Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons

Townhall.com The Blogspot for Political, Conservative and Republican Blogs and Bloggers


Friday, May 23, 2008
Richard Viguerie Addresses Libertarian Convention
Posted by: Matt Lewis at 1:23 PM
From a press release:

(Denver, Colorado) In his keynote speech on May 23 to the Libertarian Party National Convention, Richard A. Viguerie, one of the founders of the modern conservative movement, declared today that John McCain is “trying to get conservative support on the cheap.” 
Read More...




Friday, May 23, 2008
Friday Afternoon Moment of Zen
Posted by: Matt Lewis at 1:14 PM
The song you're ashamed to like ...







Friday, May 23, 2008
Appeasement By Any Other Name . . .
Posted by: Carol Platt Liebau at 12:19 PM
Charles Krauthammer today eviscerates the "Obama Doctrine" of meeting unconditionally with enemies, revealing it for the dangerous naivete that it is.

Seeking to right the ship, Joe Biden (clearly auditioning for Secretary of State, Heaven help us, in an Obama administration) writes in today's Wall Street Journal to set out the usual anti-Bush talking points.  (Amusingly, by the way, he rips the President for "instigating an optional war in Iraq," conveniently ignoring the fact that he voted for the 2002 resolution).

Along with lamenting that an "obsession" with the war on terror has distracted us from matters including "the persistence of poverty" and "a rapidly warming planet," (funny how an attack on the homeland will fuel such "obsessions"!)  Biden excoriates the Administration as follows:

Instead, Mr. Bush has turned a small number of radical groups that hate America into a 10-foot tall existential monster that dictates every move we make.

The intersection of al Qaeda with the world's most lethal weapons is a deadly serious problem. Al Qaeda must be destroyed. But to compare terrorism with an all-encompassing ideology like communism and fascism is evidence of profound confusion.

Terrorism is a means, not an end . . .  If [President Bush and John McCain] can't identify the enemy or describe the war we're fighting, it's difficult to see how we will win.

If there's any "evidence of profound confusion," it's on Biden's part.  One preliminary question for Biden (and Obama, for that matter): Is the prospect of Al Qaeda obtaining a nuclear weapon not an existential threat?

More broadly, it seems that the president (and by extension, McCain and the GOP) are paying the price for having gone PC, labeling the struggle we're in as a "war on terror," rather than being upfront and calling it the "war on Islamofascism" or the "war on Islamonazism" or the like (yes, Senator Biden, it is an all-encompassing ideology like Communism or fascism).   Does Biden not understand who and what we're fighting, or is he being deliberately disingenuous?

Reading the entire  piece, one almost hopes that Biden is just disingenuous -- the only other possibility is that this Democratic "leading light" on foreign policy is frighteningly ignorant.  Take this passage, dealing with the Iran problem:

Instead of regime change, we should focus on conduct change. We should make it very clear to Iran what it risks in terms of isolation if it continues to pursue a dangerous nuclear program but also what it stands to gain if it does the right thing. That will require keeping our allies in Europe, as well as Russia and China, on the same page as we ratchet up pressure.

What does he think we have been doing!?  To come full circle, let's go back to Krauthammer:

Iran, for example, has engaged in five years of talks with our closest European allies and the International Atomic Energy Agency, to say nothing of the hundreds of official U.S. statements outlining exactly what we would give them in return for suspending uranium enrichment.

Appeasement by any other name is still appeasement -- and ignoring or dismissing the Islamofascist threat, and seeking to placate or enemies seems to be the nub of a Democrat approach to national "defense."

 






Friday, May 23, 2008
Learning As We Go
Posted by: Carol Platt Liebau at 12:02 PM
Here is a piece by Rebecca Walker (daughter of Alice Walker, author of "The Color Purple") that every woman -- especially every  young woman -- should read, in a world where we're often told that ambition and professional achievement is a woman's highest and best calling.

Rebecca Walker has chosen a path very different from her mother's; her life is both a testament to the cost that feminism's "do your own thing" ethic has imposed and a hopeful sign that succeeding generations can learn from their mothers' mistakes.  One particularly moving passage:

The ease with which people can get divorced these days doesn't take into account the toll on children. That's all part of the unfinished business of feminism.

Then there is the issue of not having children. Even now, I meet women in their 30s who are ambivalent about having a family. They say things like: 'I'd like a child. If it happens, it happens.' I tell them: 'Go home and get on with it because your window of opportunity is very small.' As I know only too well.

Then I meet women in their 40s who are devastated because they spent two decades working on a PhD or becoming a partner in a law firm, and they missed out on having a family. Thanks to the feminist movement, they discounted their biological clocks. They've missed the opportunity and they're bereft.

Based on what I've seen, it's all too true.






Friday, May 23, 2008
Filling in for Hugh
Posted by: Carol Platt Liebau at 11:53 AM
I will be filling in today for the irreplaceable Hugh Hewitt.




Friday, May 23, 2008
Tucker for President?
Posted by: Matt Lewis at 11:26 AM
Crazy rumors on the internets say he might run for the Libertarian nomination ...




