Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Tuesday, August 07, 2007
Dennis Prager :: Townhall.com Columnist
Excitement Deprives Children of Happiness
by Dennis Prager
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Do you feel the leaked information from a global warming alarmist organization is meaningful?



If you want your children to be happy adults and even happy children -- and what parent does not? -- minimize the excitement in their lives. The more excitement, the less happy they are likely to be.

In both adults and children, one can either pursue excitement or pursue happiness, but one cannot do both. If you pursue excitement, you will not attain happiness. If you pursue happiness, you will still experience some moments of excitement, but you will attain happiness only if happiness, not excitement, is your goal.

When we give our child a present, he experiences excitement, and we are delighted when we see how happy he is. When done occasionally -- a holiday, a birthday -- this is perfectly fine and even beneficial. Children should have those special moments and remember forever that wonderful Christmas, Chanukah or birthday present.

But because we parents so delight in the excitement we see in our children at those moments -- because they seem so happy then -- we can easily fall into the trap of providing more and more exciting things to keep them seemingly happy at just about every moment. And they in turn come to rely on getting excited to keep them happy and to identify excitement with happiness.

But excitement is not happiness. In fact, it is the ultimate drug.

It is excitement that people seek when engaging in any destructive addictive behaviors. Excitement is a major part of what people seek in doing drugs, in having sex with multiple partners, in gambling (from slot machines to risky stock purchases) or in having an extra-marital affair. And even for many criminals, excitement is a major lure of criminal behavior.

It is argued that we are programmed to desire excitement. But we are also programmed to be lazy, to be irresponsible and to eat unhealthy foods. And just as these other natural instincts do not lead us to happiness, neither does excitement.

Today's young people have the ability to experience excitement more than any generation in history. Outside of school, excitement is available almost 24/7. MTV is exciting (MTV has done far more damage to this generation than has the tobacco industry); video games are exciting; the nearly all-pervasive sexual stimuli are exciting; MySpace (largely a human cesspool) is exciting; getting tattooed is exciting; piercings are exciting; many pictures and videos on the Internet are exciting. The list of exciting things many children experience is as long as there are hours in the day.

But all this excitement is actually inhibiting our children's ability to enjoy life and therefore be happy. All this excitement renders young people jaded, not happy. To cite a simple example, many children today would refuse to watch a black and white film -- "It's boring," they say. They would even refuse to watch many of the greatest color films if they lacked the amount of excitement -- usually meaning violence but also frequently meaning foul language and sexual content -- that they are now so used to seeing in films. Plot development is "boring"; blowing up people and buildings is exciting.

That is why the frequent complaint of "I'm bored" is often a sign of a jaded child, i.e., a child addicted to excitement and therefore incapable of enjoying life when not being excited.

All this excitement in their lives bodes poorly for the future happiness of millions of American children. Real life, let alone daily life, will seem so boring to them that they will not be able to enjoy it. And more than a few of them will opt for lives of constant excitement, often in ways destructive to themselves and others.

The solutions are as simple to offer as they may be difficult to enforce. Limit the amount of excitement in your children's lives: the amount of video games, the amount of non-serious television, the amount of music whose only aim is to excite. If they are bored, they will have to remedy that boredom by playing with friends, finding a hobby, talking to a family member, walking the dog, doing chores, reading a book or magazine, learning a musical instrument or foreign language, memorizing state capitals, writing a story or just their thoughts, exercising or playing a sport, or just thinking.

The younger the age from which children are deprived of superficial excitement, the longer they will remain innocent -- i.e., not jaded -- and capable of real happiness. For as long as they live under your roof, and therefore (hopefully) under your control, you can implement excitement detox. If you do, they may hate you now, but they will thank you later, which is far superior to liking you now and hating you later. And in parenting, that is often the choice we must make.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Dennis Prager is a radio show host, contributing columnist for Townhall.com, and author of 4 books including Happiness Is a Serious Problem: A Human Nature Repair Manual.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Dennis Prager's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
Interesting point of view..
..that correlates with my own experience.

When I was in college, the shower was weak and the beds were thin and uncomfortable. On the first day of my return to home, to the thick-flow shower and my deep featherbed, it was like heaven!

Yet the very next day, I had gotten used to the new comforts. They were no longer anything special, or a source of happiness. I noticed this, yet I couldn't summon the happiness I had felt from experiencing the very same pleasures I now enjoy daily. It's so frustrating.

