Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons

Townhall.com The Blogspot for Political, Conservative and Republican Blogs and Bloggers


Monday, May 05, 2008
The NYT's Crusade Against McCain
Posted by: Amanda Carpenter at 2:43 PM
The Vicki Iseman hit piece was just the beginning. 




Monday, May 05, 2008
The MAGLEV Project
Posted by: John Campbell at 12:36 PM

Last week, the House passed H.R. 1195 which amends the Highway Bill from 2005, (The Safe, Accountable, Flexible, and Efficient Transportation Equity Act SAFETEA-LU).  To say H.R. 1195 passed is an understatement, it passed overwhelmingly…there were only 50 of us who voted against it, including yours truly.

This bill was supposed to only be making technical corrections to SAFETEA-LU, but if you read what the bill actually does, it conveniently increases funding for roughly 500 earmarks.

Included is a “technical correction” which expands an earmark for magnetic levitation technology (MAGLEV), a mass transit program. This earmark was problematic from the start. This project actively competes with a private company that is raising billions of dollars (without taxpayer support) to complete a similar high-speed rail route from Las Vegas to Southern California. Furthermore, the demand for a MAGLEV route from Southern California to Las Vegas is relatively low. Taxpayers from Florida, Ohio, or any other state should not be forced to foot the bill for earmarks that serve a select few.  Besides, you can get a plane ticket from LAX to Las Vegas for as little as $118.






Monday, May 05, 2008
Finally, a Reason Ayers Loves His Country
Posted by: Carol Platt Liebau at 12:06 PM
Immediately below, Amanda links to a picture of Bill Ayers standing on an American flag.  There is a  similar or the same photo over at Marathon Pundit (HT: Jim Geraghty).

Just wanted to point out part of clipping that accompanies the photo:

Bill Ayers recollected his adventurous violence with practiced jokes.  "Guilty as hell, free as a bird, it's a great country," he said.

Ah, who says radicals don't love their country?  Problem is that it's a form of "patriotism" that few normal people recognize.




Monday, May 05, 2008
2001 Photo: Ayers Stomping US Flag
Posted by: Amanda Carpenter at 11:55 AM
Barack Obama says William Ayers is "just a guy in the neighborhood" who engaged in terrorist activities when Obama was just a tike. And that's why it's ok for Obama and Ayers to be friends now.

So, what does Obama have to say about Ayers stomping on the flag in 2001?





Monday, May 05, 2008
McCain to Address La Raza
Posted by: Matt Lewis at 11:25 AM
Jonathan Martin reports that John McCain will, "address the left-leaning Latino group La Raza in July." 




Monday, May 05, 2008
She Won't Back Down
Posted by: Matt Lewis at 10:22 AM
Hotline's "Wake-Up Call" reports,

"HRC launched her first TV ad in OR this weekend, highlighting her "commitment to take on the big challenges'."





Monday, May 05, 2008
Defending Jeremiah?
Posted by: Michael Medved at 10:17 AM

Amidst all the raging controversy, a few brave voices have come forward to defend Pastor Jeremiah Wright. They deserve more attention than they’ve received because they illustrate the pompous fatuity so typical of the religious left. 

For instance, within his own denomination, the Rantin’ Rev most certainly enjoys his supporters. Reverend Richard Wagner of Union Congregational Church, a United Church of Christ congregation in St. Louis Park, Minnesota, says the Pyrotechnic Pastor displays Biblical stature, and speaks “with the same passion and hyperbole as the Hebrew prophets.” The New York Times adds that “clergy members have cited Amos, who cursed all the nations, saving his harshest words for his own.” 

There are no end of ridiculous elements to this comparison, but we might as well start with the fact that Jeremiah Wright doesn’t see the U.S. as “his own” nation; he considers himself a loyal son of the African Motherland, and speaks no harsh words about the continent that produced his ancestors. 

Moreover, the Hebrew prophets lived ascetically and humbly (remember Elijah being fed by ravens in a cave?) and it’s hard to imagine them relishing a multi-million dollar home built with congregational funds, or gleefully commanding the spotlight on PBS or the National Press Club. 

Finally, the prophets were profoundly serious people, virtually possessed by the voice of God, willing to disregard their personal welfare to convey a message.  

