Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com   RightArrow - Townhall.com  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
Friday, August 08, 2008
Paul Greenberg :: Townhall.com Columnist
The Return of a Prophet
by Paul Greenberg
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Who won Tuesday's presidential debate?


This is an abridged version of a column that originally appeared in 1994, when the Russian author Alexander Solzhenitsyn, who died Sunday at 89, returned to Russia from his long exile.

It's like reading that Tolstoy is touring Soviet Russia to see the Moscow subway and the Gulag. It's like having Dickens arrive in 20th-century England to catch the Beatles.

Alexander Solzhenitsyn has come back to the Big Gulag he left in 1974 (Leonid Brezhnev, secretary-general and chief warden) to find it wide open, flying the old czarist flag and hurling off in all directions. It's as if Ivan Denisovitch, the hero of his classic book about the Gulag, had grown old, free and a stranger in a not quite strange land.

That this climactic return should be seen by so many as anti-climactic - as just another writer going home after his glory days - only adds to the extraordinary ordinariness of a story that could be called "The Return of S." By Gogol, probably.

Neither the Russians nor the world may know quite what to think of Solzhenitsyn, or even want to. He has always been a man out of his time, plodding along the most unexpected paths, remaining obscure when one had expected him to take center stage, only to emerge into the news long after interest in him had waned.

It's a toss-up whether Solzhenitsyn has more grievously offended East or West. The political and cultural elites of both don't know quite how to classify him, even if they pretend to. The reservations routinely attached to their praise rings much louder than the praise. "He was a courageous man, but..." But he's a fascist, an imperialist, a crank, an anti-Semite, an ingrate, an eccentric, a loner, a hater, a nationalist... pick your own snap judgment.

What he is, is his own man. Which is why he got in trouble over there and disappointed over here. He is a great resource, but one that can be tapped only on its own terms. He will always disappoint those who think they can use him to reflect their own, conventional wisdom. Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
Subject: "civic culture"
"Solzhenitsyn took especial aim at American society's loss of "civic culture", especially among its "ruling and intellectual elites." And he said these things at Harvard. In short, he wasn't the sort of guest who can be counted on to ignore the peeling paint and cracks in the walls."

The loss of "civic culture", primarily a result of the hippy culture, which now permeates everything, made not only America but also the world a lesser place. And the "ruling and intellectual elites" are the pigs who wallow in their muck more than anyone else.(my apologies to the porcus family)

Sex and Money!
We love Washington, it is our policy center. Whether you are there working or not, there is something coming out of there for you. Our parties in Washington, the Republicans, Democrats, Independents or the Green Party, if there are any, are supposed to do the people’s business supposedly. It happens and it does not. Some are there for some other motivates and some may be there for the people’s business.
The Republican love money and the Democrats love sex. Although there may be members of both parties doing what the other does; Democrats are associated sex and the Republicans are associated with money.
We have heard about Republican congressmen and money. They are about getting rich, playing with Uncle Sam. The Republicans are not so good with money; this is in term of the economy, although they are conservative and should be concerned with our spending but they are big spenders. They are not physical conservative nowadays that they should be but are spending and taking. They have not kept the Regan idea of America, but still talk about it every time. If you can not keep his principles stop talking about it before one day he comes and ask you why?
The Democrats on the other hand are some how conservative with our money, which is our economy but not our women. Judge this, I may be analyzing this immaturely but the two parties are working in Washington like the Republicans are to money as the Democrats are to sex.
There are good and earnest Republicans and Democrats in Washington don’t misunderstand me but the behavior is letting me think in this direction.
We depend on Washington for good policies and we know good things can come from there. We are waiting for a good comprehensive energy bill, congress, give it to us. We are waiting and will wait. There are more that you can do, do it and bring your rating up. We the Americans people hire you for our business, help us in that direction. Unemployment is high, it worrisome.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily dose of conservative columns, editorial cartoons, talk radio, news, and more!
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.