I have a feeling that if we only appreciated what we had - fully appreciated it, all the time - we would be insanely happy our whole lives. The only thing keeping us from that happiness is how damned quickly we get USED to good things.

The only good solutions I've found are to:

1. Experience relative poverty of conditions now and then. Go vacation somewhere without electricity and running water.

2. Read, read, read. Sometimes reading about poor conditions can get you the same beneficial effect as experiencing them. "Dune" taught me to appreciate water, for example.

Anyone else have insights?

Kahryl,
I basically agree with the article, although the development of personality depends, of course, on far more factors than this over-simplification would suggest.

Your post seems to imply that you have spent some time "roughing it". So too for myself; I have spent plenty of time in 3rd world countries (mainly Fiji) since my partner hails from that "tropical paradise with no money" as the locals call it. When living among these people, I could not help but notice that the people there are more happy than my rich friends in the USA and Australia. I have never heard anyone in Fiji complaining of boredom. Instead, they have limitless ability to amuse themselves for hours in their rather scarce free time, without the expensive toys and entertainment we take for granted.

These days, I'm actually starting to feel sorry for Americans. They seem to be on such a perpetual treadmill of their own making. Incredibly, talented people making $3M or more per year feel inadequate compared with their peers raking in even more. (Gleaned from article in local paper about engineers in Silicon Valley).

Poor little rich America!

"Creative Deprivation"
The frugality expert, Amy Daczycyn, writes of the phenomenon of children - or adults for that matter - being unable to enjoy small, simple things in life like a walk in the park, apple picking or a small ice cream cone rather than the "jumbo deluxe sundae." Music used to only be able to be heard when musicians were assembled: now it can be in every home--with DVDs and video games--all hours of the day. The cure to the ennui-producing overload, she points out, is not more stuff but the opposite. You actively limit the "flow of stuff" and the 24/7 entertainment, for your children and/or yourself. Then smaller things become a thrill, from the one new CD you bought in the last few months, to the occasional trip to the amusement park or even the once in a lifetime trip to France. Saving money, she says, is the side benefit. The main benefit is no more jaded eight year old children --or adults--in her family.

My mom used to practice the same idea without the title. We'd want to go to the mall as teens, or go out to eat a lot and she'd say,
"If I let you do it all the time now, what will thrill you when you're older?" We thought she was mean and stupid at the time. Now I see how wise she was. I'm way past eighteen but going out to eat is STILL a treat for me. And our family is planning a second-time-in-a-lifetime Carribean cruise next year, and thoroughty enjoying every minute of the anticipation and the saving up for it.

What they need is routine and tradition
Rather than trying to find new things all the time, its better if you establish routines and traditions for your kids, so they always have things to look forward to but they know what they are. Before the 'big roads' [Interstates] were built, we used to take the Blue Highways on our many travels to our relatives in the South or to the tracks where Daddy raced. There were six of us in the car and no entertainment save the books that filled the footwells along with the picnic basket. But we knew every landmark on the way and would look forward to seeing the Giant Apple, the Statute of Vulcan, the signs to Pedroville and the Giant Sombrero when we passed it, and of course the Rock City signs. (I never did See Rock City until I took my own child there, and it was a definite anticlimax). We also looked forward to Daddy's stories which happened at specific points along the trips -- and even, when we were little, the chance for ghostly moaning as we went through tunnels on our way to Chicago! There were sparklers in our Christmas stockings and cupcakes for our birthdays, and complex rituals leading up to every holiday including the infamous pickle ornament on the tree that -- if you were the first one to spot it -- led to first choice among the hand frosted cookies we had all spent an afternoon decorating. We had our excitements, growing up, but we always knew what they would be and when they would come. Its something I continued for my kids and I find that they love to know what comes next and what will be coming -- the trip to Washington at age 7, the birthday overnight at the Embassy Suites with the friend of their choice and the choice of movie which was reached by the hotel van, Christmas Eve with the Grandparents who came into town for the huge Midnight Service that would be televised to hear Mama sing with the performance choir, The Nutcracker matinee...

Yes, excitement is good for children, but anticipation of an excitement they know and love is the best.

Warren Small
Did someone forget to take their meds? Here's a little tip for you - it's not always about the military-industrial complex.