Despite the carefully cultivated image as a dashiki-wearing rebel, Jeremiah Wright is a self-serving careerist, a media-mad showoff who will even say things he knows to be untrue (lying about the nature of the Tuskegee Experiment to make people believe the government created AIDS) in order to advance his own standing and interests.  

His egotistical behavior in putting his own standing and publicity ahead of the fate of his supposed friend, Barack Obama, simply provides the latest indication that this unbridled showman is more about profit than he is about prophet.  






Monday, May 05, 2008
Obama's Deal with the Teamsters
Posted by: Matt Lewis at 10:17 AM
Today's Wall Street Journal implies that Barack Obama may have offered the
Teamsters a quid pro quo in order to win the endorsement.  Making matters worse, his "deal" involves looking the other way on the issue of corruption:

"Sen. Barack Obama won the endorsement of the Teamsters earlier this year after privately telling the union he supported ending the strict federal oversight imposed to root out corruption, according to officials from the union and the Obama campaign.

It's an unusual stance for a presidential candidate. Policy makers have largely treated monitoring of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters as a legal matter left to the Justice Department since an independent review board was set up in 1992 to eliminate mob influence in the union."

Once again, it is interesting that this information is at least partly coming from within Obama's own team.

Making back-room deals with the Teamsters -- now that's a "new brand of politics"!






Monday, May 05, 2008
Obama Adviser: Obama Was In Search of "Blackness"
Posted by: Matt Lewis at 9:20 AM
This Newsweek quote -- from an Obama adviser -- about why Oprah Winfrey left Rev. Wright's church, but Obama didn't, is drawing a lot of attention ...
"Friends of Sen. Barack Obama, whose relationship with Wright has rocked his bid for the White House, insist that it would be unfair to compare Winfrey's decision to leave Trinity United with his own decision to stay. "[His] reasons for attending Trinity were totally different,'' said one campaign adviser, who declined to be named discussing the Illinois senator's sentiments. "Early on, he was in search of his identity as an African-American and, more importantly, as an African-American man. Reverend Wright and other male members of the church were instrumental in helping him understand the black experience in America. Winfrey wasn't going for that. She's secure in her blackness, so that didn't have a hold on her.''

(Emphasis mine).






Monday, May 05, 2008
Veep Race: McCain/Romney Would Lose?
Posted by: Matt Lewis at 8:38 AM

                             John McCain and La governor Bobby Jindal.

Bill Kristol's op-ed this morning focuses on the possibility that John McCain might pick La governor Bobby Jindal as his running mate.   While that is an interesting possibility to discuss (personally, I think he needs to serve as governor for a few years), this excerpt about Mitt Romney caught my attention: 

"Another McCain staffer called my attention to this finding in the latest Fox News poll: McCain led Obama in the straight match-up, 46 to 43. Voters were then asked to choose between two tickets, McCain-Romney vs. Obama-Clinton. Obama-Clinton won 47 to 41.

That reversal of a three-point McCain lead to a six-point deficit for the McCain ticket suggests what might happen (a) when the Democrats unite, and (b) if McCain were to choose a conventional running mate, who, as it were, reinforced the Republican brand for the ticket. As the McCain aide put it, this is what will happen if we run a traditional campaign; our numbers will gradually regress toward the (losing) generic Republican number."

Kristol admits this scenario depends on Obama being the nominee.  I might also add that this scenario assumes Obama would pick Hillary; he wouldn't.  Still, this serves as a bit of a blow to those who are hoping for a McCain/Romney ticket. 

It is also interesting to note that it was McCain staffers who reportedly brought this to Kristols' attention ...

Update:  Check out my new Politico column on Romney v. Huckabee.


Tags: Veep   Mitt   Romney



Monday, May 05, 2008
The Ol' Bait and Switch
Posted by: Amanda Carpenter at 7:20 AM
Remember when Obama told Chris Wallace he would work with Republicans on issues like deregulation?

Apparently, he meant reducing oversight over the unions. This is from the Wall Street Journal today:

Sen. Barack Obama won the endorsement of the Teamsters earlier this year after privately telling the union he supported ending the strict federal oversight imposed to root out corruption, according to officials from the union and the Obama campaign.





Monday, May 05, 2008
Black Velvet if You Link
Posted by: Mary Katharine Ham at 7:00 AM

Obama avoiding black neighborhoods on the trail. According to reports from N.C., he's also avoiding the largely white, blue-collar mountains of the state. Exactly to whom is he talking?

