Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Wednesday, May 23, 2007
Ashley Herzog :: Townhall.com Columnist
The College "Hook-up" Culture
by Ashley Herzog
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will Congress pass Obamacare by the end of the year?

When I opened my campus newspaper last week and saw an article titled “Unhooked: Ohio University women discuss the college hook-up culture,” I was expecting an eye-roll-inducing paean to women’s “sexual empowerment.” Who could blame me? Many college newspapers fill their pages with just that type of banal trash, including preposterous female “sex columnists” who hail promiscuity as the highest form of liberation. I hesitated to even read it.

But instead of inane prattling about condoms, lingerie and oral sex, the article was filled with quotes from women unhappy with the college “hook-up culture.” As a freshman identified only as Rachel said, “I think for guys, it’s a lot about hooking up; for girls it’s more of an emotional thing. Maybe the guy will call you; maybe he’ll just say ‘hi’ on the street. But he sees you as an object, while you’re upset. The guys are over-empowered.”

There goes the sexual revolution.

For decades, feminists have been propagating the myth that men and women have equal desires for and reactions to casual sex. A woman who engages in multiple trysts is “embracing her sexuality” – and if she has doubts afterwards, she’s simply experiencing unnecessary guilt heaped upon her by a patriarchal society. Women and men are really the same, they say, so why shouldn’t a woman “have sex like a man”?

College women are slowly starting to realize that it’s all a lie. Even women’s studies courses and three hundred episodes of “Sex and The City” can’t mask the fact that expert opinion favors chastity.

In her book “Unprotected,” published earlier this year, Dr. Miriam Grossman makes a medical case for sexual conservatism. As a psychiatrist at UCLA’s student health services, Grossman has seen firsthand the emotional destructiveness of promiscuity. She declares multiple hook-ups “hazardous to a woman’s mental health.”

Laura Sessions Step’s book “Unhooked: How Young Women Pursue Sex, Delay Love and Lose at Both” details how women who settle for casual sex neglect their emotional needs. Of course, for even suggesting that women have emotional needs different from men’s, Steps was criticized by feminists. But her theories apparently make sense to college women, at least enough to inspire articles like the one I read.

As feminists assail traditional moral standards for sexual behavior as “oppressive,” they ignore the fact that the sexual revolution has created a culture in which men win and women lose. While women bear the unwanted pregnancies, abortions, and emotional pain wrought by casual sex, men are free to move on to the next bedmate.

Unfortunately, many college women have been brainwashed by a popular culture that embraces a combination of girl-power feminism and the Playboy philosophy. They believe that sex is just for fun and casual hook-ups have no emotional consequences. They believe they are just like men.

But, if the article in my school’s paper is any indication, others are catching on to the truth: the hook-up culture is more oppressive than traditional morality ever was.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Ashley Herzog is a Townhall columnist and the author of Feminism vs. Women.

Be the first to read Ashley Herzog's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

In response to Roy
1) Factually incorrect. the UN resolved to partition Palesting in Resolution 181.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1947_UN_Partition_Plan
Trying to hedge your bets by then demanding to know why many do not honor UN resolutions is silly. Either they should be honored, or not. If not, then the resolution creating Israel may be ignored, but so must be the resolutions AGAINST Israel since then. Or you can choose to honor UN resolutions, in which case the formation of Israel was valid and all the hostile acts of Arab nations and Palestinian terrorits are illegal and reprehensible.
As for 'giving someone's land' away, I note your curious silence on the many Muslim nations that evicted their Jewish inhabitants after the formation of Israel. Leaves you open to charges of hypocrisy.
The 1956 invasion of Sinai was in response to Egyptian use of the Sinai to illegally blockade the port of Eilat. Perhaps you are upset that Israel responded effectively to a crime against it. Note that Israel responded favorably to international pressure by evacuating the peninsula several months later... unlike the behavior of Egypt which defied international will by demanding the expulsion of treaty-mandated UNEF in 1967.

2) Israel declared independence but stuck firmly within the boundaries established by the UN... until repeated Palestinian Arab attacks demonstrated that relying upon undefensible borders was suicide. It is a matter of history who attacked first: Palestinian villagers; only later followed by regular troops from surrounding Arab nations. Does not the victim of unprovoked aggression have a right to protect itself? Apparently not if they're Jews.

3) Israel is a democracy. Unlike Arab nations, Israel extends the franchise to ARABS living in her midst, and the results show:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Knesset_members
If you want to condemn Israel's alleged mistreatment of Arabs, why not look at how Arab states treat their Jewish citizens? Oh yeah, they don't ALLOW JEWS IN AT ALL. Condemnation of one party for moderate abuses while remaining silent on the other parties far-worse abuses represents hypocrisy. As you well know.
Further, if Israel had not maintained an occupation army to secure DEFENSIBLE borders, the experience of history shows that further unprovoked attacks, contrary to UN Resolution 181, would have followed. Clearly what offends you is that Israel has successfully defended itself from the destruction and massacre that her neighbors continue to desire to visit on her.