Nor is capitalism to blame, unless you are implying that prosperity itself is a culprit. This nation has succesfully operated under a capitalistic system for 200 years, yet the problems of childhood ennui have only become an issue in the past two generations.

When people start blaming the ills of the world on capitalism, I get that "Here we go" feeling that usually presages some communistic, anti-industrial Luddite harangue.

But the solution to misspent energies brought on by material comfort is not to dismantle the economic system that has made our comfort possible -- only the kind of people being described by Prager would think that way. The answer, as he says, is simple in theory but difficult in practice because it all takes place between your ears.

I think Prager has a good point but
not everyone falls into his little boxes quite so simply; the only real reason to live is to enjoy life and as the saying goes "different strokes for different folks".

Above all else, parents should enjoy
their children and participate in what is otherwise mundane with them. I think its when amusements/excitement is used to replace parental investment that the unhealthy connection with excitement is galvanized.

I notice parents who don't want to be bothered on a personal level tend to indulge the base/excitement seeking nature of their children to more or less, get them out of the way.

Creativity
New things ARE exciting to children--momentarily--and it's fun to watch.

However, to keep providing new toys and new experiences because we enjoy seeing this excitement is to literally take an ego trip at their expense.

What it costs them is the development of their own creativity.

We discovered at early ages that to whine "I'm bored!" was to ensure that the next few hours would be spent cleaning the dust off the gargoyles festooning our grandmother's Victorian furniture, or pulling weeds in the yard. We learned to entertain ourselves, and our imaginative powers flourished.

Experiencing somebody else's creativity is no substitute for the sheer joy of experiencing your own.







Karhryl
It sounds like your parents provided you with the comforts they could, but raised you with the desire to recognize and appreciate what you have. Reading DEFINITELY lays before the reader the many other lifestyle possibilities there are. I want my daughter to have the comforts of nice clothes, comfortable living space, a good education, the ability to pursue her passions, etc... But above all else, we spend time together not as peers, but certainly as friends.

An aside-I loved "The #1 Ladies Detective Agency" series by Alexander McAll Smith.

Experience Rich and Relationship Poor...
...that's the sad reality for many today. A life full of excitement and experience and little time spent together doing the things that knit us together as friends and family. When my oldest child was born, my wife and I cut off our cable and have now gone without television for 13 years. It's amazing how much time we have available to us. Our family reads, plays games, hangs out over a cool lemonade, works around the garden, takes walks...you get the idea. We place family and relationships first. Yes, we still have surprises, but they're infrequent and not our focus. AudiR10 has it right. Routine and tradition have made our home a place of peace, nurture and love.

Sandman
You are absolutely correct, and eloquent to boot.

For once I agree with Prager
In fact, I think all kids should learn to sit quietly in meditation for at least a half an hour a day. Happiness is a quiet mind.

Phylo out.

FOLLOW THE MONEY WHEN IN DOUBT
Someone gave big $$ to author, i think.

Problem: - drugging children - for Attention Deficiency???
At, say, 50 cents a pill times millions of kids DAILY....That's a PROFIT!!!
Not paying attention to the teacher is normal. That's a normal kid.

The happiness/excitement argument sounds like this idiocy:
"let's export American jobs; it will help our economy and increase the employment here"

You just gotta love....
a writer whose idiocy is so concise that you can read just the titles of his essays and know that they are pure unadulterated garbage.

Enough is enough
"That is why the frequent complaint of "I'm bored" is often a sign of a jaded child, i.e., a child addicted to excitement and therefore incapable of enjoying life when not being excited."

I find as I get older I do not crave excitement, or change for change's sake. I AM content to be home, with my housework, "puddering," and dogs.

I am gaining a NEW appreciation of my parents and grandparents. I NOW know the intangible "why" behind, "why my parents did not come to visit me in while I was stationed in Europe." Or "why" is Mom (now in her 70s) content to have her routine each week and not have it disrupted.

Our kids are exiting their teens and starting in on their 20s. These are the years to "drink deeply" of life and life experiences. I'd rather they GO OUT AND DO, than sit on the couch in front of a screen.

Good Article
I agree that the pursuit of excitement, just like the pursuit of fame or money does not lead to happiness. There's nothing wrong with excitement, money or fame, but pursuing those in order to find happiness is the dead end road. That's a good principle to live by. I'm glad someone is out there saying these things.

