Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons

Townhall.com The Blogspot for Political, Conservative and Republican Blogs and Bloggers


Wednesday, May 21, 2008
What is "Conservative"?
Posted by: Matt Lewis at 3:10 PM
In a thought-provoking piece, Austin Bramwell advances the notion that we need to do a better job of defining conservatism.  In fact, he has come up with a definition he believes to be superior to "conventional definitions":

Conservatism is the defense of legitimacy wherever it happens to exist. “Legitimacy” here is defined in the empirical, Weberian sense: that is, an institution is legitimate if and only if the opinion has become widespread that it is right (for whatever reason or lack thereof) to obey it. The conservative, in short, cultivates obedience to existing institutions. This definition, I submit, has all the advantages of the conventional definitions, none of their defects, and some important advantages of its own.

Bramell's peice is well worth reading.  But I think his definition lacks a few of the vitally-essential ingredients Russell Kirk long ago established: 

Kirk developed six "canons" of conservatism, which Russello (2004) described as follows:

  1. A belief in a transcendent order, which Kirk described variously as based in tradition, divine revelation, or natural law;
  2. An affection for the "variety and mystery" of human existence;
  3. A conviction that society requires orders and classes that emphasize "natural" distinctions;
  4. A belief that property and freedom are closely linked;
  5. A faith in custom, convention, and prescription, and
  6. A recognition that innovation must be tied to existing traditions and customs, which entails a respect for the political value of prudence.





Wednesday, May 21, 2008
The Lioness of the Senate?
Posted by: Mary Katharine Ham at 2:34 PM
Jennifer Rubin thinks Hillary may be able to take a page from Ted Kennedy's career book.
Kennedy, despite his family’s White House history, could never make it there himself. His baggage was too great, the timing never right. And even if he had gained the nomination in 1980, it’s not clear he would have been any more successful in stopping Ronald Reagan. He might well have been been relegated to the “loser” list, a group not treated with great reverence by the Democratic Party. Instead, he put away presidential ambitions and became the “lion of the Senate,” leaving a legislative mark greater than many presidents.
Michelle Malkin says it's time for her to go.

I'm not so sure. Keep in mind there are only a few days left until the last primary, Hillary's holding out for the May 31st decision on Florida and Michigan, and she's still got the really ticked-off feminist vote. This is from a leaked e-mail from a Hillary supporter to a San Francisco columnist:
"I will not vote for Barack Obama. I will not stay home. I will go to the polls and proudly write on my ballot, HILLARY CLINTON. I want the DNC to count my vote as a protest vote. I want them to know I am tired of being a second-class citizen in my own country. This isn't about Barack Obama or John McCain. This isn't about Iraq or Iran. This is about a war, a war for our voice, our dignity, and our selves...I hope you will join me."
I don't think this thing is going to end in a nomination for her or a VP slot, but I do think she's free to continue if she wishes. If people want to get mad about the conflated process being dragged on so long, they should make their complaints to the Democratic National Committee's rule-makers.






Wednesday, May 21, 2008
John McCain Wants You to Comment Here!
Posted by: Matt Lewis at 1:52 PM
John McCain's website is encouraging folks to post comments on conservative and liberal sites. 

As Jonathan Martin notes

McCain supporters are asked to send the details of their comment to the campaign, which in turn will verify it and then reward the supporter with "points" (assumedly to accumulate for McCain swag)
This is actually something I've long thought smart campaigns should consider.  After all, comments can sometimes influence the bloggers -- or even change narratives, themselves.  So it stands to reason a campaign would seek to influence the debate not only on the blogs, but in the comments, as well.

The idea to award "points" is a smart idea.  But it also raises ethical questions:  For example, will Townhall be inundated with "trolls," posing as legitimate commenters?   

What is more, sites like RedState have, in the past, required commenters to disclose if they are working on a campaign.  Does this overt effort to influence the narrative and conversations in the blogosphere cross an unspoken line?

... The fact that the McCain campaign is "suggesting" talking points for commenters to use -- might also lead some critics to sugges McCain is attempting to manipulate the public by spreading propoganda.  It's one thing to encourage supporters to engage in the discussion -- it's another thing to give them the talking points.

Granted, campaigns do this every day.  Political campaigns have always "encouraged" supporters to do things like call-in to talk radio shows, etc.  These efforts are usually conducted in a clandestine manner, of course -- while this is a very overt effort by the McCain campaign.  In this regard, we should probably applaud the campaign for transparency.

In short, this is an interesting idea, which raises the question:  Is this smart politics that respects the nascent power of the web -- or a cheap attempt to "game" the blogs? 