4) The majority of Palestinians were a transient people who moved to the are now considered Israel after the British took Palestine away from the Turks. Indeed, very many moved in to the region to take advantage of the need for labor created by newly-established Jewish farms and agricultural initiatives.
The Palestinians who had long resided in the region worked the land for absentee Ottoman landowners.
In fact, Palestine had the same sort of subsistence-farming economy as many other backwards areas until large numbers of Jews moved in, often with foreign currency assistance, to open up large-scale irrigation projects, followed by commercial agriculture, followed at last by industry.
Read the descriptions of Palestine by all interested parties in WW1 and following, up to the eve of WW2.
By the bye, here's your 'expanding' west bank settlements:
http://www.crosswalk.com/1347336/print/
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1135696363666&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FPrinter
http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2005-09-22-israel-base-evacuated_x.htm

5) It is not racist to describe ACCURATELY a society. You may be offended to hear the truth about most Muslim societies (including the Palestinians'), but that doesn't change reality:
Following are articles on Palestinian honor killings of women, female genital mutilation, institutional violence toward homosexuals (who seek to remain in Israel to spare their lives), and efforts to keep women from exercising the rights of citizenship by voting, the appalling abuse of children by teaching them to be suicide bombers;
perhaps you need to read them and use them as a springboard for your own investigations (rather than using the reflexive and inaccurate accusation of 'racism' to silence facts you don't find palatable):

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/2826963.stm
uk.gay.com/headlines/4096
http://www.sodomylaws.org/world/palestine/psnews007.htm
http://www.phrmg.org/monitor2002/Aug2002-3.htm
http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2005-10-06-palestinianviolence_x.htm
http://www.merip.org/mer/mer206/ruggi.htm
http://www.aina.org/news/20060119104907.htm
http://www.freedomhouse.org/template.cfm?page=180
(search above page for 'mutilation')
http://www.womensenews.org/article.cfm/dyn/aid/2295/context/outrage
http://hrw.org/english/docs/2006/11/07/palab14496.htm
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15593267/
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/07/world/middleeast/07palestinians.html?ex=1320555600&en=0db40422a07eda92&ei=5088&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss
http://www.miftah.org/PrinterF.cfm?DocId=8564
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/1446003.stm

"If you feel the need to champion authoritarian, patriarchal, theocratic, mysogynist, abusive and coercive states over a liberal democracy, then that is your chosen allegiance, of course."
You've picked your side. Now be proud of it.

The United States has not been 'fair-minded'? How silly. Must a judge view the rapist and female victim as equally culpable in order to be 'fair-minded' ( a situation analogous to the relationship between Israel and her neighbors)?
Apparently so, in your mind.

Tallil2long - Israel a democracy?
Not sure why I am devoting precious time to debating this issue. Perhaps hopeful that a few open-minded souls will check this post and begin to read both sides. I'm convinced that if you read both sides there is plenty of blame to go around.

A few quick points, each of which is worth a book.

(1) The UN did not establish Israel. It suggested a division. I don't know if the big powers had a right to give somebody else's land to new arrivals in any case. It always strikes me as curious how Israel-firsters love to cite the UN of 1947-1948 but now consider its resolutions of no importance. How many have we vetoed that criticized Israel? I was strongly pro-Israel, by the way, until its invasion of Egypt in 1956 made me begin to look into the situation. Ike had the courage to tell the UK-France-Israeli aggressors to back off.

(2) Did the Palestinians start the blood feud? Or, was it Israel's declaration of independence and immediate seizure of land? More than one way of looking at this. Both sides have a strong argument, which is why I believe the US could have negotiated a fair settlement years ago if it hadn't been for the powerful Israeli lobby. Then we could have avoided our present mess.

(3) Is Israel a democracy? Forty years of an occupation army? Democratic? Oppression of a minority? Don't tell me that Arabs are treated equally in Israel. I've been there four times and seen Israel 'democracy' in action. What if the US only admitted Christians and even discriminated against liberal Protestants (as Israel only permits Jewish immigrants and discriminates against Reform and Conservative)? Would you then call the USA a democracy? And all the Sabbath 'blue laws'? And a religious symbol as its national flag? And on and on. Israel is barely democratic for Jews, and even there it falls short.

(4) The Palestinians were a relatively advanced Arab people, both Muslims and Christians. They were a secular people before Israel encouraged the development of Hamas to counter Arafat. They were well-educated as a people. Christian Palestinians, by the way, overwhelmingly oppose the occupation. Under occupation the Palestinian economy and much more has been all but destroyed. Meanwhile, Israel continues to expand settlements on the West Bank? How is that advancing peace? democracy? Most of the settlers are more like Islamic crazies than moderate Jews, of which there are many. The issue is debated more freely in the Israeli press than here in the USA where the media is afraid of advertizers and the charge of anti-Semitism, the mccarthyite smear of today.

(5) You talk about the backward society of the Palestinians. That is racist nonsense, to begin with. Like southerners used to talk about African-Americans. Palestinians were not theocratic in the least until Israel blocked all reasonable efforts to achieve justice and then they voted in Hamas. Sad, but extremists usually gain from such frustration. Most women were not veiled and discriminated against among Palestinians as in Saudi Arabia. This attempt to smear all Arab Muslims with the same brush shows ignorance and/or prejudice, maybe both. You should be ashamed.

Read both sides and help the cause of peace and justice. Otherwise you are a part of the continuing problem. My fear is that its too late already because of people like you who have been fed a diet of prejudice over the years.

I salute Jews (and Christians and Muslims) who recognize that we must move in a new direction or face 100 years of unnecessary killing, much of it started when the USA failed to be a fair-minded middle man in the search for peace in the Holy Land. Up until very recent years Americans who even hinted at two states were savagely attacked. Remember when Hillary suggested same 10-15 or so years ago?

Read and think! It will do you good.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.