the slot.)

if you want to learn more about the candidates you can visit their websites:
Anuzis for Chair, the Comeback Starts Now! at anuzisforchair.com

Michael Steel for RNC Chairman, the Republican Party IS the Future at steeleforchairman.com
After my interview with Steele wrapped his campaign site has unleashed a neat tool to solicit grassroots ideas for the party. Basically you can text Steele's campaign a message at 66937. Click here for more details from his site about it.







Sunday, November 23, 2008
A Disgrace to Womankind
Posted by: Carol Platt Liebau at 3:22 PM
Here is the blog entry from the Code Pink blog describing the trip to Iran currently being enjoyed by Code Pink's co-founders, Medea Benjamin and Obama fundraiser Jodie Evans.  Apparently, they are there to conduct "citizen diplomacy" -- blissfully unaware that if they weren't serving as useful idiots for the Iranian regime, they'd probably be stoned to death for their overall personae and behavior.

Reflecting on the days’ events, I was struck by how much more open Iran is than I had thought. Yes, we have to wear headscarves and long coats, but that seems so unimportant --although I must say that I feel very claustrophobic covering my head all day. (During lunch at the restaurant, Rostam told me I could take the scarf off, but about 20 minutes later some men came to complain.)

If it's really "unimportant" that women are required by government decree to be covered, let's see how Benjamin and Medea react if the US enacts such a mandate, shall we?  And you've got to love this:

I have been comparing the atmosphere here to that of Iraq under Saddam Hussein and here it is very different. People in Iraq were afraid to speak out against Saddam, people in Iran aren’t.

And yet, CodePink outspokenly opposed the Iraq War, which removed the onerous restrictions she now invokes.  Go figure.  Finally:

While most wouldn’t want to be filmed venting against their government, they talk to us in an amazingly open fashion, barely looking over their shoulders to see if anyone is listening.

Isn't that just wonderful?  What a paradise.  It's revealing that they have so much scorn for America and so much praise for Iraq.

Unbelievable.  Words can't begin to express the contempt any American should feel for these morally obtuse useful idiots.




Sunday, November 23, 2008
A Mistake, or As Good As It Gets?
Posted by: Carol Platt Liebau at 3:06 PM
According to the UK Telegraph, Obama aides believe he's made a mistake by hiring Hillary Clinton.

The quick answer is that it's too soon to say.  Obviously, the Clintons are one enormous package of needy egos laced with drama.  As long as they are on the national stage, they are trouble for any other Democrat seeking or holding a national role, because they are people who can't stand to be upstaged. 

Obama has made the calculation that they will do him less damage inside the tent than outside it.  Inside, at least they both have a stake in the success of his administration.  Outside, they'd have no reason not to cause difficulties in hopes of burnishing the relative luster of the Clinton Administration or furthering Hillary's national ambitions.
 
Will Hillary try to take over?  Probably.  Will she "do her own thing"?  Of course.  And will her husband create embarrassment for her and everyone else?  Almost undoubtedly.  What's more, any off-the-cuff utterance the  utterly undisciplined former President makes about world events will be scrutinized for the extent to which it reflects Hillary's (or the Obama Administration's) policy.

But apparently President-elect Obama considers all that a fair trade-off for being relieved of the necessity to watch his back simultaneously at home -- with Hillary Clinton in the Senate -- and abroad, with Bill Clinton roaming the globe.

How's that old slogan go?  You give me domestic policy, I'll give you the world.  That seems to be the arrangement Barack Obama has tried to make with Hillary Clinton.  We'll see if it works.




Sunday, November 23, 2008
Guest Blog by Diane Medved: The Truth will (IS) Out: The 10 Big Lies About America
Posted by: Michael Medved at 12:36 PM

I may be working on my own book about marriage as the combination of opposites, but right now I'm rather engrossed in the progress of a different book--The 10 Big Lies About America.

My husband's book was published on Tuesday, and I'm not only invested in its success as the "opposite" half of my mate, but because I spent several months working on it.

My husband, who is insecure enough to think his opportunities are fleeting and must all be embraced when presented--regardless of how many other obligations he must fulfill--had signed his book contract months earlier and found himself with deadline fast approaching and still only an outline and lots of ideas to show for it. Every time somebody would mention his book project, he'd change the subject. It became the "elephant in the room," and the weight on his back, even as he wrote three or four columns every day, went to movie screenings several times a week, appeared on countless news TV shows and, oh yes, did a three-hour radio show daily. And kept Shabbat, which removed one day from his potential work time.

He considered who he could bring on board to help get this project done. He already had his editor to nag him, and in the end he decided that perhaps the best writing partner was, um, very, very close. Close enough to sit next to him holding her laptop taking notes any time, any place.  This wasn't a wild idea, since we'd collaborated on a book before (Saving Childhood: Protecting Our Children from the National Assault on Innocence, which he outlined and I wrote) and I had five other books to my own credit.

However, when one is ruminating in the bathtub or while driving, one tends to get too many good ideas. "We should put in all these massacres in the chapter on Indians..." and I carefully wrote them all down, and proceeded to research them all and write succinctly about them. I have always been a good, dutiful student. The chapter I wrote on "the crime of genocide" against American Indians included every point he requested. It was 130 pages long and had 128 endnotes. My chapter on slavery, for which I read 56 books, was also 130 pages, and had 136 endnotes.