BLOGS.png picture by MattLewis01

 






Wednesday, May 21, 2008
Earmark War
Posted by: John Campbell at 1:51 PM

The Defense Authorization Bill for 2009 is set to hit the floor today and already a battle is brewing over earmarks.  House Armed Services Chairman Ike Skelton (D-MO) included a provision in the enormous Defense authorization that rejects President Bush’s Executive Order: Protecting American Taxpayers From Government Spending on Wasteful Earmarks which directs Executive Branch agencies not to commit, obligate, or expend funds on the basis of earmarks included in the actual text of legislation. Not only do they undo President Bush’s executive order, they also have indicated their intent to “sneak” earmarks into bills at the last minute using a process known as “airdropping”, will be actively used. 

The provision inserted into the bill is only 5 lines long but effectively declares that the president’s executive order “shall not apply”.  The bill currently lists 541 individual projects totaling $9.9 billion in the accompanying report.      

It appears that the earmarkers are now more determined than ever to bring home the bacon.

Oink.






Wednesday, May 21, 2008
Righting the Narrative ...
Posted by: Matt Lewis at 1:09 PM
Conor Friedersdorf aruges another Bill Buckley would be great -- but another Tom Wolfe is what we really need ...




Wednesday, May 21, 2008
HIGHER SPENDING, HIGHER TAXES, NO REFORM
Posted by: John Campbell at 12:56 PM

Today the House will consider the Budget Resolution Conference Report for 2009.  The report calls for record tax increases, increases discretionary spending by $241 billion above the President’s level over 5 years, and does nothing to reform entitlements or earmarks. Below are some of the highlights of what this budget WILL do:

  • Raises taxes by at least $683 billion over the next 5 years. These include increases in marginal tax rates; elimination of the 10-percent bracket for lower-income taxpayers; restore the marriage penalty, the death tax, as well as install higher tax rates on investments.
  • Authorizes More Than $1 Trillion over and above entitlements. The conference report increases so called “discretionary spending” by $21 above the President’s request, pushing it above $1 trillion for 2009. This translates to a spending increase of $241 billion when extended over 5 years.
  • Entitlements Continue on Automatic Pilot. This budget does nothing to address the growing entitlement problem. Medicare and Social Security alone currently face $40 billion in unfunded liabilities, and that figure is growing unchecked every year.
  • Record Debt Increase. Although Democrats claim to balance the budget by 2012, the conference report results in the largest debt increase in history – from $8.951 trillion in 2007 to $9.575 trillion in 2008 – and increase of $624 billion this year.
  • No Earmark Reform. Having repeatedly decried the scandal of earmarks, the Majority does nothing in the budget to address them. Last year’s appropriations bills included some 11,000 earmarks totaling $14.8 billion – and under this budget, the trend will continue.

Not only will this budget stifle economic growth, it will increase our debt level, and authorize an enormous amount of money for discretionary spending.  That isn’t even accounting for what the budget fails to do! ….Scary thought isn’t it?






Wednesday, May 21, 2008
More Evidence of the MSNBC for Obama Train...
Posted by: Amanda Carpenter at 12:16 PM
The National Journal's Linda Douglass, regularly booked on MSNBC as a political journalist/analyst/commentator, is joining the Obama campaign.

She will be leaving the NJ for the position.

And, re: DC's best bars: The Tune Inn and Hawk N' Dove are terrible, in my opinion. I much prefer Arlington's Liberty Tavern and the Pizza Paradiso basement in Georgetown.





Wednesday, May 21, 2008
P.C. Protected Groups' Interests Collide Leaving British Confused and Nervous
Posted by: Mary Katharine Ham at 12:14 PM
A Muslim man who requested a female driving instructor for his wife objects when the company sends a woman... who used to be a man.

It's the battle of the "others!" Muslim vs. transsexual. With whom will the guilt-ridden liberals of Britain side when neither is being "oppressed" by "The Man?"





Wednesday, May 21, 2008
America's Best Places for Casual, Frequent Inebriation
Posted by: Mary Katharine Ham at 12:08 PM
Esquire names the country's best bars. Two Washington, D.C. haunts make the list, and they're on the same block. What are the chances?

I'm guessing the expert bar-reviewers decided after the first bar, when they couldn't crawl more than a couple doors down for their continued research, that they'd just settle on where they were.







Wednesday, May 21, 2008
The Snob Party
Posted by: Carol Platt Liebau at 11:58 AM
The Democrats of Appalachia, who've supported Hillary Clinton so overwhelmingly, have become something of a whipping boy -- with many of their fellow party members thinking (if not saying) that they must be racist for refusing meekly to climb aboard the Obama bandwagon when instructed to do so by their betters in liberal elites.