Wantonly Wasteful While Seeking Thrills
I have a series of blog-entries where I have been inviting readers to add their thoughts to a list of dilemmas facing advanced civilization.

The second installment yesterday, http://pascalfervor.blogspot.com/2007/08/dilemmas-facing-advanced-civilization.html hit on the same idea: "Wanton wastefulness solely to temporarily slake the appetite of a bored audience for exciting entertainment." Those who keep seeking thrills become inured, and so they suffer ennui.

There is also a link (quite funny but in a sad way) which starkly demonstrates how far afield and stupid can be attempts to overcome boredom and to seek applause for the effort.

Boredom v. Excitement

The obvious way to avoid excitement in your children's lives [or yours] is make reading Mr. Prager's column mandatory!

This is Bull
Excitement isn't ruining kids, actually it is the lack of being allowed to be kids that ruins kids. Already Pre-K is going to be a requirement, more schools are dropping recess, games like Tag and Dodge Ball are out because they may hurt the feelings of some kids.

What happens is kids start looking for things to fill that void that is being left, being young isn't being allowed anymore, we hear that clap trap of "Teach them to be responsible young people". They can never learn to be responsible if they aren't given the chance to be irresponsible when they are young kids.

To a healthy child excitement is spending the afternoon on a swing set and slide. Grownups see that as nothing but a long drawn out back and forth motion that would likely make them sea sick, kids love it.

Having kids around the house means that you need band aids and monkey blood for cuts and scratches, ice for bumps on the head, tweesers for thorns and splinters, a water hose to drink out of cool down and wash the mud off. And yeah, every now and then it may mean some stitches or a cast.

When we deprive the kids the excitement of being a kid, they will find excitement else where.

justpaul
I've always assumed that most libs just glanced (at best) at the articles before they started spewing, but you must be the first to actually admit it.

Leroy - this is bull?
Leroy,

You are reading things into the article that aren't there. I've heard Prager enough to know he would agree with just about everything you wrote:

- Kids are rushed to soon with education such as homework in kindergarten.

- Kids should have free time to just be kids and play for hours doing things like playing on swings and slides.

- Kids should be allowed to take reasonable risks even if it means the risk of cuts and broken bones.

The excitement Prager is talking about is playing high tension video games, constantly receiving the "best" gift, or getting front row seats at some concert promoted on radio Disney. Excitement overload is where a kid complains, "The park with swings is so boring!, I want to go to Magic Mountain or Wild Rivers!"




Adults, Not Kids, Want Excitement
The problem is not with kids seeking excitement, but with adults demanding constant excitement and stimulation for themselves. This results in the phenomenon of men and women refusing to date decent people of the opposite sex because they don't find them exciting enough; quitting perfectly good jobs that have lost their edge because they feel bored at work; moving from one locale to another in search of the perfect, stimulating community; focusing on political sideshows such as gay marriage, anti flag-burning Constitutional amendments, etc.., which excite the passions and distract from real issues facing our country; embracing idiotic cliches about the war in Iraq (Bush lied, people died; Haliburton!; fight terrorism there so we don't have to fight it here, etc.) instead of understanding the complex geo-politicial situation, and focusing on political nonsense such as John Edwards' hair or Fred Thompson's young wife, instead of real political issues.

Justpaul
justpaul writes: Tuesday, August, 07, 2007 9:43 AM
You just gotta love....
a writer whose idiocy is so concise that you can read just the titles of his essays and know that they are pure unadulterated garbage.
_______________________________

An example of an excitable boy.

Babies too
Just came across this article and thought of Prager's point. Seems there are baby videos out there trying to make babies into Einsteins. Results are just the opposite.

Here's the link and an excerpt:

http://www.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1650352,00.html?cnn=yes

== As far as Christakis and his colleagues can determine, the only thing that baby videos are doing is producing a generation of overstimulated kids. "There is an assumption that stimulation is good, so more is better," he says. "But that's not true; there is such a thing as overstimulation." His group has found that the more television children watch, the shorter their attention spans later in life. "Their minds come to expect a high level of stimulation, and view that as normal," says Christakis, "and by comparison, reality is boring." ==



Thinker, Justpaul
What? "Follow the money"? "a writer whose idiocy is so concise that you can read just the titles of his essays and know that they are pure unadulterated garbage"?

