Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Thursday, August 31, 2006
Cam Edwards :: Townhall.com Columnist
Shoot to deceive
by Cam Edwards
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
 
Poll
Will Sarah Palin make a run at the GOP Nomination in 2012?


When is an anti-gunner a pro-gun advocate? The obvious answer is never, but that’s too simple a response. The actual answer is “any time a member of the media wants to portray the anti-gunner in a pro-gun light”. Take, for example, a new article in The New Republic entitled “Gun Crazy: The Revolt Against the NRA” by Michael Blanding. Blanding, a freelance writer from Boston, profiles the group calling itself American Hunters and Shooters Association. AHSA bills itself as a “moderate alternative to the NRA”, but in reality it’s an organization founded by leaders in the anti-gun movement who have strong ties to the Brady Campaign.

Blanding’s article calls John Rosenthal, the president of AHSA’s foundation, a “Boston real estate developer who served a stint on the board of the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence.” But the article also quotes Rosenthal as saying he left the Brady Campaign because of the organization’s “extreme anti-gun stance”. Blanding leaves out any mention of the fact that Rosenthal created, and still runs, the Massachusetts-based outfit known as Stop Handgun Violence. Despite the fact that Blanding is from Boston, I was willing to give him the benefit of the doubt. Perhaps Rosenthal didn’t volunteer that information and Blanding simply didn’t do his research. Then I found an article in Boston Magazine from February 2006 entitled “Straight Shooter”. It’s a glowing profile of John Rosenthal, complete with many mentions of his work with Stop Handgun Violence, and Michael Blanding wrote it.

In May of this year Blanding wrote another piece for Boston Magazine called “The Ways of the Gun”, in which he makes the case that Boston’s rising crime rate is the fault of other states with less restrictive gun laws. In that article Blanding describes Rosenthal as an “anti-gun activist”, but now he’s a pro-gun moderate alternative to the NRA. Why? Because Blanding didn’t write a TNR article about the need for more gun control, he wrote an article about liberals trying to woo gun-owners. To accurately portray Rosenthal as someone who helped pass Massachusetts’ Gun Control Act of 1998 does nothing to win the hearts and minds of gun owners.

Blanding commits the same sin of omission when describing AHSA’s Executive Director, Robert Ricker. Ricker is described as “a former NRA general counsel and lobbyist for the firearms industry”, which is incorrect. Ricker spent a brief period of time as one of the attorneys in the General Counsel’s office, but was never general counsel himself. Blanding fails to mention that Ricker switched sides, so to speak, back in the late 1990’s, and has since testified as an expert witness for those hoping to hold gun manufacturers and sellers responsible for the actions of criminals. Chris Cox, NRA-ILA’s Executive Director, wrote an article about AHSA (found here) in which he details testimony Ricker gave in a 2005 deposition. Ricker testified that his two biggest clients were the Educational Fund to Stop Gun Violence (part of the Coalition to Stop Gun Violence) and the group Virginians for Public Safety. Ricker also testified that AHSA was another of his clients, and paid him $3,000 a month for his services. Again, Blanding apparently didn’t want to let his readers know Ricker’s entire background.

I realize that for Blanding, AHSA represents a new and exciting attempt to mislead gun owners (we’re talking about a writer who once penned a “Culture of Life Top Ten” wish list for the ultra-lefty Alternet, in which he expressed his desire that Congress would pass Massachusetts-style gun control laws). New or not, AHSA is trying to deceive gun owners into buying into an anti-gun movement and to give anti-gun politicians a bit of pro-gun cover. From the tens of thousands of dollars its leaders have donated to candidates like Ted Kennedy, John Kerry, and Nancy Pelosi to the fact that the press contact for this supposedly non-partisan organization is also the head of the Fairfax City (Virginia) Democratic Committee, American Hunters and Shooters Association isn’t out to protect your rights. They’re out to deceive you, and Michael Blanding appears happy to help.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Cam Edwards is the host of “Cam and Company” on www.nranews.com

Be the first to read Cam Edwards' column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

Ever since...
The Brady bill was enacted over the NRA sponsored bill that would have provided more enforcement; instead of feel good esthetics, if it looks bad, it must be bad regulations.
I could care less about the baloney brigade Brady bunch of Constitution haters.

Blanding responds
Michael Blanding responds:
Contrary to what Cam Edwards writes, the piece that I wrote for The New Republic (http://www.tnr.com/doc.mhtml?i=20060904&s=blanding090406) was not a profile of the American Hunters and Shooters Association (AHSA). Rather, the focus of the piece was on the backlash of a small but growing minority of hunters and sportsmen against the National Rifle Association (NRA). That backlash has been caused, among other things, by the NRA’s support of conservative politicians who have supported logging and gas exploration over wildlife conservation. In fact, I went to the Outdoor Writers Association of America (OWAA) conference this spring expecting to find a lot of opposition to AHSA’s views; instead I found a number of rank-and-file hunters who were equally concerned about wildlife habitat destruction and the increasingly extreme views of the NRA leadership. That was the point I was making in the piece, a point also reflected in polls of hunters as well in by political races such as the recent governor’s race in Virginia.

Had I been writing a piece specifically about the AHSA, I would have certainly gone into more detail on the backgrounds of the founders of the group. As it was, I did mention the fact that the group was controversial and referenced Rosenthal’s affiliation with the Brady Campaign, which I thought was sufficient to present him as a compromised figure on gun control. However, I was hardly trying to deceive anyone. After all, as Edwards points out, in the Boston Globe article I wrote about Rosenthal, I did refer to his leadership in Stop Handgun Violence, an organization he started with Michael Kennedy no less. Why would I do that if I were trying to paper over his resume? As for the reference to Rosenthal as an “anti-gun activist,” that was in the context of a story about gun trafficking, an issue on which Rosenthal and other members of the AHSA advisory board are on the record supporting tighter controls. Regardless of the terms I have used, I have been consistent in my characterization of Rosenthal every time I have written about him, presenting him as a gun owner and businessmen who also supports moderate gun control strictures, such as limitations on gun trafficking, child safety locks, and an assault-weapon ban. In fact, the stated views of ASHA and its founders are more interesting to me than the notion that they are some kind of “Trojan Horse” that really wants to ban guns, a notion which after my reporting I think is entirely unfounded.

However, like I said, I could have written a whole story about the AHSA and the controversy surrounding the organization. As a journalist, Edwards should know there is only so much you can address in one piece. I felt the more significant story in this case was the broader backlash by hunters against the NRA, an issue Edwards fails to address with his fixation on the AHSA rather than on the point of view they represent.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.