Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Wednesday, November 15, 2006
Mary Grabar :: Townhall.com Columnist
Martin Luther King, Jr.’s, “God Delusion”?
by Mary Grabar
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Do you feel the leaked information from a global warming alarmist organization is meaningful?



The theocracy is coming! The theocracy is coming!

So warn authors, documentary makers, and celebrities, who would like to rip away what they see as veils of religious superstition.

They warn us of the dangers of Christian belief and extend their arguments to religion in general. Elton John claims religion encourages hatred of gays. Ted Turner has stated that Christianity is a religion for losers. Michelle Goldberg, author of Kingdom Coming, warns about the gradual erosion of rights with the rise of what she calls “Christian nationalism”; she sees evidence is such things as workplace prayer sessions. Sam Harris, author of Letter to a Christian Nation, attributes conflict and war to religion. The elimination of religious belief, in his estimation, would lead to peace. Richard Dawkins, author of The God Delusion, asks believers to follow his doctrine of empirical science (a relatively young and unstable endeavor compared to religion). These thinkers are on a mission and ask us to abandon our religious beliefs and adopt their ways of thinking, which they present as unclouded, and under which humanity will evolve to its potential.

They warn that Christians threaten such “rights” as abortion and stem cell research. Those like Michael J. Fox, they imply, would continue to suffer because Christians don’t want to give up embryos for research.

Christians erode civil rights, they claim, because they are against same-sex marriage. Furthermore these Christians who are the most outspoken against same-sex marriage are the very ones struggling with their own homosexual leanings. As Huffington Post columnist and advocate of sadomasochistic sex, Stephen Elliott, wrote, “if Mark Foley hadn’t repressed his homosexuality and desire for young boys he could have a lover closer to his own age who would have dressed up in a little school boy outfit and bent over the desk for a few whacks from the schoolmaster’s paddle.”

Indeed, these liberal advocates chortled when the Reverend Ted Haggard came falling down and rejoiced when their Democratic candidates won in the last election. They position themselves to be as “fearless” as their publisher Arianna Huffington who promotes her book for women and girls on that web magazine and on talk shows.

The references to self-will, and morality un-proscribed by religious restrictions or traditional values, give such magazines the feel of a convergence of free-thinkers. Much of the commentary is peppered with profanity. These thinkers and writers present themselves champions of the downtrodden, women, homosexuals, and minorities.

This week, on November 13, C-Span televised the ground-breaking ceremony of the Martin Luther King, Jr., Memorial in Washington, D.C. In attendance was the Reverend Jesse Jackson, as well as the Reverend Al Sharpton. Reverend Jackson’s stature as a civil rights leader was not diminished, as far as I can tell, when it was revealed that his mistress gave birth to his child. He was forgiven by his followers. Indeed, during this tearful ceremony the Reverend Jackson said some prayers. A hymn was sung by a choir.

These demonstrations of religious faith were not unusual in the civil rights movement and before that in the abolitionist movement. Abolitionist writers like Phillis Wheatley, Harriet Beecher Stowe, and Frederick Douglass regularly alluded to or quoted the New Testament. In her elegy for the Reverend George Whitefield, Wheatley quotes from one of his sermons:

“Take him, ye Africans, he longs for you, Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Mary Grabar earned her Ph.D. in English from the University of Georgia and teaches in the Atlanta area. She is a Pushcart Prize-nominated poet and published fiction writer. Visit her website and get on her mailing list at marygrabar.com
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
Innate Morality
Sandman,

Here's a really interesting radio program that just came up that discusses neuroscience's study of innate morality:

http://richarddawkins.net/article,315,Morality,Radio-Lab--WNYCorg

icouldbewrong,but
Answering your questions -

First, you alluded to evidence that the Bible is not God's word. Share. What do you think you know that I don't?

I was NOT born a Christian, so I already went through the process of deciding whether there was enough evidence for me to believe in Christ as personal savior and came to the conclusion that it was impossible not to believe. Check out my blog if you want to know part of my personal testimony of how I came to that point in my life. I will submit that you see no evidence for God because you are not willing to see evidence for God. It's not that it's not there, it's that you're blind to it.

Richard Dawkins' writing is suffuse with arrogance. The very title of "The God Delusion" gives him away. He thinks anyone who believes in something beyond the material realm is insane and he says so repeatedly in his books. I work with schizophrenics in my job and I can tell you that the Christians I know are not deluded. They are intelligent, reality-based individuals who just see evidence Richard Dawkins thinks is nonsense.

I can't go into seven years of cousinly scientific debates, but I will share a tiny bit that impressed me. Scientists believed for several centuries that the universe was eternal. They built whole sub-systems of science based upon the idea that the universe had always been. Quite a few scientists publicly ridiculed Christians for believing the universe had a finite beginning. When Einstein developed his theory of relativity, he found some of his calculations not working and had to incorporate a fudge factor to explain it. Then newer technologies discovered the Big Bang. The universe had a beginning, which explained why Einstein's formula were off. A lot of scientists panicked for a while because they had to reevaluate theories that no longer worked. Now most accept the reality of it and the theories have been scrapped or re-posited based upon new evidence. There are still a lot of questions and Stephen Hawkins even admitted that the Big Bang is a problem for naturalistic science, at least until a naturalistic first cause is found. I personally believe God was the first cause. In part, I base that belief on my personal relationship with Him, but I also am in absolute awe of the fine-tuning required to have created a functioning universe from such a colossal and cataclymic cosmic event. I see design there and I saw it back when I first heard about the Big Bang in Junior High BEFORE I became a Christian.

The current weight of evidence doesn't prove God or disprove anything in science (except the static universe theory that has been discredited), but it adds weight to my beliefs. I don't need that evidence to exist to bolster my faith. I simply recognize it as compatible.

I firmly believe that when scientists quit running around like chicken littles afraid the sky is falling and actually reassess evolution by random selection based upon new evidences gleaned from technologies unavailable 30 years ago they will find that ID has some correct theories. I didn't endorse the entire movement. I think it has some merit that currently is being ignored. I think evolution as currently stated will not stand as currently stated, but I don't need it to fall in order to believe in God. He provides enough evidence of His existence without help from Darwin.

I think Richard Dawkins is going to be shown for the arrogant narcissist he is, but I don't think he's going to admit it. He needs God to be a delusion because if He isn't, he's going to have some 'splaining to do and that wouldn't be something an arrogant narcissist volunteers for.

Basically, I think Christians are better off than atheists. If I'm wrong, I've spent the last 30 years with some trustworthy and supportive friends, raised my kids with morals, taught a bunch of people to speak and read/write English, and basically found peace and acceptance of self through my delusional relationship with the non-existent God, and after I die, it won't matter if I was wrong because I won't be aware of it. If I'm right, however, I have experienced those benefits AND I get to stand before God with my small pile of sins and be told they don't matter and to go on into heaven.

If atheists are right, then the same thing happens to me and to them and it won't matter because we won't be aware of it. If atheists are wrong -- well, the Bible says what it says. There are consequences for denying Christ. Eternity without God may not sound all that scary to you now, but I don't think you'll say the same when you're actually experiencing it.

Which is why I speak up! I don't know you and technically, on a strictly human level, I don't care what happens to you, but because of God's work in my life, I care what happens to your eternal soul. I want you to know that there is a God and you will be held accountable to Him sometime in the future. You can choose to ignore that, but you don't get to opt out of the consequences and I would be remiss if I didn't tell you that. You know ... you could be wrong.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.