In response to:

The Selfishness Debate: Ayn Rand vs the Dalai Lama

lee362 Wrote: Apr 27, 2012 7:20 AM
I am no Christian but I cannot help but notice that Christ's advice to the rich man to help the less fortunate was not intended to benefit the poor (for "the poor will always be with us"). It was intended to help the rich man attain salvation. Thoughtful philanthropy is enlightened self-interest.
SterCrazy Wrote: Apr 27, 2012 12:16 PM
There is room here for a long treatise on the differences between Objectivist and Christian views on material possessions. Jesus was not against ownership of possessions. He dd speak out against ownership for personal benefit - the rich man whose life was taken just after he decided he needed bigger barns to hold his stuff.

Rand was vehemently opposed to the idea of eternal life and all that it means. Jesus recognized that this life is a temporary state on the way to an eternal state, and so the value of material goods is lessened. Plus, for Jesus, all material goods ultimately are derived from the materials and resources freely provided from God to us. We are stewards, not owners.

I’m in Monaco for the 10th forum of the Convention of Independent Financial Advisors, a Swiss-based NGO that focuses on promoting an ethical and productive environment for private investment. I moderated a couple of panels on interesting topics, including the European fiscal crisis.

But I want to focus on the comments of another speaker, Monsieur Matthieu

Ricard, a French-born Buddhist monk. As you can see from his Wikipedia entry, he’s a very impressive individual. In addition to his other accomplishments, he serves as the French translator for the Dalai Lama.

During one of the dinners, we got into...

Related Tags: Ayn Rand Dalai Lama
Sunday, May 19 | 07:06 AM ET
Sunday, May 19 | 07:06 AM ET
Sunday, May 19 | 07:06 AM ET
Sunday, May 19 | 07:06 AM ET