Over at Slate, Dee Davis has a remarkably insightful piece

Maybe the party that once welcomed Appalachian coal miners and hillside farmers has moved on. The national Democratic Party has become younger, richer, hipper and far less interested in preserving an identity forged in the Great Depression. Who really wants a political party full of poor mountaineers? Perhaps, in the minds of some, "Coal Miner's Daughter" has been supplanted by "Deliverance."

Lots of ink has been spilled about the competing coalitions that make up the Democrat Party but they've all been defined in terms of immutable characteristics -- race, gender and the like.

Davis correctly notes that many of the biggest fissures are, in fact, ideological and socioeconomic.  Normal, rural Americans aren't interested in dismantling the country's defenses, going soft on criminals, or hanging around with anti-American radicals.  (Oh, and keep up the attacks on the military record of a guy who spent years in the Hanoi Hilton and refused an early release when it was offered to him -- these traditionalist Democrats will love that).

In short, they're cultural conservatives who are becoming an increasingly uneasy part of a party that's going further and further to the left on non-economic matters (well, economic matters, too) -- and which will be veering sharply to the left with Barack Obama at the top of the ticket.

And contrary to the way they're too often portrayed and treated by elites, they're not stupid, and they're not ignorant of their own interests.  They also know when they're being condescended to.  

Would they be a natural Hillary constituency?  Not really -- until her most recent incarnation, she's come across as pretty much of a lefty throughout her entire career.  In my view, what's carried her through is the obvious cultural leftism of her rival -- and the memory of her husband.  Bill Clinton had many faults, but he was able to convey a genuine understanding and respect for the lives and experiences of rural Democrats (perhaps because he had been one).

That's something the Dem ticket is going to be sorely lacking in '08.




Wednesday, May 21, 2008
The Obama Gaffe Machine
Posted by: Mary Katharine Ham at 10:05 AM
Michelle Malkin brings together a pretty devastating list of goof-ups from the savior of American politics:

-- Last May, he claimed that tornadoes in Kansas killed a whopping 10,000 people: "In case you missed it, this week, there was a tragedy in Kansas. Ten thousand people died -- an entire town destroyed." The actual death toll: 12.

-- Earlier this month in Oregon, he redrew the map of the United States: "Over the last 15 months, we've traveled to every corner of the United States. I've now been in 57 states? I think one left to go."

-- Last week, in front of a roaring Sioux Falls, S.D., audience, Obama exulted: "Thank you, Sioux City. ... I said it wrong. I've been in Iowa for too long. I'm sorry."

George Bush was misunderestimated. These two Democratic candidates seem to have been consistently misoverestimated. Doesn't mean we can count Obama out in a general, but we can probably count on him messing up with delightful regularity.





Wednesday, May 21, 2008
Yet Another Classless Criticism of McCain's Military Service
Posted by: Mary Katharine Ham at 9:51 AM

This appears to be becoming a strategy:

Gillespie noted that McCain was the son and grandson of admirals and called him part of the "Navy royalty."

"Admirals' sons," Gillespie said, unopposed for the Democratic nomination in the 1st Congressional District held by Republican Rep. Jack Kingston, "were treated like royalty. They were privileged people. They were given a silver spoon. Their careers were prepared for them."

Gillespie, a former Army officer who served in Iraq, said McCain was the kind of admiral's son who became a "maverick."

McCain, Gillespie added, was "somebody who needed to stand out, someone that needed to draw attention to themselves and ... was usually out for themselves."

He said his "heart grieves" for McCain's suffering as a POW.

"After that," Gillespie said, "he was somewhat of a celebrity and it went to his head. ... I think he was a self-promoter for the last four years (in the Navy.)

Asked to cite specific examples, Gillespie responded, "I don't have one right now."

Geraghty reminds us that this has happened twice before. Stay classy, Obama supporters.





Wednesday, May 21, 2008
Bill Richardson Wouldn't Talk to Ahmadinejad
Posted by: Matt Lewis at 9:47 AM
Bill Richardson had this to say this morning: "Well, you know throughout my career, I've talked to a lot of bad guys. You know, I have talked to Castro. I think you don't talk to Ahmadinejad. You talk to some of the moderate clerics." (Fox News' "Fox And Friends," 5/21/08, 7:25:12 AM EST)



Obama has stated that he would talk to Ahmadinejad. Richardson knows a lot more about diplomacy than Obama, and he’s saying it’s dumb to do what Obama wants to do. That’s bad news. Especially since Richardson is an Obama supporter.