The most charitable response to the posters of asinine comments such as these is that they were written yesterday before the article even appeared. More likely though is that the posters are overexcited boys who lack the ability or patience to thoughtfully process information properly.

We need to teach them
"Godliness with contentment is great gain."

Prager
It's not how I would've argued the point, and certainly not the terms I would've used, but from the context your point is well taken, and your point is right on the mark.

Sometimes Dennis....

Sometimes you give us what we need. Words and thoughts that ring so true.

I look at my daughter who yearns for simplicity. Loves to read a book. Writes little stories for no reason at all. And sometimes claims, "the best time ever", when all we did is go for a bike ride.

I'll surely pass this article to the in-laws :)

If we value...
"If you want your children to be happy adults and even happy children -- and what parent does not? -- minimize the excitement in their lives. The more excitement, the less happy they are likely to be."

So, if we value the mental well-being of Minnesota's children, we should make sure the Vikings never, EVER win a Super Bowl. Shudder. :)

The Twins winning two World Series was risky enough.

Agreed
Too many activities and distractions are a liberal substitute for good parenting.

http://hostilethoughts.blogspot.com/

Liberal?
How the heck does this issue of happiness/excitement have anything to do with liberalism or conservatism?

I'm pretty far left and I agree with Prager on this one.

I worry about people who think the world is divided into good people and liberals.

Kahryl
I'll meet you half way on this one. I agree that the subject and justification of Prager's column is nonpolitical. I am probably as far right as you claim to be left, but I honestly don't know what that has to do with the subject of this piece.

Parents can claim whatever political affiliations they choose, and I doubt their choice would have much of a correlation with the degree of their fitness as a parent. There are far too many nutjobs on both ends of the political spectrum to believe that political beliefs, in and of themselves, are much of an indicator of parental fitness.


Sand Man, you've got it!
I put many evengelical "put the kids in a bubble and don't let the evil world get on them" parents on par with hippie "anything goes as long as you (mostly me) feels good". 360 degrees from sick is still sick.

Kahryl

You are not a true liberal (anything that feels good) if you agree with Prager. The "Neo-Liberals" have taken charge of the party. These perverts don't just want to meet kids on MySpace, they want to do it legally, with legal marijuana to boot.

I'm sickened by the courting of every wacko group. These Democrat candidates are better than that. They need to stand up and say "Prager is Right on the issues". "Prager represents good common sense".

But, that won't be heard, for fear it would keep some wacko voters home.

Thanks, Dr. Prager
This definitely needed to be addressed!

What omni's comments reveal
One is supposed to react intelligently to the column, but I can't help reacting to one of the comments. Omni writes: "I think Prager has a good point but not everyone falls into his little boxes quite so simply..." Did Prager in this article say "everyone?" Did I miss something? As Prager has pointed out before, a generalization by definition implies exceptions. Indeed an important tool in reasoning is generalizations. Wikipedia states regarding generalizations: "Generalization is a foundational element of logic and human reasoning. Generalization posits the existence of a domain or set of elements, as well as one or more common characteristics shared by those elements."

voysest

Correct! Unless the article is written in extreme length, with archaic language, the liberals think it is "Over-simplified".

Prager "over-simplified" for his target audience, which would be people like me. Those of us (the majority) with a basic education.

I would assume someone with a degree would not need Prager's insights ? His show is targeted towards basic principles with understandable morals. I grew up a poorly educated liberal, and am grateful Dennis is willing to drop down to my level and help.

Am I missing something here?

voysest
you're right he didn't actually come out and say everyone however it may be implied by his statement " if you want happy children then limit their excitement". There is no limitation on you and it is therefore all inclusive to mean evceryone else out here or as they say in the south "all y'all".

they are
beginning to see a link between early television watchers and autism. Not a "cause," just a "correlation," but certainly worth knowing about. Television is not a good babysitter. Also, the schools are seeing an incredibly higher level of autism.

excellent article
This article is very wise. I have 4 children, ages 9 to 16. We have 3 video game systems, a hi-def projector with surround sound, handheld electronics, 5 PCs, etc. BUT, we have also taught our children by precept and by example from their earliest years to limit screen time, be frugal, and reject materialism (the seeking of happiness through material acquisition). And I'm pleased to say that just when I hear one of my kids start saying he's bored, I will find several of them rediscovering Scrabble, or card games, or their bikes, or the fun of building forts, etc. I know parents that respond to such complaints of boredom by giving their kids money to spend. I realize that kids come pre-programmed with much of their personality, and my wife and I can take only a little credit for how our kids have turned out. But it sure helps my happiness when I hear (often) from other adults how happy and polite and friendly my kids are. I have to conclude that would be different if we had no limits on the kind of excitement Prager is talking about.