I ticked off each point my husband wanted covered as I continued writing subsequent chapters, but when the editor heard of the massive amounts of material being generated, he screamed. This was not to be a tome; it was to be like my husband's radio show--cogent points, well-documented, able to fit between commercials.

My hundreds of pages of writing were cherry-picked by my husband, who re-formulated and then wrote the chapters himself. As I read the book now, I see the editor was right--it's darn good. It's succinct, it's punchy, it's clever. Every now and then I see something I uncovered via my hours of digging through obscure material...like my perusal of photocopies of the original letters between the generals accused of suggesting Native American genocide via "smallpox-infected blankets," a myth definitively quashed by my research.

Am I disappointed my work is only peripherally used in The 10 Big Lies? Well, no. The book is fantastic and I envision any parent or teacher who wants to present the truth about American history insisting that children read it. I envision it being quoted around Thanksgiving tables and at family Christmas dinners (where some lucky person received it as a gift) because of its inspiring, uplifting and heartwarming messages.

And since I truly DO believe that man and woman are "sides" of the same unique entity called a marriage, I figure I get all the kudos and thrill that my husband is earning now.

But maybe...hmmm...there's some way to publish my chapters....

      Diane Medved's blog: www.brightlightsearch.blogspot.com




Your Blog Postings:
Last updated 26 Minutes 30 Seconds Ago
Last updated 36 Minutes 20 Seconds Ago
Last updated 37 Minutes 5 Seconds Ago
Last updated 37 Minutes 41 Seconds Ago
Last updated 38 Minutes 14 Seconds Ago
 

Archives of our Conservative, Republican, Political Blogs

Blog Search



Townhall Conservative, Republican, Political Blogs Townhall Blogs
Townhall Conservative, Republican, Political Columns Columns
Your Townhall Conservative, Republican, Political Blogs Your Blogs
By Month
 November 2009
 October 2009
 September 2009
 August 2009
 July 2009
 June 2009
 May 2009
 April 2009
 March 2009
 February 2009
 January 2009
 December 2008
 November 2008
 October 2008
 September 2008
 August 2008
 July 2008
 June 2008
By Issue
 A Culture of Life
 Budget & Government
 Campaigns & Elections
 Education
 Energy & Environment
 Faith & Family
 Foreign Affairs
 Health Care
 Immigration
 Jobs & Economy
 Judges & Courts
 Media & Culture
 Property Rights
 Safety & Security
 Science & Technology
 Second Amendment
 Social Security
 Tax Relief
Advertisement

Comments Comments

Keith Olbermann is the lefty version. .
 Re: Olbermann's Classless Three-Fingered Salute To Carrie Prejean
  By Cicero
Too Funny
 Re: Can't Take the Heat? Get Out of the Bookstores.
  By SJA
Patriots, all of you
 Re: Obama's Veteran's Day Remarks
  By An Instinctive Gesture of Reciprocal Liking
When the revolution comes. . .
 Re: Olbermann's Classless Three-Fingered Salute To Carrie Prejean
  By Cicero
Here!
 Re: Can't Take the Heat? Get Out of the Bookstores.
  By An Instinctive Gesture of Reciprocal Liking
Quick, these prices won't last!
 Re: Can't Take the Heat? Get Out of the Bookstores.
  By An Instinctive Gesture of Reciprocal Liking
SJA
 Re: Remembering Our Veterans
  By AFCHIEF
Clarity
 Re: Hilarious: Jon Stewart Busts Fox For Doctoring B-Roll
  By An Instinctive Gesture of Reciprocal Liking
Private life?
 Re: Carrie Prejean Needs A Job
  By Luna
Peter
 Re: Newt's Spokesman: If Pres Clinton Passed Hillarycare He Wouldn't Have Had A 2nd Term
  By Seadog
dread
 Re: Carrie Prejean Needs A Job
  By Eugene
Galston
 Re: Leftist Hair-Pulling: Rahmbo vs. The Brookings Institute
  By Big Sky Cowboy
RonnaRonna
 Re: Patients First: "Harry's Chamber and the Bill of Secrets"
  By Seadog
Terrible idea
 Re: Should Tea Partiers Form Their Own Party?
  By ray
interesting
 Re: Hilarious: Jon Stewart Busts Fox For Doctoring B-Roll
  By Crispian
MY sincere thanks and appreciation to
 Re: Remembering Our Veterans
  By Seadog
Just ignore Eugene/Axe
 Re: Prejean Slams Olbermann, Says Liberal Media "Palinized" Her & Talks About The "Sex Tape"
  By Allen Caeden
Lonny,
 Re: Olbermann's Classless Three-Fingered Salute To Carrie Prejean
  By Crispian
Democrap disease
 Re: No Comfort for Democrats
  By Peter
Very glad to see this "called out"...
 Re: Hilarious: Jon Stewart Busts Fox For Doctoring B-Roll
  By clarityseeker

The Latest on Town HallThe Latest on Town Hall


Blog Roll Blog Roll