Friday, May 23, 2008
Memorial Day Road Warrior?
Posted by: Matt Lewis at 11:02 AM
If you are heading out of town for Memorial Day, you're pretty likely to see some severe traffic.  GetAmericaMoving.com is asking holiday commuters to, "upload pictures, videos, and messages detailing traffic bottlenecks, roads and bridges in need of repair, or other problems that are slowing us down."

The website is run by The Alliance for Improving America's Infrastructure, an organization dedicated to fixing the country's infrastructure.  This morning I interviewed former Senator Jim Talent, the organization's national co-chair, about this issue -- and more.  Stay tuned ...  






Friday, May 23, 2008
McCain rejects Rod Parsley’s Endorsement
Posted by: Matt Lewis at 9:32 AM
As Hot Air reports, McCain is also rejecting the support of Rod Parsley:
"But McCain wasn’t finished rejecting endorsements from ministers. He also repudiated Rev. Rod Parsley, and Ohio preacher who had made derogatory comments about Muslims, calling Islam “an anti-Christ religion that intends through violence to conquer the world.”

“I believe there is no place for that kind of dialogue in America, and I believe that even though he endorsed me, and I didn’t endorse him, the fact is that I repudiate such talk,” McCain said in an interview with the Associated Press. “I reject his endorsement.”





Friday, May 23, 2008
Courts Make Polarization Inevitable on Abortion, Marriage
Posted by: Michael Medved at 9:26 AM

  A small story from Britain carries a big message for the United States.

  On Tuesday, members of Parliament voted against an attempt to ban all abortions in the last six months of pregnancy. The surprising note in the AP account reported that “legislators voted in favor of keeping the current law, which allows abortions during the first 24 weeks of a woman’s pregnancy.”

   In other words, Britain decided to keep its present policy of not permitting last trimester abortions – maintaining a more restrictive standard than the United States.

   Considering the general assumption that American society embraces more conservative and more religious attitudes than the UK, why would our cousins across the pond follow a less strident pro-abortion approach than the government of this Republic?

   The answer, of course, is that the Brits decided the issue through Parliament, inevitably reaching a moderate, compromise policy. No one could describe a nation as “pro-life” that allows abortions for the first six months of pregnancy, but the recent parliamentary debate showed a more flexible, nuanced approach than the U.S.  The legislators debated a change in abortion policy, with no question as to whether they had the right to do so.

   In the United States, however, the courts have usurped all decision-making on this issue, and judicial activism makes compromise or moderation impossible. The Supreme Court invented (they say “discovered”) a Constitutional “right” to abortion that applies in most cases even during the last three months of pregnancy. With the courts in control, the people and their elected representatives remain powerless to alter the rules.

    When judges make law, the law takes shape in extreme and absolutist terms.

    That’s part of the problem with the California Supreme Court decision on same-sex marriage. If left to legislatures, there’s a natural  tendency to seek middle ground on this issue – enacting civil unions, but not gay marriage, in California, New Jersey, Vermont, Hawaii and other states.  When courts call the shots, this natural split-the-difference approach – with privileges similar to marriage, but without changing the institution of marriage itself –becomes impossible. In court decisions, one side generally wins while the other side loses, with little chance for taking the middle ground.  For judicial tyrants, every issue becomes a question of defining ultimate right or wrong, rather than a matter of finding the wisest policy.

    That’s why the United States ended up with the most radical abortion-on-demand rules in the western world – while our “enlightened” allies in Western Europe do more to restrict and discourage the termination of pregnancies.

   Judicial tyranny on abortion, marriage or any other crucial issue is profoundly dangerous not just because it’s undemocratic and unresponsive, but because it pushes policy toward absolute and polarizing extremes.

   In contrast to the sweeping pronouncements of judges, the half-way measures and concessions in legislative decisions may look inelegant, but they prove more workable and flexible in the long run.






Friday, May 23, 2008
Weekend Reading
Posted by: Jonathan Garthwaite at 9:00 AM
Jerry Falwell's wife of forty-nine years has written a new book, Jerry Falwell - His Life and Legacy.

The mainstream media has always enjoyed trashing the spiritual and political leader so I'm particularly interested in hearing his story from the woman who stood by him through it all.    Just in time for a holiday weekend.




Friday, May 23, 2008
McCain Says Immigration Reform Should Be Top Priority
Posted by: Jonathan Garthwaite at 8:51 AM
Regardless of whether McCain or Obama is elected in November, we're going to have another battle against comprehensive immigration reform amnesty in 2009.

"Agents of tolerance" talk?




Friday, May 23, 2008
Post-Primary "Agents of Intolerance"
Posted by: Matt Lewis at 8:18 AM
Are Yglesias and I observing the same phenomenon?
"... In one interesting possible future, McCain reaches the conclusion that he's got the GOP nomination and conservatives have nowhere to go so he brings back the "agents of intolerance" talk, maybe picks a pro-choice running mate, and makes a serious high-risk high-reward effort to definitively separate himself from the mire into which the rest of the party is sinking."