The headline on this should be: "National daytime talk show host's political judgment better than Obama's by about 15 years."

Frank Rich performs great contortions in order to blame McCain for the fact that our national conversation on race isn't as candid as it could be. Seriously.

Hillary has more balls than you.

Confirmed: Democrats actually have no idea what guns even look like.

Fiorina for VP?

Bill Clinton's still got it! Take that, Obama!

NYT Ombudsman: "Yeah, we forgot to actually quote Jeremiah Wright too much., Our bad."

This weekend in superdelegates.

Strange new respect all over the place.

PBS Ombudsman: "Yeah, we could have been a little harder on Wright in that Moyers interview. Our bad."





Sunday, May 04, 2008
Boo Hoo -- They're "Using Symbols as Bludgeons"
Posted by: Carol Platt Liebau at 5:11 PM
Todays NY Times features a front-page story by Robin Toner, bemoaning the alleged tendency of the Republicans to "use symbols as bludgeons" against the Democrats.

But think about it.  Political campaigns are always about symbolism -- "malaise" vs. "morning in America."  Both sides use symbols.  Sure, as the piece points out, it was the Pledge of Allegiance in 1988, but four years later, it was President George H.W. Bush's alleged bewilderment at a grocery scanner (later exposed as an egregious falsehood) or looking at his watch during a debate that became the operative and destructive symbols of a losing campaign.

What exercises Democrats (and their friends in the press) isn't the use of symbols, per se -- it's that they get tripped up on the symbols of patriotism like the Pledge of Allegiance, flag lapel pins, and the like.  From that, they charge that Republicans are "questioning their patriotism."  That's not true, of course.  Rather, Republicans are questioning the way their expressions of patriotism -- which, as noted here, often suggest a deep-rooted distaste for the notion of American exceptionalism -- reflect their values.  In turn, Democrats hate these issues being drawn to public attention because, in fact, some of their values are in conflict with those of the majority of Americans, who do believe their country is exceptional.

For the elites, such issues are somehow "distractions" -- what voters should really be caring about is how they can get the government to do more for them or give more to them.  What they don't get is that for many Americans, these issues aren't "distractions" at all . . . they're revealing windows into the values and priorities of the people who are seeking to lead them.

In passing, Toner likewise refers to the "swift boating" of John Kerry.  Please.  If anyone has tried to manipulate patriotic symbols cynically and for his own advantage (and dishonestly, at that!) more than John "Reporting For Duty" Kerry, I'd like to know whom.  His problem wasn't his former swift boat comrades in arms -- it's that his own former words and attitudes (remember Ghengis "Jengish" Khan?) were out of synch with the image he was trying to portray . . . and were deeply offensive to many.

"Using symbols as bludgeons" is simply an excuse Democrats make for why they lose.  They lose when they're wrong on the issues.  And they lose when Republicans can demonstrate that their undoubted love of country (yes, their "patriotism") takes forms that look pretty strange to the normal American voter. 

Maybe the answer for the Dems is to rearrange their values and priorities -- rather than blaming Republicans for supposed "trickery" and voters for their stupidity in falling for the GOP's alleged gambit.




Sunday, May 04, 2008
A GOP Problem or a Jenkins Problem?
Posted by: Matt Lewis at 4:40 PM
On Monday, I wrote about the importance of supporting Woody Jenkins in Louisiana's special election.  Sadly, he did not prevail yesterday

This, of course, may -- or may not -- have major implications ...

Because Jenkins' opponent -- Democratic State Representative Don Cazayoux -- was compared to Barack Obama in Republican TV ads, the lesson some are taking from this defeat is that attempts to tie future Democratic candidates to Obama and Rev. Wright simply won't work.  This, of course, is wishful thinking on the part of Obama supporters.  It may be that this was a bad test-case.

For one thing, it was not easy to tie Cazayoux to Obama.  Cazayoux did a good job of portraying himself as a "John Breaux" conservative Democrat who was pro-gun and pro-life.  This will not always be the case in other states, however. 

Another reason it may not be fair to conclude that the Obama linkage wasn't the problem is that some see Jenkins as a flawed candidate.  I talked with two top GOP operatives this week, and both agreed with that assessment. 