Wednesday, May 21, 2008
Huck Takes Swipe at Bloggers?
Posted by: Matt Lewis at 9:32 AM
... Apparently it was our fault that Huckabee joked about Obama's assassination ...  Guess we overreacted??  ... At least, that's what Huck seems to be implying here with his quote to U.S. News & World Report:

 "He [Obama] told me he didn't think it was a big deal, that he knew I didn't mean anything by it and not to worry. He was a class act and gracious. Too bad the people who blew it up on the Internet weren't as classy or calm as he was."


Tags: Veep   huckabee   huck



Wednesday, May 21, 2008
Dress for Success: Gipper Style
Posted by: Matt Lewis at 9:13 AM
Esquire reports,

Hickey Freeman has modeled its new hand-stitched Presidential Collection on images of Ronald Reagan in his broad-shouldered, conservatively cut two-piece suits. So even if McCain doesn't fill his shoes, he can wear his suit.

Suit ($3,250), shirt ($425), and tie ($135) by Hickey Freeman Presidential Collection.





Your Blog Postings:
Last updated 14 Minutes 34 Seconds Ago
Last updated 18 Minutes 5 Seconds Ago
Last updated 20 Minutes 13 Seconds Ago
Last updated 40 Minutes 39 Seconds Ago
Last updated 42 Minutes 23 Seconds Ago
 

Archives of our Conservative, Republican, Political Blogs

Blog Search



Townhall Conservative, Republican, Political Blogs Townhall Blogs
Townhall Conservative, Republican, Political Columns Columns
Your Townhall Conservative, Republican, Political Blogs Your Blogs
By Month
 November 2009
 October 2009
 September 2009
 August 2009
 July 2009
 June 2009
 May 2009
 April 2009
 March 2009
 February 2009
 January 2009
 December 2008
 November 2008
 October 2008
 September 2008
 August 2008
 July 2008
 June 2008
By Issue
 A Culture of Life
 Budget & Government
 Campaigns & Elections
 Education
 Energy & Environment
 Faith & Family
 Foreign Affairs
 Health Care
 Immigration
 Jobs & Economy
 Judges & Courts
 Media & Culture
 Property Rights
 Safety & Security
 Science & Technology
 Second Amendment
 Social Security
 Tax Relief
Advertisement

Comments Comments

Juniper
 Re: Obama's Veteran's Day Remarks
  By AliveInHim
Respectable, decent, intelligent,
 Re: Democratic Congresswomen: GOP "Repulses" Women
  By cottoneyed
Calm down, Eugene
 Re: Carrie Prejean Needs A Job
  By twomay
Neocondunce
 Re: Carrie Prejean Needs A Job
  By twomay
Hey loony,
 Re: Pelosi Says Obamacare Will Be Our "Christmas Present"
  By cottoneyed
Hey loony,
 Re: Olbermann's Classless Three-Fingered Salute To Carrie Prejean
  By cottoneyed
SHE WAS ON LKL TONIGHT
 Re: Olbermann's Classless Three-Fingered Salute To Carrie Prejean
  By RUSTY LIMBOTOMY
WHY WOULD ANY SOLDIER
 Re: Obama's Veteran's Day Remarks
  By RUSTY LIMBOTOMY
Hey olby, olbernutter,
 Re: Olbermann's Classless Three-Fingered Salute To Carrie Prejean
  By cottoneyed
Mr. olbernutter
 Re: Olbermann's Classless Three-Fingered Salute To Carrie Prejean
  By cottoneyed
Christmas Gift?
 Re: Pelosi Says Obamacare Will Be Our "Christmas Present"
  By arik
And the feckless Fluncky lectures never
 Re: Can't Take the Heat? Get Out of the Bookstores.
  By clarityseeker
Munck hallucinates:
 Re: Can't Take the Heat? Get Out of the Bookstores.
  By homer noble
MaineCon
 Re: Can't Take the Heat? Get Out of the Bookstores.
  By clarityseeker
lonny is doing the
 Re: Pelosi Says Obamacare Will Be Our "Christmas Present"
  By homer noble
Jupiter
 Re: Leftist Hair-Pulling: Rahmbo vs. The Brookings Institute
  By NOTW
Jupiter
 Re: Pelosi Says Obamacare Will Be Our "Christmas Present"
  By NOTW
Greg Hengler 2:46 PM
 Re: Newt's Spokesman: If Pres Clinton Passed Hillarycare He Wouldn't Have Had A 2nd Term
  By Bob Munck
CHRISTMAS
 Re: Pelosi Says Obamacare Will Be Our "Christmas Present"
  By VESTA
A Book is NOT a Vote
 Re: Can't Take the Heat? Get Out of the Bookstores.
  By Bob Munck

The Latest on Town HallThe Latest on Town Hall


Blog Roll Blog Roll