... By the way, let me state once again for the record that I never "endorsed" or "supported" John McCain in the primary.  What I did do was (1.) Refuse to be a Romney sycophant, and (2.) CORRECTLY predict that John McCain would win New Hampshire -- and that he had a good shot at the nomination (even when others were predicting he would drop out of the race by Labor Day).  Accurate campaign analysis should not be confused with support.

I also tried to be fair to him, just as I am doing now.  Even in 2007, when McCain did things like skip CPAC, for example, I criticized him for it.  I also gave him credit when he did things I thought were smart or good.






Thursday, May 22, 2008
Way to Win the Heartland
Posted by: Carol Platt Liebau at 10:11 PM
A week after California's Supreme Court declared gay marriage to be a "right," it's worth noting, as CNS does here, that Barack Obama has called for the complete repeal of DOMA (Defense of Marriage Act).

As the linked piece points out, that position is one that more moderate Democrat senators oppose.  And it's hardly likely to win Obama the votes he needs in states like Kentucky, Pennsylvania and Ohio.




Thursday, May 22, 2008
Quote of the Day ...
Posted by: Matt Lewis at 5:02 PM
"Keep your mouth shut, your head down, and don't act like you want it" -- Jack Kemp, on getting the VP nod (Hotline's Last Call - 5/15/00).



Your Blog Postings:
Last updated 8 Minutes 17 Seconds Ago
Last updated 22 Minutes 32 Seconds Ago
Last updated 29 Minutes 52 Seconds Ago
Last updated 31 Minutes 26 Seconds Ago
Last updated 32 Minutes 3 Seconds Ago
 

Archives of our Conservative, Republican, Political Blogs

Blog Search



Townhall Conservative, Republican, Political Blogs Townhall Blogs
Townhall Conservative, Republican, Political Columns Columns
Your Townhall Conservative, Republican, Political Blogs Your Blogs
By Month
 November 2009
 October 2009
 September 2009
 August 2009
 July 2009
 June 2009
 May 2009
 April 2009
 March 2009
 February 2009
 January 2009
 December 2008
 November 2008
 October 2008
 September 2008
 August 2008
 July 2008
 June 2008
By Issue
 A Culture of Life
 Budget & Government
 Campaigns & Elections
 Education
 Energy & Environment
 Faith & Family
 Foreign Affairs
 Health Care
 Immigration
 Jobs & Economy
 Judges & Courts
 Media & Culture
 Property Rights
 Safety & Security
 Science & Technology
 Second Amendment
 Social Security
 Tax Relief
Advertisement

Comments Comments

Thats all interesting
 Re: Obama and Fox News: Together Again?
  By douglas
RonnaRonna
 Re: AP: Obama Rejects All Proposed Strategies for Afghanistan
  By SJA
SJA (11-12 @ 10:20 AM): Agreed!!!!
 Re: AP: Obama Rejects All Proposed Strategies for Afghanistan
  By Bea
Bill knows brothels, apparently
 Re: AP: Obama Rejects All Proposed Strategies for Afghanistan
  By Juniper
Town Hall readers
 Re: Patients First: "Harry's Chamber and the Bill of Secrets"
  By vladimir estragon
Glen Beck in the only FOX
 Re: Obama and Fox News: Together Again?
  By RonnaRonna
SJA
 Re: Mark McKinnon: Bob McDonnell's Election Shows Card Check is a 'Huge Liability for Democrats'
  By Juniper
The ronnas
 Re: AP: Obama Rejects All Proposed Strategies for Afghanistan
  By Juniper
tribeck
 Re: AP: Obama Rejects All Proposed Strategies for Afghanistan
  By vladimir estragon
NOTW
 Re: AP: Obama Rejects All Proposed Strategies for Afghanistan
  By Juniper
More misleading headlines
 Re: AP: Obama Rejects All Proposed Strategies for Afghanistan
  By vladimir estragon
Too Smart to be a Liberal
 Re: AP: Obama Rejects All Proposed Strategies for Afghanistan
  By RonnaRonna
hey Juni
 Re: Mark McKinnon: Bob McDonnell's Election Shows Card Check is a 'Huge Liability for Democrats'
  By SJA
Can't wait to see Major
 Re: Obama and Fox News: Together Again?
  By Juniper
Hard-hitting analysis
 Re: 'V' is for Obama? Not So Fast
  By vladimir estragon
Lou Dobbs
 Re: Lou Dobbs Quitting CNN; Obama Grants Fox News Interview
  By Kenny Z
Bea
 Re: AP: Obama Rejects All Proposed Strategies for Afghanistan
  By SJA
Bottom line: CLUELESSNESS
 Re: 'V' is for Obama? Not So Fast
  By Juniper
Running away from Obama
 Re: Mark McKinnon: Bob McDonnell's Election Shows Card Check is a 'Huge Liability for Democrats'
  By Juniper
SJA--I did not notice until...
 Re: Obama's Veteran's Day Remarks
  By clarityseeker

The Latest on Town HallThe Latest on Town Hall


Blog Roll Blog Roll