Spot on
Another way to look at this is the choice between joy and pleasure. True joy never leaves one hungry, pleasure usually does - and always will if it is the focus. Or using Prager's words - excitement always leaves one hungry wanting more and more, and happiness never leaves one hungry.

We just got back from a 1000 mile drive (one way) for vacation. We have 5 boys, ages 2-11 in a van. We had a couple DVD portable players with multiple headsets and a Nintendo SP and DS hand held game players. When we had "down time" the kids got along, were respectful, looked outside, drew on paper, invented games. When it was media time, the noise level among the kids was high, the fighting was high, and the bordom factor was high, and the happiness factor LOW. Prager is right on.


Adult focus would have been appropriate
For the most part I agree with Prager, although I'd like to expand on the excitement element by saying that it goes beyond "excitement" per se- but the addictive desire to experience emotional and/or sensational extremes.

So it is one illustration explaining one angle behind some people's addiction to tattoos, or even plastic surgery.

Prager's article was pretty general but on point, but I believe that the point would have been driven home better if it focused on adults, not only because because of the enabling of the children, but also the narcissistic manner in which most adults go about their lives.

Look no further than any activist group- they generally make their presense known most intensely when the situation is sensationalized and trivial.(Just ask Mike Vick and Don Imus.) It's because of this cycle of hypersensitivity that the causes they once championed fade to black in favor of an agenda that serves to keep them popular and creates an insatiable lust for increased political clout.

Our public schools are another glaring example of this, as you would be hard pressed to find a school district now that doesn't have some type of self-esteem based curriculum for students.

Not only do we have these behaviors, we continually encourage these behaviors, and more of our children are inheriting them.

Are we on a road to ruin?

Chin_Wah - mentions self-esteem

I have a question... Why do we try to boost self-esteem in children?

It seems most children are already self-centered and therefore would have Too much self-esteem.

Doesn't a criminal have inflated self-esteem ? How could one harm another without feeling a higher importance of self than the victim.

Children and excitement....baseball?
If our children are always seeking more exciting things to do how do you explain the popularity of baseball? The pace is slower than paint drying, the motions of the players are monotonous and predictable. Since there are so many teams playing and so many games played in any season any individual games means nothing.
Yet thousands attend the games, watch it on tv and listen on radio.

This has to be a topic for an Ultimate Issues show.

Excellent article..
I couldn't agree more with Mr. Prager. I have a second chance at raising children, and my present wife takes my two young boys to the library for puppet shows and book readings and other assorted activities. She takes them into her garden to till the soil and plant plants and water and built a sandbox for play. They have toys- but all the toys are made for their active participation. They are being brought up in a way I could never imagine. To see the differnce in their upbringing compared to the way I raised my grown children and the way I was raised is eye opening. Nothing compares to experience. I have learned my lesson, life is made for living and living isn't passive excitement.

The Revolt of the Masses
Reading this article I remembered a book I once read from the spanish philosopher José Ortega y Gasset(the book is ¨La rebelión de las masas¨ or ¨Revolt of the masses¨ in english) on wich he outlines the condition of modern men.He says humanity now faces a world where everything is available,everything is ready to be delighted yet we didnt have to do any sacrifice to have this abundance of resources.In the mind of the moderns civilization as we know it has always been like that,all the advantages brought up by Technique are eternal like the air we breathe.We are spoiled by the civilization goods and resources as humanity have never been.Thats our condition according to him, we are naturally spoiled(señoritos satisfechos).Thats why we are never satisfied because its a quality of spoiled people to never get satisfied and always want more and more.He describes the common man(hombre masa) as a hermetic man,who doesnt listen to anyone but himself,who doesnt accepts orders or hierarchy because he thinks he is the owner of the world,or at least his world.Only when people realize the the world we know now was made with blood and sacrifice of humble people they will start to appreciate life and not only excitement,that its the falsification of life.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.