One went so far as to argue that a generic or "random" Republican would have an easier time winning the seat than Jenkins.  He was viewed as a controversial conservative with lots of baggage.  Moreover, they argued that his campaign was not well-organized -- and that he could not raise money.  The money issue seems to be true, inasmuch as most of the money spent on Jenkins' behalf was by the NRCC, Club for Growth, and other outside groups -- not from Jenkins' campaign, itself.

According to these top Republican operatives, Jenkins' defeat is not so much a harbinger of things to come, as much as a warning that Republicans need to field better candidates.

Of course, RNC-types -- and political operatives, in general -- tend to be pragmatists who sometimes look down their nose at hard-core conservatives.  So any criticism of Jenkins -- a devout conservative who once brought a plastic fetus on the floor of the legislature -- should be taken with that in mind.

In any event, national GOP operatives note that Obama's introduction into the race actually helped narrow the gap for Jenkins.  It will be interesting to see if these early races are, in fact, indications of a continued GOP slide in November. 





Sunday, May 04, 2008
Watch Out NAACP
Posted by: Matt Lewis at 1:24 PM
... It's Civil Rights 2.0.



Your Blog Postings:
Last updated 29 Minutes 35 Seconds Ago
Last updated 53 Minutes 3 Seconds Ago
Last updated 1 Hours 4 Minutes 23 Seconds Ago
Last updated 1 Hours 28 Minutes 5 Seconds Ago
Last updated 1 Hours 32 Minutes 58 Seconds Ago
 

Archives of our Conservative, Republican, Political Blogs

Blog Search



Townhall Conservative, Republican, Political Blogs Townhall Blogs
Townhall Conservative, Republican, Political Columns Columns
Your Townhall Conservative, Republican, Political Blogs Your Blogs
By Month
 December 2009
 November 2009
 October 2009
 September 2009
 August 2009
 July 2009
 June 2009
 May 2009
 April 2009
 March 2009
 February 2009
 January 2009
 December 2008
 November 2008
 October 2008
 September 2008
 August 2008
 July 2008
By Issue
 A Culture of Life
 Budget & Government
 Campaigns & Elections
 Education
 Energy & Environment
 Faith & Family
 Foreign Affairs
 Health Care
 Immigration
 Jobs & Economy
 Judges & Courts
 Media & Culture
 Property Rights
 Safety & Security
 Science & Technology
 Second Amendment
 Social Security
 Tax Relief
Advertisement

Comments Comments

Axe
 Re: Another Creative Way To Pretend A Public Mandate Is Constitutional
  By The Plumber
Plumber Butt-Crack
 Re: Al Franken Denies Lieberman Extra Minute To Speak -- McCain Fires Back
  By Careful with that axe, Eugene
Banana BK
 Re: What Was Nelson's Price?
  By Careful with that axe, Eugene
BK
 Re: What Was Nelson's Price?
  By Careful with that axe, Eugene
BK
 Re: What Was Nelson's Price?
  By Molotov
Things are pretty bad when
 Re: Don't Give Up!
  By Seadog
Seadog
 Re: JAM DOWN
  By Molotov
careful
 Re: Al Franken Denies Lieberman Extra Minute To Speak -- McCain Fires Back
  By mike
Craazy Ronna cracks up...
 Re: What Was Nelson's Price?
  By Careful with that axe, Eugene
Axe
 Re: What Was Nelson's Price?
  By BK
Axe
 Re: What Was Nelson's Price?
  By BK
RHymes with
 Re: JAM DOWN
  By Careful with that axe, Eugene
Axe
 Re: What Was Nelson's Price?
  By BK
Jo
 Re: JAM DOWN
  By Molotov
CAREFUL
 Re: What Was Nelson's Price?
  By Ronna
Jo
 Re: JAM DOWN
  By Seadog
Patrick Michael
 Re: Obama in Copenhagen: Our Dramatic Breakthrough "Limits Warming To No More Than 2 Degrees"
  By mike
Crazy Ronna.
 Re: What Was Nelson's Price?
  By Careful with that axe, Eugene
Rhymes with...
 Re: The Acid Test
  By Careful with that axe, Eugene
Axe
 Re: Al Franken Denies Lieberman Extra Minute To Speak -- McCain Fires Back
  By The Plumber

The Latest on Town HallThe Latest on Town Hall


Blog Roll Blog Roll